Triple aminoacylation specificity of a chimerized transfer RNA

The tRNA identity landscape for aminoacylation and beyond

tRNAs are key partners in ribosome-dependent protein synthesis. This process is highly dependent on the fidelity of tRNA aminoacylation by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and relies primarily on sets of identities within tRNA molecules composed of determinants and antideterminants preventing mischarging by non-cognate synthetases. Such identity sets were discovered in the tRNAs of a few model organisms, and their properties were generalized as universal identity rules. Since then, the panel of identity elements governing the accuracy of tRNA aminoacylation has expanded considerably, but the increasing number of reported functional idiosyncrasies has led to some confusion. In parallel, the description of other processes involving tRNAs, often well beyond aminoacylation, has progressed considerably, greatly expanding their interactome and uncovering multiple novel identities on the same tRNA molecule. This review highlights key findings on the mechanistics and evolution of tRNA and tRNA-like identities. In addition, new methods and their results for searching sets of multiple identities on a single tRNA are discussed. Taken together, this knowledge shows that a comprehensive understanding of the functional role of individual and collective nucleotide identity sets in tRNA molecules is needed for medical, biotechnological and other applications.

History of tRNA research in strasbourg

The tRNA molecules, in addition to translating the genetic code into protein and defining the second genetic code via their aminoacylation by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, act in many other cellular functions and dysfunctions. This article, illustrated by personal souvenirs, covers the history of ~60 years tRNA research in Strasbourg. Typical examples point up how the work in Strasbourg was a two-way street, influenced by and at the same time influencing investigators outside of France. All along, research in Strasbourg has nurtured the structural and functional diversity of tRNA. It produced massive sequence and crystallographic data on tRNA and its partners, thereby leading to a deeper physicochemical understanding of tRNA architecture, dynamics, and identity. Moreover, it emphasized the role of nucleoside modifications and in the last two decades, highlighted tRNA idiosyncrasies in plants and organelles, together with cellular and health-focused aspects. The tRNA field benefited from a rich local academic heritage and a strong support by both university and CNRS. Its broad interlinks to the worldwide community of tRNA researchers opens to an exciting future. © 2019 IUBMB Life, 2019 © 2019 IUBMB Life, 71(8):1066-1087, 2019.

On the origin of the genetic code: signatures of its primordial complementarity in tRNAs and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

If the table of the genetic code is rearranged to put complementary codons face-to-face, it becomes apparent that the code displays latent mirror symmetry with respect to two sterically different modes of tRNA recognition. These modes involve distinct classes of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs I and II) with recognition from the minor or major groove sides of the acceptor stem, respectively. We analyze the anticodon pairs complementary to the face-to-face codon couplets. Taking into account the invariant nucleotides on either side (5' and 3'), we consider the risk of anticodon confusion and subsequent erroneous aminoacylation in the ancestral coding system. This logic leads to the conclusion that ribozymic precursors of tRNA synthetases had the same two complementary modes of tRNA aminoacylation. This surprising case of molecular mimicry (1) shows a key potential selective advantage arising from the partitioning of aaRSs into two classes, (2) is consistent with the hypothesis that the two aaRS classes were originally encoded by the complementary strands of the same primordial gene and (3) provides a 'missing link' between the classic genetic code, embodied in the anticodon, and the second, or RNA operational, code that is embodied mostly in the acceptor stem and is directly responsible for proper tRNA aminoacylation.

Recognition of pyrrolysine tRNA by the Desulfitobacterium hafniense pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase

Pyrrolysine (Pyl), the 22nd co-translationally inserted amino acid, is incorporated in response to a UAG amber stop codon. Pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase (PylRS) attaches Pyl to its cognate tRNA, the special amber suppressor tRNA^Pyl. The genes for tRNA^Pyl (pylT) and PylRS (pylS) are found in all members of the archaeal family Methanosarcinaceae, and in Desulfitobacterium hafniense. The activation and aminoacylation properties of D. hafniense PylRS and the nature of the tRNA^Pyl identity elements were determined by measuring the ability of 24 mutant tRNA^Pyl species to be aminoacylated with the pyrrolysine analog N-ε-cyclopentyloxycarbonyl-l-lysine. The discriminator base G73 and the first base pair (G1·C72) in the acceptor stem were found to be major identity elements. Footprinting analysis showed that PylRS binds tRNA^Pyl predominantly along the phosphate backbone of the T-loop, the D-stem and the acceptor stem. Significant contacts with the anticodon arm were not observed. The tRNA^Pyl structure contains the highly conserved T-loop contact U54·A58 and position 57 is conserved as a purine, but the canonical T- to D-loop contact between positions 18 and 56 was not present. Unlike most tRNAs, the tRNA^Pyl anticodon was shown not to be important for recognition by bacterial PylRS.

