Roles of specific extracellular domains of the glucagon receptor in ligand binding and signaling

Molecular and in vivo phenotyping of missense variants of the human glucagon receptor

Naturally occurring missense variants of G protein–coupled receptors with loss of function have been linked to metabolic disease in case studies and in animal experiments. The glucagon receptor, one such G protein–coupled receptor, is involved in maintaining blood glucose and amino acid homeostasis; however, loss-of-function mutations of this receptor have not been systematically characterized. Here, we observed fewer glucagon receptor missense variants than expected, as well as lower allele diversity and fewer variants with trait associations as compared with other class B1 receptors. We performed molecular pharmacological phenotyping of 38 missense variants located in the receptor extracellular domain, at the glucagon interface, or with previously suggested clinical implications. These variants were characterized in terms of cAMP accumulation to assess glucagon-induced Gα_s coupling, and of recruitment of β-arrestin-1/2. Fifteen variants were impaired in at least one of these downstream functions, with six variants affected in both cAMP accumulation and β-arrestin-1/2 recruitment. For the eight variants with decreased Gα_s signaling (D63^ECDN, P86^ECDS, V96^ECDE, G125^ECDC, R225^3.30H, R308^5.40W, V368^6.59M, and R378^7.35C) binding experiments revealed preserved glucagon affinity, although with significantly reduced binding capacity. Finally, using the UK Biobank, we found that variants with wildtype-like Gα_s signaling did not associate with metabolic phenotypes, whereas carriers of cAMP accumulation-impairing variants displayed a tendency toward increased risk of obesity and increased body mass and blood pressure. These observations are in line with the essential role of the glucagon system in metabolism and support that Gα_s is the main signaling pathway effecting the physiological roles of the glucagon receptor.

Structure of the glucagon receptor in complex with a glucagon analogue

Class B G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which consist of an extracellular domain (ECD) and a transmembrane domain (TMD), respond to secretin peptides to play a key part in hormonal homeostasis, and are important therapeutic targets for a variety of diseases. Previous work has suggested that peptide ligands bind to class B GPCRs according to a two-domain binding model, in which the C-terminal region of the peptide targets the ECD and the N-terminal region of the peptide binds to the TMD binding pocket. Recently, three structures of class B GPCRs in complex with peptide ligands have been solved. These structures provide essential insights into peptide ligand recognition by class B GPCRs. However, owing to resolution limitations, the specific molecular interactions for peptide binding to class B GPCRs remain ambiguous. Moreover, these previously solved structures have different ECD conformations relative to the TMD, which introduces questions regarding inter-domain conformational flexibility and the changes required for receptor activation. Here we report the 3.0 Å-resolution crystal structure of the full-length human glucagon receptor (GCGR) in complex with a glucagon analogue and partial agonist, NNC1702. This structure provides molecular details of the interactions between GCGR and the peptide ligand. It reveals a marked change in the relative orientation between the ECD and TMD of GCGR compared to the previously solved structure of the inactive GCGR-NNC0640-mAb1 complex. Notably, the stalk region and the first extracellular loop undergo major conformational changes in secondary structure during peptide binding, forming key interactions with the peptide. We further propose a dual-binding-site trigger model for GCGR activation-which requires conformational changes of the stalk, first extracellular loop and TMD-that extends our understanding of the previously established two-domain peptide-binding model of class B GPCRs.

Structure of the full-length glucagon class B G-protein-coupled receptor

The human glucagon receptor, GCGR, belongs to the class B G-protein-coupled receptor family and plays a key role in glucose homeostasis and the pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. Here we report the 3.0 Å crystal structure of full-length GCGR containing both the extracellular domain and transmembrane domain in an inactive conformation. The two domains are connected by a 12-residue segment termed the stalk, which adopts a β-strand conformation, instead of forming an α-helix as observed in the previously solved structure of the GCGR transmembrane domain. The first extracellular loop exhibits a β-hairpin conformation and interacts with the stalk to form a compact β-sheet structure. Hydrogen-deuterium exchange, disulfide crosslinking and molecular dynamics studies suggest that the stalk and the first extracellular loop have critical roles in modulating peptide ligand binding and receptor activation. These insights into the full-length GCGR structure deepen our understanding of the signalling mechanisms of class B G-protein-coupled receptors.

