Three tRNA binding sites in rabbit liver ribosomes and role of the intrinsic ATPase in 80S ribosomes from higher eukaryotes

Functions and Regulation of Translation Elongation Factors

Translation elongation is a key step of protein synthesis, during which the nascent polypeptide chain extends by one amino acid residue during one elongation cycle. More and more data revealed that the elongation is a key regulatory node for translational control in health and disease. During elongation, elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu, eEF1A in eukaryotes) is used to deliver aminoacyl-tRNA (aa-tRNA) to the A-site of the ribosome, and elongation factor G (EF-G, EF2 in eukaryotes and archaea) is used to facilitate the translocation of the tRNA₂-mRNA complex on the ribosome. Other elongation factors, such as EF-Ts/eEF1B, EF-P/eIF5A, EF4, eEF3, SelB/EFsec, TetO/Tet(M), RelA and BipA, have been found to affect the overall rate of elongation. Here, we made a systematic review on the canonical and non-canonical functions and regulation of these elongation factors. In particular, we discussed the close link between translational factors and human diseases, and clarified how post-translational modifications control the activity of translational factors in tumors.

Eukaryotic Elongation Factor 3 Protects Saccharomyces cerevisiae Yeast from Oxidative Stress

Translation is a core process of cellular protein homeostasis and, thus, needs to be tightly regulated. The production of newly synthesized proteins adapts to the current needs of the cell, including the response to conditions of oxidative stress. Overall protein synthesis decreases upon oxidative stress. However, the selective production of proteins is initiated to help neutralize stress conditions. In contrast to higher eukaryotes, fungi require three translation elongation factors, eEF1, eEF2, and eEF3, for protein synthesis. eEF1 and eEF2 are evolutionarily conserved, but they alone are insufficient for the translation elongation process. eEF3 is encoded by two paralogous genes, YEF3 and HEF3. However, only YEF3 is essential in yeast, whereas the function of HEF3 remains unknown. To elucidate the cellular function of Hef3p, we used cells that were depleted of HEF3 and treated with H₂O₂ and analyzed the growth of yeast, global protein production, and protein levels. We found that HEF3 is necessary to withstand oxidative stress conditions, suggesting that Hef3p is involved in the selective production of proteins that are necessary for defense against reactive oxygen species.

The molecular choreography of protein synthesis: translational control, regulation, and pathways

Translation of proteins by the ribosome regulates gene expression, with recent results underscoring the importance of translational control. Misregulation of translation underlies many diseases, including cancer and many genetic diseases. Decades of biochemical and structural studies have delineated many of the mechanistic details in prokaryotic translation, and sketched the outlines of eukaryotic translation. However, translation may not proceed linearly through a single mechanistic pathway, but likely involves multiple pathways and branchpoints. The stochastic nature of biological processes would allow different pathways to occur during translation that are biased by the interaction of the ribosome with other translation factors, with many of the steps kinetically controlled. These multiple pathways and branchpoints are potential regulatory nexus, allowing gene expression to be tuned at the translational level. As research focus shifts toward eukaryotic translation, certain themes will be echoed from studies on prokaryotic translation. This review provides a general overview of the dynamic data related to prokaryotic and eukaryotic translation, in particular recent findings with single-molecule methods, complemented by biochemical, kinetic, and structural findings. We will underscore the importance of viewing the process through the viewpoints of regulation, translational control, and heterogeneous pathways.

The ever-evolving role of mTOR in translation

Control of translation allows for the production of stoichiometric levels of each protein in the cell. Attaining such a level of fine-tuned regulation of protein production requires the coordinated temporal and spatial control of numerous cellular signalling cascades impinging on the various components of the translational machinery. Foremost among these is the mTOR signalling pathway. The mTOR pathway regulates both the initiation and elongation steps of protein synthesis through the phosphorylation of numerous translation factors, while simultaneously ensuring adequate folding of nascent polypeptides through co-translational degradation of misfolded proteins. Perhaps most remarkably, mTOR is also a key regulator of the synthesis of ribosomal proteins and translation factors themselves. Two seminal studies have recently shown in translatome analysis that the mTOR pathway preferentially regulates the translation of mRNAs encoding ribosomal proteins and translation factors. Therefore, the role of the mTOR pathway in the control of protein synthesis extends far beyond immediate translational control. By controlling ribosome production (and ultimately ribosome availability), mTOR is a master long-term controller of protein synthesis. Herein, we review the literature spanning the early discoveries of mTOR on translation to the latest advances in our understanding of how the mTOR pathway controls the synthesis of ribosomal proteins.

