Histone synthesis and deposition in the G1 and S phases of hepatoma tissue culture cells

Roles of Histone H2A Variants in Cancer Development, Prognosis, and Treatment

Histones are nuclear proteins essential for packaging genomic DNA and epigenetic gene regulation. Paralogs that can substitute core histones (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4), named histone variants, are constitutively expressed in a replication-independent manner throughout the cell cycle. With specific chaperones, they can be incorporated to chromatin to modify nucleosome stability by modulating interactions with nucleosomal DNA. This allows the regulation of essential fundamental cellular processes for instance, DNA damage repair, chromosomal segregation, and transcriptional regulation. Among all the histone families, histone H2A family has the largest number of histone variants reported to date. Each H2A variant has multiple functions apart from their primary role and some, even be further specialized to perform additional tasks in distinct lineages, such as testis specific shortH2A (sH2A). In the past decades, the discoveries of genetic alterations and mutations in genes encoding H2A variants in cancer had revealed variants' potentiality in driving carcinogenesis. In addition, there is growing evidence that H2A variants may act as novel prognostic indicators or biomarkers for both early cancer detection and therapeutic treatments. Nevertheless, no studies have ever concluded all identified variants in a single report. Here, in this review, we summarize the respective functions for all the 19 mammalian H2A variants and their roles in cancer biology whilst potentiality being used in clinical setting.

Insights into the roles of histone chaperones in nucleosome assembly and disassembly in virus infection

Nucleosomes are assembled or disassembled with the aid of histone chaperones in a cell. Viruses can exist either as minichromosomes/episomes or can integrate into the host genome and in both the cases the viral proteins interact and manipulate the cellular nucleosome assembly machinery to ensure their survival and propagation. Recent studies have provided insight into the mechanism and role of histone chaperones in nucleosome assembly and disassembly on the virus genome. Further, the interactions between viral proteins and histone chaperones have been implicated in the integration of the virus genome into the host genome. This review highlights the recent progress and future challenges in understanding the role of histone chaperones in viruses with DNA or RNA genome and their role in governing viral pathogenesis.

The replisome guides nucleosome assembly during DNA replication

Nucleosome assembly during DNA replication is tightly coupled to ongoing DNA synthesis. This process, termed DNA replication-coupled (RC) nucleosome assembly, is essential for chromatin replication and has a great impact on both genome stability maintenance and epigenetic inheritance. This review discusses a set of recent findings regarding the role of replisome components contributing to RC nucleosome assembly. Starting with a brief introduction to the factors involved in nucleosome assembly and some aspects of the architecture of the eukaryotic replisome, we discuss studies from yeast to mammalian cells and the interactions of replisome components with histones and histone chaperones. We describe the proposed functions of replisome components during RC nucleosome assembly and discuss their impacts on histone segregation and implications for epigenetic inheritance.

Analysis of histone ubiquitylation by MSL1/MSL2 proteins in vitro

Histone posttranslational modifications (PTM) control gene activity by targeting chromatin-regulatory proteins. By altering histone charges PTMs could also modulate inter- and intra-nucleosomal interactions, and thus affect chromatin high-order compaction and nucleosome stochastic folding, respectively. However, recently it has been shown that histone H2BK34- ubiquitylation (which is deposited in vivo by MOF-MSL) can destabilize one of the nucleosomal H2A-H2B dimers in symmetrically and (albeit to a lesser extend) asymmetrically modified nucleosomes, and thus promote formation of a hexasome particle. Here we have studied ubiquitylation patterns by purified MSL1/MSL2 using nucleosomes and different histone substrates. We have shown that H2B-ubiquitylation by MSL1/2 depends on substrate configuration. In addition, MSL1/2 efficiently ubiquitylate histone substrates but very poorly modify nucleosomes, which implies a requirement for nucleosome structural alteration for efficient ubiquitylation of H2BK34. Nucleosome modification by MSL1/MSL2 in vitro was analyzed directly using nucleosome gel-mobility shift assay, which suggested that MSL1/2 can deposit two ubiquitin moieties in one nucleosome.

Effects of DNA Superhelical Stress on the Stability of H2B-Ubiquitylated Nucleosomes

On the nucleosome level, histone posttranslational modifications function mainly as the regulatory signals; in addition, some posttranslational modifications can enhance nucleosome stochastic folding, which is restricted in "canonic" nucleosomes. Recently, it has been shown in vitro that symmetric or asymmetric nucleosome ubiquitylation at H2BK34 (and H2BK120, to a lesser extent) can destabilize one of the nucleosomal H2A-H2B dimers and promote nucleosome conversion to a hexasome particle [Krajewski et al. (2018). Nucleic Acids Res., 46, 7631-7642]. Such lability of H2Bub nucleosomes raises a question of whether they could accommodate transient changes in DNA torsional tensions, which are generated by virtually any process that manipulates DNA strands. Using positively or negatively supercoiled DNA minicircles and homogeneously-modified H2Bub histones, we have found that DNA topology could strongly and selectively affect nucleosome stability depending on its ubiquitylation state (here the term "nucleosome stability" means the nucleosome property to maintain its structural integrity and dynamics characteristic to "canonic" nucleosomes). The results point to a role for H2B ubiquitylation in amplifying or mitigating the effects of a DNA torque on the nucleosome stability and dynamics.

Regulatory functions and chromatin loading dynamics of linker histone H1 during endoreplication in Drosophila

Here, Andreyeva et al. show that linker histone H1 is required for the underreplicated phenomenon in Drosophila salivary glands, in which tissues undergo endoreplication without cell division, and the latest replicating regions occasionally fail to complete endoreplication, resulting in underreplicated domains of polytene chromosomes. They demonstrate that H1 directly interacts with the suppressor of underreplication (SUUR) protein and is required for SUUR binding to chromatin in vivo and that the localization of H1 in chromatin changes profoundly during the endocycle.