An intricate RNA structure with two tRNA-derived motifs directs complex formation between yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase and its mRNA

Accurate translation of genetic information necessitates the tuned expression of a large group of genes. Amongst them, controlled expression of the enzymes catalyzing the aminoacylation of tRNAs, the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, is essential to insure translational fidelity. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, expression of aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS) is regulated in a process necessitating recognition of the 5' extremity of AspRS messenger RNA (mRNA(AspRS)) by its translation product and adaptation to the cellular tRNA(Asp) concentration. Here, we have established the folding of the approximately 300 nucleotides long 5' end of mRNA(AspRS) and identified the structural signals involved in the regulation process. We show that the regulatory region in mRNA(AspRS) folds in two independent and symmetrically structured domains spaced by two single-stranded connectors. Domain I displays a tRNA(Asp) anticodon-like stem-loop structure with mimics of the aspartate identity determinants, that is restricted in domain II to a short double-stranded helix. The overall mRNA structure, based on enzymatic and chemical probing, supports a three-dimensional model where each monomer of yeast AspRS binds one individual domain and recognizes the mRNA structure as it recognizes its cognate tRNA(Asp). Sequence comparison of yeast genomes shows that the features within the mRNA recognized by AspRS are conserved in different Saccharomyces species. In the recognition process, the N-terminal extension of each AspRS subunit plays a crucial role in anchoring the tRNA-like motifs of the mRNA on the synthetase.

Single amino acid changes in AspRS reveal alternative routes for expanding its tRNA repertoire in vivo

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) are enzymes that are highly specific for their tRNA substrates. Here, we describe the expansion of a class IIb aaRS-tRNA specificity by a genetic selection that involves the use of a modified tRNA displaying an amber anticodon and the argE(amber) and lacZ(amber) reporters. The study was performed on Escherichia coli aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS) and amber tRNA(Asp). Nine AspRS mutants able to charge the amber tRNA(Asp) and to suppress the reporter genes were selected from a randomly mutated library. All the mutants exhibited a new amber tRNA(Asp) specificity in addition to the initial native tRNA(Asp). Six mutations were found in the anticodon-binding site located in the N-terminal OB-fold. The strongest suppressor was a mutation of residue Glu-93 that contacts specifically the anticodon nucleotide 34 in the crystal structure. The other mutations in the OB-fold were found at close distance from the anticodon in the so-called loop L45 and strand S1. They concern residues that do not contact tRNA(Asp) in the native complex. In addition, this study shows that suppressors can carry mutations located far from the anticodon-binding site. One such mutation was found in the synthetase hinge-module where it increases the tRNA(Asp)-charging rate, and two other mutations were found in the prokaryotic-specific insertion domain and the catalytic core. These mutants seem to act by indirect effects on the tRNA acceptor stem binding and on the conformation of the active site of the enzyme. Altogether, these data suggest the existence of various ways for modifying the mechanism of tRNA discrimination.

Stop codons and UGG promote efficient binding of the polypeptide release factor eRF1 to the ribosomal A site

