Large-scale mining for similar protein binding pockets: with RAPMAD retrieval on the fly becomes real

SiteMine: Large-scale binding site similarity searching in protein structure databases

Drug discovery and design challenges, such as drug repurposing, analyzing protein-ligand and protein-protein complexes, ligand promiscuity studies, or function prediction, can be addressed by protein binding site similarity analysis. Although numerous tools exist, they all have individual strengths and drawbacks with regard to run time, provision of structure superpositions, and applicability to diverse application domains. Here, we introduce SiteMine, an all-in-one database-driven, alignment-providing binding site similarity search tool to tackle the most pressing challenges of binding site comparison. The performance of SiteMine is evaluated on the ProSPECCTs benchmark, showing a promising performance on most of the data sets. The method performs convincingly regarding all quality criteria for reliable binding site comparison, offering a novel state-of-the-art approach for structure-based molecular design based on binding site comparisons. In a SiteMine showcase, we discuss the high structural similarity between cathepsin L and calpain 1 binding sites and give an outlook on the impact of this finding on structure-based drug design. SiteMine is available at https://uhh.de/naomi.

VirtuousPocketome: a computational tool for screening protein-ligand complexes to identify similar binding sites

Protein residues within binding pockets play a critical role in determining the range of ligands that can interact with a protein, influencing its structure and function. Identifying structural similarities in proteins offers valuable insights into their function and activation mechanisms, aiding in predicting protein-ligand interactions, anticipating off-target effects, and facilitating the development of therapeutic agents. Numerous computational methods assessing global or local similarity in protein cavities have emerged, but their utilization is impeded by complexity, impractical automation for amino acid pattern searches, and an inability to evaluate the dynamics of scrutinized protein-ligand systems. Here, we present a general, automatic and unbiased computational pipeline, named VirtuousPocketome, aimed at screening huge databases of proteins for similar binding pockets starting from an interested protein-ligand complex. We demonstrate the pipeline's potential by exploring a recently-solved human bitter taste receptor, i.e. the TAS2R46, complexed with strychnine. We pinpointed 145 proteins sharing similar binding sites compared to the analysed bitter taste receptor and the enrichment analysis highlighted the related biological processes, molecular functions and cellular components. This work represents the foundation for future studies aimed at understanding the effective role of tastants outside the gustatory system: this could pave the way towards the rationalization of the diet as a supplement to standard pharmacological treatments and the design of novel tastants-inspired compounds to target other proteins involved in specific diseases or disorders. The proposed pipeline is publicly accessible, can be applied to any protein-ligand complex, and could be expanded to screen any database of protein structures.

Structural fractal analysis of the active sites of acetylcholinesterase from various organisms

Acetylcholinesterase (AChE) is the object of many studies due to the fact that it plays an important role in the vital activity of organisms. In particular, when new AChE inhibitors are developed, much attention is paid to the specificity of their action. One of the approaches used to study the specificity is to compare AChE taken from various organisms. In this work, crystallographic data are used to investigate the active sites of AChE (ASAs) in the free (uncomplexed) state for the following five organisms: Homo sapiens (HS), Mus musculus (MM), Torpedo californica (TC), Electrophorus electricus (EE), and Drosophila melanogaster (DM). The structural fractal analysis (SFA) proposed by us earlier is used as a research method. This method is based on the calculation and comparison of the fractal dimensions of molecular structures. SFA demonstrates that there are no significant structural differences between the active sites of human AChE and other AChEs. However, differences are found for the MM/EE pair. Further analysis of individual AARs has revealed two different areas of active sites. Ser203, Trp236, Phe338, and Tyr341 are found to belong to a variable region, and the remaining AARs belong to a conservative region of the ASAs. The fraction of "variability" is low, 0.8%.

Estimating the Similarity between Protein Pockets

With the exponential increase in publicly available protein structures, the comparison of protein binding sites naturally emerged as a scientific topic to explain observations or generate hypotheses for ligand design, notably to predict ligand selectivity for on- and off-targets, explain polypharmacology, and design target-focused libraries. The current review summarizes the state-of-the-art computational methods applied to pocket detection and comparison as well as structural druggability estimates. The major strengths and weaknesses of current pocket descriptors, alignment methods, and similarity search algorithms are presented. Lastly, an exhaustive survey of both retrospective and prospective applications in diverse medicinal chemistry scenarios illustrates the capability of the existing methods and the hurdle that still needs to be overcome for more accurate predictions.