Activation and conformational dynamics of a class B G-protein-coupled glucagon receptor

The human glucagon receptor (GCGR) is a class B G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). The GCGR can be activated by glucagon and regulates the release of glucose. The GCGR has been proposed to be an important drug target for type 2 diabetes. Based on the structural model of a full-length glucagon-bound GCGR (glu-GCGR), we performed accelerated molecular dynamics (aMD) simulations, potential of mean force (PMF) calculations, cross-correlation analysis and community network analysis to study the activation mechanism and the conformational dynamics during the activation process. The PMF map depicts three different conformational states of the GCGR: the inactive, intermediate and active states. The activation of the GCGR is characterized by the outward movement of the intracellular side of helix VI. In the active state of the GCGR, the Arg173(2.46)-Ser350(6.41) and Glu245(3.50)-Thr351(6.42) hydrogen bonds break, and the χ1 rotamer of Phe322(5.54) changes from perpendicular to parallel to helix VI. The binding of the agonist glucagon decreases the correlated motions of the extracellular loops (ELCs) and the helices around the glucagon-binding site. During the activation of the GCGR, the connections between the intracellular sides of helices become weaker, and the connections between glucagon and ECLs and the extracellular sides of helices become stronger. These facilitate G-protein coupling on the intracellular side and glucagon binding on the extracellular side, and stabilize the GCGR in the active state. We expect that this study can provide useful information on the activation mechanism of the GCGR and facilitate the future design of GCGR inhibitors.

7TM Domain Structure of Adhesion GPCRs

Schematic presentation of the overall adhesion G Protein-Coupled Receptor (aGPCR) structure and functional domains, covering an extracellular N-terminal fragment (NTF), a membrane-spanning C-terminal fragment (CTF) and a GPCR proteolysis site (GPS). (Left side) aGPCR model constructed based on the seven-transmembrane (7TM) structure (blue) of secretin family glucagon receptor (GCGR) (PDB, 4L6R) [11] and the GPCR autoproteolysis inducing (GAIN) domain (magenta) structure of latrophilin 1 (PDB, 4DLQ) [9]. The β-13 strand residues are depicted in green. (Right side) The experimentally validated full-length secretin family GCGR structure combining structural and experimental information from the GCGR 7TM crystal structure (PDB, 4L6R) (blue), the GCGR extracellular domain (ECD) structure (PDB, 4ERS) (magenta) and the ECD structure of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1)-bound glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1R) (PDB, 3IOL) (green), complemented by site-directed mutagenesis, electron microscopy (EM), hydrogen-deuterium exchange (HDX) and cross-linking studies [11-13]) Despite the recent breakthroughs in the elucidation of the three-dimensional structures of the seven transmembrane (7TM) domain of the G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) superfamily, a corresponding structure of a member of the adhesion GPCR (aGPCR) family has not yet been solved. In this chapter, we give an overview of the current knowledge of the 7TM domain of aGPCRs by comparative structure-based sequence similarity analyses between aGPCRs and GPCRs with known crystal structure. Of the GPCR superfamily, only the secretin family shares some sequence similarity with aGPCRs. This chapter will therefore emphasize on the comparison of these two GPCR families. Two 7TM domain structures of secretin family GPCRs are known that provide insight into the structure-function relationships of conserved sequence motifs that play important roles and are also present in most aGPCRs. This suggests that the 7TM domains of aGPCRs and secretin family GPCRs share a similar structural fold and that the conserved residues in both families may be involved in similar intermolecular interaction networks and facilitate similar conformational changes. Comparison of the residues that line the large peptide hormone binding pocket in the 7TM domain of secretin family GPCRs with corresponding residues in aGPCRs indicates that in the latter, the corresponding pocket in the 7TM domain is relatively hydrophobic and may be even larger. Improved knowledge on these conserved sequence motifs will help to understand the interactions of the aGPCR 7TM domain with ligands and gain insight into the activation mechanism of aGPCRs.

