Substituted NDP-MSH peptides paired with mutant melanocortin-4 receptors demonstrate the role of transmembrane 6 in receptor activation

Recommended Tool Compounds for the Melanocortin Receptor (MCR) G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs)

The melanocortin receptors are a centrally and peripherally expressed family of Class A GPCRs with physiological roles, including pigmentation, steroidogenesis, energy homeostasis, and others yet to be fully characterized. There are five melanocortin receptor subtypes that, apart from the melanocortin-2 receptor (MC2R), are stimulated by a shared set of endogenous agonists. Until 2020, X-ray crystallographic and cryo-electron microscopic (cryo-EM) structures of these receptors were unavailable, and the investigation of their mechanisms of action and putative ligand-receptor interactions was driven by site-directed mutagenesis studies of the receptors and targeted structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies of the endogenous and derivative synthetic ligands. Synthetic derivatives of the endogenous agonist ligand α-MSH have evolved into a suite of powerful ligands such as NDP-MSH (melanotan I), melanotan II (MTII), and SHU9119. This suite of tool compounds now enables the study of the melanocortin receptors and serves as scaffolds for FDA-approved drugs, means of validating stably expressing melanocortin receptor cell lines, core ligands in assessing cryo-EM structures of active and inactive receptor complexes, and essential references for high-throughput discovery and mechanism of action studies. Herein, we review the history and significance of a finite set of these essential tool compounds and discuss how they are being utilized to further the field's understanding of melanocortin receptor physiology and greater druggability.

Neuronal cells derived from human induced pluripotent stem cells as a functional tool of melanocortin system

BACKGROUND

The preparation of human neurons derived from human induced pluripotent stem (iPS) cells can serve as a potential tool for evaluating the physiological and pathophysiological properties of human neurons and for drug development.

METHODS

In the present study, the functional activity in neuronal cells differentiated from human iPS cells was observed.

RESULTS

The differentiated cells expressed mRNAs for classical neuronal markers (microtubule-associated protein 2, β-tubulin III, calbindin 1, synaptophysin and postsynaptic density protein 95) and for subunits of various excitatory and inhibitory transmitters (NR1, NR2A, NR2B, GABA_A α1). Moreover, the differentiated cells expressed neuropeptides and receptors which are predominantly present in the hypothalamus. The expression of mRNA for preopiomelanocortin, agouti-related protein (AgRP), melanocortin-3 receptor (MC3R) and melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) increased in culture with a peak on Day 30 which subsequently decreased at Day 45. Immunoreactivities for MC3R and MC4R were also observed in cells differentiated from human iPS cells. Application of a potent agonist for MC3R and MC4R, [Nle4, D-Phe7]-α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone, significantly increased intracellular cAMP levels, but this was suppressed by AgRP (83-132) and SHU9119.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings offer the possibility for drug developments using neurons differentiated from normal or disease-associated human iPS cells.

Comparative Functional Alanine Positional Scanning of the α-Melanocyte Stimulating Hormone and NDP-Melanocyte Stimulating Hormone Demonstrates Differential Structure-Activity Relationships at the Mouse Melanocortin Receptors

