In vivo chemical footprinting of the Escherichia coli ribosome

Ribosome RNA assembly intermediates visualized in living cells

In cells, RNAs likely adopt numerous intermediate conformations prior to formation of functional RNA-protein complexes. We used single-nucleotide resolution selective 2'-hydroxyl acylation analyzed by primer extension (SHAPE) to probe the structure of Escherichia coli 16S rRNA in healthy growing bacteria. SHAPE-directed modeling indicated that the predominant steady-state RNA conformational ensemble in dividing cells had a base-paired structure different from that expected on the basis of comparative sequence analysis and high-resolution studies of the 30S ribosomal subunit. We identified the major cause of these differences by stopping ongoing in-cell transcription (in essence, an in-cell RNA structure pulse-chase experiment) which caused the RNA to chase into a structure that closely resembled the expected one. Most helices that formed alternate RNA conformations under growth conditions interact directly with tertiary-binding ribosomal proteins and form a C-shape that surrounds the mRNA channel and decoding site. These in-cell experiments lead to a model in which ribosome assembly factors function as molecular struts to preorganize this intermediate and emphasize that the final stages of ribonucleoprotein assembly involve extensive protein-facilitated RNA conformational changes.

Mutations in the leader region of ribosomal RNA operons cause structurally defective 30 S ribosomes as revealed by in vivo structural probing

The biogenesis of functional ribosomes is regulated in a very complex manner, involving different proteins and RNA molecules. RNAs are not only essential components of both ribosomal subunits but also transiently interacting factors during particle formation. In eukaryotes snoRNAs act as molecular chaperones to assist maturation, modification and assembly. In a very similar way highly conserved leader sequences of bacterial rRNA operons are involved in the correct formation of 30 S ribosomal subunits. Certain mutations in the rRNA leader region cause severe growth defects due to malfunction of ribosomes which are assembled from such transcription units. To understand how the leader sequences act to facilitate the formation of the correct 30 S subunits we performed in vivo chemical probing to assess structural differences between ribosomes assembled either from rRNA transcribed from wild-type operons or from operons which contain mutations in the rRNA leader region. Cells transformed with plasmids containing the respective rRNA operons were reacted with dimethylsulphate (DMS). Ribosomes were isolated by sucrose gradient centrifugation and modified nucleotides within the 16 S rRNA were identified by primer extension reaction. Structural differences between ribosomes from wild-type and mutant rRNA operons occur in several clusters within the 16 S rRNA secondary structure. The most prominent differences are located in the central domain including the universally conserved pseudoknot structure which connects the 5', the central and the 3' domain of 16 S rRNA. Two other clusters with structural differences fall in the 5' domain where the leader had been shown to interact with mature 16 S rRNA and within the ribosomal protein S4 binding site. The other differences in structure are located in sites which are also known as sites for the action of several antibiotics. The data explain the functional defects of ribosomes from rRNA operons with leader mutations and help to understand the altered biogenesis pathway from mutations in an rRNA leader region to the formation of functionally defective ribosomes.

A conformational switch in Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA during decoding of messenger RNA

Direct evidence is presented for a conformational switch in 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) that affects tRNA binding to the ribosome and decoding of messenger RNA (mRNA). These data support the hypothesis that dynamic changes in rRNA structure occur during translation. The switch involves two alternating base-paired arrangements apparently facilitated by ribosomal proteins S5 and S12, and produces significant changes in the rRNA structure. Chemical probing shows reciprocal enhancements or protections at sites in 16S rRNA that are at or very near sites that were previously crosslinked to mRNA. These data indicate that the switch affects codon-anticodon arrangement and proper selection of tRNA at the ribosomal A site, and that the switch is a fundamental mechanism in all ribosomes.

The selection in vivo and characterization of an RNA recognition motif for spectinomycin

Ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes participate in almost all macromolecular processes, including RNA processing, protein synthesis, and the signal recognition of proteins targeted for export. An understanding of these processes requires detailed knowledge of interactions at the molecular level, which has evidently been difficult due to the size and complexity of the particles. Fragmentation of large RNP complexes into functional subdomains is proven to be a successful in vitro strategy to probe ligand interactions at the molecular level. We reasoned that RNA molecules expressed in vivo may fold in such a manner as to mimic a drug binding site present on the intact ribosome. If expressed at sufficient levels, the RNA would sequester the antibiotic thereby permitting the continued function of the ribosome and consequently allow the cell to survive in the presence of the drug. Evidence is presented here in support of this RNA fragment-rescue concept following the selection and characterization of RNA fragments that confer resistance to the antibiotic spectinomycin.