Transmembrane signal transduction by peptide hormones via family B G protein-coupled receptors

Although family B G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) contain only 15 members, they play key roles in transmembrane signal transduction of hormones. Family B GPCRs are drug targets for developing therapeutics for diseases ranging from metabolic to neurological disorders. Despite their importance, the molecular mechanism of activation of family B GPCRs remains largely unexplored due to the challenges in expression and purification of functional receptors to the quantity for biophysical characterization. Currently, there is no crystal structure available of a full-length family B GPCR. However, structures of key domains, including the extracellular ligand binding regions and seven-helical transmembrane regions, have been solved by X-ray crystallography and NMR, providing insights into the mechanisms of ligand recognition and selectivity, and helical arrangements within the cell membrane. Moreover, biophysical and biochemical methods have been used to explore functions, key residues for signaling, and the kinetics and dynamics of signaling processes. This review summarizes the current knowledge of the signal transduction mechanism of family B GPCRs at the molecular level and comments on the challenges and outlook for mechanistic studies of family B GPCRs.

Conformational states of the full-length glucagon receptor

Class B G protein-coupled receptors are composed of an extracellular domain (ECD) and a seven-transmembrane (7TM) domain, and their signalling is regulated by peptide hormones. Using a hybrid structural biology approach together with the ECD and 7TM domain crystal structures of the glucagon receptor (GCGR), we examine the relationship between full-length receptor conformation and peptide ligand binding. Molecular dynamics (MD) and disulfide crosslinking studies suggest that apo-GCGR can adopt both an open and closed conformation associated with extensive contacts between the ECD and 7TM domain. The electron microscopy (EM) map of the full-length GCGR shows how a monoclonal antibody stabilizes the ECD and 7TM domain in an elongated conformation. Hydrogen/deuterium exchange (HDX) studies and MD simulations indicate that an open conformation is also stabilized by peptide ligand binding. The combined studies reveal the open/closed states of GCGR and suggest that glucagon binds to GCGR by a conformational selection mechanism.

Structural and functional insights into the juxtamembranous amino-terminal tail and extracellular loop regions of class B GPCRs

Class B guanine nucleotide-binding protein GPCRs share heptahelical topology and signalling via coupling with heterotrimeric G proteins typical of the entire superfamily of GPCRs. However, they also exhibit substantial structural differences from the more extensively studied class A GPCRs. Even their helical bundle region, most conserved across the superfamily, is predicted to differ from that of class A GPCRs. Much is now known about the conserved structure of the amino-terminal domain of class B GPCRs, coming from isolated NMR and crystal structures, but the orientation of that domain relative to the helical bundle is unknown, and even less is understood about the conformations of the juxtamembranous amino-terminal tail or of the extracellular loops linking the transmembrane segments. We now review what is known about the structure and function of these regions of class B GPCRs. This comes from indirect analysis of structure-function relationships elucidated by mutagenesis and/or ligand modification and from the more direct analysis of spatial approximation coming from photoaffinity labelling and cysteine trapping studies. Also reviewed are the limited studies of structure of some of these regions. No dominant theme was recognized for the structures or functional roles of distinct regions of these juxtamembranous portions of the class B GPCRs. Therefore, it is likely that a variety of molecular strategies can be engaged for docking of agonist ligands and for initiation of conformational changes in these receptors that would be expected to converge to a common molecular mechanism for activation of intracellular signalling cascades.

Insights into the structure of class B GPCRs

The secretin-like (class B) family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are key players in hormonal homeostasis and are interesting drug targets for the treatment of several metabolic disorders (such as type 2 diabetes, osteoporosis, and obesity) and nervous system diseases (such as migraine, anxiety, and depression). The recently solved crystal structures of the transmembrane domains of the human glucagon receptor and human corticotropin-releasing factor receptor 1 have opened up new opportunities to study the structure and function of class B GPCRs. The current review shows how these structures offer more detailed explanations to previous biochemical and pharmacological studies of class B GPCRs, and provides new insights into their interactions with ligands.

Structure of the human glucagon class B G-protein-coupled receptor

Binding of the glucagon peptide to the glucagon receptor (GCGR) triggers the release of glucose from the liver during fasting; thus GCGR plays an important role in glucose homeostasis. Here we report the crystal structure of the seven transmembrane helical domain of human GCGR at 3.4 Å resolution, complemented by extensive site-specific mutagenesis, and a hybrid model of glucagon bound to GCGR to understand the molecular recognition of the receptor for its native ligand. Beyond the shared seven transmembrane fold, the GCGR transmembrane domain deviates from class A G-protein-coupled receptors with a large ligand-binding pocket and the first transmembrane helix having a 'stalk' region that extends three alpha-helical turns above the plane of the membrane. The stalk positions the extracellular domain (~12 kilodaltons) relative to the membrane to form the glucagon-binding site that captures the peptide and facilitates the insertion of glucagon's amino terminus into the seven transmembrane domain.

