Method To Assess Packing Quality of Transmembrane α-Helices in Proteins. 1. Parametrization Using Structural Data

Structural, dynamic, and functional aspects of helix association in membranes: a computational view

This review surveys recent achievements of molecular computer modeling in understanding spatial structure, dynamics, and mechanisms of functioning of transmembrane α-helical dimers in membranes. The factors driving self-association of hydrophobic helices in the membrane milieu are considered with examples of their applications to biologically relevant problems. The emphasis is made on the recent results, which help to understand important aspects of structure-function relations for these systems and their biological activity. Limitations and shortcomings of the methods, along with their perspectives in design of new membrane active agents, are discussed.

Evidence that interaction between conserved residues in transmembrane helices 2, 3, and 7 are crucial for human VPAC1 receptor activation

The VPAC(1) receptor belongs to family B of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR-B) and is activated upon binding of the vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP). Despite the recent determination of the structure of the N terminus of several members of this receptor family, little is known about the structure of the transmembrane (TM) region and about the molecular mechanisms leading to activation. In the present study, we designed a new structural model of the TM domain and combined it with experimental mutagenesis experiments to investigate the interaction network that governs ligand binding and receptor activation. Our results suggest that this network involves the cluster of residues Arg(188) in TM2, Gln(380) in TM7, and Asn(229) in TM3. This cluster is expected to be altered upon VIP binding, because Arg(188) has been shown previously to interact with Asp(3) of VIP. Several point mutations at positions 188, 229, and 380 were experimentally characterized and were shown to severely affect VIP binding and/or VIP-mediated cAMP production. Double mutants built from reciprocal residue exchanges exhibit strong cooperative or anticooperative effects, thereby indicating the spatial proximity of residues Arg(188), Gln(380), and Asn(229). Because these residues are highly conserved in the GPCR-B family, they can moreover be expected to have a general role in mediating function.

[Prediction of the spatial structure of proteins: emphasis on membrane targets]

Knowledge of the spatial structure of proteins is a prerequisite for both awareness of their functional mechanisms and the framework for rational drug discovery and design. Meanwhile, direct structural determination is often hampered or impractical due to the complexity, expensiveness, and limited capabilities of experimental techniques. These issues are especially pronounced for integral membrane proteins. On numerous occasions, the theoretical prediction of protein structures may facilitate the process by exploiting physical or empirical principles. This paper surveys modern techniques for the prediction of the spatial structure of proteins using computer algorithms, and the main emphasis is placed on the most "complex" targets - membrane proteins (MPs). The first part of the review describes de novo methods based on empirical physical principles; in the second part, a comparative modeling philosophy, which accounts for the structure of related proteins, is described. Special focus is made regarding pharmacologically relevant classes of G-coupled receptors, receptor tyrosine ki-nases, and other MPs. Algorithms for the assessment of the models quality and potential fields of application of computer models are discussed.