Probing the binding site of the A1 adenosine receptor reengineered for orthogonal recognition by tailored nucleosides

A quest for novel antimicrobial targets: Inhibition of Asp-tRNAAsn/Glu-tRNAGln amidotransferase (GatCAB) by synthetic analogs of aminoacyl-adenosine in vitro and live bacteria

The Asp-tRNAAsn/Glu-tRNAGln amidotransferase (GatCAB) has been proposed as a novel antibacterial drug target due to its indispensability in prominent human pathogens. While several inhibitors with in vitro activity have been identified, none have been demonstrated to have potent activity against live bacteria. In this work, seven non-hydrolyzable transition state mimics of GatCAB were synthesized and tested as the transamidase inhibitors against GatCAB from the human pathogen Helicobacter pylori. Notably, the methyl sulfone analog of glutamyl-adenosine significantly reduced GatCAB's transamination rate. Additionally, four lipid-conjugates of these mimics displayed antibacterial activity against Bacillus subtilis, likely due to enhanced cell permeability. Inhibitory activity against GatCAB in live bacteria was confirmed using a sensitive gain-of-function dual luciferase reporter in Mycobacterium bovis-BCG. Only the lipid-conjugated methyl sulfone analog exhibited a significant increase in mistranslation rate, highlighting its cell permeability and inhibitory potential. This study provides insights for developing urgently needed novel antibacterial agents amidst emerging antimicrobial drug resistance.

Cryo-EM structure of the human adenosine A2B receptor-Gs signaling complex

The human adenosine A_2B receptor (A_2BR) is a class A G protein-coupled receptor that is involved in several major physiological and pathological processes throughout the body. A_2BR recognizes its ligands adenosine and NECA with relatively low affinity, but the detailed mechanism for its ligand recognition and signaling is still elusive. Here, we present two structures determined by cryo-electron microscopy of A_2BR bound to its agonists NECA and BAY60-6583, each coupled to an engineered G_s protein. The structures reveal conserved orthosteric binding pockets with subtle differences, whereas the selectivity or specificity can mainly be attributed to regions extended from the orthosteric pocket. We also found that BAY60-6583 occupies a secondary pocket, where residues V250^6.51 and N273^7.36 were two key determinants for its selectivity against A_2BR. This study offers a better understanding of ligand selectivity for the adenosine receptor family and provides a structural template for further development of A_2BR ligands for related diseases.

Deciphering the Agonist Binding Mechanism to the Adenosine A1 Receptor

Despite being among the most characterized G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), adenosine receptors (ARs) have always been a difficult target in drug design. To date, no agonist other than the natural effector and the diagnostic regadenoson has been approved for human use. Recently, the structure of the adenosine A1 receptor (A1R) was determined in the active, Gi protein complexed state; this has important repercussions for structure-based drug design. Here, we employed supervised molecular dynamics simulations and mutagenesis experiments to extend the structural knowledge of the binding of selective agonists to A1R. Our results identify new residues involved in the association and dissociation pathway, they suggest the binding mode of N6-cyclopentyladenosine (CPA) related ligands, and they highlight the dramatic effect that chemical modifications can have on the overall binding mechanism, paving the way for the rational development of a structure-kinetics relationship of A1R agonists.

Structure-Based Design of Potent and Selective Ligands at the Four Adenosine Receptors

The four receptors that signal for adenosine, A₁, A_2A, A_2B and A₃ ARs, belong to the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). They mediate a number of (patho)physiological functions and have attracted the interest of the biopharmaceutical sector for decades as potential drug targets. The many crystal structures of the A_2A, and lately the A₁ ARs, allow for the use of advanced computational, structure-based ligand design methodologies. Over the last decade, we have assessed the efficient synthesis of novel ligands specifically addressed to each of the four ARs. We herein review and update the results of this program with particular focus on molecular dynamics (MD) and free energy perturbation (FEP) protocols. The first in silico mutagenesis on the A₁AR here reported allows understanding the specificity and high affinity of the xanthine-antagonist 8-Cyclopentyl-1,3-dipropylxanthine (DPCPX). On the A_2AAR, we demonstrate how FEP simulations can distinguish the conformational selectivity of a recent series of partial agonists. These novel results are complemented with the revision of the first series of enantiospecific antagonists on the A_2BAR, and the use of FEP as a tool for bioisosteric design on the A₃AR.

