Studies on interaction between histone V (f2c) and deoxyribonucleic acids

Sequence preference of mouse H1(0) and H1t

Histone H1 proteins bind to DNA and are important in formation and maintenance of chromatin structure. Little is known about differences among variant H1 histones in their interactions with DNA. We examined the effects of histones H1(0) and H1t on thermal denaturation of several DNA species. One of the DNA molecules was a 214-base-pair fragment from the plasmid pBR322, which contains an AT-rich and a GC-rich region. Both H1(0) and H1t bound preferentially to one region of the DNA fragment, a region that is relatively GC-rich. This result indicates that histones H1(0) and H1t are not totally nonspecific but rather bind with some sequence preference to DNA. This conclusion was supported by studies of other DNA species, including two 92-base-pair fragments derived from the two regions of the 214-mer, and several synthetic homocopolymers of DNA. Data obtained with the homocopolymers suggested that the binding preference was not simple preference for GC base pairs. The binding of the two H1 variants was not identical: there appear to be differences in binding site sizes, affinities, and sequence selectivities between H1t and H1(0).

Selective binding of synthetic polypeptides to DNA of varying composition and sequence: effect of minor groove binding drugs

Repetitive basic polypeptides containing lysine or arginine as every third amino acid were shown to cause DNA condensation at physiological salt concentration connected with selective DNA binding with respect to DNA composition and sequence. This selectivity is very similar to that existing in the case of histone H1 and other basic proteins and does not depend on polypeptide chain conformation. The effect of the minor groove binding drugs netropsin and distamycin was tested to elucidate the origin of the binding selectivity. The results suggest that the binding preferences are due to the variations in the conformation in various types of B-DNA that depend on DNA composition and sequence. The most important factor affecting the selectivity is probably the value of the negative electrostatic potential in the minor groove.

Preferential binding of H1e histone to GC-rich DNA

We have investigated the binding of a pure H1 histone, the mouse variant H1e, to a 214 bp fragment of DNA from pBR322. Binding was monitored by observing the effects of the protein on melting of the DNA and by a gel-mobility-shift assay. We found, using this highly purified system, that H1e protein binds preferentially and cooperatively to the GC-rich region of the DNA. A chemically synthesized peptide containing 25 residues, corresponding to a region of the carboxyl-terminal domain of H1e, shows the same sequence preference but does not exhibit cooperativity.

Histone H1-DNA interactions and their relation to chromatin structure and function

The belief that histone H1 interacts primarily with DNA in chromatin and much less with the protein component has led to numerous studies of artificial H1-DNA complexes. This review summarizes and discusses the data on different aspects of the interaction between the linker histone and naked DNA, including cooperativity of binding, preference for supercoiled DNA, selectivity with respect to base composition and nucleotide sequence, and effect of H1 binding on the conformation of the underlying DNA. The nature of the interaction, the structure of the complexes, and the role histone H1 exerts in chromatin are also discussed.

Differences in the binding of H1 variants to DNA. Cooperativity and linker-length related distribution

A study of the complexes formed between short linear DNA and three H1 variants, a typical somatic H1, and the extreme variants H5, from chicken erythrocytes, and spH1 from sea urchin sperm, has revealed differences between H1, H5 and spH1 that have implications for chromatin structure and folding. 1. All three histones bind cooperatively to DNA in 35 mM NaCl forming similar, but not identical, rod-like complexes. With sufficiently long DNA the complexes may be circular, circles forming more easily with H5 and spH1 than with H1. 2. The binding of H5 and spH1 to DNA is cooperative even in 5 mM NaCl, resulting in well-defined thin filaments that appear to contain two DNA molecules bridged by histone molecules. In contrast, H1 binds distributively over all the DNA molecules in 5 mM NaCl, but forms short stretches similar in appearance to the thin filaments formed with H5 and spH1. Rods appear to arise from the intertwining of regular thin filaments containing cooperatively bound histone molecules on raising the NaCl concentration to 35 mM. 3. The compositions of the rods correspond to one histone molecule for about every 47 bp (H1), 81 bp (H5) and 112 bp (spH1), suggesting average spacings of 24 bp (H1), 41 bp (H5) and 56 bp (spH1) in the component thin (double) filaments. Strikingly, these values are proportional to the linker lengths of the chromatins in which the particular H1 variant is the main or sole H1.

