The terminal adenosine of tRNA(Gln) mediates tRNA-dependent amino acid recognition by glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase

Biochemistry of Aminoacyl tRNA Synthetase and tRNAs and Their Engineering for Cell-Free and Synthetic Cell Applications

Cell-free biology is increasingly utilized for engineering biological systems, incorporating novel functionality, and circumventing many of the complications associated with cells. The central dogma describes the information flow in biology consisting of transcription and translation steps to decode genetic information. Aminoacyl tRNA synthetases (AARSs) and tRNAs are key components involved in translation and thus protein synthesis. This review provides information on AARSs and tRNA biochemistry, their role in the translation process, summarizes progress in cell-free engineering of tRNAs and AARSs, and discusses prospects and challenges lying ahead in cell-free engineering.

The influence of identity elements on the aminoacylation of tRNA(Arg) by plant and Escherichia coli arginyl-tRNA synthetases

Identity elements determine the accurate recognition between tRNAs and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. The arginine system from yeast and Escherichia coli has been studied extensively in the past. However, information about the enzymes from higher eukaryotes is limited and plant aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases have been largely ignored in this respect. We have designed in vitro tRNA transcripts, based on the soybean tRNA(Arg) primary structure, aiming to investigate its specific aminoacylation by two recombinant plant arginyl-tRNA synthetases and to compare this with the enzyme from E. coli. Identity elements at positions 20 and 35 in plants parallel those previously established for bacteria. Cryptic identity elements in the plant system that are not revealed within a tRNA(Arg) consensus sequence compiled from isodecoders corresponding to nine distinct cytoplasmic, mitochondrial and plastid isoaccepting sequences are located in the acceptor stem. Additionally, it has been shown that U20a and A38 are essential for a fully efficient cognate E. coli arginylation, whereas, for the plant arginyl-tRNA synthetases, these bases can be replaced by G20a and C38 with full retention of activity. G10, a constituent of the 10:25:45 tertiary interaction, is essential for both plant and E. coli activity. Amino acid recognition in terms of discriminating between arginine and canavanine by the arginyl-tRNA synthetase from both kingdoms may be manipulated by changes at different sites within the tRNA structure.

The α-amino group of the threonine substrate as the general base during tRNA aminoacylation: a new version of substrate-assisted catalysis predicted by hybrid DFT

Density functional theory-based methods in combination with large chemical models have been used to investigate the mechanism of the second half-reaction catalyzed by Thr-tRNA synthetase: aminoacyl transfer from Thr-AMP onto the (A76)3'OH of the cognate tRNA. In particular, we have examined pathways in which an active site His309 residue is either protonated or neutral (i.e., potentially able to act as a base). In the protonated His309-assisted mechanism, the rate-limiting step is formation of the tetrahedral intermediate. The barrier for this step is 155.0 kJ mol(-1), and thus, such a pathway is concluded to not be enzymatically feasible. For the neutral His309-assisted mechanism, two models were used with the difference being whether Lys465 was included. For either model, the barrier of the rate-limiting step is below the upper thermodynamic enzymatic limit of ~125 kJ mol(-1). Specifically, without Lys465, the rate-limiting barrier is 122.1 kJ mol(-1) and corresponds to a rotation about the tetrahedral intermediate C(carb)-OH bond. For the model with Lys465, the rate-limiting barrier is slightly lower and corresponds to the formation of the tetrahedral intermediate. Importantly, for both "neutral His309" models, the neutral amino group of the threonyl substrate directly acts as the proton acceptor; in the formation of the tetrahedral intermediate, the (A76)3'OH proton is directly transferred onto the Thr-NH(2). Therefore, the overall mechanism follows a general substrate-assisted catalytic mechanism.