To investigate the codon dependence of human eRF1 binding to the mRNA-ribosome complex, we examined the formation of photocrosslinks between ribosomal components and mRNAs bearing a photoactivable 4-thiouridine probe in the first position of the codon located in the A site. Addition of eRF1 to the phased mRNA-ribosome complexes triggers a codon-dependent quenching of crosslink formation. The concentration of eRF1 triggering half quenching ranges from low for the three stop codons, to intermediate for s4UGG and high for other near-cognate triplets. A theoretical analysis of the photochemical processes occurring in a two-state bimolecular model raises a number of stringent conditions, fulfilled by the system studied here, and shows that in any case sound KD values can be extracted if the ratio mT/KD<<1 (mT is total concentration of mRNA added). Considering the KD values obtained for the stop, s4UGG and sense codons (approximately 0.06 microM, 0.45 microM and 2.3 microM, respectively) and our previous finding that only the stop and s4UGG codons are able to promote formation of an eRF1-mRNA crosslink, implying a role for the NIKS loop at the tip of the N domain, we propose a two-step model for eRF1 binding to the A site: a codon-independent bimolecular step is followed by an isomerisation step observed solely with stop and s4UGG codons. Full recognition of the stop codons by the N domain of eRF1 triggers a rearrangement of bound eRF1 from an open to a closed conformation, allowing the universally conserved GGQ loop at the tip of the M domain to come into close proximity of the peptidyl transferase center of the ribosome. UGG is expected to behave as a cryptic stop codon, which, owing to imperfect eRF1-codon recognition, does not allow full reorientation of the M domain of eRF1. As far as the physical steps of eRF1 binding to the ribosome are considered, they appear to closely mimic the behaviour of the tRNA/EF-Tu/GTP complex, but clearly eRF1 is endowed with a greater conformational flexibility than tRNA.

Yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase binds specifically its own mRNA

Dimeric class II aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS) from yeast has a modular architecture and includes an N-terminal appendix of 70 amino acid residues that protrudes from the anticodon-binding module. This extension, of predicted helical structure, is not essential for aminoacylation but contains an RNA-binding motif that promotes non-specific interactions with tRNAs. As shown here, this protein extension can also interact with the 5' end of the AspRS mRNA. In vitro, optimal binding occurs on an mRNA domain comprising part of the 87 nucleotide long 5'UTR and the sequence encoding the N-terminal appendix. At the protein side, only the appendix and the anticodon-binding module participate in the interaction between AspRS and the mRNA domain. Binding is specific, since only tRNA(Asp) can dissociate the complex. In vivo, AspRS also binds specifically this mRNA domain and in doing so triggers a reduced translation of a fused GFP mRNA. From that, a mechanism for the regulation of this eukaryotic aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase is proposed. Implications for aspartylation accuracy in yeast are given.

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and their inhibitors as a novel family of antibiotics

The emergence of multidrug-resistant strains of pathogenic microorganisms and the slow progress in new antibiotic development has led in recent years to a resurgence of infectious diseases that threaten the well-being of humans. The result of many microorganisms becoming immune to major antibiotics means that fighting off infection by these pathogens is more difficult. The best strategy to get around drug resistance is to discover new drug targets, taking advantage of the abundant information that was recently obtained from genomic and proteomic research, and explore them for drug development. In this regard, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (ARSs) provide a promising platform to develop novel antibiotics that show no cross-resistance to other classical antibiotics. During the last few years there has been a comprehensive attempt to find the compounds that can specifically target ARSs and inhibit bacterial growth. In this review, the current status in the development of ARS inhibitors will be briefly summarized, based on their chemical structures and working mechanisms.

Stop codon selection in eukaryotic translation termination: comparison of the discriminating potential between human and ciliate eRF1s

During eukaryotic translation termination, eRF1 responds to three stop codons. However, in ciliates with variant genetic codes, only one or two codons function as a stop signal. To localize the region of ciliate eRF1 implicated in stop codon discrimination, we have constructed ciliate-human hybrid eRF1s by swapping regions of human eRF1 for the equivalent region of ciliate Euplotes eRF1. We have examined the formation of a cross-link between recombinant eRF1s and mRNA analogs containing the photoactivable 4-thiouridine (s(4)U) at the first position of stop and control sense codons. With human eRF1, this cross-link can be detected only when either stop or UGG codons are located in the ribosomal A site. Here we show that the cross-link of the Euplotes-human hybrid eRF1 is restricted to mRNAs containing UAG and UAA codons, and that the entire N-terminal domain of Euplotes eRF1 is involved in discriminating against UGA and UGG. On the basis of these results, we discuss the steps of the selection process that determine the accuracy of stop codon recognition in eukaryotes.