Regulation of the mammalian elongation cycle by subunit rolling: a eukaryotic-specific ribosome rearrangement

The extent to which bacterial ribosomes and the significantly larger eukaryotic ribosomes share the same mechanisms of ribosomal elongation is unknown. Here, we present subnanometer resolution cryoelectron microscopy maps of the mammalian 80S ribosome in the posttranslocational state and in complex with the eukaryotic eEF1A⋅Val-tRNA⋅GMPPNP ternary complex, revealing significant differences in the elongation mechanism between bacteria and mammals. Surprisingly, and in contrast to bacterial ribosomes, a rotation of the small subunit around its long axis and orthogonal to the well-known intersubunit rotation distinguishes the posttranslocational state from the classical pretranslocational state ribosome. We term this motion "subunit rolling." Correspondingly, a mammalian decoding complex visualized in substates before and after codon recognition reveals structural distinctions from the bacterial system. These findings suggest how codon recognition leads to GTPase activation in the mammalian system and demonstrate that in mammalia subunit rolling occurs during tRNA selection.

Keeping the eIF2 alpha kinase Gcn2 in check

The protein kinase Gcn2 is present in virtually all eukaryotes and is of increasing interest due to its involvement in a large array of crucial biological processes. Some of these are universally conserved from yeast to humans, such as coping with nutrient starvation and oxidative stress. In mammals, Gcn2 is important for e.g. long-term memory formation, feeding behaviour and immune system regulation. Gcn2 has been also implicated in diseases such as cancer and Alzheimer's disease. Studies on Gcn2 have been conducted most extensively in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, where the mechanism of its activation by amino acid starvation has been revealed in most detail. Uncharged tRNAs stimulate Gcn2 which subsequently phosphorylates its substrate, eIF2α, leading to reduced global protein synthesis and simultaneously to increased translation of specific mRNAs, e.g. those coding for Gcn4 in yeast and ATF4 in mammals. Both proteins are transcription factors that regulate the expression of a myriad of genes, thereby enabling the cell to initiate a survival response to the initial activating cue. Given that Gcn2 participates in many diverse processes, Gcn2 itself must be tightly controlled. Indeed, Gcn2 is regulated by a vast network of proteins and RNAs, the list of which is still growing. Deciphering molecular mechanisms underlying Gcn2 regulation by effectors and inhibitors is fundamental for understanding how the cell keeps Gcn2 in check ensuring normal organismal function, and how Gcn2-associated diseases may develop or may be treated. This review provides a critical evaluation of the current knowledge on mechanisms controlling Gcn2 activation or activity.

Overexpression of eukaryotic translation elongation factor 3 impairs Gcn2 protein activation

In eukaryotes, phosphorylation of translation initiation factor 2α (eIF2α) by the kinase Gcn2 (general control nonderepressible 2) is a key response to amino acid starvation. Sensing starvation requires that Gcn2 directly contacts its effector protein Gcn1, and both must contact the ribosome. We have proposed that Gcn2 is activated by uncharged tRNA bound to the ribosomal decoding (A) site, in a manner facilitated by ribosome-bound Gcn1. Protein synthesis requires cyclical association of eukaryotic elongation factors (eEFs) with the ribosome. Gcn1 and Gcn2 are large proteins, raising the question of whether translation and monitoring amino acid availability can occur on the same ribosome. Part of the ribosome-binding domain in Gcn1 has homology to one of the ribosome-binding domains in eEF3, suggesting that these proteins utilize overlapping binding sites on the ribosome and consequently cannot function simultaneously on the same ribosome. Supporting this idea, we found that eEF3 overexpression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae diminished growth on amino acid starvation medium (Gcn(-) phenotype) and decreased eIF2α phosphorylation, and that the growth defect associated with constitutively active Gcn2 was diminished by eEF3 overexpression. Overexpression of the eEF3 HEAT domain, or C terminus, was sufficient to confer a Gcn(-) phenotype, and both fragments have ribosome affinity. eEF3 overexpression did not significantly affect Gcn1-ribosome association, but it exacerbated the Gcn(-) phenotype of Gcn1-M7A that has reduced ribosome affinity. Together, this suggests that eEF3 blocks Gcn1 regulatory function on the ribosome. We propose that the Gcn1-Gcn2 complex only functions on ribosomes with A-site-bound uncharged tRNA, because eEF3 does not occupy these stalled complexes.