Recognition of base pairs by polar peptides in double stranded DNA

The resonance Raman spectrum of native DNA has been obtained using excitation at 257 nm. In a first part, the spectral lines are assigned to the different nucleotide bases which provide the resonance effect. In a second part, the interactions of DNA with basic peptides (Arginine Methylester, Lysine Methylester, Arginyl-Arginine) are investigated using excitation at 300 nm and 257 nm, which give complementary information about the DNA. Both Arginine Methylester and Arginyl-arginine recognize the A-T base pairs, the first one in the large groove, the second one in the narrow groove of DNA. The DNA-Lysine Methylester interaction is very likely not specific but can take place in the large groove of DNA.

Sequence sensitivity of histone binding

The nucleotide sequence selectivity of histone binding has been measured by thermal denaturation of reconstituted nucleoproteins. When DNAs of different average base compositions competed for the binding of purified histone fractions during in vitro reconstitutions in the presence of salt and urea, a decreasing (A + T)-binding preference was observed following the order H1 greater than H2B greater than H5 greater than H2A greater than [H2A + H2B] greater than [H2A + H2B + H3 + H4], [H1 + (H2A + H2B + H3 + H4)2]. Nucleoprotein complexes formed under conditions shown to yield more physiologically comparable nucleosome structures revealed a minimal (A + T)-binding preference. These results suggest that homotypic and heterotypic histone interactions decreased the nucleotide sequence selectivity of nucleosome binding.

Interaction between lysine-rich histones and DNA

Using a membrane filter retention technique we have studied the interaction between DNA and lysine rich histone H5 in vitro. It is found that, depending on the ionic conditions, H5 can bind DNA in a random or cooperative manner and exhibits a preference to DNA with high molecular weight and/or high A + T content, as also observed with H1. The presence of 6 M urea in the assay mixture does not impair the selectivity of H5 to A + T rich DNA but partly affects its selectivity to DNA size. In contrast to H1, H5 does not discriminate between the superhelical and relaxed forms of circular SV40 DNA.

Denaturation of mouse satellite DNA upon melting of chromatin in solution

The denaturation of mouse satellite DNA upon melting of chromatin in solution of low ionic strength has been studied. A procedure for preparation of partially denaturated chromatin was developed which enabled the isolation of double-stranded (non-denatured) DNA sequences according to their thermal stability in chromatin. The content of mouse satellite DNA in these DNA sequences was determined by hybridization with RNA, complementary to satellite DNA in order to find the temperature interval of denaturation of satellite DNA. It was found that the melting temperature of satellite DNA in chromatin was lower than that of the total DNA. The results are discussed in relation to previously reported anomalous behaviour of satellite DNA upon melting of chromatin on hydroxyapatite.

Protein dissociation from DNA in model systems and chromatin

Salt induced dissociation of protamine, poly(L-lysine) and poly(L-arginine) from DNA was measured by relative light scattering at theta = 90 degrees and/or centrifugation. Dissociation of histones from DNA was studied using relative light scattering and intrinsic tyrosine fluorescence. Protamine was dissociated from DNA at 0.15 M MgCl2 (ionic strength mu = 0.45) or 0.53 M NaCl (mu = 0.53) based on light scattering data and at approximately 0.2 M MgCl2 (mu = 0.6) or 0.6 M NaCl based on centrifugation data. NaCl induced dissociation of poly(Lys) or poly(Arg) from natural DNAs measured by light scattering did not depend on the guanine plus cytosine content. To dissociate poly(Arg) from DNA higher ionic strength using NaCl, MgCl2, or CaCl2, similar ionic strength using NaClo4, and lower ionic strength using Na2SO4 was needed then to dissociated poly(Lys). Both the decrease in light scattering and the enhancement of tyrosine fluorescence of chromatin occurred between 0.5 and 1.5 M NaCl when histones were dissociated.

Existence of differences in repressor properties between serine-rich histones (H5, F2c) from immature and mature pigeon erythroid cells

The abilities of H1 and H5 histones from immature and mature pigeon erythroid cells and subfractions of H5 histones with different content of alkali-labile phosphorus to restrict RNA synthesis were compared in an in vitro transcription system with bacterial RNA polymerase. It has been found that: a) H1 histones from both sources exhibit similar efficiency. b) H5 histones from immature cells restrict transcription to a lesser extent than the same histone from the mature erythrocyte. c) The subfraction of H5 histone from immature cells with the higher content of alkali-labile phosphorus restrict transcription less than the subfraction with the lower degree of phosphorylation. The results suggest that H5 histone, which first appears in the erythroblasts in a highly phosphorylated form, does not display its potential 'repressor' properties. During erythrocyte maturation H5 histone is dephosphorylated and this causes the massive inactivation of erythrocyte genome.

