DNA polymerase I-mediated translesion synthesis in RecA-independent DNA interstrand cross-link repair in E. coli

Bypass of a psoralen DNA interstrand cross-link by DNA polymerases β, ι, and κ in vitro

Repair of DNA interstrand cross-links in mammalian cells involves several biochemically distinctive processes, including the release of one of the cross-linked strands and translesion DNA synthesis (TLS). In this report, we investigated the in vitro TLS activity of a psoralen DNA interstrand cross-link by three DNA repair polymerases, DNA polymerases β, κ, and ι. DNA polymerase β is capable of bypassing a psoralen cross-link with a low efficiency. Cell extracts prepared from DNA polymerase β knockout mouse embryonic fibroblasts showed a reduced bypass activity of the psoralen cross-link, and purified DNA polymerase β restored the bypass activity. In addition, DNA polymerase ι misincorporated thymine across the psoralen cross-link and DNA polymerase κ extended these mispaired primer ends, suggesting that DNA polymerase ι may serve as an inserter and DNA polymerase κ may play a role as an extender in the repair of psoralen DNA interstrand cross-links. The results demonstrated here indicate that multiple DNA polymerases could participate in TLS steps in mammalian DNA interstrand cross-link repair.

A model for transition of 5'-nuclease domain of DNA polymerase I from inert to active modes

Bacteria contain DNA polymerase I (PolI), a single polypeptide chain consisting of ∼930 residues, possessing DNA-dependent DNA polymerase, 3′-5′ proofreading and 5′-3′ exonuclease (also known as flap endonuclease) activities. PolI is particularly important in the processing of Okazaki fragments generated during lagging strand replication and must ultimately produce a double-stranded substrate with a nick suitable for DNA ligase to seal. PolI's activities must be highly coordinated both temporally and spatially otherwise uncontrolled 5′-nuclease activity could attack a nick and produce extended gaps leading to potentially lethal double-strand breaks. To investigate the mechanism of how PolI efficiently produces these nicks, we present theoretical studies on the dynamics of two possible scenarios or models. In one the flap DNA substrate can transit from the polymerase active site to the 5′-nuclease active site, with the relative position of the two active sites being kept fixed; while the other is that the 5′-nuclease domain can transit from the inactive mode, with the 5′-nuclease active site distant from the cleavage site on the DNA substrate, to the active mode, where the active site and substrate cleavage site are juxtaposed. The theoretical results based on the former scenario are inconsistent with the available experimental data that indicated that the majority of 5′-nucleolytic processing events are carried out by the same PolI molecule that has just extended the upstream primer terminus. By contrast, the theoretical results on the latter model, which is constructed based on available structural studies, are consistent with the experimental data. We thus conclude that the latter model rather than the former one is reasonable to describe the cooperation of the PolI's polymerase and 5′-3′ exonuclease activities. Moreover, predicted results for the latter model are presented.

Cross-link structure affects replication-independent DNA interstrand cross-link repair in mammalian cells

DNA interstrand cross-links (ICLs) are cytotoxic products of common anticancer drugs and cellular metabolic processes, whose mechanism(s) of repair remains poorly understood. In this study, we show that cross-link structure affects ICL repair in nonreplicating reporter plasmids that contain a mispaired N(4)C-ethyl-N(4)C (C-C), N3T-ethyl-N3T (T-T), or N1I-ethyl-N3T (I-T) ICL. The T-T and I-T cross-links obstruct the hydrogen bond face of the base and mimic the N1G-ethyl-N3C ICL created by bis-chloroethylnitrosourea, whereas the C-C cross-link does not interfere with base pair formation. Host-cell reactivation (HCR) assays in human and hamster cells showed that repair of these ICLs primarily involves the transcription-coupled nucleotide excision repair (TC-NER) pathway. Repair of the C-C ICL was 5-fold more efficient than repair of the T-T or I-T ICLs, suggesting the latter cross-links hinder lesion bypass following initial ICL unhooking. The level of luciferase expression from plasmids containing a C-C cross-link remnant on either the transcribed or nontranscribed strand increased in NER-deficient cells, indicating NER involvement occurs at a step prior to remnant removal, whereas expression from similar T-T remnant plasmids was inhibited in NER-deficient cells, demonstrating NER is required for remnant removal. Sequence analysis of repaired plasmids showed a high proportion of C residues inserted at the site of the T-T and I-T cross-links, and HCR assays showed that Rev1 was likely responsible for these insertions. In contrast, both C and G residues were inserted at the C-C cross-link site, and Rev1 was not required for repair, suggesting replicative or other translesion polymerases can bypass the C-C remnant.

Evidence for the involvement of human DNA polymerase N in the repair of DNA interstrand cross-links

Human DNA polymerase N (PolN) is an A-family nuclear DNA polymerase whose function is unknown. This study examines the possible role of PolN in DNA repair in human cells treated with PolN-targeted siRNA. HeLa cells with siRNA-mediated knockdown of PolN were more sensitive than control cells to DNA cross-linking agent mitomycin C (MMC) but were not hypersensitive to UV irradiation. The MMC hypersensitivity of PolN knockdown cells was rescued by the overexpression of DNA polymerase-proficient PolN but not by DNA polymerase-deficient PolN. Furthermore, in vitro experiments showed that purified PolN conducts low-efficiency nonmutagenic bypass of a psoralen DNA interstrand cross-link (ICL), whose structure resembles an intermediate in the proposed pathway of ICL repair. These results suggest that PolN might play a role in translesion DNA synthesis during ICL repair in human cells.

Effect of cross-link structure on DNA interstrand cross-link repair synthesis

DNA interstrand cross-links (ICLs) are products of chemotherapeutic agents and cellular metabolic processes that block both replication and transcription. If left unrepaired, ICLs are extremely toxic to cells, and ICL repair mechanisms contribute to the survival of certain chemotherapeutic resistance tumors. A critical step in ICL repair involves unhooking the cross-link. In the absence of a homologous donor sequence, the resulting gap can be filled in by a repair synthesis step involving bypass of the cross-link remnant. Here, we examine the effect of cross-link structure on the ability of unhooked DNA substrates to undergo repair synthesis in mammalian whole cell extracts. Using 32P incorporation assays, we found that repair synthesis occurs efficiently past the site of damage when a DNA substrate containing a single N4C-ethyl-N4C cross-link is incubated in HeLa or Chinese hamster ovary cell extracts. This lesion, which can base pair with deoxyguanosine, is readily bypassed by both Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I and T7 DNA polymerase in a primer extension assay. In contrast, bypass was not observed in the primer extension assay or in mammalian cell extracts when DNA substrates containing a N3T-ethyl-N3T or N1I-ethyl-N3T cross-link, whose linkers obstruct the hydrogen bond face of the bases, were used. A modified phosphorothioate sequencing method was used to analyze the ICL repair patches created in the mammalian cell extracts. In the case of the N4C-ethyl-N4C substrate, the repair patch spanned the site of the cross-link, and the lesion was bypassed in an error-free manner. However, although the N3T-ethyl-N3T and N1I-ethyl-N3T substrates were unhooked in the extracts, bypass was not detected. These and our previous results suggest that although the chemical structure of an ICL may not affect initial cross-link unhooking, it can play a significant role in subsequent processing of the cross-link. Understanding how the physical and chemical differences of ICLs affect repair may provide a better understanding of the cytotoxic and mutagenic potential of specific ICLs.