Synthesis, Structures, and Spectroscopic, Magnetic, and Electrochemical Properties of (μ-Alkoxo)bis(μ-carboxylato)diruthenium Complexes, M[Ru2(dhpta)(μ-O2CR)2] (M = Na and K, dhptaH5 = 1,3-Diamino-2-hydroxypropanetetraacetic Acid)

Structure and photochemical properties of (mu-alkoxo)bis(mu-carboxylato)diruthenium complexes with naphthylacetate ligands

Two new dinuclear Ru(III) complexes containing naphthalene moieties, K[Ru2(dhpta)(mu-O2CCH2-1-naph)2] (1) and K[Ru2(dhpta)(mu-O2CCH2-2-naph)2] (2) (H5dhpta = 1,3-diamino-2-hydroxypropane-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid, naph-1-CH2CO2H = 1-naphthylacetic acid, naph-2-CH2CO2H = 2-naphthylacetic acid), were synthesized. Complex 2 crystallized as an orthorhombic system having a space group of Pbca with unit cell parameters a = 10.6200(5) A, b = 20.270(1) A, c = 35.530(2) A, and Z = 8. EXAFS analysis of 1 and 2 in the solid states and in solution clarified that the dinuclear structures of 1 and 2 were kept in DMSO solutions. Variable-temperature magnetic susceptibility data indicated that the two Ru(III) centers are strongly antiferromagnetically coupled as shown by the large coupling constants, J = -581 cm(-1) (1) and -378 cm(-1) (2). In the cyclic voltammograms of 1 and 2, one oxidation peak and two reduction peaks which were assigned to the redox reaction of the ruthenium moieties were observed in DMF. The large conproportionation constants estimated from the reduction potentials of Ru(III)Ru(III) and Ru(III)Ru(II) indicated the great stability of the mixed-valent state. The mixed-valent species [Ru(III)Ru(II)(dhpta)(mu-O2CCH2-R)2](2-) (R = 1-naph (6) and R = 2-naph (7)) were prepared by controlled potential electrolysis of 1 and 2 in DMF. The electronic absorption spectra of 6 and 7 were similar to that of [Ru(III)Ru(II) (dhpta)(mu-O2CCH3)2](2-) which is a typical Class II type mixed-valent complex. The fluorescence decay of 1 and 2 indicated that there are two quenching processes which come from the excimer and monomer states. The short excimer lifetimes of 1 and 2 were ascribed to the energy transfer from the naphthyl moieties to the Ru centers. The different excimer ratio between 1 and 2 suggested that the excimer formation is affected by the conformation of the naphthyl moieties in the diruthenium(III) complexes.

2,5-Dioxido-1,4-benzoquinonediimine (H2L2−), A Hydrogen-Bonding Noninnocent Bridging Ligand Related to Aminated Topaquinone: Different Oxidation State Distributions in Complexes [{(bpy)2Ru}2(μ-H2L)]n (n=0,+,2+,3+,4+) and [{(acac)2Ru}2(μ-H2L)]m (m=2−,−,0,+,2+)

The symmetrically dinuclear title compounds were isolated as diamagnetic [(bpy)2Ru(mu-H2L)Ru(bpy)2](ClO4)2 (1-(ClO4)2) and as paramagnetic [(acac)2Ru(mu-H2L)Ru(acac)2] (2) complexes (bpy=2,2'-bipyridine; acac- = acetylacetonate = 2,4-pentanedionato; H2L = 2,5-dioxido-1,4-benzoquinonediimine). The crystal structure of 22 H2O reveals an intricate hydrogen-bonding network: Two symmetry-related molecules 2 are closely connected through two NH(H2L2-)O(acac-) interactions, while the oxygen atoms of H2L2- of two such pairs are bridged by an (H2O)8 cluster at half-occupancy. The cluster consists of cyclic (H2O)6 arrangements with the remaining two exo-H2O molecules connecting two opposite sides of the cyclo-(H2O)6 cluster, and oxido oxygen atoms forming hydrogen bonds with the molecules of 2. Weak antiferromagnetic coupling of the two ruthenium(III) centers in 2 was established by using SQUID magnetometry and EPR spectroscopy. Geometry optimization by means of DFT calculations was carried out for 1(2+) and 2 in their singlet and triplet ground states, respectively. The nature of low-energy electronic transitions was explored by using time-dependent DFT methods. Five redox states were reversibly accessible for each of the complexes; all odd-electron intermediates exhibit comproportionation constants K(c)>10(8). UV-visible-NIR spectroelectrochemistry and EPR spectroscopy of the electrogenerated paramagnetic intermediates were used to ascertain the oxidation-state distribution. In general, the complexes 1n+ prefer the ruthenium(II) configuration with electron transfer occurring largely at the bridging ligand (mu-H2Ln-), as evident from radical-type EPR spectra for 13+ and (+. Higher metal oxidation states (iii, iv) appear to be favored by the complexes 2m; intense long-wavelength absorption bands and RuIII-type EPR signals suggest mixed-valent dimetal configurations of the paramagnetic intermediates 2+ and 2-.

Electro- and photochemical properties of a (μ-alkoxo)bis(μ-carboxylato)diruthenium complex having two tetraphenylporphinato zinc(ii) moieties

The novel (mu-alkoxo)bis(mu-carboxylato)diruthenium complex K[Ru(2)(dhpta)(mu-O(2)C-p-ZnTPP)(2)] 3 was prepared by simple ligand substitution reaction. Strong antiferromagnetic interaction between two Ru(III) ions of 3 was observed with a coupling constant of -425 approximately -404 cm(-1). The cyclic voltammogram of 3 can be explained in terms of superposition of those of ZnTPP-p-CO(2)H and K[Ru(2)(dhpta)(mu-O(2)CPh)(2)] 2, indicating no significant electrochemical interaction. The large conproportionation constant estimated from the reduction potentials for Ru(III)Ru(III) and Ru(II)Ru(III) indicates great stability of the mixed-valence state. The mixed-valence species [Ru(II)Ru(III)(dhpta)(mu-O(2)C-p-ZnTPP)(2)](2-) 4 was prepared by controlled potential electrolysis. The electronic absorption spectrum of 4 was quite similar to that of [Ru(II)Ru(III)(dhpta)(mu-O(2)CCH(3))(2)](2-) which is a typical Class II complex. The fluorescence from the S(2) state of the ZnTPP unit of 3 was significantly (78%) quenched. The electron transfer from the ZnTPP unit to Ru(III) ions in 3 is a plausible mechanism, even though energy transfer could not be ruled out completely. The free energy change for electron transfer, Delta G(CS), was estimated to be ca.-1.1 eV, which is similar to typical values for the reorganization energy lambda in polar solvents. Hence, the electron transfer scheme is situated almost at the top of the Marcus parabola, enabling ultrafast electron transfer.