Fast Local Alignment of Protein Pockets (FLAPP): A System-Compiled Program for Large-Scale Binding Site Alignment

Protein function is a direct consequence of its sequence, structure, and the arrangement at the binding site. Bioinformatics using sequence analysis is typically used to gain a first insight into protein function. Protein structures, on the other hand, provide a higher resolution platform into understanding functions. As the protein structural information is increasingly becoming available through experimental structure determination and through advances in computational methods for structure prediction, the opportunity to utilize these data is also increasing. Structural analysis of small molecule ligand binding sites in particular provides a direct and more accurate window to infer protein function. However, it remains a poorly utilized resource due to the huge computational cost of existing methods that make large-scale structural comparisons of binding sites prohibitive. Here, we present an algorithm called FLAPP that produces very rapid atomic level alignments. By combining clique matching in graphs and the power of modern CPU architectures, FLAPP aligns a typical pair of binding sites at ∼12.5 ms using a single CPU core, ∼1 ms using 12 cores on a standard desktop machine, and performs a PDB-wide scan in 1-2 min. We perform rigorous validation of the algorithm at multiple levels of complexity and show that FLAPP provides accurate alignments. We also present a case study involving vitamin B12 binding sites to showcase the usefulness of FLAPP for performing an exhaustive alignment-based PDB-wide scan. We expect that this tool will be invaluable to the scientific community to quickly align millions of site pairs on a normal desktop machine to gain insights into protein function and drug discovery for drug target and off-target identification and polypharmacology.

Site2Vec: a reference frame invariant algorithm for vector embedding of protein–ligand binding sites

Protein–ligand interactions are one of the fundamental types of molecular interactions in living systems. Ligands are small molecules that interact with protein molecules at specific regions on their surfaces called binding sites. Binding sites would also determine ADMET properties of a drug molecule. Tasks such as assessment of protein functional similarity and detection of side effects of drugs need identification of similar binding sites of disparate proteins across diverse pathways. To this end, methods for computing similarities between binding sites are still evolving and is an active area of research even today. Machine learning methods for similarity assessment require feature descriptors of binding sites. Traditional methods based on hand engineered motifs and atomic configurations are not scalable across several thousands of sites. In this regard, deep neural network algorithms are now deployed which can capture very complex input feature space. However, one fundamental challenge in applying deep learning to structures of binding sites is the input representation and the reference frame. We report here a novel algorithm, Site2Vec, that derives reference frame invariant vector embedding of a protein–ligand binding site. The method is based on pairwise distances between representative points and chemical compositions in terms of constituent amino acids of a site. The vector embedding serves as a locality sensitive hash function for proximity queries and determining similar sites. The method has been the top performer with more than 95% quality scores in extensive benchmarking studies carried over 10 data sets and against 23 other site comparison methods in the field. The algorithm serves for high throughput processing and has been evaluated for stability with respect to reference frame shifts, coordinate perturbations and residue mutations. We also provide the method as a standalone executable and a web service hosted at (http://services.iittp.ac.in/bioinfo/home).

Binding site characterization - similarity, promiscuity, and druggability

The elucidation of non-obvious binding site similarities has provided useful indications for the establishment of polypharmacology, the identification of potential off-targets, or the repurposing of known drugs. The concept underlying all of these approaches is promiscuous binding which can be analyzed from a ligand-based or a binding site-based perspective. Herein, we applied methods for the automated analysis and comparison of protein binding sites to study promiscuous binding on a novel dataset of sites in complex with ligands sharing common shape and physicochemical properties. We show the suitability of this dataset for the benchmarking of novel binding site comparison methods. Our investigations also reveal promising directions for further in-depth analyses of promiscuity and druggability in a pocket-centered manner. Drawbacks concerning binding site similarity assessment and druggability prediction are outlined, enabling researchers to avoid the typical pitfalls of binding site analyses.

A benchmark driven guide to binding site comparison: An exhaustive evaluation using tailor-made data sets (ProSPECCTs)

The automated comparison of protein-ligand binding sites provides useful insights into yet unexplored site similarities. Various stages of computational and chemical biology research can benefit from this knowledge. The search for putative off-targets and the establishment of polypharmacological effects by comparing binding sites led to promising results for numerous projects. Although many cavity comparison methods are available, a comprehensive analysis to guide the choice of a tool for a specific application is wanting. Moreover, the broad variety of binding site modeling approaches, comparison algorithms, and scoring metrics impedes this choice. Herein, we aim to elucidate strengths and weaknesses of binding site comparison methodologies. A detailed benchmark study is the only possibility to rationalize the selection of appropriate tools for different scenarios. Specific evaluation data sets were developed to shed light on multiple aspects of binding site comparison. An assembly of all applied benchmark sets (ProSPECCTs–Protein Site Pairs for the Evaluation of Cavity Comparison Tools) is made available for the evaluation and optimization of further and still emerging methods. The results indicate the importance of such analyses to facilitate the choice of a methodology that complies with the requirements of a specific scientific challenge.