Starvation in vivo for aminoacyl-tRNA increases the spatial separation between the two ribosomal subunits

Structures in situ of individual ribosomes in E. coli have been determined by computer-aided electron microscope tomography using a tilt series of positively stained embedded cellular sections. Amino acid starvation of a bacterial culture, causing a deficiency for aminoacyl-tRNA, induces a spatial separation between the ribosomal subunits compared with ribosomes in exponentially growing cells. Eight ribosomes from each growth condition were aligned to each other, and the two average structures were determined. Comparison of these suggests that the distance between the two subunits increases by approximately 3 nm upon starvation for aminoacyl-tRNA during protein synthesis. Ribosomes in most other states of the translational elongation cycle in exponentially growing cells show a more compact structure than previously realized.

Structural dynamics of translating ribosomes: 16S ribosomal RNA bases that may move twice during translocation

Recent footprinting, sedimentation and neutron-scattering results obtained in vivo or on pre-translocation and post-translocation ribosomal complexes are integrated with cross-linking and immunoelectron microscopy information. It is proposed that the 30S subunit pulses during translocation and that its pre- and post-translocation structures are not necessarily identical. Accordingly, translocation is characterized by three consecutive conformational states of the 30S and 50S subunits. State 1 (the pre-translocation state) lasts until the elongation factor EF-G.GTP complex binds to the ribosome or adopts the GTPase conformation. State 2 (the translocation state, or the peak or plateau of the pulse) follows and lasts until EF-G adopts a subsequent conformation or is released from the ribosome. State 3 (the post-translocation state) ensues and lasts until A (aminoacyl) site binding of aminoacyl-tRNA. In state 2, 16S RNA hairpins 26 and 33-33A, located in the platform and the head of the 30S subunit, respectively, become kinked or twisted, and residue A1503, near the decoding site, becomes exposed. A platform twist is associated with P (peptide) to E (exit) site tRNA movements and a head twist with pivoting of the peptidyl-tRNA elbow from the A to the P site, around a (retractable?) S19 domain. These twists result in an unlocking of the platform and the head from the 50S subunit. Exposure of A1503 is tentatively associated with movements of mRNA or tRNA anticodon stem-loops. These twisted or otherwise-exposed residues readopt their previous setting upon completion of translocation, i.e. states 1 and 3 of 16S RNA differ more from state 2 than from each other.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Spectinomycin interacts specifically with the residues G1064 and C1192 in 16S rRNA, thereby potentially freezing this molecule into an inactive conformation

The upper stem of helix 34, consisting of the base-paired sequences C1063G1064U1065 and A1191C1192G1193, is suggested to be involved in the binding of spectinomycin. In E. coli 16S rRNA, each of the three mutations at position C1192 confers resistance to spectinomycin. In chloroplast ribosomes from tobacco plants and algae, resistance is conferred by single mutations at positions 1064, 1191, and 1193 (E. coli numbering). Since each of these mutations disrupt any of the three basepairs in the upper stem of helix 34, it has been postulated that spectinomycin can bind to this region and inhibit protein synthesis, only if its nucleotides are basepaired. We have tested this hypothesis by introducing disruptive and compensatory mutations that alter the basepair G1064-C1192. Using the specialized ribosome system, the translational activity of such mutants was determined, in the absence and presence of spectinomycin. We show that any of the three disruptive mutations A1064, C1064, and U1064 confer resistance, in accordance with the model for spectinomycin binding. Compensatory mutations A1064U1192, C1064G1192, and U1064A1192, however, maintained the resistance. This indicates that a basepaired conformation as such is not sufficient for spectinomycin binding, but rather that a G-C pair at positions 1064 and 1192 is required. In addition, we find that the translational activity of specialized ribosomes containing the mutations C1064G1192 is 5-fold lower compared to that of ribosomes containing any of the other mutations introduced, regardless whether spectinomycin is present or not. Since the introduction of C1064G1192 is expected to increase the stability of the upper stem of helix 34, we suggest that these mutations impair ribosome function by preventing the (transient) disruption of the upper stem. By analogy, we speculate that spectinomycin blocks protein synthesis by stabilizing the upper stem. In both cases, the 30S subunit would be frozen into an inactive conformation.