Rescue of a pathogenic mutant human glucagon receptor by pharmacological chaperones

We have previously demonstrated that a homozygous inactivating P86S mutation of the glucagon receptor (GCGR) causes a novel human disease of hyperglucagonemia, pancreatic α-cell hyperplasia, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (Mahvash disease). The mechanisms for the decreased activity of the P86S mutant (P86S) are abnormal receptor localization to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and defective interaction with glucagon. To search for targeted therapies for Mahvash disease, we examined whether P86S can be trafficked to the plasma membrane by pharmacological chaperones and whether novel glucagon analogs restore effective receptor interaction. We used enhanced green fluorescent protein-tagged P86S stably expressed in HEK 293 cells to allow fluorescence imaging and western blotting and molecular modeling to design novel glucagon analogs in which alanine 19 was replaced with serine or asparagine. Incubation at 27 °C largely restored normal plasma membrane localization and normal processing of P86S but osmotic chaperones had no effects. The ER stressors thapsigargin and curcumin partially rescued P86S. The lipophilic GCGR antagonist L-168,049 also partially rescued P86S, so did Cpd 13 and 15 to a smaller degree. The rescued P86S led to more glucagon-stimulated cAMP production and was internalized by glucagon. Compared with the native glucagon, the novel glucagon analogs failed to stimulate more cAMP production by P86S. We conclude that the mutant GCGR is partially rescued by several pharmacological chaperones and our data provide proof-of-principle evidence that Mahvash disease can be potentially treated with pharmacological chaperones. The novel glucagon analogs, however, failed to interact with P86S more effectively.

Action of molecular switches in GPCRs--theoretical and experimental studies

G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs), also called 7TM receptors, form a huge superfamily of membrane proteins that, upon activation by extracellular agonists, pass the signal to the cell interior. Ligands can bind either to extracellular N-terminus and loops (e.g. glutamate receptors) or to the binding site within transmembrane helices (Rhodopsin-like family). They are all activated by agonists although a spontaneous auto-activation of an empty receptor can also be observed. Biochemical and crystallographic methods together with molecular dynamics simulations and other theoretical techniques provided models of the receptor activation based on the action of so-called "molecular switches" buried in the receptor structure. They are changed by agonists but also by inverse agonists evoking an ensemble of activation states leading toward different activation pathways. Switches discovered so far include the ionic lock switch, the 3-7 lock switch, the tyrosine toggle switch linked with the nPxxy motif in TM7, and the transmission switch. The latter one was proposed instead of the tryptophan rotamer toggle switch because no change of the rotamer was observed in structures of activated receptors. The global toggle switch suggested earlier consisting of a vertical rigid motion of TM6, seems also to be implausible based on the recent crystal structures of GPCRs with agonists. Theoretical and experimental methods (crystallography, NMR, specific spectroscopic methods like FRET/BRET but also single-molecule-force-spectroscopy) are currently used to study the effect of ligands on the receptor structure, location of stable structural segments/domains of GPCRs, and to answer the still open question on how ligands are binding: either via ensemble of conformational receptor states or rather via induced fit mechanisms. On the other hand the structural investigations of homoand heterodimers and higher oligomers revealed the mechanism of allosteric signal transmission and receptor activation that could lead to design highly effective and selective allosteric or ago-allosteric drugs.

The third extracellular loop of the human calcitonin receptor-like receptor is crucial for the activation of adrenomedullin signalling

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The extracellular loops (ECLs) in Family A GPCRs are important for ligand binding and receptor activation, but little is known about the function of Family B GPCR ECLs, especially ECL3. Calcitonin receptor-like receptor (CLR), a Family B GPCR, functions as a calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and an adrenomedullin (AM) receptor in association with three receptor activity-modifying proteins (RAMPs). Here, we examined the function of the ECL3 of human CLR within the CGRP and AM receptors.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

A CLR ECL3 chimera, in which the ECL3 of CLR was substituted with that of VPAC2 (a Family B GPCR that is unable to interact with RAMPs), and CLR ECL3 point mutants were constructed and transiently transfected into HEK-293 cells along with each RAMP. Cell-surface expression of each receptor complex was then measured by flow cytometry; [(125) I]-CGRP and [(125) I]-AM binding and intracellular cAMP accumulation were also measured.

