Kinetics of the stages of transcription initiation at the Escherichia coli lac UV5 promoter

Transcription Initiation by Mix and Match Elements: Flexibility for Polymerase Binding to Bacterial Promoters

Bacterial RNA polymerase is composed of a core of subunits (β β′, α1, α2, ω), which have RNA synthesizing activity, and a specificity factor (σ), which identifies the start of transcription by recognizing and binding to sequence elements within promoter DNA. Four core promoter consensus sequences, the –10 element, the extended –10 (TGn) element, the –35 element, and the UP elements, have been known for many years; the importance of a nontemplate G at position -5 has been recognized more recently. However, the functions of these elements are not the same. The AT-rich UP elements, the –35 elements (–35TTGACA–30), and the extended –10 (15TGn–13) are recognized as double-stranded binding elements, whereas the –5 nontemplate G is recognized in the context of single-stranded DNA at the transcription bubble. Furthermore, the –10 element (–12TATAAT–7) is recognized as both double-stranded DNA for the T:A bp at position –12 and as nontemplate, single-stranded DNA from positions –11 to –7. The single-stranded sequences at positions –11 to –7 as well as the –5 contribute to later steps in transcription initiation that involve isomerization of polymerase and separation of the promoter DNA around the transcription start site. Recent work has demonstrated that the double-stranded elements may be used in various combinations to yield an effective promoter. Thus, while some minimal number of contacts is required for promoter function, polymerase allows the elements to be mixed and matched. Interestingly, which particular elements are used does not appear to fundamentally alter the transcription bubble generated in the stable complex. In this review, we discuss the multiple steps involved in forming a transcriptionally competent polymerase/promoter complex, and we examine what is known about polymerase recognition of core promoter elements. We suggest that considering promoter elements according to their involvement in early (polymerase binding) or later (polymerase isomerization) steps in transcription initiation rather than simply from their match to conventional promoter consensus sequences is a more instructive form of promoter classification.

Operator sequence alters gene expression independently of transcription factor occupancy in bacteria

A canonical quantitative view of transcriptional regulation holds that the only role of operator sequence is to set the probability of transcription factor binding, with operator occupancy determining the level of gene expression. In this work, we test this idea by characterizing repression in vivo and the binding of RNA polymerase in vitro in experiments where operators of various sequences were placed either upstream or downstream from the promoter in Escherichia coli. Surprisingly, we find that operators with a weaker binding affinity can yield higher repression levels than stronger operators. Repressor bound to upstream operators modulates promoter escape, and the magnitude of this modulation is not correlated with the repressor-operator binding affinity. This suggests that operator sequences may modulate transcription by altering the nature of the interaction of the bound transcription factor with the transcriptional machinery, implying a new layer of sequence dependence that must be confronted in the quantitative understanding of gene expression.

Mechanism of transcriptional repression at a bacterial promoter by analysis of single molecules

The molecular basis for regulation of lactose metabolism in Escherichia coli is well studied. Nonetheless, the physical mechanism by which the Lac repressor protein prevents transcription of the lactose promoter remains unresolved. Using multi-wavelength single-molecule fluorescence microscopy, we visualized individual complexes of fluorescently tagged RNA polymerase holoenzyme bound to promoter DNA. Quantitative analysis of the single-molecule observations, including use of a novel statistical partitioning approach, reveals highly kinetically stable binding of polymerase to two different sites on the DNA, only one of which leads to transcription. Addition of Lac repressor directly demonstrates that bound repressor prevents the formation of transcriptionally productive open promoter complexes; discrepancies in earlier studies may be attributable to transcriptionally inactive polymerase binding. The single-molecule statistical partitioning approach is broadly applicable to elucidating mechanisms of regulatory systems including those that are kinetically rather than thermodynamically controlled.

Thermodynamics of biological processes

There is a long and rich tradition of using ideas from both equilibrium thermodynamics and its microscopic partner theory of equilibrium statistical mechanics. In this chapter, we provide some background on the origins of the seemingly unreasonable effectiveness of ideas from both thermodynamics and statistical mechanics in biology. After making a description of these foundational issues, we turn to a series of case studies primarily focused on binding that are intended to illustrate the broad biological reach of equilibrium thinking in biology. These case studies include ligand-gated ion channels, thermodynamic models of transcription, and recent applications to the problem of bacterial chemotaxis. As part of the description of these case studies, we explore a number of different uses of the famed Monod-Wyman-Changeux (MWC) model as a generic tool for providing a mathematical characterization of two-state systems. These case studies should provide a template for tailoring equilibrium ideas to other problems of biological interest.

