1
|
Qin J, Ashworth DJ, Yates SR, Shen G. Coupled use of Fe-impregnated biochar and urea-hydrogen peroxide to simultaneously reduce soil-air emissions of fumigant and improve crop growth. JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 2020; 396:122762. [PMID: 32361626 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2020.122762] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2020] [Revised: 04/14/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Reducing the emissions of soil fumigants such as 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) is essential to protecting air quality. Although biochar is useful in reducing such emissions, biochar-adsorbed fumigants may desorb and cause secondary air pollution. This study investigated the degradation of 1,3-D on iron (Fe)-impregnated biochar (FBC) amended with urea-hydrogen peroxide (UHP). The results indicated the degradation rate of trans-1,3-D on FBC-UHP was 54-fold higher than that on pristine biochar (PBC). Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) combined with other characterization methods revealed that the presence of semiquinone-type radicals in FBC effectively accelerated the Fe(III)/Fe(II) cycleto maintain enough Fe(IIII) for UHP activation and ·OH generation. ·OH, rather than ·O2-, was the dominant active oxidant. Soil column tests showed that application of FBC to the soil surface reduced cumulative 1,3-D emissions from 34.80 % (bare soil) to 0.81%. After the column experiment, the mixing of the FBC with UHP resulted in the residual cis-isomers decreasing from 32.5% to 10.5%. Greenhouse bioassays showed that mixing post-1,3-D degradation FBC-UHP with soil significantly promoted lettuce growth relative to PBC. The findings of this study provide a new approach for biochar application, especially for the emission reduction of hazardous volatile organic compounds from soil.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiaolong Qin
- School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, PR China
| | - Daniel J Ashworth
- Department of Environmental Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, United States; USDA-ARS, Salinity Laboratory, 450 West Big Springs Road, Riverside, California 92507, United States.
| | - Scott R Yates
- USDA-ARS, Salinity Laboratory, 450 West Big Springs Road, Riverside, California 92507, United States
| | - Guoqing Shen
- School of Agriculture and Biology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, 200240, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fang W, Cao A, Yan D, Han D, Li J, Liu X, Li Y, Ouyang C, Wang Q. Effect of environmental conditions on the permeability of low density polyethylene film and totally impermeable film to methyl isothiocyanate fumigant. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2017; 599-600:1-8. [PMID: 28460289 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2016] [Revised: 02/26/2017] [Accepted: 03/01/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Fumigant methyl isothiocyanate (MITC) is a very promising alternative to methyl bromide, providing effective control of soil borne disease. However, there is a significant volatilization of MITC following fumigation because of its high application rates and high vapor pressure. Covering the soil surface with plastic tarps is a common approach used for restricting fumigant emissions to the atmosphere. To minimize atmospheric emissions of MITC by tarping, we determined the effect of temperature, humidity, and fumigant mixtures on the permeability to MITC of low density polyethylene film (LDPE) and totally impermeable film (TIF), using static sealed chambers. The results showed that temperature had the largest impact on the mass transfer coefficient (MTC) of MITC across LDPE film; the permeability increased 8.8 times when temperature was raised from 5°C to 35°C. There was a small increase in tarp permeability with increasing relative humidity below 75%, but it was little difference in MTC values between 75% and 100% relative humidity. The permeability of TIF to MITC is much lower than that of LDPE. TIF is much more sensitive to the ambient conditions; both temperature and humidity can drastically alter the MTC of MITC across TIF. Fumigant mixtures of MITC did not have a significant impact on the MTC across the LDPE film. The results of this study will contribute to establishing guidance on the appropriate environmental conditions for using tarping films to reduce MITC emission and achieve adequate pest control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wensheng Fang
- Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Aocheng Cao
- Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Beijing 100193, China.
| | - Dongdong Yan
- Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Beijing 100193, China.
