Energy-dependent conversion of transformed cytosolic glucocorticoid receptors from soluble to particulate-bound form

Nestin modulates glucocorticoid receptor function by cytoplasmic anchoring

Nestin is the characteristic intermediate filament (IF) protein of rapidly proliferating progenitor cells and regenerating tissue. Nestin copolymerizes with class III IF-proteins, mostly vimentin, into heteromeric filaments. Its expression is downregulated with differentiation. Here we show that a strong nestin expression in mouse embryo tissue coincides with a strong accumulation of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR), a key regulator of growth and differentiation in embryonic development. Microscopic studies on cultured cells show an association of GR with IFs composed of vimentin and nestin. Cells lacking nestin, but expressing vimentin, or cells expressing vimentin, but lacking nestin accumulate GR in the nucleus. Completing these networks with an exogenous nestin, respectively an exogenous vimentin restores cytoplasmic anchoring of GR to the IF system. Thus, heteromeric filaments provide the basis for anchoring of GR. The reaction pattern with phospho-GR specific antibodies and the presence of the chaperone HSC70 suggest that specifically the unliganded receptor is anchored to the IF system. Ligand addition releases GR from IFs and shifts the receptor into the nucleus. Suppression of nestin by specific shRNA abolishes anchoring of GR, induces its accumulation in the nucleus and provokes an irreversible G1/S cell cycle arrest. Suppression of GR prior to that of nestin prevents entry into the arrest. The data give evidence that nestin/vimentin specific anchoring modulates growth suppression by GR. We hypothesize that expression of nestin is a major determinant in suppression of anti-proliferative activity of GR in undifferentiated tissue and facilitates activation of this growth control in a precise tissue and differentiation dependent manner.

Evidence for Glucocorticoid Receptor Transport on Microtubules by Dynein

Rapid, ligand-dependent movement of glucocorticoid receptors (GR) from cytoplasm to the nucleus is hsp90-dependent, and much of the movement system has been defined. GR.hsp90 heterocomplexes isolated from cells contain one of several hsp90-binding immunophilins that link the complex to cytoplasmic dynein, a molecular motor that processes along microtubular tracks to the nucleus. The immunophilins link to dynein indirectly via the dynamitin component of the dynein-associated dynactin complex (Galigniana, M. D., Harrell, J. M., O'Hagen, H. M., Ljungman, M., and Pratt, W. B. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 22483-22489). Although it is known that rapid, hsp90-dependent GR movement requires intact microtubules, it has not been shown that the movement is dynein-dependent. Here, we show that overexpression of dynamitin, which blocks movement by dissociating the dynein motor from its cargo, inhibits ligand-dependent movement of the GR to the nucleus. We show that native GR.hsp90.immnunophilin complexes contain dynamitin as well as dynein and that GR heterocomplexes isolated from cytosol containing paclitaxel and GTP to stabilize microtubules also contain tubulin. The complete movement system, including the dynein motor complex and tubulin, can be assembled under cell-free conditions by incubating GR immune pellets with paclitaxel/GTP-stabilized cytosol prepared from GR(-) L cells. This is the first evidence that the movement of a steroid receptor is dynein-dependent, and it is the first isolation of a steroid receptor bound to the entire system that determines its retrograde movement.

Binding of aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) to AhR-interacting protein. The role of hsp90

The aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) has been shown to interact with an immunophilin-like molecule known as AhR-interacting protein (AIP) and to enhance AhR function. We show here that AIP associates with AhR homologues from mouse and fish, which can bind ligands such as dioxin, but nonligand binding homologues from Caenorhabditis elegans or Drosophila do not bind to AIP. However, a minimal ligand-binding domain of the AhR is incapable of binding AIP. The binding of AIP to AhR in reticulocyte lysate shows several of the characteristics of an hsp90-dependent process, including sensitivity to geldanamycin and temperature and a requirement for ATP or nonhydrolyzable analogues. Purified AIP binds to the C terminus of hsp90, and mutation of a conserved basic residue in the tetratricopeptide repeats of AIP (K266A, analogous to K97A in protein phosphatase 5) abolishes binding to hsp90. Mutation of K266A in AIP reduces binding to AhR by 75-80%; the geldanamycin sensitivity of this complex shows that AhR stabilizes the AIP-hsp90-AhR complex. The alpha-helical C terminus of AIP, which is outside the tetratricopeptide repeat domain, is absolutely required for binding to AhR as shown by deletions of the C-terminal 5 amino acids or alanine-scanning mutagenesis, but it is not required for binding of AIP to hsp90. The data support a model where 1) AIP binds to both hsp90 and AhR; 2) hsp90 is required for AhR-AIP binding; and 3) the binding of AhR to AIP stabilizes the AIP-hsp90-AhR complex.