Eukaryotic DNA replicates asynchronously, with discrete genomic loci replicating during different stages of S phase. Drosophila larval tissues undergo endoreplication without cell division, and the latest replicating regions occasionally fail to complete endoreplication, resulting in underreplicated domains of polytene chromosomes. Here we show that linker histone H1 is required for the underreplication (UR) phenomenon in Drosophila salivary glands. H1 directly interacts with the Suppressor of UR (SUUR) protein and is required for SUUR binding to chromatin in vivo. These observations implicate H1 as a critical factor in the formation of underreplicated regions and an upstream effector of SUUR. We also demonstrate that the localization of H1 in chromatin changes profoundly during the endocycle. At the onset of endocycle S (endo-S) phase, H1 is heavily and specifically loaded into late replicating genomic regions and is then redistributed during the course of endoreplication. Our data suggest that cell cycle-dependent chromosome occupancy of H1 is governed by several independent processes. In addition to the ubiquitous replication-related disassembly and reassembly of chromatin, H1 is deposited into chromatin through a novel pathway that is replication-independent, rapid, and locus-specific. This cell cycle-directed dynamic localization of H1 in chromatin may play an important role in the regulation of DNA replication timing.

Breaking Symmetry - Asymmetric Histone Inheritance in Stem Cells

Asymmetric cell division (ACD) gives rise to two daughter cells with distinct fates. ACD is widely used during development and by many types of adult stem cells during tissue homeostasis and regeneration. ACD can be regulated by extrinsic cues, such as signaling molecules, as well as by intrinsic factors, such as organelles and cortex proteins. The recent discovery of asymmetric histone inheritance during stem cell ACD has revealed another intrinsic mechanism by which ACD produces two distinct daughters. In this review we discuss these findings in the context of cell-cycle regulation, as well as other studies of ACD, to begin understanding the underlying mechanisms and biological relevance of this phenomenon.

Epigenomic reprogramming in inorganic arsenic-mediated gene expression patterns during carcinogenesis

Arsenic is a ubiquitous metalloid that is not mutagenic but is carcinogenic. The mechanism(s) by which arsenic causes cancer remain unknown. To date, several mechanisms have been proposed, including the arsenic-induced generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). However, it is also becoming evident that inorganic arsenic (iAs) may exert its carcinogenic effects by changing the epigenome, and thereby modifying chromatin structure and dynamics. These epigenetic changes alter the accessibility of gene regulatory factors to DNA, resulting in specific changes in gene expression both at the levels of transcription initiation and gene splicing. In this review, we discuss recent literature reports describing epigenetic changes induced by iAs exposure and the possible epigenetic mechanisms underlying these changes.

The histone variant composition of centromeres is controlled by the pericentric heterochromatin state during the cell cycle

Correct chromosome segregation requires a unique chromatin environment at centromeres and in their vicinity. Here, we address how the deposition of canonical H2A and H2A.Z histone variants is controlled at pericentric heterochromatin (PHC). Whereas in euchromatin newly synthesized H2A and H2A.Z are deposited throughout the cell cycle, we reveal two discrete waves of deposition at PHC - during mid to late S phase in a replication-dependent manner for H2A and during G1 phase for H2A.Z. This G1 cell cycle restriction is lost when heterochromatin features are altered, leading to the accumulation of H2A.Z at the domain. Interestingly, compromising PHC integrity also impacts upon neighboring centric chromatin, increasing the amount of centromeric CENP-A without changing the timing of its deposition. We conclude that the higher-order chromatin structure at the pericentric domain influences dynamics at the nucleosomal level within centromeric chromatin. The two different modes of rearrangement of the PHC during the cell cycle provide distinct opportunities to replenish one or the other H2A variant, highlighting PHC integrity as a potential signal to regulate the deposition timing and stoichiometry of histone variants at the centromere.

Assembling chromatin: the long and winding road

It has been over 35 years since the acceptance of the "chromatin subunit" hypothesis, and the recognition that nucleosomes are the fundamental repeating units of chromatin fibers. Major subjects of inquiry in the intervening years have included the steps involved in chromatin assembly, and the chaperones that escort histones to DNA. The following commentary offers an historical perspective on inquiries into the processes by which nucleosomes are assembled on replicating and nonreplicating chromatin. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Histone chaperones and Chromatin assembly.

Histone variants: emerging players in cancer biology

Histone variants are key players in shaping chromatin structure, and, thus, in regulating fundamental cellular processes such as chromosome segregation and gene expression. Emerging evidence points towards a role for histone variants in contributing to tumor progression, and, recently, the first cancer-associated mutation in a histone variant-encoding gene was reported. In addition, genetic alterations of the histone chaperones that specifically regulate chromatin incorporation of histone variants are rapidly being uncovered in numerous cancers. Collectively, these findings implicate histone variants as potential drivers of cancer initiation and/or progression, and, therefore, targeting histone deposition or the chromatin remodeling machinery may be of therapeutic value. Here, we review the mammalian histone variants of the H2A and H3 families in their respective cellular functions, and their involvement in tumor biology.

