Insertion Reactions of [M(SR)3(PMe2Ph)2] with CS2 (M = Ru, Os; R = C6F4H-4, C6F5). X-ray Structures of [Ru(S2CSC6F4H-4)2(PMe2Ph)2], trans-Thiolates [M(SR)2(S2CSR)(PMe2Ph)2] (M = Ru; R = C6F5 and M = Os; R = C6F4H-4), and trans-Thiolate−Phosphine [Os(SC6F5)2(S2CSC6F5)(PMe2Ph)2]

Exploring the persistence of the fluorinated thiolate 2,3,5,6-S(C6F4H-4) motif to establish πF-πF stacking in metal complexes: a crystal engineering perspective

π-π stacking interactions are versatile because they are involved in many processes, such as protein folding, DNA stacking, and drug recognition. However, from the point of view of crystal engineering, there is an incipient knowledge of its exploitation. A comparison of these interactions with hydrogen bonds shows a huge difference in their employment as a reliable non-covalent interaction. And different reasons can be listed to explain why hydrogen bonding can be considered a more robust interaction than π-π stacking. For instance, hydrogen bonds encompass a wide energy range (25-40 kJ mol-1). From this, these interactions can be classified as strong, moderate, and weak. Hence, the first two can be considered highly to moderately directional to be exploited in crystal engineering. This aspect is relevant for them to be used in a relatively reliably way in this area of supramolecular chemistry. On the other hand, in the case of π-π stacking, the energy range is 0-10 kJ mol-1, thus implying that hydrogen bonds or any other energetically more robust contact would predominate in the competition for establishing packing interactions in a given arrangement. In this sense, if stacking is pretended to be exploited from the point of view of crystal engineering, one of the points that must be ensured is that this interaction will be the one energetically predominant. However, although there are other factors to consider, it seems that energetics is the dominant one. In this line, our research group has obtained and studied many single-crystalline structures of coordination and organometallic compounds containing fluorinated thiolates. This being particularly true in the case of the thiolate 2,3,5,6-S(C6F4H-4) bound to different metals, where it has been observed that they preferentially tend to establish πF-πF stacking interactions, results that have been reported in several papers. Thus, from this perspective, we have explored, using ConQuest (CCDC) a number of structures to observe how feasible is to find stacking in coordination and organometallic compounds containing the thiolate 2,3,5,6-S(C6F4H-4).

Carbon−Fluorine Bond Cleavage in the Preparation of Osmium(III) and Osmium(IV) Fluorothiolate Complexes. Fluorine by Fluorine NMR-Assignment and Fluxional Processes

Reactions of OsO4 with HSR (R=C6F5, C6F4H-4,) in refluxing ethanol afford [Os(SC6F5)3(SC6F4(SC6F5)-2)] (1) and [Os(SC6F4H-4)3(SC6F3H-4-(SC6F4H-4)-2)] (2), which involve the rupture of C-F bonds. At room temperature, the compound [Os(SC6F5)3(PMe2Ph)2] or [Os(SC6F5)4(PMe2Ph)] reacts with KOH(aq) in acetone, giving rise to [ Os(SC6F5)(SC6F4(SC6F4O-2)-2)(PMe2Ph)2] (3), through a process involving the rupture of two C-F bonds, while the compound [Os(SC6F4H)4(PPh3)] reacts with KOH(aq) in acetone to afford [Os(SC6F4H-4)2(SC6F3H-4-O-2)(PPh3)] (4), which also implies a C-F bond cleavage. Single-crystal X-ray diffraction studies of 1, 2, and 4 indicate that these compounds include five-coordinated metal ions in essentially trigonal-bipyramidal geometries, whereas these studies on the paramagnetic compound 3 show a six-coordinated osmium center in a distorted octahedral geometry. 19F, 1H, 31P{1H}, and COSY 19F-19F NMR studies for the diamagnetic 1, 2, and 4 compounds, including variable-temperature 19F NMR experiments, showed that these molecules are fluxional. Some of the activation parameters for these dynamic processes have been determined.

Reatividade do [Fe(CO)2(eta2-CS2)(PPh 3)2] frente a compostos de Cu(I): síntese de espécies binucleares heterometálicas contendo CS2 em ponte entre Fe(0) e Cu(I)

Este trabalho contempla a síntese e caracterização espectroscópica de dois compostos carbonílicos heterometálicos do tipo [Fe(CO)3(m-CS2)(PPh3 )(CuX)], X = Cl, ClO4. Os dados provenientes da espectroscopia no infravermelho e de RMN de 31P{¹H} foram conclusivos quanto à proposição da geometria octaédrica distorcida ao redor do átomo de ferro (0), como também sobre a natureza bimetálica de ambos compostos. Estes dados esclareceram o modo de coordenação dos grupos carbonilos, da trifenilfosfina (PPh3), bem como a disposição do ligante dissulfeto de carbono em ponte entre os átomos de Fe (0) e Cu (I).