Effect of medium hypertonicity on reovirus translation rates. An application of kinetic modeling in vivo

Kinetic Modeling of Virus Growth in Cells

When a virus infects a host cell, it hijacks the biosynthetic capacity of the cell to produce virus progeny, a process that may take less than an hour or more than a week. The overall time required for a virus to reproduce depends collectively on the rates of multiple steps in the infection process, including initial binding of the virus particle to the surface of the cell, virus internalization and release of the viral genome within the cell, decoding of the genome to make viral proteins, replication of the genome, assembly of progeny virus particles, and release of these particles into the extracellular environment. For a large number of virus types, much has been learned about the molecular mechanisms and rates of the various steps. However, in only relatively few cases during the last 50 years has an attempt been made-using mathematical modeling-to account for how the different steps contribute to the overall timing and productivity of the infection cycle in a cell. Here we review the initial case studies, which include studies of the one-step growth behavior of viruses that infect bacteria (Qβ, T7, and M13), human immunodeficiency virus, influenza A virus, poliovirus, vesicular stomatitis virus, baculovirus, hepatitis B and C viruses, and herpes simplex virus. Further, we consider how such models enable one to explore how cellular resources are utilized and how antiviral strategies might be designed to resist escape. Finally, we highlight challenges and opportunities at the frontiers of cell-level modeling of virus infections.

Translational regulation of rotavirus gene expression

Rotavirus mRNAs are transcribed from 11 genomic dsRNA segments within a subviral particle. The mRNAs are extruded into the cytoplasm where they serve as mRNA for protein synthesis and as templates for packaging and replication into dsRNA. The molecular steps in the replication pathway that regulate the levels of viral gene expression are not well defined. We have investigated potential mechanisms of regulation of rotavirus gene expression by functional evaluation of two differentially expressed viral mRNAs. NSP1 (gene 5) and VP6 (gene 6) are expressed early in infection, and VP6 is expressed in excess over NSP1. We formulated the hypothesis that the amounts of NSP1 and VP6 were regulated by the translational efficiencies of the respective mRNAs. We measured the levels of gene 5 and gene 6 mRNA and showed that they were not significantly different, and protein analysis indicated no difference in stability of NSP1 compared with VP6. Polyribosome analysis showed that the majority of gene 6 mRNA was present on large polysomes. In contrast, sedimentation of more than half of the gene 5 mRNA was subpolysomal. The change in distribution of gene 5 mRNA in polyribosome gradients in response to treatment with low concentrations of cycloheximide suggested that gene 5 is a poor translation initiation template compared with gene 6 mRNA. These data define a regulatory mechanism for the difference in amounts of VP6 and NSP1 and provide evidence for post-transcriptional control of rotavirus gene expression mediated by the translational efficiency of individual viral mRNAs.

The target of rapamycin (TOR) proteins

Rapamycin potently inhibits downstream signaling from the target of rapamycin (TOR) proteins. These evolutionarily conserved protein kinases coordinate the balance between protein synthesis and protein degradation in response to nutrient quality and quantity. The TOR proteins regulate (i) the initiation and elongation phases of translation, (ii) ribosome biosynthesis, (iii) amino acid import, (iv) the transcription of numerous enzymes involved in multiple metabolic pathways, and (v) autophagy. Intriguingly, recent studies have also suggested that TOR signaling plays a critical role in brain development, learning, and memory formation.

Translational repression of EF-1 alpha mRNA in vitro

In this report we show that when 10,000 x g supernatant extracts of growth arrested murine erythroleukemia (MEL) cells are incubated there is a rapid conversion of essentially all mRNAs to non-translating messenger ribonucleoprotein (RNP) particles. Most of these RNPs are readily translated in an initiation-dependent manner when added to a nuclease-treated rabbit reticulocyte lysate. A notable exception is the RNP containing eucaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha (EF-1 alpha) mRNA. The mRNA for poly(A)-binding protein behaved similarly to EF-1 alpha. Previous work has demonstrated that the translation of both these mRNAs are repressed in vivo when the growth of a number of different mammalian cells is arrested [Slobin L. I. and Jordan, P. (1984) Eur J. Biochem. 145, 1984; Thomas, G. and Thomas, G. (1986) J. Cell Biol. 103, 1986]. Translational activity of EF-1 alpha mRNA could be restored by treating RNP particles with 0.5 M KCl, provided that the RNPs were separated from salt wash by chromatography on oligo(dT)-cellulose. Addition of the salt wash to total MEL cell mRNA significantly and selectively inhibited EF-1 alpha mRNA translation, suggesting that a component of the salt wash acts as a trans-acting translational repressor of EF-1 alpha mRNA.

The stimulatory effect of actinomycin D on avian reovirus replication in L cells suggests that translational competition dictates the fate of the infection

Indirect immunostaining of avian reovirus S1133-infected L-cell monolayers showed that most of the cells can support viral replication. However, the number of cells in which the virus was actually replicating depended on the multiplicity of virus infection. The presence of actinomycin D during infection increased viral protein synthesis, viral growth, and the number of actively infected cells at late infection times. The antibiotic elicited these effects by triggering viral replication in cells that already contained unproductive cytoplasmic virus but that would not get productively infected in the absence of the drug. From these results, we propose a model for the interaction between L cells and avian reovirus S1133 in which viral versus host mRNA competition for the translational machinery determines the fate of the virus infection.