Architectural underpinnings of the genetic code for glutamine

Structure-based mutational analysis was used to probe the architecture of the glutamine binding pocket in Escherichia coli glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS). Crystallographic studies of several different GlnRS complexes in a lattice that supports catalytic activity have shown that the glutamine amide group makes only ambiguous hydrogen-bonding interactions with a tyrosine hydroxyl and bound water molecule, rather than the highly specific hydrogen-bonding and electrostatic interactions made by the substrate amino acid in all other nonediting tRNA synthetases. Further, the amide oxygen of substrate glutamine accepts a hydrogen bond from the 3'-ribose hydroxyl group of ATP, an unusual distal substrate-substrate interaction also not observed in any other tRNA synthetase complex. Steady-state and pre-steady-state kinetic analysis using a 3'-dATP analogue in place of ATP shows that removal of this distal interaction does not affect K(m) for the analogue as compared with ATP, yet decreases the efficiency of aminoacylation by 10(3)-fold while significantly elevating K(m) for glutamine. In other experiments, mutation of eight nearly fully conserved residues in the glutamine binding pocket reveals decreases in k(cat)/K(m) ranging from 5- to 400-fold, and in K(d) for glutamine of up to at least 60-fold. Amino acid replacements at Tyr211 and Gln255, which participate with substrate glutamine in an antidromic circular arrangement of hydrogen bonds, cause the most severe decreases in catalytic efficiency. This finding suggests that the relative absence of direct hydrogen bonds to glutamine may be in part compensated by additional binding energy derived from the enhanced stability of this circular network. Calculations of electrostatic surface potential in the active site further suggest that a complementary electrostatic environment is also an important determinant of glutamine binding.

Interaction of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases with tRNA: general principles and distinguishing characteristics of the high-molecular-weight substrate recognition

This review summarizes results of numerous (mainly functional) studies that have been accumulated over recent years on the problem of tRNA recognition by aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases. Development and employment of approaches that use synthetic mutant and chimeric tRNAs have demonstrated general principles underlying highly specific interaction in different systems. The specificity of interaction is determined by a certain number of nucleotides and structural elements of tRNA (constituting the set of recognition elements or specificity determinants), which are characteristic of each pair. Crystallographic structures available for many systems provide the details of the molecular basis of selective interaction. Diversity and identity of biochemical functions of the recognition elements make substantial contribution to the specificity of such interactions.

Structural bases of transfer RNA-dependent amino acid recognition and activation by glutamyl-tRNA synthetase

Glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) is one of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases that require the cognate tRNA for specific amino acid recognition and activation. We analyzed the role of tRNA in amino acid recognition by crystallography. In the GluRS*tRNA(Glu)*Glu structure, GluRS and tRNA(Glu) collaborate to form a highly complementary L-glutamate-binding site. This collaborative site is functional, as it is formed in the same manner in pretransition-state mimic, GluRS*tRNA(Glu)*ATP*Eol (a glutamate analog), and posttransition-state mimic, GluRS*tRNA(Glu)*ESA (a glutamyl-adenylate analog) structures. In contrast, in the GluRS*Glu structure, only GluRS forms the amino acid-binding site, which is defective and accounts for the binding of incorrect amino acids, such as D-glutamate and L-glutamine. Therefore, tRNA(Glu) is essential for formation of the completely functional binding site for L-glutamate. These structures, together with our previously described structures, reveal that tRNA plays a crucial role in accurate positioning of both L-glutamate and ATP, thus driving the amino acid activation.

Discrimination of cognate and noncognate substrates at the active site of class I lysyl-tRNA synthetase

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are divided into two unrelated structural classes, with lysyl-tRNA synthetase (LysRS) being the only enzyme represented in both classes. On the basis of the structure of l-lysine complexed with Pyrococcus horikoshii class I LysRS (LysRS1) and homology to glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS), residues implicated in amino acid recognition and noncognate substrate discrimination were systematically replaced in Borrelia burgdorferi LysRS1. The catalytic efficiency of steady-state aminoacylation (k(cat)/K(M)) with lysine by LysRS1 variants fell by 1-4 orders of magnitude compared to that of the wild type. Disruption of putative hydrogen bonding interactions through replacement of G29, T31, and Y269 caused up to 1500-fold reductions in k(cat)/K(M), similar to changes previously observed for comparable variants of class II LysRS (LysRS2). Replacements of W220 and H242, both of which are implicated in hydrophobic interactions with the side chain of lysine, resulted in more dramatic changes with up to 40000-fold reductions in k(cat)/K(M) observed. This indicates that the more compact LysRS1 active site employs both electrostatic and hydrophobic interactions during lysine discrimination, explaining the ability of LysRS1 to discriminate against noncognate substrates accepted by LysRS2. Several of the LysRS1 variants were found to be more specific than the wild type with respect to noncognate amino acid recognition but less efficient in cognate aminoacylation. This indicates that LysRS1 compromises between efficient catalysis and substrate discrimination, in contrast to LysRS2 which is considerably more effective in catalysis but is less specific than its class I counterpart.