The invariant uridine of stop codons contacts the conserved NIKSR loop of human eRF1 in the ribosome

To unravel the region of human eukaryotic release factor 1 (eRF1) that is close to stop codons within the ribosome, we used mRNAs containing a single photoactivatable 4-thiouridine (s(4)U) residue in the first position of stop or control sense codons. Accurate phasing of these mRNAs onto the ribosome was achieved by the addition of tRNA(Asp). Under these conditions, eRF1 was shown to crosslink exclusively to mRNAs containing a stop or s(4)UGG codon. A procedure that yielded (32)P-labeled eRF1 deprived of the mRNA chain was developed; analysis of the labeled peptides generated after specific cleavage of both wild-type and mutant eRF1s maps the crosslink in the tripeptide KSR (positions 63-65 of human eRF1) and points to K63 located in the conserved NIKS loop as the main crosslinking site. These data directly show the interaction of the N-terminal (N) domain of eRF1 with stop codons within the 40S ribosomal subunit and provide strong support for the positioning of the eRF1 middle (M) domain on the 60S subunit. Thus, the N and M domains mimic the tRNA anticodon and acceptor arms, respectively.

tRNA discrimination by T. thermophilus phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase at the binding step

The extent of tRNA recognition at the level of binding by Thermus thermophilus phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase (PheRS), one of the most complex class II synthetases, has been studied by independent measurements of the enzyme association with wild-type and mutant tRNA(Phe)s as well as with non-cognate tRNAs. The data obtained, combined with kinetic data on aminoacylation, clearly show that PheRS exhibits more tRNA selectivity at the level of binding than at the level of catalysis. The anticodon nucleotides involved in base-specific interactions with the enzyme prevail both in the initial binding recognition and in favouring aminoacylation catalysis. Tertiary nucleotides of base pair G19-C56 and base triple U45-G10-C25 contribute primarily to stabilization of the correctly folded tRNA(Phe) structure, which is important for binding. Other nucleotides of the central core (U20, U16 and of the A26-G44 tertiary base pair) are involved in conformational adjustment of the tRNA upon its interaction with the enzyme. The specificity of nucleotide A73, mutation of which slightly reduces the catalytic rate of aminoacylation, is not displayed at the binding step. A few backbone-mediated contacts of PheRS with the acceptor and anticodon stems revealed in the crystal structure do not contribute to tRNA(Phe) discrimination, their role being limited to stabilization of the complex. The highest affinity of T. thermophilus PheRS for cognate tRNA, observed for synthetase-tRNA complexes, results in 100-3000-fold binding discrimination against non-cognate tRNAs.

The tRNA specificity of Thermus thermophilus EF-Tu

By introducing a GAC anticodon, 21 different Escherichia coli tRNAs were misacylated with either phenylalanine or valine and assayed for their affinity to Thermus thermophilus elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu)*GTP by using a ribonuclease protection assay. The presence of a common esterified amino acid permits the thermodynamic contribution of each tRNA body to the overall affinity to be evaluated. The E. coli elongator tRNAs exhibit a wide range of binding affinities that varied from -11.7 kcal/mol for Val-tRNA(Glu) to -8.1 kcal/mol for Val-tRNA(Tyr), clearly establishing EF-Tu*GTP as a sequence-specific RNA-binding protein. Because the ionic strength dependence of k(off) varied among tRNAs, some of the affinity differences are the results of a different number of phosphate contacts formed between tRNA and protein. Because EF-Tu is known to contact only the phosphodiester backbone of tRNA, the observed specificity must be a consequence of an indirect readout mechanism.

Manipulation of tRNA properties by structure-based and combinatorial in vitro approaches

The wide knowledge accumulated over the years on the structure and function of transfer RNAs (tRNAs) has allowed molecular biologists to decipher the rules underlying the function and the architecture of these molecules. These rules will be discussed and the implications for manipulating tRNA properties by structure-based and combinatorial in vitro approaches reviewed. Since most of the signals conferring function to tRNAs are located on the two distal extremities of their three-dimensional L shape, this implies that the structure of the RNA domain connecting these two extremities can be of different architecture and/or can be modified without disturbing individual functions. This concept is first supported by the existence in nature of RNAs of peculiar structures having tRNA properties, as well as by engineering experiments on natural tRNAs. The concept is further illustrated by examples of RNAs designed by combinatorial methods. The different procedures used to select RNAs or tRNA-mimics interacting with aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases or with elongation factors and to select tRNA-mimics aminoacylated by synthetases are presented, as well as the functional and structural characteristics of the selected molecules. Production and characteristics of aptameric RNAs fulfilling aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase functions and of RNAs selected to have affinities for amino acids are also described. Finally, properties of RNAs obtained by either the structure-based or the combinatorial methods are discussed in the light of the origin and evolution of the translation machinery, but also with a view to obtain new inhibitors targeting specific steps in translation.