Features of 80S mammalian ribosome and its subunits

It is generally believed that basic features of ribosomal functions are universally valid, but a systematic test still stands out for higher eukaryotic 80S ribosomes. Here we report: (i) differences in tRNA and mRNA binding capabilities of eukaryotic and bacterial ribosomes and their subunits. Eukaryotic 40S subunits bind mRNA exclusively in the presence of cognate tRNA, whereas bacterial 30S do bind mRNA already in the absence of tRNA. 80S ribosomes bind mRNA efficiently in the absence of tRNA. In contrast, bacterial 70S interact with mRNA more productively in the presence rather than in the absence of tRNA. (ii) States of initiation (P_i), pre-translocation (PRE) and post-translocation (POST) of the ribosome were checked and no significant functional differences to the prokaryotic counterpart were observed including the reciprocal linkage between A and E sites. (iii) Eukaryotic ribosomes bind tetracycline with an affinity 15 times lower than that of bacterial ribosomes (K_d 30 μM and 1–2 μM, respectively). The drug does not effect enzymatic A-site occupation of 80S ribosomes in contrast to non-enzymatic tRNA binding to the A-site. Both observations explain the relative resistance of eukaryotic ribosomes to this antibiotic.

Novel activity of eukaryotic translocase, eEF2: dissociation of the 80S ribosome into subunits with ATP but not with GTP

Ribosomes must dissociate into subunits in order to begin protein biosynthesis. The enzymes that catalyze this fundamental process in eukaryotes remained unknown. Here, we demonstrate that eukaryotic translocase, eEF2, which catalyzes peptide elongation in the presence of GTP, dissociates yeast 80S ribosomes into subunits in the presence of ATP but not GTP or other nucleoside triphosphates. Dissociation was detected by light scattering or ultracentrifugation after the split subunits were stabilized. ATP was hydrolyzed during the eEF2-dependent dissociation, while a non-hydrolyzable analog of ATP was inactive in ribosome splitting by eEF2. GTP inhibited not only ATP hydrolysis but also dissociation. Sordarin, a fungal eEF2 inhibitor, averted the splitting but stimulated ATP hydrolysis. Another elongation inhibitor, cycloheximide, also prevented eEF2/ATP-dependent splitting, while the inhibitory effect of fusidic acid on the splitting was nominal. Upon dissociation of the 80S ribosome, eEF2 was found on the subunits. We propose that the dissociation activity of eEF2/ATP plays a role in mobilizing 80S ribosomes for protein synthesis during the shift up of physiological conditions.

Domain and nucleotide dependence of the interaction between Saccharomyces cerevisiae translation elongation factors 3 and 1A

Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 3 (eEF3) is a fungal-specific ATPase proposed to catalyze the release of deacylated-tRNA from the ribosomal E-site. In addition, it has been shown to interact with the aminoacyl-tRNA binding GTPase elongation factor 1A (eEF1A), perhaps linking the E and A sites. Domain mapping demonstrates that amino acids 775-980 contain the eEF1A binding sites. Domain III of eEF1A, which is also involved in actin-related functions, is the site of eEF3 binding. The binding of eEF3 to eEF1A is enhanced by ADP, indicating the interaction is favored post-ATP hydrolysis but is not dependent on the eEF1A-bound nucleotide. A temperature-sensitive P915L mutant in the eEF1A binding site of eEF3 has reduced ATPase activity and affinity for eEF1A. These results support the model that upon ATP hydrolysis, eEF3 interacts with eEF1A to help catalyze the delivery of aminoacyl-tRNA at the A-site of the ribosome. The dynamics of when eEF3 interacts with eEF1A may be part of the signal for transition of the post to pre-translocational ribosomal state in yeast.