Comparison of promoter-specific events during transcription initiation in mycobacteria

DNA-protein interactions that occur during transcription initiation play an important role in regulating gene expression. To initiate transcription, RNA polymerase (RNAP) binds to promoters in a sequence-specific fashion. This is followed by a series of steps governed by the equilibrium binding and kinetic rate constants, which in turn determine the overall efficiency of the transcription process. We present here the first detailed kinetic analysis of promoter-RNAP interactions during transcription initiation in the sigma(A)-dependent promoters P(rrnAPCL1), P(rrnB) and P(gyr) of Mycobacterium smegmatis. The promoters show comparable equilibrium binding affinity but differ significantly in open complex formation, kinetics of isomerization and promoter clearance. Furthermore, the two rrn promoters exhibit varied kinetic properties during transcription initiation and appear to be subjected to different modes of regulation. In addition to distinct kinetic patterns, each one of the housekeeping promoters studied has its own rate-limiting step in the initiation pathway, indicating the differences in their regulation.

Mode of action of the Bordetella BvgA protein: transcriptional activation and repression of the Bordetella bronchiseptica bipA promoter

The Bordetella BvgAS signal transduction system controls the transition among at least three known phenotypic phases (Bvg+, Bvg(i), and Bvg-) and the expression of a number of genes which have distinct phase-specific expression profiles. This complex regulation of gene expression along the Bvg signaling continuum is best exemplified by the gene bipA, which is expressed at a low level in the Bvg+ phase, at a maximal level in the Bvg(i) phase, and at undetectable levels in the Bvg- phase. The bipA promoter has multiple BvgA binding sites which play distinct regulatory roles. We had previously speculated that the expression profile of bipA is a consequence of the differential occupancy of the various BvgA binding sites as a result of variation in the levels of phosphorylated BvgA (BvgA-P) inside the cell. In this report, we provide in vitro evidence for this model and show that bipA expression is activated at low concentrations of BvgA-P and is repressed at high concentrations. By using independent DNA binding assays, we demonstrate that under activating conditions there is a synergistic effect on the binding of BvgA and RNA polymerase (RNAP), leading to the formation of open complexes at the promoter. We further show that, under in vitro conditions, when bipA transcription is minimal, there is competition between the binding of RNAP and BvgA-P to the bipA promoter. Our results show that the BvgA binding site IR2 plays a central role in mediating this repression.

Operator design and mechanism for CarA repressor-mediated down-regulation of the photoinducible carB operon in Myxococcus xanthus

The carB operon encodes all except one of the enzymes involved in light-induced carotenogenesis in Myxococcus xanthus. Expression of its promoter (P(B)) is repressed in the dark by sequence-specific DNA binding of CarA to a palindrome (pI) located between positions -47 and -64 relative to the transcription start site. This promotes subsequent binding of CarA to additional sites that remain to be defined. CarS, produced in the light, interacts physically with CarA, abrogates CarA-DNA binding, and thereby derepresses P(B). In this study, we delineate the operator design that exists for CarA by precisely mapping out the second operator element. For this, we examined how stepwise deletions and site-directed mutagenesis in the region between the palindrome and the transcription start site affect CarA binding around P(B) in vitro and expression of P(B) in vivo. These revealed the second operator element to be an imperfect interrupted palindrome (pII) spanning positions -26 to -40. In vitro assays using purified M. xanthus RNA polymerase showed that CarA abolishes P(B)-RNA polymerase binding and runoff transcription and that both were restored by CarS, thus rationalizing the observations in vivo. CarA binding to pII (after association with pI) effectively occludes RNA polymerase from P(B) and so provides the operative mechanism for the repression of the carB operon by CarA. The bipartite operator design, whereby transcription is blocked by the low affinity CarA-pII binding and is readily restored by CarS, may have evolved to match the needs for a rapid and an effective response to light.