The melanocortin system has been implicated in the regulation of various physiological functions including melanogenesis, steroidogenesis, energy homeostasis, and feeding behavior. Five melanocortin receptors have been identified to date and belong to the family of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). Post-translational modification of the proopiomelanocortin (POMC) prohormone leads to the biosynthesis of the endogenous melanocortin agonists, including α-melanocyte stimulating hormone (α-MSH), β-MSH, γ-MSH, and adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH). All the melanocortin agonists derived from the POMC prohormone contain a His-Phe-Arg-Trp tetrapeptide sequence that has been implicated in eliciting the pharmacological responses at the melanocortin receptors. Herein, an alanine (Ala) positional scan is reported for the endogenous α-MSH ligand and the synthetic, more potent, NDP-MSH peptide (Ac-Ser(1)-Tyr(2)-Ser(3)-Nle(4)-Glu(5)-His(6)-DPhe(7)-Arg(8)-Trp(9)-Gly(10)-Lys(11)-Pro(12)-Val(13)-NH2) at the cloned mouse melanocortin receptors to test the assumption that the structure-activity relationships of one ligand would apply to the other. Several residues outside of the postulated pharmacophore altered potency at the melanocortin receptors, most notably the 1560-, 37-, and 15-fold potency loss when the Glu(5) position of α-MSH was substituted with Ala at the mMC1R, mMC3R, and mMC4R, respectively. Importantly, the altered potencies due to Ala substitutions in α-MSH did not necessarily correlate with equivalent Ala substitutions in NDP-MSH, indicating that structural modifications and corresponding biological activities in one of these melanocortin ligands may not be predictive for the other agonist.

Biased signalling: the instinctive skill of the cell in the selection of appropriate signalling pathways

GPCRs (G-protein-coupled receptors) are members of a family of proteins which are generally regarded as the largest group of therapeutic drug targets. Ligands of GPCRs do not usually activate all cellular signalling pathways linked to a particular seven-transmembrane receptor in a uniform manner. The fundamental idea behind this concept is that each ligand has its own ability, while interacting with the receptor, to activate different signalling pathways (or a particular set of signalling pathways) and it is this concept which is known as biased signalling. The importance of biased signalling is that it may selectively activate biological responses to favour therapeutically beneficial signalling pathways and to avoid adverse effects. There are two levels of biased signalling. First, bias can arise from the ability of GPCRs to couple to a subset of the available G-protein subtypes: Gαs, Gαq/11, Gαi/o or Gα12/13. These subtypes produce the diverse effects of GPCRs by targeting different effectors. Secondly, biased GPCRs may differentially activate G-proteins or β-arrestins. β-Arrestins are ubiquitously expressed and function to terminate or inhibit classic G-protein signalling and initiate distinct β-arrestin-mediated signalling processes. The interplay of G-protein and β-arrestin signalling largely determines the cellular consequences of the administration of GPCR-targeted drugs. In the present review, we highlight the particular functionalities of biased signalling and discuss its biological effects subsequent to GPCR activation. We consider that biased signalling is potentially allowing a choice between signalling through ‘beneficial’ pathways and the avoidance of ‘harmful’ ones.

Pleiotropic functions of the transmembrane domain 6 of human melanocortin-4 receptor

The melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) is a critical regulator of energy homeostasis and has emerged as a premier target for obesity treatment. Numerous mutations in transmembrane domain 6 (TM6) of MC4R resulting in functional alterations have been identified in obese patients. Several mutagenesis studies also provided some data suggesting the importance of this domain in receptor function. To gain a better understanding of the structure-function relationship of the receptor, we performed alanine-scanning mutagenesis in TM6 to determine the functions of side chains. Of the 31 residues, two were important for cell surface expression, five were indispensable for α-melanocyte-stimulating hormone (α-MSH) and β-MSH binding, and six were important for signaling in the Gs-cAMP-PKA pathway. H264A, targeted normally to the plasma membrane, was undetectable by competitive binding assay and severely defective in basal and stimulated cAMP production and ERK1/2 phosphorylation. Nine mutants had decreased basal cAMP signaling. Seven mutants were constitutively active in cAMP signaling and their basal activities could be inhibited by two MC4R inverse agonists, Ipsen 5i and ML00253764. Five mutants were also constitutively active in the MAPK pathway with enhanced basal ERK1/2 phosphorylation. In summary, our study provided comprehensive data on the structure-function relationship of the TM6 of MC4R. We identified residues that are important for cell surface expression, ligand binding, cAMP generation, and residues for maintaining the WT receptor in active conformation. We also reported constitutive activation of the MAPK pathway and biased signaling. These data will be useful for rationally designing MC4R agonists and antagonists for treatment of eating disorders.