Pharmacological targeting of adenosine receptor signaling

Adenosine receptor signaling plays important roles in normal physiology, but is also known to modulate the development or progression of several different diseases. The design of new, efficient, and safe pharmacological approaches to target the adenosine system may have considerable therapeutic potential, but is also associated with many challenges. This review summarizes the main challenges of adenosine receptor targeted treatment including tolerance, disease stage, cell type-specific effects, caffeine intake, adenosine level assessment and receptor distribution in vivo. Moreover, we discuss several potential ways to overcome these obstacles (i.e., the use of partial agonists, indirect receptor targeting, allosteric enhancers, prodrugs, non-receptor-mediated effects, neoreceptors, conditional knockouts). It is important to address these concerns during development of new and successful therapeutic approaches targeting the adenosine system.

Ligand-specific binding and activation of the human adenosine A(2B) receptor

Adenosine A(2B) receptors, which play a role in inflammation and cancer, are of considerable interest as novel drug targets. To gain deeper insights into ligand binding and receptor activation, we exchanged amino acids predicted to be close to the binding pocket. The alanine mutants were stably expressed in CHO cells and characterized by radioligand binding and cAMP assays using three structural classes of ligands: xanthine (antagonist), adenosine, and aminopyridine derivatives (agonists). Asn282(7.45) and His280(7.43) were found to stabilize the binding site by intramolecular hydrogen bond formation as in the related A(2A) receptor subtype. Trp247(6.48), Val250(6.51), and particularly Ser279(7.42) were shown to be important for binding of nucleosidic agonists. Leu81(3.28), Asn186(5.42), and Val250(6.51) were discovered to be crucial for binding of the xanthine-derived antagonist PSB-603. Leu81(3.28), which is not conserved among adenosine receptor subtypes, may be important for the high selectivity of PSB-603. The N186(5.42)A mutant resulted in an increased potency for agonists. The interactions of the non-nucleosidic agonist BAY60-6583 were different from those of the nucleosides: while BAY60-6583 appeared not to interact with Ser279(7.42), its interactions with Trp247(6.48) and Val250(6.51) were significantly weaker compared to those of NECA. Moreover, our results discount the hypothesis of Trp247(6.48) serving as a "toogle switch" because BAY60-6583 was able to activate the corresponding mutant. This study reveals distinct interactions of structurally diverse ligands with the human A(2B) receptor and differences between closely related receptor subtypes (A(2B) and A(2A)). It will contribute to the understanding of G protein-coupled receptor function and advance A(2B) receptor ligand design.

Probing GPCR structure: adenosine and P2Y nucleotide receptors

The adenosine receptors (ARs) provide an example of how to accurately predict ligand recognition, even prior to the availability of a crystallographic structure. Homology modeling has been used to gain structural insight, in conjunction with site-directed mutagenesis, and structure-activity relationships of small molecular ligands. Recent X-ray structures greatly improved the accuracy of knowledge of AR ligand recognition and furthermore characterized conformational changes induced by receptor activation. Now, homology modeling extends these structural insights to related GPCRs and suggests new ligand structures. This strategy is also being applied to the eight subtypes of P2Y receptors for extracellular nucleotides, which lack X-ray structures and are best modeled by homology to the CXCR4 (peptide) receptor. Neoceptors, as studied for three of the four AR subtypes, create a molecular complementarity between a mutant receptor and a chemically tailored agonist ligand to selectively enhance affinity, implying direct physical contact and thus validating docking hypotheses.