Divergence in Noncognate Amino Acid Recognition between Class I and Class II Lysyl-tRNA Synthetases

Lysine insertion during coded protein synthesis requires lysyl-tRNA(Lys), which is synthesized by lysyl-tRNA synthetase (LysRS). Two unrelated forms of LysRS are known: LysRS2, which is found in eukaryotes, most bacteria, and a few archaea, and LysRS1, which is found in most archaea and a few bacteria. To compare amino acid recognition between the two forms of LysRS, the effects of l-lysine analogues on aminoacylation were investigated. Both enzymes showed stereospecificity toward the l-enantiomer of lysine and discriminated against noncognate amino acids with different R-groups (arginine, ornithine). Lysine analogues containing substitutions at other positions were generally most effective as inhibitors of LysRS2. For example, the K(i) values for aminoacylation of S-(2-aminoethyl)-l-cysteine and l-lysinamide were over 180-fold lower with LysRS2 than with LysRS1. Of the other analogues tested, only gamma-aminobutyric acid showed a significantly higher K(i) for LysRS2 than LysRS1. These data indicate that the lysine-binding site is more open in LysRS2 than in LysRS1, in agreement with previous structural studies. The physiological significance of divergent amino acid recognition was reflected by the in vivo resistance to growth inhibition imparted by LysRS1 against S-(2-aminoethyl)-l-cysteine and LysRS2 against gamma-aminobutyric acid. These differences in resistance to naturally occurring noncognate amino acids suggest the distribution of LysRS1 and LysRS2 contributes to quality control during protein synthesis. In addition, the specific inhibition of LysRS1 indicates it is a potential drug target.

The zinc-binding site of a class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase is a SWIM domain that modulates amino acid binding via the tRNA acceptor arm

In its tRNA acceptor end binding domain, the glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS) of Escherichia coli contains one atom of zinc that holds the extremities of a segment (Cys98-x-Cys100-x24-Cys125-x-His127) homologous to the Escherichia coli glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS) loop where a leucine residue stabilizes the peeled-back conformation of tRNAGln acceptor end. We report here that the GluRS zinc-binding region belongs to the novel SWIM domain family characterized by the signature C-x-C-xn-C-x-H (n = 6-25), and predicted to interact with DNA or proteins. In the presence of tRNAGlu, the GluRS C100Y variant has a lower affinity for l-glutamate than the wild-type enzyme, with Km and Kd values increased 12- and 20-fold, respectively. On the other hand, in the absence of tRNAGlu, glutamate binds with the same affinity to the C100Y variant and to wild-type GluRS. In the context of the close structural and mechanistic similarities between GluRS and GlnRS, these results indicate that the GluRS SWIM domain modulates glutamate binding to the active site via its interaction with the tRNAGlu acceptor arm. Phylogenetic analyses indicate that ancestral GluRSs had a strong zinc-binding site in their SWIM domain. Considering that all GluRSs require a cognate tRNA to activate glutamate, and that some of them have different or no putative zinc-binding residues in the corresponding positions, the properties of the C100Y variant suggest that the GluRS SWIM domains evolved to position correctly the tRNA acceptor end in the active site, thereby contributing to the formation of the glutamate binding site.

tRNA-dependent active site assembly in a class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase

The crystal structure of ligand-free E. coli glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS) at 2.4 A resolution shows that substrate binding is essential to construction of a catalytically proficient active site. tRNA binding generates structural changes throughout the enzyme, repositioning key active site peptides that bind glutamine and ATP. The structure gives insight into longstanding questions regarding the tRNA dependence of glutaminyl adenylate formation, the coupling of amino acid and tRNA selectivities, and the roles of specific pathways for transmission of tRNA binding signals to the active site. Comparative analysis of the unliganded and tRNA-bound structures shows, in detail, how flexibility is built into the enzyme architecture and suggests that the induced-fit transitions are a key underlying determinant of both amino acid and tRNA specificity.

Amino acid discrimination by a class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase specified by negative determinants