Binding site similarities are useful in the context of promiscuity prediction, drug repurposing, the analysis of protein-ligand and protein-protein complexes, function prediction, and further fields of general interest in chemical biology and biochemistry. Many years of research have led to the development of a multitude of methods for binding site analysis and comparison. On the one hand, their availability supports research. On the other hand, the huge number of methods hampers the efficient selection of a specific tool. Our research is dedicated to the analysis of different cavity comparison tools. We use several binding site data sets to establish guidelines which can be applied to ensure a successful application of comparison methods by circumventing potential pitfalls.

GPU-Based Point Cloud Superpositioning for Structural Comparisons of Protein Binding Sites

In this paper, we present a novel approach to solve the labeled point cloud superpositioning problem for performing structural comparisons of protein binding sites. The solution is based on a parallel evolution strategy that operates on large populations and runs on GPU hardware. The proposed evolution strategy reduces the likelihood of getting stuck in a local optimum of the multimodal real-valued optimization problem represented by labeled point cloud superpositioning. The performance of the GPU-based parallel evolution strategy is compared to a previously proposed CPU-based sequential approach for labeled point cloud superpositioning, indicating that the GPU-based parallel evolution strategy leads to qualitatively better results and significantly shorter runtimes, with speed improvements of up to a factor of 1,500 for large populations. Binary classification tests based on the ATP, NADH, and FAD protein subsets of CavBase, a database containing putative binding sites, show average classification rate improvements from about 92 percent (CPU) to 96 percent (GPU). Further experiments indicate that the proposed GPU-based labeled point cloud superpositioning approach can be superior to traditional protein comparison approaches based on sequence alignments.

Mapping the 3D structures of small molecule binding sites

Background

Analysis of the 3D structures of protein–ligand binding sites can provide valuable insights for drug discovery. Binding site comparison (BSC) studies can be employed to elucidate the function of orphan proteins or to predict the potential for polypharmacology. Many previous binding site analyses only consider binding sites surrounding an experimentally observed bound ligand.

Results

To encompass potential protein–ligand binding sites that do not have ligands known to bind, we have incorporated fpocket cavity detection software and assessed the impact of this inclusion on BSC performance. Using fpocket, we generated a database of ligand-independent potential binding sites and applied the BSC tool, SiteHopper, to analyze similarity relationships between protein binding sites. We developed a method for clustering potential binding sites using a curated dataset of structures for six therapeutically relevant proteins from diverse protein classes in the protein data bank. Two clustering methods were explored; hierarchical clustering and a density-based method adept at excluding noise and outliers from a dataset. We introduce circular plots to visualize binding site structure space. From the datasets analyzed in this study, we highlight a structural relationship between binding sites of cationic trypsin and prothrombin, protein targets known to bind structurally similar small molecules, exemplifying the potential utility of objectively and holistically mapping binding site space from the structural proteome.

Conclusions

We present a workflow for the objective mapping of potential protein–ligand binding sites derived from the currently available structural proteome. We show that ligand-independent binding site detection tools can be introduced without excessive penalty on BSC performance. Clustering combined with intuitive visualization tools can be applied to map relationships between the 3D structures of protein binding sites.Graphical abstract

Considerations of Protein Subpockets in Fragment-Based Drug Design

While the fragment-based drug design approach continues to gain importance, gaps in the tools and methods available in the identification and accurate utilization of protein subpockets have limited the scope. The importance of these features of small molecule-protein recognition is highlighted with several examples. A generalized solution for the identification of subpockets and corresponding chemical fragments remains elusive, but there are numerous advancements in methods that can be used in combination to address subpockets. Finally, additional examples of approaches that consider the relative importance of small-molecule co-dependence of protein conformations are highlighted to emphasize an increased significance of subpockets, especially at protein interfaces.

Detection of Binding Site Molecular Interaction Field Similarities

Protein binding-site similarity detection methods can be used to predict protein function and understand molecular recognition, as a tool in drug design for drug repurposing and polypharmacology, and for the prediction of the molecular determinants of drug toxicity. Here, we present IsoMIF, a method able to identify binding site molecular interaction field similarities across protein families. IsoMIF utilizes six chemical probes and the detection of subgraph isomorphisms to identify geometrically and chemically equivalent sections of protein cavity pairs. The method is validated using six distinct data sets, four of those previously used in the validation of other methods. The mean area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) obtained across data sets for IsoMIF is higher than those of other methods. Furthermore, while IsoMIF obtains consistently high AUC values across data sets, other methods perform more erratically across data sets. IsoMIF can be used to predict function from structure, to detect potential cross-reactivity or polypharmacology targets, and to help suggest bioisosteric replacements to known binding molecules. Given that IsoMIF detects spatial patterns of molecular interaction field similarities, its predictions are directly related to pharmacophores and may be readily translated into modeling decisions in structure-based drug design. IsoMIF may in principle detect similar binding sites with distinct amino acid arrangements that lead to equivalent interactions within the cavity. The source code to calculate and visualize MIFs and MIF similarities are freely available.