Histone H2A.Z inheritance during the cell cycle and its impact on promoter organization and dynamics

Although it has been clearly established that well-positioned histone H2A.Z-containing nucleosomes flank the nucleosome-depleted region (NDR) at the transcriptional start site (TSS) of active mammalian genes, how this chromatin-based information is transmitted through the cell cycle is unknown. We show here that in mouse trophoblast stem cells, the amount of histone H2A.Z at promoters decreased during S phase, coinciding with homotypic (H2A.Z-H2A.Z) nucleosomes flanking the TSS becoming heterotypic (H2A.Z-H2A). To our surprise these nucleosomes remained heterotypic at M phase. At the TSS, we identified an unstable heterotypic histone H2A.Z-containing nucleosome in G1 phase that was lost after DNA replication. These dynamic changes at the TSS mirror a global expansion of the NDR at S and M phases, which, unexpectedly, is unrelated to transcriptional activity. Coincident with the loss of histone H2A.Z at promoters, histone H2A.Z is targeted to the centromere when mitosis begins.

A key role for Chd1 in histone H3 dynamics at the 3' ends of long genes in yeast

Chd proteins are ATP–dependent chromatin remodeling enzymes implicated in biological functions from transcriptional elongation to control of pluripotency. Previous studies of the Chd1 subclass of these proteins have implicated them in diverse roles in gene expression including functions during initiation, elongation, and termination. Furthermore, some evidence has suggested a role for Chd1 in replication-independent histone exchange or assembly. Here, we examine roles of Chd1 in replication-independent dynamics of histone H3 in both Drosophila and yeast. We find evidence of a role for Chd1 in H3 dynamics in both organisms. Using genome-wide ChIP-on-chip analysis, we find that Chd1 influences histone turnover at the 5′ and 3′ ends of genes, accelerating H3 replacement at the 5′ ends of genes while protecting the 3′ ends of genes from excessive H3 turnover. Although consistent with a direct role for Chd1 in exchange, these results may indicate that Chd1 stabilizes nucleosomes perturbed by transcription. Curiously, we observe a strong effect of gene length on Chd1's effects on H3 turnover. Finally, we show that Chd1 also affects histone modification patterns over genes, likely as a consequence of its effects on histone replacement. Taken together, our results emphasize a role for Chd1 in histone replacement in both budding yeast and Drosophila melanogaster, and surprisingly they show that the major effects of Chd1 on turnover occur at the 3′ ends of genes.

Nucleosomes prevent transcription by interfering with transcription factor binding at the beginning of genes and blocking elongating RNA polymerase II across the bodies of genes. To overcome this repression, regulatory proteins move, remove, or structurally alter nucleosomes, allowing the transcription machinery access to gene sequences. Over the body of a gene, it is important that nucleosome structure be restored after a polymerase has passed by; failure to do so may lead to activation of transcription from internal gene sequences. Interestingly, although nucleosomes constantly move on and off of promoters, they are relatively stable over the bodies of genes. Thus, the same nucleosomes that are removed to allow a polymerase to pass by must be reassembled in its wake. Here, we examine the role of an ATP–dependent chromatin remodeling protein, Chd1, in regulating nucleosome dynamics. We find that Chd1 is important for exchange of the histone H3 in both yeast and Drosophila and that, surprisingly, while it promotes exchange of histones at the beginning of genes, it prevents exchange at the ends of genes. Finally, we show that Chd1 helps determine the characteristic pattern of chemical modifications of histone H3 found over actively transcribed gene sequences.

The nucleosome family: dynamic and growing

Ever since the discovery of the nucleosome in 1974, scientists have stumbled upon discrete particles in which DNA is wrapped around histone complexes of different stoichiometries: octasomes, hexasomes, tetrasomes, "split" half-nucleosomes, and, recently, bona fide hemisomes. Do all these particles exist in vivo? Under what conditions? What is their physiological significance in the complex DNA transactions in the eukaryotic nucleus? What are their dynamics? This review summarizes research spanning more than three decades and provides a new meaning to the term "nucleosome." The nucleosome can no longer be viewed as a single static entity: rather, it is a family of particles differing in their structural and dynamic properties, leading to different functionalities.

Transcription through chromatin by RNA polymerase II: histone displacement and exchange

The process of transcript elongation by RNA polymerase II (Pol II) involves transcription-dependent exchange and displacement of all core histones and is tightly controlled by numerous protein complexes modifying chromatin structure. These processes can contribute to regulation of transcription initiation and elongation, as well as the chromatin state. Recent data suggest that the histone octamer is displaced from DNA at a high rate of transcription, but can survive less frequent transcription that is accompanied only by partial loss of H2A/H2B histones. Here we propose that critical density of Pol II molecules could be required for displacement of the histone octamer and discuss mechanisms that are most likely involved in the processes of histone exchange.

Continuous histone H2B and transcription-dependent histone H3 exchange in yeast cells outside of replication

We investigated the dynamics of histone-DNA interactions in yeast by using inducible forms of epitope-tagged histones H2B and H3. Chromatin assembly of newly synthesized histones was assessed by chromatin immunoprecipitation in G1-arrested cells to prevent replication-coupled histone incorporation. We find that while histone deposition within a subtelomeric region is strictly linked to DNA replication, histone H2B is continuously incorporated at the promoter and coding regions of both transcriptionally active and inactive loci. In contrast, incorporation of histone H3 occurs only at active genes, being predominant at the promoter and showing a dynamics along the gene that inversely correlates with the average nucleosomal density. Similar results were obtained with N-terminally truncated H2B and H3 variants. We infer that replication-independent incorporation of H2B and H3 are distinct events, each occurring independently of the histone tail, and that nucleosome loss at active promoters reflects a dynamic equilibrium between histone deposition and dissociation.

Nucleosome displacement in transcription

Recent reports reinforce the notion that nucleosomes are highly dynamic in response to the process of transcription. Nucleosomes are displaced at promoters during gene activation in a process that involves histone modification, ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling complexes, histone chaperones and perhaps histone variants. During transcription elongation nucleosomes are acetylated and transferred behind RNA polymerase II where they are required to suppress spurious transcription initiation within the body of the gene. It is becoming increasingly clear that the eukaryotic transcriptional machinery is adapted to exploit the presence of nucleosomes in very sophisticated ways.