The Molecular Mechanics of Eukaryotic Translation

Great advances have been made in the past three decades in understanding the molecular mechanics underlying protein synthesis in bacteria, but our understanding of the corresponding events in eukaryotic organisms is only beginning to catch up. In this review we describe the current state of our knowledge and ignorance of the molecular mechanics underlying eukaryotic translation. We discuss the mechanisms conserved across the three kingdoms of life as well as the important divergences that have taken place in the pathway.

Functional interactions between yeast translation eukaryotic elongation factor (eEF) 1A and eEF3

The translation elongation machinery in fungi differs from other eukaryotes in its dependence upon eukaryotic elongation factor 3 (eEF3). eEF3 is essential in vivo and required for each cycle of the translation elongation process in vitro. Models predict eEF3 affects the delivery of cognate aminoacyl-tRNA, a function performed by eEF1A, by removing deacylated tRNA from the ribosomal Exit site. To dissect eEF3 function and its link to the A-site activities of eEF1A, we have identified a temperature-sensitive allele of the YEF3 gene. The F650S substitution, located between the two ATP binding cassettes, reduces both ribosome-dependent and intrinsic ATPase activities. In vivo this mutation increases sensitivity to aminoglycosidic drugs, causes a 50% reduction of total protein synthesis at permissive temperatures, slows run-off of polyribosomes, and reduces binding to eEF1A. Reciprocally, excess eEF3 confers synthetic slow growth, increased drug sensitivity, and reduced translation in an allele specific fashion with an E122K mutation in the GTP binding domain of eEF1A. In addition, this mutant form of eEF1A shows reduced binding of eEF3. Thus, optimal in vivo interactions between eEF3 and eEF1A are critical for protein synthesis.

Novel complexes of mammalian translation elongation factor eEF1A.GDP with uncharged tRNA and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase. Implications for tRNA channeling

Multimolecular complexes involving the eukaryotic elongation factor 1A (eEF1A) have been suggested to play an important role in the channeling (vectorial transfer) of tRNA during protein synthesis [Negrutskii, B.S. & El'skaya, A.V. (1998) Prog. Nucleic Acids Res. Mol. Biol. 60, 47-78]. Recently we have demonstrated that besides performing its canonical function of forming a ternary complex with GTP and aminoacyl-tRNA, the mammalian eEF1A can produce a noncanonical ternary complex with GDP and uncharged tRNA [Petrushenko, Z.M., Negrutskii, B.S., Ladokhin, A.S., Budkevich, T.V., Shalak, V.F. & El'skaya, A.V. (1997) FEBS Lett. 407, 13-17]. The [eEF1A.GDP.tRNA] complex has been hypothesized to interact with aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (ARS) resulting in a quaternary complex where uncharged tRNA is transferred to the enzyme for aminoacylation. Here we present the data on association of the [eEF1A.GDP.tRNA] complex with phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase (PheRS), e.g. the formation of the above quaternary complex detected by the gel-retardation and surface plasmon resonance techniques. To estimate the stability of the novel ternary and quaternary complexes of eEF1A the fluorescence method and BIAcore analysis were used. The dissociation constants for the [eEF1A.GDP.tRNA] and [eEF1A.GDP.tRNAPhe.PheRS] complexes were found to be 20 nm and 9 nm, respectively. We also revealed a direct interaction of PheRS with eEF1A in the absence of tRNAPhe (Kd = 21 nm). However, the addition of tRNAPhe accelerated eEF1A.GDP binding to the enzyme. A possible role of these stable novel ternary and quaternary complexes of eEF1A.GDP with tRNA and ARS in the channeled elongation cycle is discussed.