Immunofluorescent study of histone H5 in chick erythroid cells from developing embryos and adults

Indirect immunofluorescence has been used to detect the presence of histone H5 in single cells during avian erythropoiesis. Evidence is presented which demonstrates that this method specifically detects histone H5. The results show that the increase in the amount of H5 which can be extracted from nuclei during erythropoiesis is accounted for both by an increase in the amount of H5 per cell and by an increase in the total number of cells containing histone H5. Of particular interest are the observations that histone H5 is arranged within the nucleus in several distinct, reproducible patterns and that different patterns predominate at different stages of erythroid cell development. In addition to suggesting new possibilities for the role of histone H5, these findings indicate that immunofluorescence may be used profitably to explore the supramolecular organization of chromatin.

Histone H5 in nucleated erythrocytes of fish as determined by radioimmunoassay

Tissue-specific histone H5 in the nucleated erythrocytes of dogfish, scup, skate, tautog, sea robin and toad fish was studied. The presence of this histone was inferred by its electrophoretic mocility on polyacrylamide gels containing either acid-urea or sodium dodecyl sulfate. By radioimmunoprecipitation assays, cross reaction was observed between fish histones and an anti-H5chicken antibody. The antibody was specific to chicken histone H5; purified chicken histone H1 and calf thymus total histones did not cross react. It is concluded that fish histone H5 shares common antigenic determinants with the chicken H5 histone.

Denaturation of mouse satellite and ribosomal DNA during hydroxyapatite thermal chromatography of chromatin

Mouse DNA and chromatin were melted on hydroxyapatite and the denaturation profiles of ribosomal and satellite DNAs were followed by hybridization with their complementary RNAs. Neither ribosomal nor bulk DNA had significantly different melting profiles in chromatin as compared to DNA. However, most of satellite DNA eluted at higher temperature from chromatin than from purified DNA. One explaination for the higher melting temperature of mouse satellite DNA in chromatin suggests that the complex between this particular DNA component and at least some proteins in chromatin is more stable than the average DNA-protein interaction.

Interactions between arginine-rich histones and deoxyribonucleic acids. I. Thermal denaturation

Physical properties of histone-DNA complexes very often depend upon the method of complex formation. In an attempt to make the studies of histone-DNA interactions more relevant to biological systems, results from thermal denaturation of native chromatin were used as references for determining how closely a given histone-DNA complex approaches its native state in chromatin. In the case of arginine-rich histones H3 (III or f3) and H4 (IV or f2a1), four methods were used for making complexes with calf thymus DNA: (A) NaCl gradient dialysis with urea; (B) NaCl gradient dialysis without urea; (C) direct mixing in 2.5 x 10(-4) EDTA, pH 8.0; and (D) direct mixing in 0.01 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.0. It was observed that a complex made by direct mixing in phosphate (method D) is closer to the native than is one made by direct mixing in EDTA (method C) than the one made by gradient dialysis with urea (method A) or without urea (method B). Regardless of the method used for complex formation, no substantial differences were observed between complexes with histone H3 dimer with disulfide bond(s) and a reduced H3 without disulfide bond, implying that perhaps a dimer with or without disulfide bond is a natural fundamental subunit in our experimental conditions. When the method of direct mixing in EDTA is used, the melting properties of the complexes vary only slightly with any one of the following H3 histones: from calf thymus, H3 without disulfide bond, H3 dimer, and H3 oligomer with disulfide bonds, also, from duck erythrocyte, H3 monomer and dimer. The complexes formed between DNA and a mixture of H3 and H4 by method D have melting properties similar to those of native chromatin. Since an equimolar mixture of histone H3 and H4 in 0.01 M phosphate, pH 7.0, was shown to form a tetramer (D'Anna, J.A., and Isenberg, I. (1974), Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 61, 343), our results suggest that, a tetramer of H3 and H4, likely to be (H3)2(H4)2, formed from one H3 dimer and one H4 dimer, can bind DNA in a manner similar to that in native chromatin.