Developmental expression pattern of histone H4 gene associated to DNA synthesis in the endoparasitic platyhelminth Mesocestoides corti

In higher eukaryotes, histone gene expression is coupled to DNA replication during the S-phase of the cell cycle. This coupling is primarily controlled at the transcriptional level. Considering the basal phylogenic position of platyhelminthes in the bilateria phylum, we have cloned a partial sequence of the histone H4 gene of Mesocestoides corti and studied its expression during the post larval development of this endoparasitic platyhelminth. In in vitro trypsin-induced tetrathyridia development to segmented adult worm, we found that histone H4 is expressed concomitantly with DNA synthesis throughout all stages of development. DNA synthesis and histone H4 mRNA levels were sharply increased at 24 h after inducing development. Afterwards, tetrathyridia grew in length from days 4 to 12 of development as proliferative cells gradually increased in number. Consequently, during this period of development histone H4 mRNA levels were upregulated. Taken together these results suggest that a replication-dependent expression pattern of histone H4 occurs in ancient bilateria, such as platyhelminthes, as previously observed in higher eukaryotes.

Histone dynamics during transcription: exchange of H2A/H2B dimers and H3/H4 tetramers during pol II elongation

Chromatin within eukaryotic cell nuclei accommodates many complex activities that require at least partial disassembly and reassembly of nucleosomes. This disassembly/reassembly is thought to be somewhat localized when associated with processes such as site-specific DNA repair but likely occurs over extended regions during processive processes such as DNA replication or transcription. Here we review data addressing the effect of transcription elongation on nucleosome disassembly/reassembly, specifically focusing on the issue of transcription-dependent exchange of H2A/H2B dimers and H3/H4 tetramers. We suggest a model whereby passage of a polymerase through a nucleosome induces displacement of H2A/H2B dimers with a much higher probability than displacement of H3/H4 tetramers such that the extent of tetramer replacement is relatively low and proportional to polymerase density on any particular gene.

Modifications of H3 and H4 during chromatin replication, nucleosome assembly, and histone exchange

Histone posttranslational modifications that accompany DNA replication, nucleosome assembly, and H2A/H2B exchange were examined in human tissue culture cells. Through microsequencing analysis and chromatin immunoprecipitation, it was found that a subset of newly synthesized H3.2/H3.3 is modified by acetylation and methylation at sites that correlate with transcriptional competence. Immunoprecipitation experiments suggest that cytosolic predeposition complexes purified from cells expressing FLAG-H4 contain H3/H4 dimers, not tetramers. Studies of the deposition of newly synthesized H2A/H2B onto replicating and nonreplicating chromatin demonstrated that H2A/H2B exchange takes place in chromatin regions that contain acetylated H4; however, there is no single pattern of H4 acetylation that accompanies exchange. H2A/H2B exchange is also largely independent of the deposition of replacement histone variant, H3.3. Finally, immunoprecipitation of nucleosomes replicated in the absence of de novo nucleosome assembly showed that histone modifications do not prevent the transfer of parental histones to newly replicated DNA and thus have the potential to serve as means of epigenetic inheritance. Our experiments provide an in-depth analysis of the "histone code" associated with chromatin replication and dynamic histone exchange in human cells.

2. Chromatin assembly with H3 histones: full throttle down multiple pathways

The typical eukaryotic genome packages roughly 6 feet of DNA into a nucleus about 5 mum in diameter, yet this compaction blocks access to the DNA. At the first level of compaction, DNA is wrapped around octamers of core histone proteins to form arrays of nucleosomes. Nucleosomes are sufficient to block access to DNA, and cells must therefore manipulate nucleosomes in the course of activating the genome. Dramatic progress has been made in understanding the mechanisms by which nucleosomes are manipulated. In addition to the major core histones, most eukaryotic genomes also encode additional variant histones, which have some structural similarity. These are targeted to specific loci by coupling specialized nucleosome assembly pathways to DNA replication, transcription, or to developmental processes. We review evidence that nucleosome assembly pathways are interlinked with histone-modification systems, and may thereby perpetuate epigenetic chromatin states.

Histone dynamics in living cells revealed by photobleaching

The latest development of imaging technology and fluorescent proteins has enabled us to visualize the dynamics of chromatin proteins in living cells. Particularly, photobleaching techniques like fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) revealed the mobility of many nuclear proteins including histones. Although most nucleosomal histones are maintained over cell generations to maintain epigenetic marks on their tails, some exhibit dynamic exchange. In general, histone H3-H4 tetramers stably bind to DNA once assembled during DNA replication; in contrast, the H2A-H2B dimers exchange slowly in euchromatin and are evicted during transcription. Recent data further indicate that different histone variants have different localization and kinetics. The replacement H3 variant, H3.3, is incorporated into transcriptionally active chromatin independently of DNA replication, and the centromeric variant, CENP-A, appears to assemble into nucleosomes in centromeres during G2 phase by replacing canonical H3. Different behaviors of H2A variants are also demonstrated. Importantly, the mobility of histones, and other nuclear proteins, is altered in response to changes in cellular physiology and various stimuli. Whereas we know little about how these dynamics are regulated, distinct complexes that mediate assembly and exchange of specific variants have been isolated, thus future analyses will reveal the molecular mechanisms underlying the phenomena in living cells.