Functional interactions of an Escherichia coli ribosomal ATPase

The gene encoding ribosome-bound ATPase (RbbA), which occurs bound to 70S ribosomes and 30S subunits, has been identified. The amino-acid sequence of RbbA reveals the presence of two ATP-binding domains in the N-terminal half of the protein. RbbA harbors an intrinsic ATPase activity that is stimulated by both 70S ribosomes and 30S subunits. Here we show that purified recombinant RbbA markedly stimulates polyphenylalanine synthesis in the presence of the elongation factors Tu and G (EF-Tu and EF-G) and that the hydrolysis of ATP by RbbA is required to stimulate synthesis. RbbA is reported to have affinity for EF-Tu but not for EF-G. Additionally, RbbA copurifies with 30S ribosomal subunits and can be crosslinked to the ribosomal protein S1. Studies using a spectrum of antibiotics, including some of similar function, revealed that hygromycin, which binds to the 30S subunit, has a significant effect on the ATPase activity and on the affinity of RbbA for ribosomes. A possible role for RbbA in protein-chain elongation is proposed.

New chromatographic and biochemical strategies for quick preparative isolation of tRNA

A combination of hydrophobic chromatography on phenyl-Sepharose and reversed phase HPLC was used to purify individual tRNAs with high specific activity. The efficiency of chromatographic separation was enhanced by biochemical manipulations of the tRNA molecule, such as aminoacylation, formylation of the aminoacyl moiety and enzymatic deacylation. Optimal combinations are presented for three different cases. (i) tRNA(Phe) from Escherichia coli. This species was isolated by a combination of low pressure phenyl-Sepharose hydrophobic chromatography with RP-HPLC. (ii) tRNA(Ile) from E. coli: Aminoacylation increases the retention time for this tRNA in RP-HPLC. The recovered acylated intermediate is deacylated by reversion of the aminoacylation reaction and submitted to a second RP-HPLC run, in which deacylated tRNA(Ile) is recovered with high specific activity. (iii) tRNA(i)(Met) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The aminoacylated form of this tRNA is unstable. To increase stability, the aminoacylated form was formylated using E.coli: enzymes and, after one RP-HPLC step, the formylated derivative was deacylated using peptidyl-tRNA hydrolase from E.COLI: The tRNA(i)(Met) recovered after a second RP-HPLC run exhibited electrophoretic homogeneity and high specific activity upon aminoacylation. These combinations of chromatographic separation and biochemical modification can be readily adapted to the large-scale isolation of any particular tRNA.

Suramin blocks nucleotide triphosphate binding to ribosomal protein L3 from Trypanoplasma borreli

Ribosomal protein L3 (L3) has been demonstrated to participate in formation of the peptidyltransferase center and is essential for its catalytic activity. In the present study we show that L3 is able to bind nucleotide triphosphates with high and specific affinity in vitro. L3 was serendipitously identified by screening of a genomic phage library from a primitive kinetoplastid flagellate Trypanoplasma borreli with the ATPase domain of the topoisomerase II gene as a probe. The cloned gene was overexpressed and purified as a his-tag fusion protein in E. coli. Radioligand binding experiments, using [gamma-35S]ATP, showed that L3 is able to bind ATP but also GTP and UTP with similar high affinity (IC50 50-100 nM), while it has no ATPase activity. Furthermore, we showed that L3 has more than 500-fold higher affinity for nucleotide triphosphates compared to the corresponding nucleotide monophosphates and diphosphates. Molecular genetic and biochemical analyses allowed us to localize the NTP binding domain of L3 to the N-terminal 296 residues. Suramin, a polysulfonated naphthylamine derivative of urea, known for its chemotherapeutic effects completely inhibited the binding of [gamma-35S]ATP at subclinical levels. Results obtained with surface plasmon resonance technology showed that suramin both forms weak multimolecular complexes with L3 and binds strongly to L3 in nearly stoichiometric amounts.

Renaturation of rabbit liver aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases by 80S ribosomes

Protein biosynthesis machinery is thought to be mostly compartmentalised within the mammalian cell, involving direct interactions between different components of the translation apparatus. The present research concerns the functional meaning of the interaction between the rabbit liver aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and 80S ribosomes. We have shown that rabbit liver 80S ribosomes are able to enhance the activity of leucyl-tRNA synthetase, which is a component of high-molecular weight aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase complex, and phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase not associated within this complex. The ribosomes increase the initial rate of both the total reaction of tRNA aminoacylation and the first step of this reaction, the formation of leucyladenylate. Moreover, a positive cooperativity of the tRNA interaction with two binding sites of leucyl-tRNA synthetase is also increased in the presence of highly purified 80S ribosomes. The effect of 80S ribosomes on partly denatured leucyl-tRNA synthetase and phenylalanyl-tRNA synthetase and the protection by 80S ribosomes of both enzymes against inactivation indicate a refolding and stabilising capacity of the ribosomes. It is concluded that the interaction of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and 80S ribosomes is important for the maintenance of an active conformation of the enzymes.