Conformational study on cyclic melanocortin ligands and new insight into their binding mode at the MC4 receptor

The melanocortin receptors are involved in many physiological functions, including pigmentation, sexual function, feeding behavior, and energy homeostasis, making them potential targets to treat obesity, sexual dysfunction, etc. Understanding the basis of the ligand-receptor interactions is crucial for the design of potent and selective ligands for these receptors. The conformational preferences of the cyclic melanocortin ligands MTII (Ac-Nle(4)-c[Asp(5)-His(6)-DPhe(7)-Arg(8)-Trp(9)-Lys(10)]-NH(2)) and SHU9119 (Ac-Nle(4)-c[Asp(5)-His(6)-DNal(2')(7)-Arg(8)-Trp(9)-Lys(10)]-NH(2)), which show agonist and antagonist activity at the h-MC4R, respectively, were comprehensively investigated by solution NMR spectroscopy in different environments. In particular, water and water/DMSO (8:2) solutions were used as isotropic solutions and an aqueous solution of DPC (dodecylphosphocholine) micelles was used as a membrane mimetic environment. NMR-derived conformations of these two ligands were docked within h-MC4R models. NMR and docking studies revealed intriguing differences which can help explain the different activities of these two ligands.

Structure, function and regulation of the melanocortin receptors

Melanocortin receptors belong to the seven-transmembrane (TM) domain proteins that are coupled to G-proteins and signaled through intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate. Many structural features conserved in other G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) are found in the melanocortin receptors. There are five melanocortin receptor subtypes and each of the melanocortin receptor subtypes has a different pattern of tissue expression and has its own profile regarding the relative potency of different melanocortin peptides. α-, β-, and γ-MSH and ACTH are known endogenous agonist ligands for the melanocortin receptors. Agouti and AgRP are the only known naturally occurring antagonists of the melanocortin receptors. We have examined the molecular basis of all five human melanocortin receptors for different ligand binding affinities and potencies using chimeric and mutated receptors. Our studies indicate that human melanocortin MC(1) receptor, human melanocortin MC(3) receptor, human melanocortin MC(4) receptor and human melanocortin MC(5) receptor utilize orthosteric sites for non selective agonists, α-MSH and NDP-α-MSH, high affinity binding and utilize allosteric sites for selective agonist or antagonist binding. Furthermore, our results indicate that molecular determinants of human melanocortin MC(2) receptor for ACTH binding and signaling are different from that of other melanocortin receptors. Many studies also indicate that agonists can induce different conformation changes of melanocortin receptors, which then lead to the activation of different signaling pathways, even when the expression level of receptor and the strength of stimulus-response coupling are the same. This finding may provide new information for the design of drugs for targeting melanocortin receptors.

Interactions of the melanocortin-4 receptor with the peptide agonist NDP-MSH

Melanocortin-4 receptor (MC4R) has an important regulatory role in energy homeostasis and food intake. Peptide agonists of the MC4R are characterized by the conserved sequence His₆-Phe₇-Arg₈-Trp₉, which is crucial for their interaction with the receptor. This investigation utilized the covalent attachment approach to identify receptor residues in close proximity to the bound ligand [Nle₄,d-Phe₇]melanocyte-stimulating hormone (NDP-MSH), thereby differentiating between residues directly involved in ligand binding and those mutations that compromise ligand binding by inducing conformational changes in the receptor. Also, recent X-ray structures of G-protein-coupled receptors were utilized to refine a model of human MC4R in the active state (R^⁎), which was used to generate a better understanding of the binding mode of the ligand NDP-MSH at the atomic level.

The mutation of residues in the human MC4R—such as Leu106 of extracellular loop 1, and Asp122, Ile125, and Asp126 of transmembrane (TM) helix 3, His264 (TM6), and Met292 (TM7)—to Cys residues produced definitive indications of proximity to the side chains of residues in the core region of the peptide ligand. Of particular interest was the contact between d-Phe₇ on the ligand and Ile125 of TM3 on the MC4R. Additionally, Met292 (TM7) equivalent to Lys(7.45) (Ballesteros numbering scheme) involved in covalently attaching retinal in rhodopsin is shown to be in close proximity to Trp₉.