Changes in the 17 bp spacer in the P(R) promoter of bacteriophage lambda affect steps in open complex formation that precede DNA strand separation

Tau plots and temperature-shift experiments were used to determine which step in the formation of transcriptionally-competent open complexes is affected by changing the length of the 17 bp spacer separating the -10 and -35 consensus regions of the P(R) promoter of bacteriophage lambda. Abortive initiation assays at 37 degrees C indicate that the primary effect of insertion of a base-pair, thereby increasing spacer length to 18 bp, is a decrease in k(f), the rate constant for conversion from closed (RP(c)) to open (RP(o)) complexes, by approximately a factor of 4. The mutation did not significantly affect K(B), the equilibrium constant for formation of closed complexes, and decreased K(B)k(f) by a factor of 3. Deletion of a bp to create a 16 bp spacer had a much greater effect, decreasing the measured value of k(f) by a factor of about 25 to 30, and K(B)k(f) by a factor of 7 to 8. When the values of the parameters for the deletion mutant were corrected for incomplete occupancy of RP(o) at equilibrium, the effects of the deletion were even greater. In particular, the corrected value of K(B)k(f) was about 15 times lower than the corresponding value for two promoters with wild-type spacing. Based on temperature shift experiments, the changes in spacer length did not affect the equilibrium at 20 degrees C between RP(i), a stable intermediate in which DNA strands are not separated, and RP(o). Although differential sensitivity of single-stranded bases to KMnO(4) indicated that in about 20% of the open complexes at 20 degrees C the DNA strands are not fully separated (RP(o1)), the distribution between these complexes and RP(o2) (DNA strands fully separated) was also not affected significantly by changes in spacer length. Thus, changes in spacer length primarily affect k(2), the rate constant for conversion of RP(c) to RP(i), which corresponds to a nucleation of DNA strand-separation. Application of published data and/or algorithms for determining effects of nucleotide sequence on twist angle or rise at individual bp steps does not provide a simple explanation of the difference in promoter strength between P(R) derivatives with 16 bp spacing and those with 18 bp spacing.

A real-time fluorescence method to monitor the melting of duplex DNA during transcription initiation by RNA polymerase

The melting of duplex DNA in the vicinity of the transcription start site is an essential step of transcription initiation. Here we describe a fluorescent promoter technique which allows the melting of promoter DNA to be observed in a real-time manner with high sensitivity. We have constructed a 114-bp lacUV5 promoter fragment (-89 to +25) which contains a fluorescence probe in the region between the -10 consensus hexamer and the transcription start site. This region was chosen to incorporate a fluorescence probe as it undergoes strand separation subsequent to binding RNA polymerase (RNAP) (i.e., open complex formation). Upon mixing RNAP and fluorochrome-labeled promoter a time-dependent biphasic change in fluorescence was observed. The second slower component was shown to be due to the open complex by comparing the fluorescence data with the kinetics of open complex formation as measured by using alternative methods of open complex detection. The rate constants for open complex formation and dissociation were determined and found to be in excellent agreement with previously reported values. The techniques presented herein can generally be applied to other systems. Furthermore, this method will serve as an important research tool as well as it could be used in designing high-throughput assays involving transcription complexes.

Initiation of minus-strand RNA synthesis by the brome mosaicvirus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase: use of oligoribonucleotide primers

Various DNA- and RNA-dependent RNA polymerases have been reported to use oligoribonucleotide primers to initiate nucleic acid synthesis. For the brome mosaic virus RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp), we determined that in reactions performed with limited GTP concentrations, minus-strand RNA synthesis can be stimulated by the inclusion of guanosine monophosphate or specific oligoribonucleotides. Furthermore, guanylyl-3',5'-guanosine (GpG) was incorporated into minus-strand RNA and increased the rate of minus-strand RNA synthesis. In the presence of GpG, RdRp's Km for GTP decreased from 50 microM to approximately 3 microM while the Kms for other nucleotides were unaffected. These results have implications for the mechanism of initiation by RdRp.

Open complex formation by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase: the mechanism of polymerase-induced strand separation of double helical DNA

Escherichia coli RNA polymerase is able to site-specifically melt 12 bp of promoter DNA at temperatures far below those normally associated with DNA melting. Here we consider several models to explain how RNA polymerase destabilizes duplex DNA. One popular model proposes that upon binding to the promoter, RNA polymerase untwists the spacer DNA between the -10 and -35 regions, which results in a destabilization of the -10 region at a TA base step where melting initiates. Promoter untwisting may result, in part, from extensive wrapping of the DNA around RNA polymerase. Formation of the strand-separated open complex appears to be facilitated by specific protein-DNA interactions which occur predominantly on the non-template strand. Recent evidence suggests that these include important contacts with sigma factor region 2.3, which we propose binds the displaced single strand of DNA.