Replication-independent core histone dynamics at transcriptionally active loci in vivo

We used a novel labeling technique in the naturally synchronous organism Physarum polycephalum to examine the fate of core histones in G2 phase. We find rapid exchange of H2A/H2B dimers with free pools that is greatly diminished by treatment of the cells with alpha-amanitin. This exchange is enhanced in pol II-coding sequences compared with extragenic regions or inactive loci. In contrast, H3/H4 tetramers exhibit far lower levels of exchange in the pol II-transcribed genes tested, suggesting that tetramer exchange occurs via a distinct mechanism. However, we find that transcribed regions of the ribosomal RNA gene loci exhibit rapid exchange of H3/H4 tetramers. Thus, our data show that the majority of the pol II transcription-dependent histone exchange is due to elongation in vivo rather than promoter remodeling or other pol II-dependent alterations in promoter structure and, in contrast to pol I, pol II transcription through nucleosomes in vivo causes facile exchange of both H2A/H2B dimers while allowing conservation of epigenetic "marks" and other post-translational modifications on H3 and H4.

Kinetics of core histones in living human cells: little exchange of H3 and H4 and some rapid exchange of H2B

Histones H2A and H2B form part of the same nucleosomal structure as H3 and H4. Stable HeLa cell lines expressing histones H2B, H3, and H4 tagged with green fluorescent protein (GFP) were established; the tagged molecules were assembled into nucleosomes. Although H2B-GFP was distributed like DNA, H3-GFP and H4-GFP were concentrated in euchromatin during interphase and in R-bands in mitotic chromosomes. These differences probably result from an unregulated production of tagged histones and differences in exchange. In both single cells and heterokaryons, photobleaching revealed that H2B-GFP exchanged more rapidly than H3-GFP and H4-GFP. About 3% of H2B exchanged within minutes, whereas approximately 40% did so slowly (t(1/2) approximately 130 min). The rapidly exchanging fraction disappeared in 5,6-dichloro-1-beta-d-ribofuranosylbenzimidazole and so may represent H2B in transcriptionally active chromatin. The slowly exchanging fraction was probably associated with chromatin domains surrounding active units. H3-GFP and H4-GFP were assembled into chromatin when DNA was replicated, and then >80% remained bound permanently. These results reveal that the inner core of the nucleosome is very stable, whereas H2B on the surface of active nucleosomes exchanges continually.

Histone genes expression during the cell cycle in Trypanosoma cruzi

Histones, the basic proteins which compact DNA into the nucleosomal and solenoidal fibers are synthesized in correlation with DNA replication during the S-phase of the cell cycle. This behavior is controlled both at transcriptional and postranscriptional levels in higher eukaryotes and yeasts. We have found that histone synthesis in synchronized trypanosomes is controlled by fluctuations on the levels of their mRNAs. Though we cannot preclude the existence of a transcriptional regulatory mechanism, our results point to the participation of changes in the stability of histone mRNAs as a regulatory mechanism of their levels during the cell cycle in Trypanosoma. We have also found a postranscriptional regulatory mechanism which could be acting at the translational level. These results show both similarities and differences between Trypanosoma and higher eukaryotes regarding the expression of their histone genes.

Formaldehyde cross-linking for studying nucleosomal dynamics

Methods are described for the utilization of formaldehyde as a reversible cross-linking agent for the characterization of protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions. The methods include a description of procedures to: (1) isolate and characterize transcriptionally active chromatin from cells cross-linked with formaldehyde; (2) study histone mobility during replication and transcription by the characterization of the formaldehyde-cross-linked histone octamer that is isolated from cells labeled with density-labeled amino acids; and (3) cross-link the in vitro reconstituted histone-DNA complex in order to maintain its structural state during subsequent characterization. Included in these methods are procedures for a second dimensional analysis of protein-protein cross-links in which the monomer components are electrophoretically resolved in the second dimension. The methods also include procedures to selectively reverse protein-DNA cross-links while maintaining the protein-protein cross-links. Potential artifacts are also discussed; i.e., data are presented which indicate that the helical pitch of DNA can be altered if the ionic strength is not properly controlled. The stability of the cross-linked nucleosome in the presence of altered pH or salt/urea concentrations is described in order to indicate that there are limitations to procedures that can be used for the subsequent characterization of the cross-linked complex.

The levels of ubiquitinated histone H2A are highly upregulated in transformed human cells: partial colocalization of uH2A clusters and PCNA/cyclin foci in a fraction of cells in S-phase

The levels and distribution of ubiquitinated histone H2A (uH2A) have been studied in normal and transformed human cells using a monoclonal antibody (mAb E6C5) that reacts specifically with this ubiquitin conjugate as determined by two-dimensional gel western blotting and microsequencing. Immunoblotting experiments demonstrated that the levels of the protein are highly upregulated in SV40-transformed human fibroblasts (WI-38 SV40) and keratinocytes (K14) relative to their normal counterparts, a finding that was further confirmed by indirect immunofluorescence studies of formaldehyde/Triton X-100-treated cells, which showed that about 97% of the transformed cells and 26% of the normal populations reacted with the antibody to yield a fine granular nuclear staining associated with the chromatin. Transformed cells contained in addition clusters of uH2A that were quite abundant and that showed variable size, shape and distribution even within a single cell line. The clusters, which were rare in normal cells, did not colocalize with other known nuclear antigens and may correspond to novel nuclear domains where ubiquitination/deubiquitination takes place. Electron microscopic immunocytochemistry of K14 cells confirmed the existence of the clusters. Double immunofluorescence studies of K14 keratinocytes with proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)/cyclin antibodies, which react with the nuclei of cells engaged in DNA replication, showed partial colocalization of PCNA/cyclin foci and large uH2A clusters in about 14% of the S-phase cells, and these corresponded mainly to late S-phase cells. Inhibition of DNA replication with hydroxyurea resulted in an overall increase in the intensity of the uH2A staining as well as in a more clear colocalization of uH2A clusters and PCNA/cyclin foci. Taken together, the results support the contention that uH2A plays a role at some stage of DNA replication.

