Transition Metal Complexes with Sulfur Ligands. 130.(1) Synthesis, Structure, and Reactivity of the Sulfur-Rich Ruthenium Hydride Complexes [Ru(H)(PR(3))('S(4)')](-) and the eta(2)-H(2) Complex [Ru(H(2))(PCy(3))('S(4)')] (R = Ph, (i)Pr, Cy; 'S(4)'(2-) = 1,2-Bis((2-mercaptophenyl)thio)ethane(2-))

Brønsted-Lowry Acid Strength of Metal Hydride and Dihydrogen Complexes

Transition metal hydride complexes are usually amphoteric, not only acting as hydride donors, but also as Brønsted-Lowry acids. A simple additive ligand acidity constant equation (LAC for short) allows the estimation of the acid dissociation constant Ka(LAC) of diamagnetic transition metal hydride and dihydrogen complexes. It is remarkably successful in systematizing diverse reports of over 450 reactions of acids with metal complexes and bases with metal hydrides and dihydrogen complexes, including catalytic cycles where these reactions are proposed or observed. There are links between pKa(LAC) and pKa(THF), pKa(DCM), pKa(MeCN) for neutral and cationic acids. For the groups from chromium to nickel, tables are provided that order the acidity of metal hydride and dihydrogen complexes from most acidic (pKa(LAC) -18) to least acidic (pKa(LAC) 50). Figures are constructed showing metal acids above the solvent pKa scales and organic acids below to summarize a large amount of information. Acid-base features are analyzed for catalysts from chromium to gold for ionic hydrogenations, bifunctional catalysts for hydrogen oxidation and evolution electrocatalysis, H/D exchange, olefin hydrogenation and isomerization, hydrogenation of ketones, aldehydes, imines, and carbon dioxide, hydrogenases and their model complexes, and palladium catalysts with hydride intermediates.

Heterolytic H2 splitting across a Ru-S bond leading to the replacement of S by O in the carborane-dithiolato ligand of a 15-electron Ru(III) complex

A 15-electron Ru(III) complex containing carborane-thiolato ligands heterolytically cleaves dihydrogen at ambient pressure and temperature to give Ru(IV)/Ru(II) species containing a hydrido ligand at Ru(IV) and SH ligand at Ru(II). In the presence of HBF4·H2O the reaction further leads to an unprecedented replacement of an S atom by an O atom in the carborane-dithiolato ligand.

Activation of Molecular Hydrogen over a Binuclear Complex with Rh2S2 Core: DFT Calculations and NMR Mechanistic Studies

The dicationic complex [(triphos)Rh(mu-S)(2)Rh(triphos)](2+), 1 (modeled as 1c) [triphos = CH(3)C(CH(2)PPh(2))(3)], is known to activate two dihydrogen molecules and produce the bis(mu-hydrosulfido) product [(triphos)(H)Rh(mu-SH)(2)Rh(H)(triphos)](2+), 2 (modeled as 2b), from which 1 is reversibly obtained. The possible steps of the process have been investigated with DFT calculations. It has been found that each d(6) metal ion in 1c, with local square pyramidal geometry, is able to anchor one H(2) molecule in the side-on coordination. The step is followed by heterolytic splitting of the H-H bond over one adjacent and polarized Rh-S linkage. The process may be completed before the second H(2) molecule is added. Alternatively, both H(2) molecules are trapped by the Rh(2)S(2) core before being split in two distinct steps. Since the ambiguity could not be solved by calculations, (31)P and (1)H NMR experiments, including para-hydrogen techniques, have been performed to identify the actual pathway. In no case is there experimental evidence for any Rh-(eta(2)-H(2)) adduct, probably due to its very short lifetime. Conversely, (1)H NMR analysis of the hydride region indicates only one reaction intermediate which corresponds to the monohydride-mu-hydrosulfide complex [(triphos)Rh(H)(mu-SH)(mu-S)Rh(triphos)](2+) (3) (model 5a). This excludes the second hypothesized pathway. From an energetic viewpoint the computational results support the feasibility of the whole process. In fact, the highest energy for H(2) activation is 8.6 kcal mol(-1), while a larger but still surmountable barrier of 34.6 kcal mol(-1) is in line with the reversibility of the process.