The 2.5 A crystal structure of Escherichia coli glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase in a quaternary complex with tRNA(Gln), an ATP analog and glutamate reveals that the non-cognate amino acid adopts a distinct binding mode within the active site cleft. In contrast to the binding of cognate glutamine, one oxygen of the charged glutamate carboxylate group makes a direct ion-pair interaction with the strictly conserved Arg30 residue located in the first half of the dinucleotide fold domain. The nucleophilic alpha-carboxylate moiety of glutamate is mispositioned with respect to both the ATP alpha-phosphate and terminal tRNA ribose groups, suggesting that a component of amino acid discrimination resides at the catalytic step of the reaction. Further, the other side-chain carboxylate oxygen of glutamate is found in a position identical to that previously proposed to be occupied by the NH(2) group of the cognate glutamine substrate. At this position, the glutamate oxygen accepts hydrogen bonds from the hydroxyl moiety of Tyr211 and a water molecule. These findings demonstrate that amino acid specificity by GlnRS cannot arise from hydrogen bonds donated by the cognate glutamine amide to these same moieties, as previously suggested. Instead, Arg30 functions as a negative determinant to drive binding of non-cognate glutamate into a non-productive orientation. The poorly differentiated cognate amino acid-binding site in GlnRS may be a consequence of the late emergence of this enzyme from the eukaryotic lineage of glutamyl-tRNA synthetases.

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis

Aminoacyl-tRNAs are substrates for translation and are pivotal in determining how the genetic code is interpreted as amino acids. The function of aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis is to precisely match amino acids with tRNAs containing the corresponding anticodon. This is primarily achieved by the direct attachment of an amino acid to the corresponding tRNA by an aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase, although intrinsic proofreading and extrinsic editing are also essential in several cases. Recent studies of aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis, mainly prompted by the advent of whole genome sequencing and the availability of a vast body of structural data, have led to an expanded and more detailed picture of how aminoacyl-tRNAs are synthesized. This article reviews current knowledge of the biochemical, structural, and evolutionary facets of aminoacyl-tRNA synthesis.

The tRNA-dependent activation of arginine by arginyl-tRNA synthetase requires inter-domain communication

The tRNA-dependent amino acid activation catalyzed by mammalian arginyl-tRNA synthetase has been characterized. A conditional lethal mutant of Chinese hamster ovary cells that exhibits reduced arginyl-tRNA synthetase activity (Arg-1), and two of its derived revertants (Arg-1R4 and Arg-1R5) were analyzed at the structural and functional levels. A single nucleotide change, resulting in a Cys to Tyr substitution at position 599 of arginyl-tRNA synthetase, is responsible for the defective phenotype of the thermosensitive and arginine hyper-auxotroph Arg-1 cell line. The two revertants have a single additional mutation resulting in a Met222 to Ile change for Arg-1R4 or a Tyr506 to Ser change for Arg-1R5. The corresponding mutant enzymes were expressed in yeast and purified. The Cys599 to Tyr mutation affects both the thermal stability of arginyl-tRNA synthetase and the kinetic parameters for arginine in the ATP-PP(i) exchange and tRNA aminoacylation reactions. This mutation is located underneath the floor of the Rossmann fold catalytic domain characteristic of class 1 aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, near the end of a long helix belonging to the alpha-helix bundle C-terminal domain distinctive of class 1a synthetases. For the Met222 to Ile revertant, there is very little effect of the mutation on the interaction of arginyl-tRNA synthetase with either of its substrates. However, this mutation increases the thermal stability of arginyl-tRNA synthetase, thereby leading to reversion of the thermosensitive phenotype by increasing the steady-state level of the enzyme in vivo. In contrast, for the Arg-1R5 cell line, reversion of the phenotype is due to an increased catalytic efficiency of the C599Y/Y506S double mutant as compared to the initial C599Y enzyme. In light of the location of the mutations in the 3D structure of the enzyme modeled using the crystal structure of the closely related yeast arginyl-tRNA synthetase, the kinetic analysis of these mutants suggests that the obligatory tRNA-induced activation of the catalytic site of arginyl-tRNA synthetase involves interdomain signal transduction via the long helices that build the tRNA-binding domain of the enzyme and link the site of interaction of the anticodon domain of tRNA to the floor of the active site.

Retracing the evolution of amino acid specificity in glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase

Molecular phylogenetic studies of glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase suggest that it has relatively recently evolved from the closely related enzyme glutamyl-tRNA synthetase. We have now attempted to retrace one of the key steps in this process by selecting glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase mutants displaying enhanced glutamic acid recognition. Mutagenesis of two residues proximal to the active site, Phe-90 and Tyr-240, was found to improve glutamic acid recognition 3-5-fold in vitro and resulted in the misacylation of tRNA(Gln) with glutamic acid. In vivo expression of the genes encoding these misacylating variants of glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase reduced cellular growth rates by 40%, probably as a result of an increase in translational error rates. These results provide the first biochemical evidence that glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase originated through duplication and consequent diversification of an ancestral glutamyl-tRNA synthetase-encoding gene.