Analysis of nucleosome assembly and histone exchange using antibodies specific for acetylated H4

Using antibodies that specifically recognize the acetylated forms of histone H4, we show that it is possible to immunoprecipitate newly assembled (acetylated) nucleosomes. Newly replicated HeLa cell chromatin was labeled for 5-30 min with [3H]thymidine in the presence of sodium butyrate (thus inhibiting the deacetylation of newly deposited H4); bulk chromatin DNA was labeled for 24 h with [14C]thymidine. When soluble nucleosomes were incubated with immobilized antibodies, a comparison of the bound and unbound fractions showed up to a 65-fold enrichment for new chromatin DNA in the immunoprecipitate (bound), relative to the supernatant (unbound). No enrichment for new DNA was observed when preimmune control serum was used in a similar fashion. The enrichment for new DNA in the immunopellet was paralleled by a similar enrichment for all four newly synthesized histones. Acetylation was required for antibody recognition: When chromatin was replicated in the absence of butyrate (permitting histone deacetylation and chromatin maturation), equally low levels of new and old chromatin were immunoprecipitated, and no enrichment for new DNA was observed. Competition experiments confirmed these results. Analyses of histone deposition during the inhibition of DNA replication established that acetylated chromatin is the preferential target for H2A/H2B exchange. These experiments provide evidence for the highly selective assembly of newly synthesized H3, H2A, and H2B with acetylated H4, and for the involvement of histone acetylation in dynamic chromatin remodeling. In addition, immunoprecipitations of radiolabeled cytosolic extracts identified a possible somatic chromatin preassembly complex, containing newly synthesized H3 and new (acetylated) H4.

Mode of deposition of the histone subtypes during replication

By using various approaches, we have observed in cycling mouse erythroleukemia cells a characteristic sequential deposition of newly synthesized histones. Control experiments confirmed that this deposition is replicative and is not associated with a process of histone replacement. Interestingly, each of the newly synthesized variants of histones H3, H2B, and H2A was found to deposit simultaneously. This observation indicates that the mechanisms governing the nucleosome assembly do not discriminate among the variants and thus supports the idea that they have equal biological significance. In contrast, a different mode of deposition was found for the regular subtypes H1A and H1B, suggesting a structural and functional difference between these two histones.

Histones H1 and H4 are present near the replication fork

The presence of histones H1 and H4 at the sites of actual DNA synthesis has been studied with Ehrlich ascites tumour cells, pulse labeled for different times with 3H-thymidine and then treated with formaldehyde to crosslink histones to DNA. The fixed chromatin fragments were sonicated to reduce the size of DNA, purified in a CsCl gradient and immunoprecipitated with antibodies to histones H1 and H4. Determination of specific radioactivity in precipitated probes showed that both histones have been associated with nascent DNA even upon 1 min pulse with 3H-thymidine, thus indicating their presence near the replication fork.

Nucleosomal histones of transcriptionally active/competent chromatin preferentially exchange with newly synthesized histones in quiescent chicken erythrocytes

The incorporation of newly synthesized histones among various chromatin fraction isolated from non-replicating cell-cycle-phase-Go chicken immature erythrocytes was investigated. We find that newly synthesized erythroid-specific histone Hl variant H5, is incorporated randomly into chromatin. In contrast, newly synthesized nucleosomal histones H2A, H2A.Z, H2B, H3.3, and H4 are preferentially found in a fraction that is highly enriched in active/competent gene chromatin fragments and depleted in repressed gene chromatin. Moreover, ubiquitinated species of histones H2A and H2B and hyperacetylated species of H4 and H2B, which are complexed to active DNA, are labelled. These observations provide evidence that newly synthesized histones preferentially exchange with the nucleosomal histones of transcriptionally active/component chromatin domains. The results of this study suggest that nucleosomes of active chromatin may be inherently less stable than bulk nucleosomes in vivo and have implications for chromatin remodelling.

Transcription factor requirements for in vitro formation of transcriptionally competent 5S rRNA gene chromatin

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae 5S rRNA gene was used as a model system to study the requirements for assembling transcriptionally active chromatin in vitro with purified components. When a plasmid containing yeast 5S rDNA was assembled into chromatin with purified core histones, the gene was inaccessible to the yeast class III gene transcription machinery. Preformation of a 5S rRNA gene-TFIIIA complex was not sufficient for the formation of active chromatin in this in vitro system. Instead, a complete transcription factor complex consisting of TFIIIA, TFIIIB, and TFIIIC needed to be formed before the addition of histones in order for the 5S chromatin to subsequently be transcribed by RNA polymerase III. Various 5S rRNA maxigenes were constructed and used for chromatin assembly studies. In vitro transcription from these assembled 5S maxigenes revealed that RNA polymerase III was readily able to transcribe through one, two, or four nucleosomes. However, we found that RNA polymerase III was not able to efficiently transcribe a chromatin template containing a more extended array of nucleosomes. In vivo expression experiments indicated that all in vitro-constructed maxigenes were transcriptionally competent. Analyses of protein-DNA interactions formed on these maxigenes in vivo by indirect end labeling indicated that there are extensive interactions throughout the length of these maxigenes. The patterns of protein-DNA interactions formed on these genes are consistent with these DNAs being assembled into extensive nucleosomal arrays.