Interactions between arginine-rich histones and deoxyribonucleic acids. II. Circular dichroism

Circular dichroism (CD) was used to investigate the conformations of arginine-rich histones, H3 (III or f3) and H4 (IV or f2a1), and DNA in the complexes prepared by four different methods: (A) NaCl gradient dialysis with urea; (B) NaCl gradient dialysis without urea; (C) direct mixing in 2.5 x 10(-4) M EDTA, pH 8.0; and (D) direct mixing in 0.01 M sodium phosphate, pH 7.0. Using the CD spectrum of native chromatin as a criterion to judge the closeness of a complex to its native state, it was observed that a complex made by direct mixing at low ionic strength (methods C and D) is better than the ones made by NaCl gradient dialysis with or without urea (methods A and B). It is explained as a result of lack of ordered secondary structures in histones due to the presence of urea in method A or due to nonspecific aggregation in NaCl without urea (method B). Compared with all the earlier reports in literature on the CD of histone-DNA complexes, the CD spectra of arginine-rich histone-DNA complexes prepared by methods C and D are closest to that of native chromatin both in shape and in amplitude. These results imply (a) that arginine-rich histones play an important role in maintaining the conformation of chromatin and (b) that the binding of these two histones to DNA prepared by methods C and D are close to that in native chromatin. Noticeable variation in conformation of free and bound histone and histone-bound DNA has also been observed in histone H3 with one or two cysteine residues, and in reduced or oxidized state even when the complexes were prepared and examined in the same condition. CD spectra of arginine-rich histones in 0.01 M phosphates, pH 7.0, indicate the presence of alpha-helix which could be responsible for a favorable binding of the less basic regions of these histones to DNA under this condition as demonstrated by thermal denaturation (Yu, S. .S, Li H. J., and Shih, T. Y. (1976), Bio-chemistry, the preceding paper in this issue). To preserve or generate alpha-helical structures in histones seems to be a critical step in reconstituting good histone-DNA complexes.

A contribution of nonhistone proteins to the conformation of chromatin

1. Changes in circular dichroism (CD) spectra and thermal melting profiles of guinea pigliver DNA reassociated with histones and/or nonhistone proteins from the cerebral of liver chromatin are described. 2. In the DNA-histone complex, positive ellipiticity in the CD spectrum at 260-300 nm is progressively lod by a red-shift of the crossover point at around 260 nm. DNA in this complex is thermally stabilised to a considerable extent, but not to such a full extent as is shown with DNA in native chromatin. 3. DNA-nonhistone complex in 0.14 M NaCl is, in contrast to DNA-histone complex, not precipitable by centrifugation at 20 000 X g. DNA in this complex shows only a slight reduction in ellipticity at 260-300 nm, and a very weak thermal stabilisation. 4. Characteristics in the CD spectrum of the native chromatin are most satisfactorily reproduced in the DNA-histone-nonhistone complex. These include a large decrease in ellipticity at 260-300 nm, a red-shift of the crossover point at around 260 nm, and a slight negative band at around 305 nm. Also, DNA in this complex is thermally stabilised to the extent comparable with DNA in the native chromatin. 5. Addition of nonhistone proteins to the preformed DNA-histone complex in 3 M urea renders a half of the complex, named DNA-histone(-nonhistone), unprecipitable upon centrifugation at 20 000 X g in 0.14 M NaCl. CD spectrum and thermal melting profile of the precipitable DNA-histone(-nonhistone) complex are similar to those of the DNA-histone-nonhistone complex, while in the unprecipitable DNA-histone(-nonhistone) comples, the ellipticity at 260-300 nm is significantly elevated and the highest melting transition (at 80 degrees C) is lacking. 6. The CD spectrum of native cerebral chromatin closely resembles that of unprecipitable DNA-histone(-nonhistone) complex, while in liver chromatin, the spec.trum is an intermediate between those of the unprecipitable and pn of chromatin by nonhistone proteins. Cerebral nonhistone proteins bind to DNA and to the DNA-histone complex more extensively than liver nonhistone proteins. 7. It is concluded that, although the basic conformation of DNA in native chromatin is determined largely by histones, nonhistone proteins also play an individual role. There is also an indication that nonhistone proteins exert an organ-specific modification of chromatin superstructure.

A model for chromatin structure

A model for chromatin structure is presented. (a) Each of four histone species, H2A (IIbl or f2a2), H2B (IIb2 or f2b), H3 (III or f3) and H4 (IV or f2al) can form a parallel dimer. (b) These dimers can form two tetramers, (H2A)2(H2b)2 and (H3)2(H4)2. (C) These two tetramers bind a segment of DNA and condense it into a "C" segments. (d) The adjacent segments, termed extended or "E" segments, are bound by histone H1 (I or fl) for the major fraction of chromatin; the other "E" regions can be either bound by non-histone proteins or free of protein binding. (e) The binding of histones causes a structural distortion of the DNA which, depending upon the external conditions, may generate the formation of either an open structure with a heterogeneous and non-uniform supercoil or a compact structure with a string of beads. The model is supported by experimental data on histone-histone interaction, histone-DNA interaction and histone subunit-DNA interaction.