| | - Dawei Han
- Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Jun Li
- Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Xiaoman Liu
- Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Yuan Li
- Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Chanbin Ouyang
- Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Qiuxia Wang
- Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Beijing 100193, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wang Q, Mao L, Wang D, Yan D, Ma T, Liu P, Zhang C, Wang R, Guo M, Cao A. Emission reduction of 1,3-dichloropropene by soil amendment with biochar. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY 2014; 43:1656-1662. [PMID: 25603251 DOI: 10.2134/jeq2014.02.0075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Soil fumigation is an important treatment in the production chain of fruit and vegetable crops, but fumigant emissions contribute to air pollution. Biochar as a soil amendment has shown the potential to reduce organic pollutants, including pesticides, in soils through adsorption and other physicochemical reactions. A laboratory column study was performed to determine the effects of soil applications of biochar for reducing emissions of the fumigant 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D). The experimental treatments comprised of unamended and amended with biochar at doses of 0, 0.5, 1, 2, and 5% (w/w) in the top 5 cm soil layer. The unamended treatment resulted in the highest emission peak flux at 48 to 66 μg m s. Among the biochar amendment treatments, the highest peak flux (0.83 μg m s) was found in the biochar 0.5% treatment. The total emission loss was 35.7 to 40.2% of applied for the unamended treatment and <0.1 to 2.9% for the biochar-amendment treatments. A germination bioassay with cucumber seeds showed that ≥7 d of aeration would be needed to avoid phytotoxicity before replanting in biochar-containing fumigated soil. The results indicate that treatments with 0.5% or more biochar amendment reduced emission peak flux by >99.8% and showed total 1,3-D emission loss by >92% compared with that without biochar. The amendment of surface soil with biochar shows a great potential for reducing fumigant emissions.
Collapse
|
4
|
Li Y, Chi L, Mao L, Yan D, Wu Z, Ma T, Guo M, Wang Q, Ouyang C, Cao A. Control of Soilborne Pathogens of Zingiber officinale by Methyl Iodide and Chloropicrin in China. PLANT DISEASE 2014; 98:384-388. [PMID: 30708449 DOI: 10.1094/pdis-06-13-0623-re] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Development of effective alternative soil fumigants is essential to the phasing out of methyl bromide (MeBr) while keeping major soilborne pathogens under control. Here, we report on the laboratory studies and field trials evaluating methyl iodide (MeI) and chloropicrin (Pic) for control of major soilborne ginger (Zingiber officinale) pathogens Ralstonia solanacearum, Pythium spp., Fusarium oxysporum, and Meloidogyne incognita in Shandong province of China. Laboratory studies indicated that MeI at 24 mg/kg of soil was most effective, reducing four pathogens by >90%. Treatments with MeI+Pic at 12 mg/kg (1:3 and 1:5) also reduced these pathogens by >82%. In the field trials, MeI at 30 or 40 g/m2 and MeI+Pic (1:3) at 40 g/m2 yielded excellent long-term control of all target pathogens. These treatments allowed ginger plants to maintain vigorous growth and produce a greater number of tillers (>12 per plant), and increased ginger yields by >80% compared with the nontreated controls. MeI at a reduced rate of 20 g/m2 or Pic at 40 g/m2 provided levels of disease control similar to MeBr. These studies demonstrated that injection treatments with MeI at 30 and 40 g/m2, and MeI+Pic (1:3) at 40 g/m2, followed by covering with virtually impermeable film, are effective alternatives of soil fumigation for control of the major ginger pathogens in Shandong.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Li
- Department of Pesticides, Key Laboratory of Pesticide Chemistry and Application, State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193
| | - Lida Chi
- Department of Pesticides, Key Laboratory of Pesticide Chemistry and Application, State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193
| | - Liangang Mao
- Department of Pesticides, Key Laboratory of Pesticide Chemistry and Application, State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193
| | - Dongdong Yan
- Department of Pesticides, Key Laboratory of Pesticide Chemistry and Application, State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193
| | - Zhuanfang Wu
- Department of Pesticides, Key Laboratory of Pesticide Chemistry and Application, State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193
| | - Taotao Ma
- Department of Pesticides, Key Laboratory of Pesticide Chemistry and Application, State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193
| | - Meixia Guo