KEY RESULTS

Co-expression of the CLR ECL3 chimera with RAMP2 or RAMP3 led to significant reductions in the induction of cAMP signalling by AM, but CGRP signalling was barely affected, despite normal cell-surface expression of the receptors and normal [(125) I]-AM binding. The chimera had significantly decreased AM, but not CGRP, responses in the presence of RAMP1. Not all CLR ECL3 mutants supported these findings.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

The human CLR ECL3 is crucial for AM-induced cAMP responses via three CLR/RAMP heterodimers, and activation of these heterodimers probably relies on AM-induced conformational changes. This study provides a clue to the molecular basis of the activation of RAMP-based Family B GPCRs.

Analysis of the glucagon receptor first extracellular loop by the substituted cysteine accessibility method

Glucagon is an important hormone for the prevention of hypoglycemia, and contributes to the hyperglycemia observed in diabetic patients, yet very little is known about its receptor structure and the receptor-glucagon interaction. In related receptors, the first extracellular loop, ECL1, is highly variable in length and sequence, suggesting that it might participate in ligand recognition. We applied a variant of the SCAM (Substituted Cysteine Accessibility Method) to the glucagon receptor ECL1 and sequentially mutated positions 197 to 223 to cysteine. Most of the mutations (15/27) affected the glucagon potency, due either to a modification of the glucagon binding site, or to the destabilization of the active receptor conformation. We reasoned that side chains accessible to glucagon must also be accessible to large, hydrophilic cysteine reagents. We therefore evaluated the accessibility of the introduced cysteines to maleimide-PEO(2)-biotin ((+)-biotinyl-3-maleimido-propionamidyl-3,6-dioxa-octanediamine), and tested the effect of pretreatment of intact cells with a large cationic cysteine reagent, MTSET ([2-(trimethylammonium)ethyl]methanethiosulfonate bromide), on glucagon potency. Our results suggest that the second and third transmembrane helices (TM2 and TM3) are extended to position 202 and from position 215, respectively, and separated by a short β stretch (positions 203-209). Glucagon binding induced a conformational change close to TM2: L198C was accessible to the biotin reagent only in the presence of glucagon. Most other mutations affected the receptor activation rather than glucagon recognition, but S217 and D218 (at the top of TM3) were good candidates for glucagon recognition and V221 was very close to the binding site.

Exploring the binding site crevice of a family B G protein-coupled receptor, the type 1 corticotropin releasing factor receptor

Family B of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is composed of receptors that bind peptides, such as secretin, glucagon, parathyroid hormone, and corticotropin releasing factor (CRF), which play critical physiological roles. These receptors, like all GPCRs, share a common structural motif of seven membrane-spanning segments, which have been proposed to bind small ligands, such as antalarmin, a nonpeptide antagonist of the type 1 receptor for CRF (CRF(1)). This leads to the hypothesis that as for family A GPCRs, the binding sites of small ligands for family B GPCRs are on the surface of a water-accessible crevice, the binding-site crevice, which is formed by the membrane-spanning segments and extends from the extracellular surface of the receptor into the plane of the membrane. To test this hypothesis we have begun to obtain structural information about family B GPCRs, using as a prototype the CRF(1), by determining the ability of sulfhydryl-specific methanethiosulfonate derivatives, such as the methanethiosulfonate-ethylammonium (MTSEA), to react with CRF(1) and thus irreversibly inhibit (125)I-Tyr(0)-sauvagine binding. We found that MTSEA inhibited (125)I-Tyr(0)-sauvagine binding to CRF(1) and that antalarmin protected against this irreversible inhibition. To identify the susceptible cysteine(s), we mutated, one at a time, four endogenous cysteines to serine. Mutation to serine of Cys211, Cys233, or Cys364 decreased the susceptibility of sauvagine binding to irreversible inhibition by MTSEA. Thus, Cys211, Cys233, and Cys364 at the cytoplasmic ends of the third, fourth, and seventh membrane-spanning segments, respectively, are exposed in the binding site crevice of CRF(1).