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases: potential markers of genetic code development

Aminoacylation of tRNAs, catalyzed by 20 aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, is responsible for establishing the genetic code. The enzymes are divided into two classes on the basis of the architectures of their active sites. Members of the two classes also differ in that they bind opposite sides of the tRNA acceptor stem. Importantly, specific pairs of synthetases--one from each class--can be docked simultaneously onto the acceptor stem. This article relates these specific pairings to the organization of the table of codons that defines the universal genetic code.

The polypeptide chain release factor eRF1 specifically contacts the s(4)UGA stop codon located in the A site of eukaryotic ribosomes

It has been shown previously [Brown, C.M. & Tate, W.P. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 33164-33170.] that the polypeptide chain release factor RF2 involved in translation termination in prokaryotes was able to photocrossreact with mini-messenger RNAs containing stop signals in which U was replaced by 4-thiouridine (s4U). Here, using the same strategy we have monitored photocrosslinking to eukaryotic ribosomal components of 14-mer mRNA in the presence of tRNA(f)(Met), and 42-mer mRNA in the presence of tRNA(Asp) (tRNA(Asp) gene transcript). We show that: (a) both 14-mer and 42-mer mRNAs crossreact with ribosomal RNA and ribosomal proteins. The patterns of the crosslinked ribosomal proteins are similar with both mRNAs and sensitive to ionic conditions; (b) the crosslinking patterns obtained with 42-mer mRNAs show characteristic modification upon addition of tRNA(Asp) providing evidence for appropriate mRNA phasing onto the ribosome. Similar changes are not detected with the 14-mer mRNA.tRNA(f)(Met) pairs; (c) when eukaryotic polypeptide chain release factor 1 (eRF1) is added to the ribosome.tRNA(Asp) complex it crossreacts with the 42-mer mRNA containing the s(4)UGA stop codon located in the A site, but not with the s(4)UCA sense codon; this crosslink involves the N-terminal and middle domains of eRF1 but not the C domain which interacts with eukaryotic polypeptide chain release factor 3 (eRF3); (d) addition of eRF3 has no effect on the yield of eRF1-42-mer mRNA crosslinking and eRF3 does not crossreact with 42-mer mRNA. These experiments delineate the in vitro conditions allowing optimal phasing of mRNA on the eukaryotic ribosome and demonstrate a direct and specific contact of 'core' eRF1 and s(4)UGA stop codon within the ribosomal A site.

Active site mapping of yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase by in vivo selection of enzyme mutations lethal for cell growth

The active site of yeast aspartyl-tRNA synthetase has been characterised by structural and functional approaches. However, residues or structural elements that indirectly contribute to the active site organisation have still to be described. They have not been assessed by simple analysis of structural data or site-directed mutagenesis analysis, since rational targetting has proven difficult. Here, we attempt to locate these functional features by using a genetic selection method to screen a randomly mutated yeast AspRS library for mutations lethal for cell growth. This approach is an efficient method to map the active site residues, since of the 23 different mutations isolated, 13 are in direct contact with the substrates. Most of the mutations are located in a 15 A radius sphere around the ATP molecule, where they affect the very conserved residues of the class-defining motifs. The results also showed the importance of the dimer interface for the enzyme activity: a single mutation of the invariant proline residue of motif 1 led to a structural defect inactivating the enzyme. From in vivo complementation studies it appeared that the enzyme activity can be recovered by reconstitution of an intact interface through the formation of heterodimers. We also show that a single mutation affecting an interaction with G34 of the tRNA can inactivate the enzyme by inducing a relaxation of the tRNA recognition specificity. Finally, several mutants whose functional importance could not be assessed from the structural data were selected, demonstrating the importance of this type of approach in the context of a structure-function relationship study.