- Department of Pesticides, Key Laboratory of Pesticide Chemistry and Application, State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193
| | - Qiuxia Wang
- Department of Pesticides, Key Laboratory of Pesticide Chemistry and Application, State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193
| | - Canbin Ouyang
- Department of Pesticides, Key Laboratory of Pesticide Chemistry and Application, State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193
| | - Aocheng Cao
- Department of Pesticides, Key Laboratory of Pesticide Chemistry and Application, State Key Laboratory for Biology of Plant Diseases and Insect Pests, Institute of Plant Protection, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ashworth DJ, Yates SR, Luo L, Lee SR, Xuan R. Coupling of soil solarization and reduced rate fumigation: effects on methyl iodide emissions from raised beds under field conditions. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY 2013; 61:12510-12515. [PMID: 24308342 DOI: 10.1021/jf403702k] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Using field plots, we studied the effect on methyl iodide (MeI) emissions of coupling soil solarization (passive and active) and reduced rate fumigation (70% of a standard fumigation) in raised beds under virtually impermeable film (VIF). The results showed that for the standard fumigation and the passive solarization + fumigation treatments, emissions from the nontarped furrow were very high (∼50%). Emissions from the bed top and sidewall of these treatments were relatively low but were increased in the latter due to the longer environmental exposure of the VIF covering with the coupled approach (increased tarp permeability). Overall, this approach offered no advantage over fumigation-only in terms of emission reduction. With active solarization + fumigation, the large application of hot water during solarization apparently led to severely limited diffusion causing very low total emissions (<1%). Although this suggests a benefit in terms of air quality, a lack of diffusion could limit the pesticidal efficacy of the treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Ashworth
- USDA-ARS, United States Salinity Laboratory, 450 West Big Springs Road, Riverside, California 92507, United States
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Xuan R, Ashworth DJ, Wu L, Yates SR. Mitigating iodomethane emissions and iodide residues in fumigated soils. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2013; 47:13047-13052. [PMID: 24151978 DOI: 10.1021/es403954z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
Although long-regarded as an excellent soil fumigant for killing plant pests, methyl bromide (MeBr) was phased out in 2005 in the USA, because it can deplete the stratospheric ozone layer. Iodomethane (MeI) has been identified as an effective alternative to MeBr and is used in a number of countries for preplant pest control. However, MeI is highly volatile and potentially carcinogenic to humans if inhaled. In addition, iodide anions, a breakdown product of MeI, can build up in fumigated soils and potentially cause plant toxicity and contaminate groundwater via leaching. In order to overcome the above two obstacles in MeI application, a method is proposed to place reactive bags containing ammonium hydroxide solution (NH4OH) on the soil surface underneath an impermeable plastic film covering the fumigated area. Our research showed that using this approach, over 99% of the applied MeI was quantitatively transferred to iodide. Of all the resulting iodide, only 2.7% remained in the fumigated soil, and 97.3% was contained in the reactive bag that can be easily removed after fumigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richeng Xuan
- USDA-ARS, Salinity Laboratory, 450 West Big Springs Road, Riverside, California 92507, United States
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Luo L, Yates SR, Ashworth DJ, Xuan R, Becker JO. Effect of films on 1,3-dichloropropene and chloropicrin emission, soil concentration, and root-knot nematode control in a raised bed. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY 2013; 61:2400-2406. [PMID: 23343207 DOI: 10.1021/jf3034368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Soil fumigation is an important component of U.S. agriculture, but excessive emissions can be problematic. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of agricultural films (e.g., tarps) on soil fumigant atmospheric emissions and spatiotemporal distributions in soil, soil temperature, and plant pathogen control in the field using plastic films with various permeabilities and thermal properties. A reduced rate of 70% InLine (60.8% 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) and 33.3% chloropicrin (CP)) was applied via drip line to raised soil beds covered with standard high-density polyethylene film (HDPE), thermic film (Thermic), or virtually impermeable film (VIF). 