Corticotropin-releasing factor receptors and urocortins, links between the brain and the heart

Corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF), a 41 amino acid peptide, was discovered as a key signal in mediating neuroendocrine, autonomic, and behavioral responses to stress. It was revealed later that there exist additional CRF-like peptides, termed urocortins. The CRF receptor subtype 1 (CRF1 receptor) is predominant in the brain whereas subtype 2 (CRF2 receptor) is highly expressed in the brain and the heart. Both centrally and peripherally administered CRF and urocortins produce significant hemodynamic effects via activation of CRF receptors in the brain and the heart. CRF and urocortins are important neural and cardioactive hormones, and are potentially useful therapy for heart failure.

Passing the baton in class B GPCRs: peptide hormone activation via helix induction?

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest constellation of validated drug targets. Crystal structures of class A GPCRs have facilitated major advances in understanding the principles underlying GPCR activation. By contrast, relatively little is known about class B GPCRs, a family of receptors for a variety of therapeutically relevant peptide hormones. Encouraging progress has recently been made through the structural elucidation of several extracellular hormone-binding domains of class B GPCRs in complex with their natural ligands or synthetic analogues. The structures reveal similar modes of ligand binding, with concomitant alpha-helical structuring of the ligand. The latter suggests an attractive mechanical model for class B GPCR activation.

Expression of glucagon receptors in tetracycline-inducible HEK293S GnT1- stable cell lines: an approach toward purification of receptor protein for structural studies

Glucagon is a 29-amino acid polypeptide hormone secreted by pancreatic A cells. Together with insulin, it is an important regulator of glucose metabolism. Type 2 diabetes is characterized by reduced insulin secretion from pancreatic B cells and increased glucose output by the liver which has been attributed to abnormally elevated levels of glucagon. The glucagon receptor (GR) is a member of family B G protein-coupled receptors, ligands for which are peptides composed of 30-40 amino acids. The impetus for studying how glucagon interacts with its membrane receptor is to gain insight into the mechanism of glucagon action in normal physiology as well as in diabetes mellitus. The principal approach toward this goal is to design and synthesize antagonists of glucagon that will bind with high affinity to the GR but will not activate it. Site-directed mutagenesis of the GR has provided some insight into the interactions between glucagon and GR. The rational design of potent antagonists has been hampered by the lack of structural information on receptor-bound glucagon. To obtain adequate amounts of receptor protein for structural studies, a tetracycline-inducible HEK293S GnT1(-) cell line that stably expresses human GR at high-levels was developed. The recombinant receptor protein was characterized, solubilized, and isolated by one-step affinity chromatography. This report describes a feasible approach for the preparation of human GR and other family B GPCRs in the quantities required for structural studies.

Structural diversity of G protein-coupled receptors and significance for drug discovery

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of membrane-bound receptors and also the targets of many drugs. Understanding of the functional significance of the wide structural diversity of GPCRs has been aided considerably in recent years by the sequencing of the human genome and by structural studies, and has important implications for the future therapeutic potential of targeting this receptor family. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the five main human GPCR families--Rhodopsin, Secretin, Adhesion, Glutamate and Frizzled/Taste2--with a focus on gene repertoire, general ligand preference, common and unique structural features, and the potential for future drug discovery.

Differential Spatial Approximation between Secretin and Its Receptor Residues in Active and Inactive Conformations Demonstrated by Photoaffinity Labeling

Understanding of the conformational changes in G protein-coupled receptors associated with activation and inactivation is of great interest. We previously used photoaffinity labeling to elucidate spatial approximations between photolabile residues situated throughout the pharmacophore of secretin agonist probes and this receptor. The aim of the current work was to develop analogous photolabile secretin antagonist probes and to explore their spatial approximations. The most potent secretin antagonist reported is a pseudopeptide ([ψ4, 5]secretin) in which the peptide bond between residues 4 and 5 was replaced by a ψ(CH2-NH) peptide bond isostere. We have developed a series of [ψ4, 5]secretin analogs incorporating photolabile benzoyl phenylalanine residues in positions 6, 22, and 26. Each bound to the secretin receptor saturably and specifically, with affinity similar to their parental peptide. At concentrations with no measurable agonist activity, each probe covalently labeled the secretin receptor. Peptide mapping using proteolytic cleavage, immunoprecipitation, and radiochemical sequencing identified that each of these three probes labeled the amino terminus of the secretin receptor. Whereas the position 22 probe labeled the same residue as its analogous agonist probe and the position 6 probe labeled a residue within two residues of that labeled by its analogous agonist probe, the position 26 probe labeled a site 16 residues away from that labeled by its analogous agonist probe. Thus, whereas structurally related agonist and antagonist probes dock in the same general region of this receptor, conformational differences in active and inactive states result in substantial differences in spatial approximation at the carboxyl-terminal end of secretin analogs.