Universal rules and idiosyncratic features in tRNA identity

Correct expression of the genetic code at translation is directly correlated with tRNA identity. This survey describes the molecular signals in tRNAs that trigger specific aminoacylations. For most tRNAs, determinants are located at the two distal extremities: the anticodon loop and the amino acid accepting stem. In a few tRNAs, however, major identity signals are found in the core of the molecule. Identity elements have different strengths, often depend more on k cat effects than on K m effects and exhibit additive, cooperative or anti-cooperative interplay. Most determinants are in direct contact with cognate synthetases, and chemical groups on bases or ribose moieties that make functional interactions have been identified in several systems. Major determinants are conserved in evolution; however, the mechanisms by which they are expressed are species dependent. Recent studies show that alternate identity sets can be recognized by a single synthetase, and emphasize the importance of tRNA architecture and anti-determinants preventing false recognition. Identity rules apply to tRNA-like molecules and to minimalist tRNAs. Knowledge of these rules allows the manipulation of identity elements and engineering of tRNAs with switched, altered or multiple specificities.

Sequences outside recognition sets are not neutral for tRNA aminoacylation. Evidence for nonpermissive combinations of nucleotides in the acceptor stem of yeast tRNAPhe

Phenylalanine identity of yeast tRNAPhe is governed by five nucleotides including residues A73, G20, and the three anticodon nucleotides (Sampson et al., 1989, Science 243, 1363-1366). Analysis of in vitro transcripts derived from yeast tRNAPhe and Escherichia coli tRNAAla bearing these recognition elements shows that phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase is sensitive to additional nucleotides within the acceptor stem. Insertion of G2-C71 has dramatic negative effects in both tRNA frameworks. These effects become compensated by a second-site mutation, the insertion of the wobble G3-U70 pair, which by itself has no effect on phenylalanylation. From a mechanistic point of view, the G2-C71/G3-U70 combination is not a "classical" recognition element since its antideterminant effect is compensated for by a second-site mutation. This enlarges our understanding of tRNA identity that appears not only to be the outcome of a combination of positive and negative signals forming the so-called recognition/identity set but that is also based on the presence of nonrandom combinations of sequences elsewhere in tRNA. These sequences, we name "permissive elements," are retained by evolution so that they do not hinder aminoacylation. Likely, no nucleotide within a tRNA is of random nature but has been selected so that a tRNA can fulfill all its functions efficiently.

Transfer RNA identity rules and conformation of the tyrosine tRNA-like domain of BMV RNA imply additional charging by histidine and valine

This paper reports the first example of a triple aminoacylation specificity of a viral tRNA-like domain. These findings were based on structural studies on the brome mosaic virus (BMV) tRNA-like domain (Felden et al., 1994, J. Mol. Biol. 235, 508-531) together with knowledge on tRNA aminoacylation identity rules suggesting potential histidinylation and valylation capacities of the viral RNA in addition to its already known tyrosylation ability. Here, both predictions are demonstrated by in vitro aminoacylation assays. Kinetic parameters of histidinylation and valylation of BMV tRNA-like structure have been determined and compared to those of the corresponding tRNA transcripts and to the tyrosylation capacity of the molecule. The influence of experimental conditions on aminoacylation reactions was also studied. The novel aminoacylation capacities of BMV tRNA-like domain support its already reported three-dimensional fold and illustrate the predictive potential of modeling data. Biological necessity of specific or non specific aminoacylation will be discussed.

Mirror image alternative interaction patterns of the same tRNA with either class I arginyl-tRNA synthetase or class II aspartyl-tRNA synthetase

Gene cloning, overproduction and an efficient purification protocol of yeast arginyl-tRNA synthetase (ArgRS) as well as the interaction patterns of this protein with cognate tRNAArgand non-cognate tRNAAspare described. This work was motivated by the fact that the in vitro transcript of tRNAAspis of dual aminoacylation specificity and is not only aspartylated but also efficiently arginylated. The crystal structure of the complex between class II aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (AspRS) and tRNAAsp, as well as early biochemical data, have shown that tRNAAspis recognized by its variable region side. Here we show by footprinting with enzymatic and chemical probes that transcribed tRNAAspis contacted by class I ArgRS along the opposite D arm side, as is homologous tRNAArg, but with idiosyncratic interaction patterns. Besides protection, footprints also show enhanced accessibility of the tRNAs to the structural probes, indicative of conformational changes in the complexed tRNAs. These different patterns are interpreted in relation to the alternative arginine identity sets found in the anticodon loops of tRNAArgand tRNAAsp. The mirror image alternative interaction patterns of unmodified tRNAAspwith either class I ArgRS or class II AspRS, accounting for the dual identity of this tRNA, are discussed in relation to the class defining features of the synthetases. This study indicates that complex formation between unmodified tRNAAspand either ArgRS and AspRS is solely governed by the proteins.