1,3-D and CP emission rates were determined using dynamic flux chambers, and the concentrations in soil were measured using a gas sampler. The pest control efficacy for the three treatments was determined using bioassay muslin bags containing soil infested with citrus nematodes (Tylenchulus semipenetrans). The results show that the Thermic treatment had the highest emission rates, followed by the HDPE and VIF treatments, and the soil concentrations followed the reverse order. In terms of pest control, covering the beds with thermic film led to sufficient and improved efficacy against citrus nematodes compared to standard HDPE film. Under HDPE, >20% of nematodes survived in the soil at 30 cm depth at day 12. The VIF treatment substantially reduced the emission loss from the bed (2% of the Thermic and 6% of the HDPE treatments) and eliminated plant parasitic nematodes because of its superior ability to entrap fumigant and heat within soils. The findings imply that not only the film permeability but also the synergistic ability to entrap heat should be considered in the development of new improved films for fumigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lifang Luo
- U.S. Salinity Laboratory , Riverside, 450 West Big Springs Road, Riverside, California 92507, United States
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Horng YC, Huang PS, Hsieh CC, Kuo CH, Kuo TS. Selective encapsulation of volatile and reactive methyl iodide. Chem Commun (Camb) 2012; 48:8844-6. [PMID: 22842553 DOI: 10.1039/c2cc34346k] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
A simple organic molecular container can selectively encapsulate the volatile and highly reactive MeI through hydrogen-bonding interactions in solution. The remarkable encapsulation of MeI without self-methylation of the container appears to be determined by the complementary binding sites and the rigidity of the hydrogen-bonding array constrained by the molecular framework.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yih-Chern Horng
- Department of Chemistry, National Changhua University of Education, 1 Jin-De Road, Changhua 50058, Taiwan.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ashworth DJ, Yates SR, Luo L, Xuan R. Phase partitioning, retention kinetics, and leaching of fumigant methyl iodide in agricultural soils. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2012; 432:122-127. [PMID: 22728299 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2012] [Revised: 06/04/2012] [Accepted: 06/05/2012] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Although it is not currently being sold in the USA, the recent US registration of the fumigant methyl iodide has led to an increased interest in its environmental fate and transport. Although some work has now considered its volatile emissions from soil, there remains a lack of experimental data regarding its ability to be retained in soil and ultimately become transported with irrigation/rain waters. Using laboratory batch and soil column experiments, we aimed to better understand the phase partitioning of MeI, the ability of soils to retain MeI on the solid phase, and the potential for leaching of MeI and its primary degradation product, iodide, down a soil profile. Results indicated that MeI was retained by the solid phase of soil, being protected from volatilization and degradation, particularly in the presence of elevated organic matter. Retention was greater at lower moisture content, and maximum retention occurred after 56 days of incubation. At higher moisture content, the liquid phase also became important in retaining MeI within soil. Together with low observed K(D) values (0.10 to 0.57 mL g(-1)), these data suggest that MeI may be prone to leaching. Indeed, in a steady-state soil column study, initially retained MeI was transported with interstitial water. The MeI degradation product, iodide, was also readily transported in this manner. The data highlight a potentially significant process by which MeI fate and transport within the environment may be impacted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel J Ashworth
- Department of Environmental Sciences, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Xuan R, Yates SR, Ashworth DJ, Luo L. Mitigating 1,3-dichloropropene, chloropicrin, and methyl iodide emissions from fumigated soil with reactive film. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY 2012; 46:6143-6149. [PMID: 22534067 DOI: 10.1021/es300388r] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Implicated as a stratospheric ozone-depleting compound, methyl bromide (MeBr) is being phased out despite being considered to be the most effective soil fumigant. Its alternatives, i.e., 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D, which includes cis and trans isomers), chloropicrin (CP), and methyl iodide (MeI), have been widely used. High emissions of MeI from fumigated soil likely put farm workers and other bystanders at risk of adverse health effects. In this study, two types of constructed reactive film were tested for their ability to mitigate emissions of 1,3-D, CP, and MeI using laboratory permeability cells. Before activation, these films act as a physical barrier to trap fumigants leaving soil. After activation of the reactive layer containing ammonium thiosulfate solution, the films also act as a sink for the fumigants. Over 97% of trans-1,3-D and 99% of the cis-1,3-D, CP and MeI were depleted when they passed into the reactive film. Half-lives (t(1/2)) of cis-, trans-1,3-D, CP and MeI under activated reactive film were 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, and 2.0 h respectively at 40 °C.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richeng Xuan
- USDA-ARS, Salinity Laboratory, 450 West Big Springs Road, Riverside, California 92507, United States.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Glaser R, Prugger K. Iodine bonding stabilizes iodomethane in MIDAS pesticide. Theoretical study of intermolecular interactions between iodomethane and chloropicrin. JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY 2012; 60:1776-1787. [PMID: 22313191 DOI: 10.1021/jf2037906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
The results are reported of a theoretical study of iodomethane (H(3)C-I, 1) and chloropicrin (Cl(3)C-NO(2), 2), of the heterodimers 3-6 formed by aggregation of 1 and 2, and of their addition products 7 and 8 and their possible fragmentation reactions to 9-18. Mixtures of iodomethane and chloropicrin are not expected to show chemistry resulting from their reactions with each other. The structures and stabilities are discussed of the iodine-bonded molecular aggregates (IBMA) 3 and 4 and of the hydrogen- and iodine-bonded molecular aggregates (IHBMA) 5 and 6. The mixed aggregates 3-5 are bound on the free enthalpy surface relative to the homodimers of 1 and 2, and the IBMA structures 3 and 4 are most stable. This result suggests that the mixture of chloropicrin and iodomethane in the pesticide Midas is a good choice to reduce the volatility of iodomethane because of thermodynamically stabilizing iodine bonding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rainer Glaser
- Department of Chemistry, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri 65211, United States.
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ibekwe AM, Ma J. Effects of fumigants on microbial diversity and persistence of E. coli O15:H7 in contrasting soil microcosms. THE SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT 2011; 409:3740-3748. [PMID: 21757224 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2011] [Revised: 06/13/2011] [Accepted: 06/15/2011] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
Persistence of E. coli O157 in the environment is a serious public health concern. However, little is known about the persistence of this pathogen after exposure to chemical compounds like fumigants in the environment. In this study, the persistence behavior of pathogenic E. coli O157:H7 was investigated after fumigation with methyl bromide (MeBr; CH(3)Br) and methyl iodide (MeI, iodomethane; CH(3)I) in soil microcosms under laboratory conditions. Our goal was to assess changes in soil microbial community structure and persistence of E. coli O157:H7 in microcosm soils after fumigation. PCR was used to amplify 16S rRNA genes from total bacterial community composition, and the products were subjected to denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE). Microbial diversity as determined by DGGE was significantly higher in clay soil than sandy soil. Real-time PCR and plate counts were used to quantify the survival of E. coli O157:H7 in the two soils after fumigation with MeBr and MeI. The survival of the pathogen was higher in the non fumigated controls than the fumigated treatments when determined using plate counts. These results were confirmed by real time PCR analysis targeting the stx1, stx2, and the eae genes. E. coli O157:H7 survived for about 35 days when determined using the plate count method but continued to be detected at about the detection limit of 10(2) by real time PCR for more than 86 days. Our results showed that there was a fast inactivation of the pathogen during the first 35 days. After this period, a small proportion of the pathogen continued to survive in the soil microcosms. Subsequent enrichment of soil samples and immunomagnetic separation revealed the continuous presence of viable cells after 86 days of incubation. The data presented contribute to a better understanding of the behavior of E. coli O157:H7 in soil, and showed the need for more investigation of the role of dormant cells in soil that may be a source for recontamination of the environment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Mark Ibekwe
- USDA-ARS, US Salinity Lab. Riverside, CA 92507, USA.
| | | |
Collapse
|