Cloning and characterization of the glucagon receptor from cynomologous monkey

The glucagon receptor was cloned from cynolomologous monkey. A frame-shift mutation at the 3' end of the monkey transcript results in a C-terminal extension of 14 amino acids. This extension is not observed in either the human or rodent glucagon receptors. Monkey glucagon receptor was expressed in CHO cells, either with (mkGCGR) or without (mkGCGRDelta14) the 14-amino acid C-terminal extension to approximate the human receptor. Both forms of the monkey receptor bound glucagon with similar affinity and showed glucagon-stimulated cAMP production, however the full-length form of the monkey receptor (mkGCGR) was less sensitive to glucagon in its ability to stimulate cAMP than the shortened form (mkGCGRDelta14). PCR of genomic DNA from baboon and rhesus monkeys suggests that they express a form of the receptor similar to that of cynomologous monkey, while in chimpanzee, the receptor is similar to the human form.

Molecular approximation between a residue in the amino-terminal region of calcitonin and the third extracellular loop of the class B G protein-coupled calcitonin receptor

The calcitonin receptor is a member of the class B family of G protein-coupled receptors, which contains numerous potentially important drug targets. Delineation of themes for agonist binding and activation of these receptors will facilitate the rational design of receptor-active drugs. We reported previously that a photolabile residue within the carboxyl-terminal half (residue 26) and mid-region (residue 16) of calcitonin covalently label the extracellular amino-terminal domain of this receptor (Dong, M., Pinon, D. I., Cox, R. F., and Miller, L. J. (2004) J. Biol. Chem. 279, 1167-1175). Chimeric receptor studies support the importance of this region and suggest important contributions of extracellular loop domains. To examine whether other parts of the ligand may contact those loops, we developed another probe that has its photolabile site of labeling within the amino-terminal half in position 8 of the ligand. This probe was a full agonist (EC(50) = 563 +/- 67 pm), stimulating cAMP accumulation in receptor-bearing human embryonic kidney 293 cells in a concentration-dependent manner. It bound specifically and saturably (K(i) = 14.3 +/- 1.9 nm) and was able to efficiently label the calcitonin receptor. By purification, specific cleavage, and sequencing of labeled wild-type and mutant calcitonin receptors, the site of attachment was identified as residue Leu(368) within the third extracellular loop of the receptor, a domain distinct from that labeled by previous probes. These data are consistent with a common ligand binding mechanism for receptors in this important family.

Three distinct epitopes on the extracellular face of the glucagon receptor determine specificity for the glucagon amino terminus

The glucagon and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptors are homologous family B seven-transmembrane (7TM) G protein-coupled receptors, and they selectively recognize the homologous peptide hormones glucagon (29 amino acids) and GLP-1 (30-31 amino acids), respectively. The amino-terminal extracellular domain of the glucagon and GLP-1 receptors (140-150 amino acids) determines specificity for the carboxyl terminus of glucagon and GLP-1, respectively. In addition, the glucagon receptor core domain (7TM helices and connecting loops) strongly determines specificity for the glucagon amino terminus. Only 4 of 15 residues are divergent in the glucagon and GLP-1 amino termini; Ser2, Gln3, Tyr10, and Lys12 in glucagon and the corresponding Ala8, Glu9, Val16, and Ser18 in GLP-1. In this study, individual substitution of these four residues of glucagon with the corresponding residues of GLP-1 decreased the affinity and potency at the glucagon receptor relative to glucagon. Substitution of distinct segments of the glucagon receptor core domain with the corresponding segments of the GLP-1 receptor rescued the affinity and potency of specific glucagon analogs. Site-directed mutagenesis identified the Asp385 --> Glu glucagon receptor mutant that specifically rescued Ala2-glucagon. The results show that three distinct epitopes of the glucagon receptor core domain determine specificity for the N terminus of glucagon. We suggest a glucagon receptor binding model in which the extracellular ends of TM2 and TM7 are close to and determine specificity for Gln3 and Ser2 of glucagon, respectively. Furthermore, the second extracellular loop and/or proximal segments of TM4 and/or TM5 are close to and determine specificity for Lys12 of glucagon.