Strategy for RNA recognition by yeast histidyl-tRNA synthetase

Histidine aminoacylation systems are of interest because of the structural diversity of the RNA substrates recognized by histidyl-tRNA synthetases. Among tRNAs participating in protein synthesis, those specific for histidine all share an additional residue at their 5'-extremities. On the other hand, tRNA-like domains at the 3'--termini of some plant viruses can also be charged by histidyl-tRNA synthetases, although they are not actors in protein synthesis. This is the case for the RNAs from tobacco mosaic virus and its satellite virus but also those of turnip yellow and brome mosaic viruses. All these RNAs have intricate foldings at their 3'-termini differing from that of canonical tRNAs and share a pseudoknotted domain which is the prerequisite for their folding into structures mimicking the overall L-shape of tRNAs. This paper gives an overview on tRNA identity and rationalizes the apparently contradictory structural and aminoacylation features of histidine-specific tRNAs and tRNA-like structures. The discussion mainly relies on histidylation data obtained with the yeast synthetase, but the conclusions are of a more universal nature. In canonical tRNA(His), the major histidine identity element is the 'minus' 1 residue, since its removal impairs histidylation and conversely its addition to a non-cognate tRNA(Asp) confers histidine identity to the transplanted molecule. Optimal expression of histidine identity depends on the chemical nature of the -1 residue and is further increased and/or modulated by the discriminator base N73 and by residues in the anticodon. In the viral tRNA-like domains, the major identity determinant -1 is mimicked by a residue from the single-stranded L1 regions of the different pseudoknots. The consequences of this mimicry for the function of minimalist RNAs derived from tRNA-like domains are discussed. The characteristics of the histidine systems illustrate well the view that the core of the amino acid accepting RNAs is a scaffold that allows proper presentation of identity nucleotides to their amino acid identity counterparts in the synthetase and that different types of scaffoldings are possible.

Aspartate identity of transfer RNAs

Structure/function relationships accounting for specific tRNA charging by class II aspartyl-tRNA synthetases from Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Escherichia coli and Thermus thermophilus are reviewed. Effects directly linked to tRNA features are emphasized and aspects about synthetase contribution in expression of tRNA(Asp) identity are also covered. Major identity nucleotides conferring aspartate specificity to yeast, E coli and T thermophilus tRNAs comprise G34, U35, C36, C38 and G73, a set of nucleotides conserved in tRNA(Asp) molecules of other biological origin. Aspartate specificity can be enhanced by negative discrimination preventing, eg mischarging of native yeast tRNA(Asp by yeast arginyl-tRNA synthetase. In the yeast system crystallography shows that identity nucleotides are in contact with identity amino acids located in the catalytic and anticodon binding domains of the synthetase. Specificity of RNA/protein interaction involves a conformational change of the tRNA that optimizes the H-bonding potential of the identity signals on both partners of the complex. Mutation of identity nucleotides leads to decreased aspartylation efficiencies accompanied by a loss of specific H-bonds and an altered adaptation of tRNA on the synthetase. Species-specific characteristics of aspartate systems are the number, location and nature of minor identity signals. These features and the structural variations in aspartate tRNAs and synthetases are correlated with mechanistic differences in the aminoacylation reactions catalyzed by the various aspartyl-tRNA synthetases. The reality of the aspartate identity set is verified by its functional expression in a variety of RNA frameworks. Inversely a number of identities can be expressed within a tRNA(Asp) framework. From this emerged the concept of the RNA structural frameworks underlying expression of identities which is illustrated with data obtained with engineered tRNAs. Efficient aspartylation of minihelices is explained by the primordial role of G73. From this and other considerations it is suggested that aspartate identity appeared early in the history of tRNA aminoacylation systems.