Evaluation of homology modeling of G-protein-coupled receptors in light of the A(2A) adenosine receptor crystallographic structure

Homology modeling of the human A(2A) adenosine receptor (AR) based on bovine rhodopsin predicted a protein structure that was very similar to the recently determined crystallographic structure. The discrepancy between the experimentally observed orientation of the antagonist and those obtained by previous antagonist docking is related to the loop structure of rhodopsin being carried over to the model of the A(2A) AR and was rectified when the beta(2)-adrenergic receptor was used as a template for homology modeling. Docking of the triazolotriazine antagonist ligand ZM241385 1 was greatly improved by including water molecules of the X-ray structure or by using a constraint from mutagenesis. Automatic agonists docking to both a new homology modeled receptor and the A(2A) AR crystallographic structure produced similar results. Heterocyclic nitrogen atoms closely corresponded when the docked adenine moiety of agonists and 1 were overlaid. The cumulative mutagenesis data, which support the proposed mode of agonist docking, can be reexamined in light of the crystallographic structure. Thus, homology modeling of GPCRs remains a useful technique in probing the structure of the protein and predicting modes of ligand docking.

Molecular modeling of a PAMAM-CGS21680 dendrimer bound to an A2A adenosine receptor homodimer

The theoretical possibility of bivalent binding of a dendrimer, covalently appended with multiple copies of a small ligand, to a homodimer of a G protein-coupled receptor was investigated with a molecular modeling approach. A molecular model was constructed of a third generation (G3) poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimer condensed with multiple copies of the potent A(2A) adenosine receptor agonist CGS21680. The dendrimer was bound to an A(2A) adenosine receptor homodimer. Two units of the nucleoside CGS21680 could occupy the A(2A) receptor homodimer simultaneously. The binding mode of CGS21680 moieties linked to the PAMAM dendrimer and docked to the A(2A) receptor was found to be similar to the binding mode of a monomeric CGS21680 ligand.

Synthesis and potency of novel uracil nucleotides and derivatives as P2Y2 and P2Y6 receptor agonists

The phosphate, uracil, and ribose moieties of uracil nucleotides were varied structurally for evaluation of agonist activity at the human P2Y(2), P2Y(4), and P2Y(6) receptors. The 2-thio modification, found previously to enhance P2Y(2) receptor potency, could be combined with other favorable modifications to produce novel molecules that exhibit high potencies and receptor selectivities. Phosphonomethylene bridges introduced for stability in analogues of UDP, UTP, and uracil dinucleotides markedly reduced potency. Truncation of dinucleotide agonists of the P2Y(2) receptor, in the form of Up(4)-sugars, indicated that a terminal uracil ring is not essential for moderate potency at this receptor and that specific SAR patterns are observed at this distal end of the molecule. Key compounds reported in this study include 9, alpha,beta-methylene-UDP, a P2Y(6) receptor agonist; 30, Up(4)-phenyl ester and 34, Up(4)-[1]glucose, selective P2Y(2) receptor agonists; dihalomethylene phosphonate analogues 16 and 41, selective P2Y(2) receptor agonists; 43, the 2-thio analogue of INS37217 (P(1)-(uridine-5')-P(4)-(2'-deoxycytidine-5')tetraphosphate), a potent and selective P2Y(2) receptor agonist.

Probing distal regions of the A2B adenosine receptor by quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of known and novel agonists

The binding modes at the A 2B adenosine receptor (AR) of 72 derivatives of adenosine and its 5'- N-methyluronamide with diverse substitutions at the 2 and N (6) positions were studied using a molecular modeling approach. The compounds in their receptor-docked conformations were used to build CoMFA and CoMSIA quantitative structure-activity relationship models. Various parameters, including different types of atomic charges, were examined. The best statistical parameters were obtained with a joint CoMFA and CoMSIA model: R (2) = 0.960, Q (2) = 0.676, SEE = 0.175, F = 158, and R (2) test = 0.782 for an independent test set containing 18 compounds. On the basis of the modeling results, four novel adenosine analogues, having elongated or bulky substitutions at N (6) position and/or 2 position, were synthesized and evaluated biologically. All of the proposed compounds were potent, full agonists at the A 2B AR in adenylate cyclase studies. Thus, in support of the modeling, bulky substitutions at both positions did not prevent A 2B AR activation, which predicts separate regions for docking of these moieties.