Transcriptional activation of the nitrogenase promoter in vitro: adenosine nucleotides are required for inhibition of NIFA activity by NIFL

The enhancer-binding protein NIFA is required for transcriptional activation of nif promoters by the alternative holoenzyme form of RNA polymerase, which contains the sigma factor sigma 54 (sigma N). NIFA hydrolyzes nucleoside triphosphates to catalyze the isomerization of closed promoter complexes to transcriptionally competent open complexes. The activity of NIFA is antagonized by the regulatory protein NIFL in response to oxygen and fixed nitrogen in vivo. We have investigated the requirement for nucleotides in the formation and stability of open promoter complexes by NIFA and inhibition of its activity by NIFL at the Klebsiella pneumoniae nifH promoter. Open complexes formed by sigma 54-containing RNA polymerase are considerably more stable to heparin challenge in the presence of GTP than in the presence of ATP. This differential stability is most probably a consequence of GTP being the initiating nucleotide at this promoter. Adenosine nucleosides are specifically required for Azotobacter vinelandii NIFL to inhibit open complex formation by native NIFA, and the nucleoside triphosphatase activity of NIFA is strongly inhibited by NIFL under these conditions. We propose a model in which NIFL modulates the activity of NIFA via an adenosine nucleotide switch.

Mechanism of initiation of transcription by Bacillus subtilis RNA polymerase at several promoters

The behavior of the major vegetative cell RNA polymerase of Bacillus subtilis, E sigma A, during initiation of transcription was compared to that of its Escherichia coli counterpart, E sigma 70, at several promoters known to be actively transcribed by both RNA polymerases. Challenge experiments using heparin, restriction endonucleases, and competing promoter DNA under various conditions showed that, at several promoters, complexes with B. subtilis RNA polymerase formed in the absence of nucleoside triphosphates were unstable. These complexes produced DNase I footprints that were less extended than those produced by the E. coli enzyme at the same promoters. Further, in the presence of certain combinations of nucleoside triphosphates, conditions that allow production of abortive oligonucleotides, these B. subtilis RNA polymerase complexes remained dissociable. Thus, at these promoters, the B. subtilis enzyme interacted with the DNA and reached a catalytically active initial transcribing complex without becoming committed to the template. At these same promoters, E. coli RNA polymerase formed stable open complexes before forming any phosphodiester bonds. B. subtilis initial transcribing complexes also remained sensitive to the drug rifampicin until a later stage in the initiation process than did the corresponding E. coli complexes. At one promoter, B. subtilis E sigma A and E. coli E sigma 70 behaved similarly, forming stable open complexes in the absence of any nucleoside triphosphates.

lac repressor acts by modifying the initial transcribing complex so that it cannot leave the promoter

RNA polymerase engaged in the joint complex with the lac repressor at the lac UV5 promoter cannot escape into elongation but generates abortive RNA oligomers. The joint complex actively transcribes a few initial base pairs in a reaction unusually sensitive to a decrease in the substrate concentration. The joint complex, however, fails to traverse a point in the initial transcribed sequence that normally requires a high concentration of the elongating substrate. Thus, the repressor acts by augmenting a natural high "kNTP" site (pause site) embedded in the promoter. A lethal RNA polymerase mutation that mimics the effect of the repressor leads to an analogous block of promoter clearance and shortened abortive product pattern on several promoters, reflecting the widespread occurrence of high kNTP sites in promoters.

How Escherichia coli RNA polymerase can negatively regulate transcription from a constitutive promoter

We previously described the structures and functions of specific complexes between the bla promoter from Tn3 (present in pBR322) and RNA polymerase (RNAP), showing that, at excess RNAP, complexes can form in which one or two RNAPs bind to the same promoter (1:1 and 2:1 complexes) (Duval-Valentin and Ehrlich, 1988). We report here that the 2:1 complex cannot be detected below 25 degrees C; above that temperature, a 1:1 complex forms at a rate one order of magnitude faster than that of the 2:1 complex, and above 30 degrees C, the amounts of both species become equal for RNAP/promoter ratio r30 less than or equal to r less than or equal to 70. The 2:1 complex decays back to a 1:1 complex losing the last RNAP at a rate about three times that of the 1:1 complex decay. Functional assays of the complexes formed at excess RNAP show that both 1:1 and 2:1 complexes are immediately and permanently inhibited, even when the promoters are pre-incubated with ribonucleotide selections potentially enabling entrance into abortive cycling or formation of a stressed complex. We conclude that the inhibition step probably takes place in the complex formation pathway between RPi and RPo, at a novel stable intermediate isomer, RPj, formed above 25 degrees C. A possible mechanism of formation of the 2:1 complex is outlined. In vivo studies, in which r was modified by varying the bacterial growth rate, show a reduction of bla expression as r values are upshifted, specific to the bla promoter from Tn3.