Molecular determinants of glucagon receptor signaling

A 29-amino acid polypeptide hormone, glucagon has been one of the most prolific models in the study of hormone action. The key biologic function of glucagon is to counterbalance the actions of insulin and maintain a normal level of serum glucose. Diabetes mellitus can thus be considered a bihormonal disorder with an excess of glucagon contributing to the hyperglycemic state. The effects of glucagon are mediated by the glucagon receptor, which is itself a prototypical member of a distinct category called family B receptors within the G protein-coupled superfamily of seven-helical transmembrane receptors (GPCRs). At the structural level, the peptide ligands of family B receptors are highly homologous, in particular in the N-terminal region of the molecules. The mechanism by which highly homologous peptide ligands selectively recognize their receptors involves distinct molecular interactions that are gradually being elucidated. This review focuses on structural determinants of the glucagon receptor that are important for its activity with respect to interaction with its ligand and G proteins. Information about the glucagon receptor is presented within the context of what is known about other members of the family B GPCRs.

Different domains of the glucagon and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptors provide the critical determinants of ligand selectivity

(1) Glucagon and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) are homologous peptide hormones with important functions in glucose metabolism. The receptors for glucagon and GLP-1 are homologous family B G-protein coupled receptors. The GLP-1 receptor amino-terminal extracellular domain is a major determinant of glucagon/GLP-1 selectivity of the GLP-1 receptor. However, the divergent residues in glucagon and GLP-1 that determine specificity for the GLP-1 receptor amino-terminal extracellular domain are not known. Less is known about how the glucagon receptor distinguishes between glucagon and GLP-1. (2) We analysed chimeric glucagon/GLP-1 peptides for their ability to bind and activate the glucagon receptor, the GLP-1 receptor and chimeric glucagon/GLP-1 receptors. The chimeric peptide GLP-1(7-20)/glucagon(15-29) was unable to bind and activate the glucagon receptor. Substituting the glucagon receptor core domain with the GLP-1 receptor core domain (chimera A) completely rescued the affinity and potency of GLP-1(7-20)/glucagon(15-29) without compromising the affinity and potency of glucagon. Substituting transmembrane segment 1 (TM1), TM6, TM7, the third extracellular loop and the intracellular carboxy-terminus of chimera A with the corresponding glucagon receptor segments re-established the ability to distinguish GLP-1(7-20)/glucagon(15-29) from glucagon. Corroborant results were obtained with the opposite chimeric peptide glucagon(1-14)/GLP-1(21-37). (3) The results suggest that the glucagon and GLP-1 receptor amino-terminal extracellular domains determine specificity for the divergent residues in the glucagon and GLP-1 carboxy-terminals respectively. The GLP-1 receptor core domain is not a critical determinant of glucagon/GLP-1 selectivity. Conversely, the glucagon receptor core domain contains two or more sub-segments which strongly determine specificity for divergent residues in the glucagon amino-terminus.

International Union of Pharmacology. XXXV. The glucagon receptor family

Peptide hormones within the secretin-glucagon family are expressed in endocrine cells of the pancreas and gastrointestinal epithelium and in specialized neurons in the brain, and subserve multiple biological functions, including regulation of growth, nutrient intake, and transit within the gut, and digestion, energy absorption, and energy assimilation. Glucagon, glucagon-like peptide-1, glucagon-like peptide-2, glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide, growth hormone-releasing hormone and secretin are structurally related peptides that exert their actions through unique members of a structurally related G protein-coupled receptor class 2 family. This review discusses advances in our understanding of how these peptides exert their biological activities, with a focus on the biological actions and structural features of the cognate receptors. The receptors have been named after their parent and only physiologically relevant ligand, in line with the recommendations of the International Union of Pharmacology Committee on Receptor Nomenclature and Drug Classification (NC-IUPHAR).