For the first time, the interactions between the terminal regions of NDP-MSH and the receptor are described. The amino-terminus appears to be adjacent to a series of hydrophilic residues with novel interactions at Cys196 (TM5) and Asp189 (extracellular loop 2). These interactions are reminiscent of sequential ligand binding exhibited by the β₂-adrenergic receptor, with the former interaction being equivalent to the known interaction involving Ser204 of the β₂-adrenergic receptor.

Contribution of the transmembrane domain 6 of melanocortin-4 receptor to peptide [Pro5, DNal (2')8]-gamma-MSH selectivity

The melanocortin receptor (MCR) subtype family is a member of the GPCR superfamily and each of them has a different pharmacological profile regarding the relative potency of the endogenous and synthetic melanocortin peptides. Substitution of Trp with DNal (2') in gamma-MSH resulted in the loss of binding affinity and potency at hMC4R. However, the molecular mechanism of this ligand selectivity is unclear. In this study, we utilized chimeric receptors and site-directed mutagenesis approaches to investigate the molecular basis of MC4R responsible for peptide [Pro5, DNal (2')8]-gamma-MSH selectivity. Cassette substitutions of the second, third, fourth, fifth, and sixth TM of the human MC4R (hMC4R) with the homologous regions of hMC1R were constructed and the binding affinity of peptide [Pro5, DNal (2')8]-gamma-MSH at these chimeric receptors was evaluated. Our results indicate that the cassette substitutions of TM2, TM3, TM4 and TM5 of hMC4R with homologous regions of the hMC1R did not significantly increase peptide [Pro5, DNal (2')8]-gamma-MSH binding affinity and potency but substitution of the TM6 of the hMC4R with the same region of the hMC1R significantly enhances [Pro5, DNal (2')8]-gamma-MSH binding affinity and potency. Further site-directed mutagenesis study indicates that four amino acid residues, Phe267, Tyr268, Ile269 and Ser270, in TM6 of the hMC4R may play an important role in [Pro5, DNal (2')-gamma-MSH selective activity at MC4R.

GPC receptors and not ligands decide the binding mode in neuropeptide Y multireceptor/multiligand system

Many G protein-coupled receptors belong to families of different receptor subtypes, which are recognized by a variety of distinct ligands. To study such a multireceptor/multiligand system, we investigated the Y-receptor family. This family consists of four G protein-coupled Y receptors in humans (hY 1R, hY 2R, hY 4R, and hY 5R) and is activated by the so-called NPY hormone family, which itself consists of three native peptide ligands named neuropeptide Y (NPY), pancreatic polypeptide (PP), and peptide YY (PYY). The hY 5R shows high affinity for all ligands, although for PP binding, the affinity is slightly decreased. As a rational explanation, we suggest that Tyr (27) is lost as a contact point between PP and the hY 5R in contrast to NPY or PYY. Furthermore, several important residues for ligand binding were identified by the first extensive mutagenesis study of the hY 5R. Using a complementary mutagenesis approach, we were able to discover a novel interaction point between hY 5R and NPY. The interaction between NPY(Arg (25)) and hY 5R(Asp (2.68)) as well as between NPY(Arg (33)) and hY 5R(Asp (6.59)) is maintained in the binding of PYY and PP to hY 5R but different to the PP-hY 4R and NPY-hY 1R contact points. Therefore, we provide evidence that the receptor subtype and not the pre-orientated conformation of the ligand at the membrane decides the binding mode. Furthermore, the first hY 5R model was set up on the basis of the crystal structure of bovine rhodopsin. We can show that most of the residues identified to be critical for ligand binding are located within the now postulated binding pocket.