Activation of alkenes and H2 by [Fe]-H2ase model complexes

The established ability of the Fe(II) bridging hydride species (micro-H)(micro-pdt)[Fe(CO)2(PMe3)]2+, 1-H+, to take-up and heterolytically activate dihydrogen, resulting in H/D scrambling of H2/D2 and H2/D2O mixtures (Zhao et al. Inorg. Chem. 2002, 41, 3917) has prompted a study of simultaneous alkene/H2 activation by such [Fe]H2ase model complexes. That the required photolysis produced an open site was substantiated by substitution of CO in 1-H+ by CH3CN with formation of structurally characterized [(micro-H)(micro-pdt)[Fe(CO)2(PMe3)][Fe(CO)(CH3CN)(PMe3)]]+[PF6]-. Under similar photolytic conditions, H/D exchange reactions between D2 and terminal alkenes (ethylene, propene and 1-butene), but not bulkier alkenes such as 2-butene or cyclohexene, were catalyzed by 1-H+ and the edt (SCH2CH2S) analogue, 2-H+. Substantial regioselectivity for H/D exchange at the internal vinylic hydrogen was observed. The extent to which the olefins were deuterium enriched vs deuterated was catalyst dependent. The stabilizing effect of the binuclear chelating ligands, SCH2CH2CH2S, pdt, and SCH2CH2S, edt, is required for the activity of binuclear catalysts, as the mono-dentate micro-SEt analogue decomposed to inactive products under the photolytic conditions of the catalysis. Reactions of 1 and 2 with EtOSO2CF3 yielded the S-alkylated products, [(micro-SCH2CH2CH2SEt)[Fe(CO)2(PMe3)]2]+[SO3CF3]- (1-Et+), and 2-Et+, rather than micro-C2H5 analogues to the micro-H of 1-H+. The stability and lack of reactivity toward H2 of 1-Et+ and 2-Et+, indicates they are not on the reaction path of the olefin/D2 H/D exchange process. A mechanism with olefin binding to an open site created by CO loss and formation of an Fe-(CH2CHDR) intermediate is indicated. A likely role of a binuclear chelate effect is implicated for the unique S-XXX-S cofactor in the active site of [Fe]H2ase.

Ruthenium(II) ammine and hydrazine complexes with [N(Ph2PQ)2]- (Q = S, Se) ligands

Reactions of coordinatively unsaturated Ru[N(Ph2PQ)2]2(PPh3) (Q = S (1), Se (2)) with pyridine (py), SO2, and NH3 afford the corresponding 18e adducts Ru[N(Ph2PQ)2]2(PPh3)(L) (Q = S, L = NH3 (5); Q = Se, L = py (3), SO2 (4), NH3 (6)). The molecular structures of complexes 2 and 6 are determined. The geometry around Ru in 2 is pseudo square pyramidal with PPh3 occupying the apical position, while that in 6 is pseudooctahedral with PPh3 and NH3 mutually cis. The Ru-P distances in 2 and 6 are 2.2025(11) and 2.2778(11) A, respectively. The Ru-N bond length in 6 is 2.185(3) A. Treatment of 1 or 2 with substituted hydrazines L or NH2OH yields the respective adducts Ru[N(Ph2PQ)2]2(PPh3)(L) (Q = S, L = NH2NH2 (12), t-BuNHNH2 (14), l-aminopiperidine (C5H10NNH2) (15); Q = Se, L = PhCONHNH2 (7), PhNHNH2 (8), NH2OH (9), t-BuNHNH2 (10), C5H10NNH2 (11), NH2NH2 (13)), which are isolated as mixtures of their trans and cis isomers. The structures of cis-14 and cis-15 are characterized by X-ray crystallography. In both molecular structures, the ruthenium adopts a pseudooctahedral arrangement with PPh3 and hydrazine mutually cis. The Ru-N bond lengths in cis-14.CH2Cl2 and cis-15 are 2.152(3) and 2.101(3) A, respectively. The Ru-N-N bond angles in cis-14.CH2Cl2 and cis-15 are 120.5(4) and 129.0(2) degrees, respectively. Treatment of 1 with hydrazine monohydrate leads to the isolation of yellow 5 and red trans-Ru[N(Ph2PS)2]2(NH3)(H2O) (16), which are characterized by mass spectrometry, 1H NMR spectroscopy, and elemental analyses. The geometry around ruthenium in 16 is pseudooctahedral with the NH3 and H2O ligands mutually trans. The Ru-O and Ru-N bond distances are 2.118(4) and 2.142(6) A, respectively. Oxidation reactions of the above ruthenium hydrazine complexes are also studied.