Transcription factor requirements for in vitro formation of transcriptionally competent 5S rRNA gene chromatin

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae 5S rRNA gene was used as a model system to study the requirements for assembling transcriptionally active chromatin in vitro with purified components. When a plasmid containing yeast 5S rDNA was assembled into chromatin with purified core histones, the gene was inaccessible to the yeast class III gene transcription machinery. Preformation of a 5S rRNA gene-TFIIIA complex was not sufficient for the formation of active chromatin in this in vitro system. Instead, a complete transcription factor complex consisting of TFIIIA, TFIIIB, and TFIIIC needed to be formed before the addition of histones in order for the 5S chromatin to subsequently be transcribed by RNA polymerase III. Various 5S rRNA maxigenes were constructed and used for chromatin assembly studies. In vitro transcription from these assembled 5S maxigenes revealed that RNA polymerase III was readily able to transcribe through one, two, or four nucleosomes. However, we found that RNA polymerase III was not able to efficiently transcribe a chromatin template containing a more extended array of nucleosomes. In vivo expression experiments indicated that all in vitro-constructed maxigenes were transcriptionally competent. Analyses of protein-DNA interactions formed on these maxigenes in vivo by indirect end labeling indicated that there are extensive interactions throughout the length of these maxigenes. The patterns of protein-DNA interactions formed on these genes are consistent with these DNAs being assembled into extensive nucleosomal arrays.

Heterogeneous assembly of nascent core histones to form nucleosomal histone octamers in mouse FM3A cells

We investigated the assembly of newly synthesized histones into nucleosomal histone octamers using an isopycnic centrifugation analysis of these proteins of mouse FM3A cells that had been labeled by culture with heavy amino acids. Cross-linked histone octamers or non-cross-linked core histones were separated electrophoretically from other proteins on sodium dodecyl sulfate/polyacrylamide gels before being banded to equilibrium in cesium formate/guanidinium chloride density gradients. The density of core histones rapidly came to equilibrium after culture of cells in the medium containing heavy amino acids for a time as short as 30 min, indicating that the density of histone octamers in the density-labeled cells reflects the content of these new (dense) core histones relative to old (light) ones in the octamer assembly. Cross-linked histone octamers from these cells were of heterogeneous densities as judged from a broad band in a density gradient. The position and width of the band was essentially unaffected, though the peak position of the density distribution within the band moved progressively from a less to a more dense area, when the time of culture was prolonged from 2 h to 16 h. It is concluded, therefore, that new and old histones are assembled into histone octamers in heterogeneous ratios in contradiction to a conservative or semi-conservative assembly model and it is also suggested that incorporation into chromatin of new histones is not necessarily restricted to newly replicated chromatin regions.

Influence of histone acetylation on the solubility, H1 content and DNase I sensitivity of newly assembled chromatin

In a previous report [Annunziato, A.T. and Seale, R.L. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258:12675] a novel intermediate in chromatin assembly was described (detected by labeling new DNA in the presence of the deacetylase inhibitor sodium butyrate), which retained approximately 50% of the heightened sensitivity of newly replicated chromatin to DNaseI. It is now reported that nucleosomes replicated in butyrate are considerably more soluble in the presence of magnesium, relative to chromatin replicated under control conditions, and that this heightened magnesium-solubility is reflected in a concomitant increase in the preferential solubility of nucleosomes containing newly synthesized core histones. This differential solubility was accompanied by a 5- to 6-fold depletion of histone H1, and was completely abolished by the selective removal of H1 from isolated nuclei. The removal of H1 also markedly reduced the preferential DNaseI sensitivity of chromatin replicated in butyrate. Further, when mononucleosomes of control and (acetylated) nascent chromatin were compared, no differences in DNaseI sensitivity were detected. These results provide evidence that the interactions between newly assembled nucleosomes and histone H1 are altered when histone deacetylation is inhibited during chromatin replication, and suggest a mechanism for the control of H1 deposition during nucleosome assembly in vivo.

Developmental regulation of two 5S ribosomal RNA genes

The developmental regulation of two kinds of Xenopus 5S RNA genes (oocyte and somatic types) can be explained by differences in the stability of protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions in a transcription complex that directs transcription initiation by RNA polymerase III. Dissociation of transcription factors from oocyte 5S RNA genes during development allows them to be repressed by chromatin assembly. In the same cells, somatic 5S RNA genes remain active because their transcription complexes are stable.

Developmental regulation of two 5S ribosomal RNA genes

The developmental regulation of two kinds of Xenopus 5S RNA genes (oocyte and somatic types) can be explained by differences in the stability of protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions in a transcription complex that directs transcription initiation by RNA polymerase III. Dissociation of transcription factors from oocyte 5S RNA genes during development allows them to be repressed by chromatin assembly. In the same cells, somatic 5S RNA genes remain active because their transcription complexes are stable.

Kinetics of accumulation and depletion of soluble newly synthesized histone in the reciprocal regulation of histone and DNA synthesis

Procedures are presented which permit the identification and analysis of cellular histone that is not bound to chromatin. This histone, called soluble histone, could be distinguished from that bound to chromatin by the state of H4 modification and the lack of H2A ubiquitination. Changes in the levels of newly synthesized soluble histone were analyzed with respect to the balance between histone and DNA synthesis in hamster ovary cells. Pulse-chase protocols suggested that the chase of newly synthesized histone from the soluble fraction into chromatin may have two kinetic components with half-depletion times of about 1 and 40 min. When protein synthesis was inhibited, the pulse-chase kinetics of newly synthesized histone from the solubl fraction into chromatin were not significantly altered from those of the control. However, in contrast to the control, when protein synthesis was inhibited, DNA synthesis was also inhibited with kinetics similar to those of the chase of newly synthesized histone from the soluble fraction. There was a rapid decrease in the rate of DNA synthesis with a half-deceleration time of 1 min down to about 30% of the control rate, followed by a slower decrease with an approximate half-deceleration time of 40 min. When DNA synthesis was inhibited, newly synthesized histone accumulated in the soluble fraction, but H2A and H2B continued to complex with chromatin at a significant rate. Soluble histone in G1 cells showed the same differential partitioning of H4/H3 and H2A/H2B between the soluble and chromatin-bound fractions as was found in cycling cells with inhibited DNA synthesis. These results support a unified model of reciprocal regulatory mechanisms between histone and DNA synthesis in the assembly of chromatin.