Synergy between Escherichia coli CAP protein and RNA polymerase in the lac promoter open complex

Characterization of ternary complexes containing an Escherichia coli lac promoter DNA fragment, CAP protein and RNA polymerase, separated on non-denaturing polyacrylamide gels and footprinted in the gel slice, reveals a striking stabilization of CAP against dissociation in the open complex, compared to the CAP-DNA complex lacking RNA polymerase. The stabilization is lost when half a helical turn of DNA is inserted between CAP and polymerase sites, but is partially restored with an 11 base-pair insert; stimulation of transcription parallels the stabilization effect. This behavior suggests a direct protein-protein interaction. Comparison of initiation kinetics for wild-type and a mutant in which the P2 promoter has been inactivated shows that CAP both strengthens binding in the closed complex and accelerates isomerization to the open complex; the latter effect accounts for the bulk of the observed transcriptional activation.

The MerR heavy metal receptor mediates positive activation in a topologically novel transcription complex

Several physical and chemical signals from the extracellular environment are known to be transduced into changes in gene expression through multiple step pathways; however, mechanisms for triggering cellular responses to heavy metal stress have yet to be elucidated. We demonstrate here one such mechanism that employs a single heavy metal receptor protein, MerR, to directly activate transcription of the bacterial mercuric ion resistance operon. The mercuric ion-MerR complex and E. coli RNA polymerase holoenzyme synergistically bind to the metal responsive promoter in an unprecedented spatial relationship to form transcriptionally competent complexes. The activator binds adjacent to and overlaps with the polymerase molecule between the consensus -35 and -10 promoter regions. Our results support a model for transcriptional activation that includes both effector-induced protein-protein interactions and activator-induced alteration in DNA structure.

Spectroscopic analysis of DNA base-pair opening by Escherichia coli RNA polymerase. Temperature and ionic strength effects

The interaction of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase with poly[d(A-T)] and poly[d-(I-C)] was studied by difference absorption spectroscopy at temperatures, from 5 to 45 degrees C in the absence and presence of Mg2+. The effect of KCl concentration, at a fixed temperature, was studied from 12.5 to 400 mM. Difference absorption experiments permitted calculation of the extent of DNA opening induced by RNA polymerase and estimation of the equilibrium constant associated with the isomerization from a closed to an open RNA polymerase-DNA complex. delta H0 and delta S0 for the closed-to-open transition with poly[d(A-T)] or poly[d(I-C)] complexed with RNA polymerase are significantly lower than the values associated with the helix-to-coil transition for the free polynucleotides. For the RNA polymerase complexes with poly[d(A-T)] and poly[d(I-C)] in 50 mM KCl, delta H0 approximately 15-16 kcal/mol (63-67 kJ/mol) and delta S0 approximately 50-57 cal/K per mol (209-239 J/K per mol). The presence of Mg2+ does not change these parameters appreciably for the RNA polymerase-poly[d(A-T)] complex, but for the RNA polymerase-poly[d(I-C)] complex in the presence of Mg2+, the delta H0 and delta S0 values are larger and temperature-dependent, with delta H0 approximately 22 kcal/mol (92 kJ/mol) and delta S0 approximately 72 cal/K per mol (approx. 300 J/K per mol) at 25 degrees C, and delta Cp0 approximately 2 kcal/K per mol (approx. 8.3 kJ/K per mol). The circular dichroism (CD) changes observed for helix opening induced by RNA polymerase are qualitatively consistent with the thermally induced changes observed for the free polynucleotides, supporting the difference absorption method. The salt-dependent studies indicate that two monovalent cations are released upon helix opening. For poly[d(A-T)], the temperature-dependence of enzyme activity correlates well with the helix opening, implying this step to be the rate-determining step. In the case of poly[d(I-C)], the same is not true, and so the rate-determining step must be a process subsequent to helix opening.

Lac repressor is a transient gene-activating protein

We show, using a combination of methods, that contrary to the usual view, lac repressor increases, by more than 100-fold, the initial binding of RNA polymerase to E. coli lac UV5 promoter DNA. Kinetic studies revealed that the repressor acts to block the isomerization step in transcription initiation. When IPTG, a gratuitous inducer, is added, formation of open complex and productive transcription proceed. Because of the large increases in the binding constant, at low polymerase concentrations the presence of lac repressor (and then inducer) actually increases the rate of the first round of productive transcription, thus allowing the system to respond rapidly to the release of repression. This dual role of stabilization of a pretranscriptional complex coupled with blockage of transcription initiation may be a more general model for genetic regulation than that provided by the concept of simple repression.