Regulation of protein synthesis at the elongation stage. New insights into the control of gene expression in eukaryotes

There are many reports which demonstrate that the rate of protein biosynthesis at the elongation stage is actively regulated in eukaryotic cells. Possible physiological roles for this type of regulation are: the coordination of translation of mRNA with different initiation rate constants; regulation of transition between different physiological states of a cell, such as transition between stages of the cell cycle; and in general, any situation where the maintenance of a particular physiological state is dependent on continuous protein synthesis. A number of covalent modifications of elongation factors offer potential mechanisms for such regulation. Among the various modifications of elongation factors, phosphorylation of eEF-2 by the specific Ca2+calmodulin-dependent eEF-2 kinase is the best studied and perhaps the most important mechanism of regulation of elongation rate. Since this phosphorylation is strictly Ca(2+)-dependent, and makes eEF-2 inactive in translation, this mechanism could explain how changes in the intracellular free Ca2+ concentration may regulate elongation rate. We also discuss some recent findings concerning elongation factors, such as the discovery of developmental stage-specific elongation factors and the regulated binding of eEF-1 alpha to cytoskeletal elements. Together, these observations underline the importance of the elongation stage of translation in the regulation of the cellular processes essential for normal cell life.

Biosynthesis of reovirus-specified polypeptides: effect of point mutation of the sequences flanking the 5'-proximal AUG initiator codons of the reovirus S1 and S4 genes on the efficiency of mRNA translation

The effect on translation of site-directed nucleotide substitutions around the 5'-proximal AUG initiation codon of the reovirus s1 mRNA specifying polypeptide sigma 1 and the reovirus s4 mRNA specifying polypeptide sigma 3 was examined. The efficiency of synthesis of the S1-encoded sigma 1 polypeptide and the S4-encoded sigma 3 polypeptide was analyzed in transfected simian COS cells. Mutant s1 mRNAs possessing either GCU AUG G or GCA AUG G sequences surrounding the 5'-proximal sigma 1 AUG were translated with an efficiency comparable to that of the wild-type s1 mRNA which possesses the flanking sequence CCU AUG G. Mutant s4 mRNAs possessing either CCU AUG G or CCA AUG G sequences surrounding the 5'-proximal sigma 3 AUG were translated with an efficiency comparable to that of wild-type s4 mRNA which possesses the flanking sequence GCA AUG G. The s4 mRNAs, both wild-type and mutant, were translated in vivo about five times more efficiently than the s1 mRNAs, both wild-type and mutant. These results suggest that nucleotide positions other than the -3, -2, -1, and +4 positions relative to the 5'-proximal initiator AUG, where the A is +1, play a dominant role in determining the efficiency of translation of these two reovirus mRNAs in vivo.

Regulation of the utilization of mRNA for eucaryotic elongation factor Tu in Friend erythroleukemia cells

When Friend erythroleukemia cells were allowed to grow to stationary phase (2 X 10(6) to 3 X 10(6) cells per ml), approximately 60% of the mRNA for eucaryotic elongation factor Tu (eEF-Tu) sedimented at less than or equal to 80S, and most of the remaining factor mRNA was associated with small polysomes. Under the same growth conditions, greater than 90% of the mRNA for eucaryotic initiation factor 4A remained associated with polysomes. The association of eEF-Tu mRNA with polysomes changed dramatically when stationary-phase cells were treated with fresh medium. After 1 h in fresh medium, approximately 90% of eEF-Tu mRNA in Friend cells was found in heavy polysomes. Associated with the shift of eEF-Tu mRNA into heavy polysomes, we found at least a 2.6-fold increase in the synthesis of eEF-Tu in vivo as well as a remarkable 40% decrease in the total amount of eEF-Tu mRNA per cell. Our data raise the possibility that eEF-Tu mRNA that has accumulated in ribonucleoprotein particles in stationary-phase cells is degraded rather than reutilized for eEF-Tu synthesis.

The function of proteins that interact with mRNA

Specific proteins are associated with mRNA in the cytoplasm of eukaryotic cells. The complement of associated proteins depends upon whether the mRNA is an integral component of the polysomal complex being translated, or, alternatively, whether it is part of the non-translated free mRNP fraction. By subjecting cells to ultraviolet irradiation in vivo to cross-link proteins to mRNA, mRNP proteins have been shown to be associated with specific regions of the mRNA molecule. Examination of mRNP complexes containing a unique mRNA has suggested that not all mRNA contain the same family of associated RNA binding proteins. The functions of mRNA associated proteins may include a role in providing stability for mRNA, and/or in modulating translation. With the recent demonstrations that both free and polysomal mRNPs are associated with the cytoskeletal framework, specific mRNP proteins may play a role in determining the subcellular localization of specific mRNPs.

Regulation of the utilization of mRNA for eucaryotic elongation factor Tu in Friend erythroleukemia cells

When Friend erythroleukemia cells were allowed to grow to stationary phase (2 X 10(6) to 3 X 10(6) cells per ml), approximately 60% of the mRNA for eucaryotic elongation factor Tu (eEF-Tu) sedimented at less than or equal to 80S, and most of the remaining factor mRNA was associated with small polysomes. Under the same growth conditions, greater than 90% of the mRNA for eucaryotic initiation factor 4A remained associated with polysomes. The association of eEF-Tu mRNA with polysomes changed dramatically when stationary-phase cells were treated with fresh medium. After 1 h in fresh medium, approximately 90% of eEF-Tu mRNA in Friend cells was found in heavy polysomes. Associated with the shift of eEF-Tu mRNA into heavy polysomes, we found at least a 2.6-fold increase in the synthesis of eEF-Tu in vivo as well as a remarkable 40% decrease in the total amount of eEF-Tu mRNA per cell. Our data raise the possibility that eEF-Tu mRNA that has accumulated in ribonucleoprotein particles in stationary-phase cells is degraded rather than reutilized for eEF-Tu synthesis.