Mapping protein-DNA interactions in vivo with formaldehyde: evidence that histone H4 is retained on a highly transcribed gene

We have used formaldehyde-mediated protein-DNA crosslinking within intact cells to examine the in vivo chromatin structure of the D. melanogaster heat shock protein 70 (hsp70) genes. In agreement with previous in vitro studies, we find that the heat shock-mediated transcriptional induction of the hsp70 genes perturbs their chromatin structure, resulting in fewer protein-DNA contacts crosslinkable in vivo by formaldehyde. However, contrary to earlier in vitro evidence that histones may be absent from actively transcribed genes, we show directly, by immunoprecipitation of in vivo-crosslinked chromatin fragments, that at least histone H4 remains bound to hsp70 DNA in vivo, irrespective of its rate of transcription. The formaldehyde-based in vivo mapping techniques described in this work are generally applicable, and can be used both to probe protein-DNA interactions within specific genes and to determine the genomic location of specific chromosomal proteins.

Cell-cycle regulation as a mechanism for targeting proteins to specific DNA sequences in Tetrahymena thermophila

Transcriptionally active macronuclei and transcriptionally inert micronuclei of the ciliated protozoan Tetrahymena thermophila contain similar DNA sequences but have very different histones associated with the linker regions of chromatin. In situ hybridization showed that a gene coding for micronuclear linker histone is expressed only in association with micronuclear DNA replication, whereas the gene for macronuclear H1 histone is expressed during macronuclear (but not during micronuclear) S phase. These results indicate that cell-cycle regulation plays an important role in directing proteins to the appropriate nucleus in Tetrahymena and that the replication-expression model [Gottesfeld, J. & Bloomer, L. S. (1982) Cell 28, 781-791; Wormington, W. M., Schlissel, M. & Brown, D. D. (1983) Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 47, 879-884] for establishing appropriate transcriptionally active or repressed chromatin complexes during DNA replication is generally applicable.

Deposition of newly synthesized histones: hybrid nucleosomes are not tandemly arranged on daughter DNA strands

Density labeling procedures have been utilized to study the dynamics of histone-histone interactions in vivo. Cells were labeled for 60 min with dense amino acids, and the label was chased for up to 22 h (two replication events for these cells). Nuclei were isolated and treated with formaldehyde to stabilize the histone-histone interactions with a covalent cross-link that produces an octameric complex of two each of H3, H2B, H2A, and H4. This complex was then extracted from the DNA and analyzed on density gradients. The results indicate that new H3,H4 deposits as a tetramer and does not dissociate in the subsequent chases. New H2A,H2B deposited as a dimer and also does not dissociate in subsequent chases. These new histones form hybrid octamers with old histones. On the basis of the new:old ratio in the hybrid octamers, we propose that additional old H2A,H2B from elsewhere in the genome interacts with tetramers of new H3,H4 to form the newly synthesized nucleosomes. It is also observed that 5% of the cross-linked complexes produced by formaldehyde are octamer-octamer (dioctamer). Upon analysis of the density of the dioctamer, the hybrid octamers were found adjacent to octamers that were homogeneous with respect to containing normal density histones. Control experiments are presented to demonstrate that the octamer-octamer cross-links are a product of intrastrand and not interstrand interactions between nucleosomes. These same control experiments also indicate that these procedures do not induce histone exchange during the preparative procedure prior to density gradient analysis. The significance of these results with regard to the dynamics of histone-histone interactions at the replication fork and the potential role in the maintenance of differentiation is discussed.

Histone variant synthesis patterns in confluent populations of human diploid cells of different in vitro ages

Histone variant synthesis patterns have been used to determine the cell cycle state of cultured cells. H2A and H3 histone variant synthesis patterns from confluent populations of human diploid fibroblast-like cells of different in vitro ages were determined and compared as ratios. In the absence of significant levels of DNA synthesis, there was an age related increase in the H2A ratio while the H3 ratio remained constant. These results indicate that confluent populations of older HDF are either in a different state of the cell cycle than younger cells or that they are synthesizing a different set of histone components while being maintained in the same cell cycle state at confluence. The synthesis and deposition of inappropriate histone components may alter chromatin structure in older cells and inhibit their subsequent progression through the cell cycle.

Binding mode of nucleosome-assembly protein (AP-I) and histones

Studies were made on the binding mode of the nucleosome-assembly protein AP-I with histones H2A + H2B and/or H3 + H4. Histones H2A + H2B bound with AP-I to form a 7-S complex which contained twice as much AP-I (by weight) as histones. Histone H3 + H4 formed an 8-S complex with AP-I. The 7-S and 8-S complexes did not form a new complex when mixed, but significant amounts of two histone pairs were assembled into a 12-S complex on mixing the (H2A + H2B)--AP-I complex (7-S) with free H3 + H4. In contrast, when the (H3 + H4)--AP-I complex (8-S) was incubated with free H2A + H2B, almost no assembly occurred, but the 7-S complex of H2A + H2B was newly formed. Binding studies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay showed that AP-I bound with H2A + H2B faster than with H3 + H4. From these results, it is suggested that AP-I has a higher binding affinity for histone H2A + H2B than for H3 + H4, and that the 7-S complex is an intermediate in formation of the 12-S octamer complex (H2A + H2B + H3 + H4)2.