Functional interaction of yeast elongation factor 3 with yeast ribosomes

Elongation factor 3 (EF-3) is a unique and essential requirement of the fungal translational apparatus. EF-3 is a monomeric protein with a molecular mass of 116,000. EF-3 is required by yeast ribosomes for in vitro translation and for in vivo growth. The protein stimulates the binding of EF-1 alpha :GTP:aa-tRNA ternary complex to the ribosomal A-site by facilitating release of deacylated-tRNA from the E-site. The reaction requires ATP hydrolysis. EF-3 contains two ATP-binding sequence motifs (NBS). NBSI is sufficient for the intrinsic ATPase function. NBSII is essential for ribosome-stimulated activity. By limited proteolysis, EF-3 was divided into two distinct functional domains. The N-terminal domain lacking the highly charged lysine blocks failed to bind ribosomes and was inactive in the ribosome-stimulated ATPase activity. The C-terminally derived lysine-rich fragment showed strong binding to yeast ribosomes. The purported S5 homology region of EF-3 at the N-terminal end has been reported to interact with 18S ribosomal RNA. We postulate that EF-3 contacts rRNA and/or protein(s) through the C-terminal end. Removal of these residues severely weakens its interaction mediated possibly through the N-terminal domain of the protein.

Yeast elongation factor 3: structure and function

Elongation factor 3 (EF-3) is a unique and essential requirement of the fungal translational apparatus. EF-3 is a single polypeptide protein with a molecular weight of 116,000 required by yeast ribosomes for in vitro translation and for in vivo growth. The YEF3 gene, located on chromosome xii, is essential for the survival of yeast. The deduced amino acid sequence of EF-3 has revealed the presence of duplicated ATP-binding cassettes similar to those present in the membrane associated transporters. The carboxy-terminus of EF-3 contains blocks of lysine boxes essential for its functional interaction with yeast ribosomes. EF-3 stimulates binding of aminoacyl-tRNA to the ribosomal A-site by facilitating release of deacylated tRNA from the exit site (E-site). Chasing experiments revealed that EF-3 enhances the rate of tRNA dissociation from the E-site by a factor of two without affecting the affinity of the site for tRNA. EF-3 function is dependent on ATP hydrolysis. The existence of functional homologs of EF-3 in higher eukaryotes is still an open question. Further investigations are needed to settle this issue.

Models of the elongation cycle: an evaluation

The central process for the transfer of the genetic information from the nucleic acid world into the structure of proteins is the ribosomal elongation cycle, where the sequence of codons is translated into the sequence of amino acids. The nascent polypeptide chain is elongated by one amino acid during the reactions of one cycle. Essentially, three models for the elongation cycle have been proposed. The allosteric three-site model and the hybrid-site model describe different aspects of tRNA binding and do not necessarily contradict each other. However, the alpha-epsilon model is not compatible with both models. The three models are evaluated in the light of recent results on the tRNA localization within the ribosome: the tRNAs of the elongating ribosome could be localized by two different techniques, viz. an advanced method of small-angle neutron scattering and cryo-electron microscopy. The best fit with the biochemical and structural data is obtained with the alpha-epsilon model.

Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 alpha: structure, expression, functions, and possible role in aminoacyl-tRNA channeling

This review offers a comprehensive analysis of eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1 (eEF-1 alpha) in comparison with its bacterial counterpart EF-Tu. Altogether, the data presented indicate some variances in the elongation process in prokaryotes and eukaryotes. The differences may be attributed to translational channeling and compartmentalization of protein synthesis in higher eukaryotic cells. The functional importance of the EF-1 multisubunit complex and expression of its subunits under miscellaneous cellular conditions are reviewed. A number of novel functions of EF-1 alpha, which may contribute to the coordinate regulation of multiple cellular processes including growth, division, and transformation, are characterized.