Steroid receptor interactions with heat shock protein and immunophilin chaperones

We have provided a historical perspective on a body of steroid receptor research dealing with the structure and physiological significance of the untransformed 9S receptor that has often confused both novice and expert investigators. The frequent controversies and equivocations of earlier studies were due to the fact that the native, hormone-free state of these receptors is a large multiprotein complex that resisted description for many years because of its unstable and dynamic nature. The untransformed 9S state of the steroid and dioxin receptors has provided a unique system for studying the function of the ubiquitous, abundant, and conserved heat shock protein, hsp90. The hormonal control of receptor association with hsp90 provided a method of manipulating the receptor heterocomplex in a manner that was physiologically meaningful. For several steroid receptors, binding to hsp90 was required for the receptor to be in a native hormone-binding state, and for all of the receptors, hormone binding promoted dissociation of the receptor from hsp90 and conversion of the receptor to the DNA-binding state. Although the complexes between tyrosine kinases and hsp90 were discovered earlier, the hormonal regulation or steroid receptor association with hsp90 permitted much more rapid and facile study of hsp90 function. The observations that hsp90 binds to the receptors through their HBDs and that these domains can be fused to structurally different proteins bringing their function under hormonal control provided a powerful linkage between the hormonal regulation of receptor binding to hsp90 and the initial step in steroid hormone action. Because the 9S receptor hsp90 heterocomplexes could be physically stabilized by molybdate, their protein composition could be readily studied, and it became clear that these complexes are multiprotein structures containing a number of unique proteins, such as FKBP51, FKBP52, CyP-40, and p23, that were discovered because of their presence in these structures. Further analysis showed that hsp90 itself exists in a variety of native multiprotein heterocomplexes independent of steroid receptors and other 'substrate' proteins. Cell-free systems can now be used to study the formation of receptor heterocomplexes. As we outlined in the scheme of Fig. 1, the multicomponent receptor-hsp90 heterocomplex assembly system is being reconstituted, and the importance of individual proteins, such as hsp70, p60, and p23, in the assembly process is becoming recognized. It should be noted that our understanding of the mechanism and purpose of steroid receptor heterocomplex assembly is still at an early stage. We can now speculate on the roles of receptor-associated proteins in receptor action, both as individuals and as a group, but their actual functions are still vague or unknown. We can make realistic models about the chaperoning and trafficking of steroid receptors, but we don't yet know how these processes occur, we don't know where chaperoning occurs in the cell (e.g. Is it limited to the cytoplasm? Is it a diffuse process or does chaperoning occur in association with structural elements?), and, with the exception of the requirement for hormone binding, we don't know the extent to which the hsp90-based chaperone system impacts on steroid hormone action. It is not yet clear how far the discovery of this hsp90 heterocomplex assembly system will be extended to the development of a general understanding of protein processing in the cell. Because this assembly system is apparently present in all eukaryotic cells, it probably performs an essential function for many proteins. The bacterial homolog of hsp90 is not an essential protein, but hsp90 is essential in eukaryotes, and recent studies indicate that the development of the cell nucleus from prokaryotic progenitors was accompanied by the duplication of genes for hsp90 and hsp70 (698). (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Glucocorticoid receptor inhibits microtubule assembly in vitro

The effect of glucocorticoid hormones, purified glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and purified heat shock protein M(r) 90,000 (hsp90) on microtubule (MT) assembly in vitro was tested by a spectrophotometric MT assembly assay and electron microscopy. GR significantly prolonged the nucleation phase, slowed down the assembly rate and reduced the maximal amplitude of MT assembly compared with control. The effects were partially reversed by the addition of glucocorticoid hormone. GR associated with MTs. These results indicate that GR affects MT assembly in vitro, which may be a functional correlate to the structural association of GR with MTs. This implies that factors affecting GR may affect MT assembly in vivo.

Subcellular distribution of the glucocorticoid receptor and evidence for its association with microtubules

The cellular distribution of the glucocorticoid receptor (GR) has not yet been firmly established. The extensive literature indicates that GR is present both in the cytoplasm and the cell nucleus, however, some studies have failed to detect cytoplasmic GR. It is still controversial as to whether GR is randomly diffusing in the cytoplasm and nucleus, or if the GR-distribution is organized or controlled in some way, which may be of importance for the transduction of glucocorticoid effects to cells. There is evidence that both non-activated and activated GR is associated with the plasma membrane, a number of cytoplasmic organelles and the nucleus. Both morphological and biochemical evidence show that GR is associated with microtubules during different stages of the cell cycle, i.e. GR co-localizes, co-purifies and co-polymerizes with tubulin. This indicates that GR is structurally linked to the intracellular MT-network which may be of importance in the mechanism of action of glucocorticoid hormones. The literature in this field is reviewed including the reported data on subcellular GR-localization.

Microtubules are not required for glucocorticoid receptor mediated gene induction

Steroid-free glucocorticoid receptors are generally considered to reside in the cytoplasm of cells. After the binding of steroids, the receptors translocate into the nucleus in a manner that has been proposed to involve microtubules. However, some results with inhibitors of microtubule assembly argue to the contrary. In all of these studies, only the whole cell localization of receptors has been examined; the biological activity of these receptors has not been determined. We now report that steroid-induced gene expression is maintained in the absence of intact microtubules. This argues that microtubules are not required for either the nuclear translocation or biological activity of glucocorticoid receptors.