Characterization of some major identity elements in plant alanine and phenylalanine transfer RNAs

Alanine and phenylalanine tRNA sequences were amplified by PCR from Arabidopsis thaliana nuclear DNA using degenerate oligonucleotides which introduced specific mutations into the acceptor stem. The aminoacylation of T7 RNA polymerase transcripts of these sequences was investigated in vitro using partially purified bean alanyl- or phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase. In parallel, the in vivo activity of amber suppressor derivatives of these tRNAs was investigated in transient expression assays in tobacco protoplasts using a beta-glucuronidase (GUS) reporter gene containing a premature amber stop codon. The results show that mutation of the G3:U70 base pair to G3:C70 blocks aminoacylation of plant alanine tRNA, whilst conversion of the G3:C70 pair normally found in plant tRNA(Phe) to G3:U70 enables the mutated tRNA(Phe) to be a good substrate for alanyl-tRNA synthetase and impairs its aminoacylation with phenylalanine. In addition, the amber suppressor derivative of wild-type tRNA(Phe) showed very little suppressor activity in vivo, and was poorly aminoacylated with phenylalanine in vitro, suggesting that the anticodon is a major identity determinant for tRNA(Phe) in plant cells.

Histidylation by yeast HisRS of tRNA or tRNA-like structure relies on residues -1 and 73 but is dependent on the RNA context

Residue G-1 and discriminator base C73 are the major histidine identity elements in prokaryotes. Here we evaluate the importance of these two nucleotides in yeast histidine aminoacylation identity. Deletion of G-1 in yeast tRNA(His) transcript leads to a drastic loss of histidylation specificity (about 500-fold). Mutation of discriminator base A73, common to all yeast tRNA(His) species, into G73 has a more moderate but still significant effect with a 22-fold decrease in histidylation specificity. Changes at position 36 in the anticodon loop has negligible effect on histidylation. The role of residues -1 and 73 for specific aminoacylation by yeast HisRS was further investigated by studying the histidylation capacities of seven minihelices derived from the Turnip Yellow Mosaic Virus tRNA-like structure. Changes in the nature of nucleotides -1 and 73 modulate this activity but do not suppress it. The optimal mini-substrate for HisRS presents a G.A mismatch at the position equivalent to residues G-1.A73 in yeast tRNA(His), confirms the importance of this structural feature in yeast histidine identity. The fact that the minisubstrates contain a pseudoknot in which position -1 is mimicked by an internal nucleotide from the pseudoknot highlights further the necessity of a stacking interaction of this position over the amino acid accepting branch of the tRNA during the aminoacylation process. Individual transplantation of G-1 or A73 into yeast tRNA(Asp) transcript improves the histidylation efficiency of the engineered tRNA(Asp). However, a tRNA(Asp) transcript presenting simultaneously both residues G-1 and A73 becomes a less good substrate for HisRS, suggesting the importance of the structural context and/or the presence of antideterminants for an optimal expression of these two identity elements.

Identity switches between tRNAs aminoacylated by class I glutaminyl- and class II aspartyl-tRNA synthetases

High-resolution X-ray structures for the tRNA/aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complexes between Escherichia coli tRNAGln/GlnRS and yeast tRNAAsp/AspRS have been determined. Positive identity nucleotides that direct aminoacylation specificity have been defined in both cases; E. coli tRNAGln identity is governed by 10 elements scattered in the tRNA structure, while specific aminoacylation of yeast tRNAAsp is dependent on 5 positions. Both identity sets are partially overlapping and share 3 nucleotides. Interestingly, the two enzymes belong to two different classes described for aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. The class I glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase and the class II aspartyl-tRNA synthetase recognize their cognate tRNA from opposite sides. Mutants derived from glutamine and aspartate tRNAs have been created by progressively introducing identity elements from one tRNA into the other one. Glutaminylation and aspartylation assays of the transplanted tRNAs show that identity nucleotides from a tRNA originally aminoacylated by a synthetase from one class are still recognized if they are presented to the enzyme in a structural framework corresponding to a tRNA aminoacylated by a synthetase belonging to the other class. The simple transplantation of the glutamine identity set into tRNAAsp is sufficient to obtain glutaminylatable tRNA, but additional subtle features seem to be important for the complete conversion of tRNAGln in an aspartylatable substrate. This study defines C38 in yeast tRNAAsp as a new identity nucleotide for aspartylation. We show also in this paper that, during the complex formation, aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are at least partially responsible for conformational changes which involve structural constraints in tRNA molecules.