Pairwise Coupling in an Arg-Phe-Met Triplet Stabilizes α-Helical Peptide via Shared Rotamer Preferences

Analysis of the crystal structure of a parallel three-stranded coiled coil

Here, we present the crystal structure of the synthetic peptide KE1, which contains four K-coil heptads separated in the middle by the QFLMLMF heptad. The structure determination reveals the presence of a canonical parallel three stranded coiled coil. The geometric characteristics of this structure are compared with other coiled coils with the same topology. Furthermore, for this topology, the analysis of the propensity of the single amino acid to occupy a specific position in the heptad sequence is reported. A number of viral proteins use specialized coiled coil tail needles to inject their genetic material into the host cells. The simplicity and regularity of the coiled coil arrangement made it an attractive system for de novo design of key molecules in drug delivery systems, vaccines, and therapeutics.

Circular dichroism and ultraviolet resonance Raman indicate little Arg-Glu side chain α-helix peptide stabilization

Electrostatic interactions between side chains can control the conformation and folding of peptides and proteins. We used circular dichroism (CD) and ultraviolet (UV) resonance Raman spectroscopy (UVRR) to examine the impact of side chain charge on the conformations of two 21 residue mainly polyala peptides with a few Arg and Glu residues. We expected that attractions between Arg-10 and Glu-14 side chains would stabilize the α-helix conformation compared to a peptide with an Arg-14. Surprisingly, CD suggests that the peptide with the Glu-14 is less helical. In contrast, the UVRR show that these two peptides have similar α-helix content. We conclude that the peptide with Glu-14 has the same net α-helix content as the peptide with the Arg but has two α-helices of shorter length. Thus, side chain interactions between Arg-10 and Glu-14 have a minor impact on α-helix stability. The thermal melting of these two peptides is similar. However the Glu-14 peptide pH induced melting forms type III turn structures that form α-helix-turn-α-helix conformations.

Amino acid pair- and triplet-wise groupings in the interior of α-helical segments in proteins

A statistical approach has been applied to analyse primary structure patterns at inner positions of α-helices in proteins. A systematic survey was carried out in a recent sample of non-redundant proteins selected from the Protein Data Bank, which were used to analyse α-helix structures for amino acid pairing patterns. Only residues more than three positions apart from both termini of the α-helix were considered as inner. Amino acid pairings i, i+k (k=1, 2, 3, 4, 5), were analysed and the corresponding 20×20 matrices of relative global propensities were constructed. An analysis of (i, i+4, i+8) and (i, i+3, i+4) triplet patterns was also performed. These analysis yielded information on a series of amino acid patterns (pairings and triplets) showing either high or low preference for α-helical motifs and suggested a novel approach to protein alphabet reduction. In addition, it has been shown that the individual amino acid propensities are not enough to define the statistical distribution of these patterns. Global pair propensities also depend on the type of pattern, its composition and orientation in the protein sequence. The data presented should prove useful to obtain and refine useful predictive rules which can further the development and fine-tuning of protein structure prediction algorithms and tools.

Amino acid pairing at the N- and C-termini of helical segments in proteins

A systematic survey was carried out in an unbiased sample of 815 protein chains with a maximum of 20% homology selected from the Protein Data Bank, whose structures were solved at a resolution higher than 1.6 A and with a R-factor lower than 25%. A set of 5556 subsequences with alpha-helix or 3(10)-helix motifs was extracted from the protein chains considered. Global and local propensities were then calculated for all possible amino acid pairs of the type (i, i + 1), (i, i + 2), (i, i + 3), and (i, i + 4), starting at the relevant helical positions N1, N2, N3, C3, C2, C1, and N-int (interior positions), and also at the first nonhelical positions in both termini of the helices, namely, N-cap and C-cap. The statistical analysis of the propensity values has shown that pairing is significantly dependent on the type of the amino acids and on the position of the pair. A few sequences of three and four amino acids were selected and their high prevalence in helices is outlined in this work. The Glu-Lys-Tyr-Pro sequence shows a peculiar distribution in proteins, which may suggest a relevant structural role in alpha-helices when Pro is located at the C-cap position. A bioinformatics tool was developed, which updates automatically and periodically the results and makes them available in a web site.

Determinants of specificity of MDM2 for the activation domains of p53 and p65: proline27 disrupts the MDM2-binding motif of p53

Transcriptional activation and repression via the transcription factors p53 and p65 are mediated by hydrophobic short linear motifs (FXX phi phi) in their activation domains (ADs). To understand the molecular basis for specificity in binding to disparate biological targets, a series of chimeric peptides was synthesized, with sequences derived from the ADs of p53, which binds both the general transcriptional machinery and the repressor protein MDM2, and p65, which is reported to bind the general transcriptional machinery but not MDM2. The FXX phi phi motifs of p53 and p65 differ by only two residues, whereas the flanking sequences have no sequence identity. The affinities of the chimeric peptides to MDM2(25-117) and hTAF(II)31(1-140) were determined. Specificity for binding MDM2 via FXX phi phi motifs derives almost entirely from Trp23 of p53, with a 3.0 kcal mol(-1) loss of binding energy when Trp23 is changed to p65-derived Leu. The identity of the N-terminal flanking sequence did not significantly affect binding to MDM2. In contrast, replacement of the C-terminal sequence of p53 with that of p65 increased the affinity of the chimera for MDM2 by 1.1 kcal mol(-1), contrary to expectations. Replacement of the highly conserved residue Pro27 of p53 with Ser from p65 resulted in a 2.3 kcal mol(-1) improvement in binding to MDM2, generating a ligand (p53-P27S) (Kd = 4.7 nM) that exhibits the highest MDM2 affinity observed for a genetically encodable ligand. The basis for the increased affinity of p53-P27S over p53 was examined by circular dichroism and nuclear magnetic resonance. Pro27 disrupts the recognition alpha-helix of p53, with p53-P27S significantly more alpha-helical than p53.

Peptide Recognition: Encapsulation and α-Helical Folding of a Nine-Residue Peptide within a Hydrophobic Dimeric Capsule of a Bowl-Shaped Host

A dimeric capsule of coordination bowl 1 encapsulated a nine-residue peptide (Trp-Ala-Glu-Ala-Ala-Ala-Glu-Ala-Trp; 2) within the large hydrophobic cavity in water, and stabilized the alpha-helical conformation of bound 2. An NMR titration experiment revealed that monomeric bowl 1 recognized two Trp residues at the both terminals of 2 through 1/2 = 1:1 to 2:1 complexation. The 1:1 and 2:1 species exist in equilibrium even in the presence of excess 1. It was found that the formation of the 2:1 complex, in which two bowls of 1 wrapped the whole of 2, became dominant by the addition of NaNO3 due to the fact that the enhanced ion strength increased the hydrophobic interaction between Trp residues and the cavity of 1. The alpha-helical conformation of 2 within the dimeric capsule of 1 was elucidated from detailed NOESY analysis.

Anticooperativity in a Glu-Lys-Glu salt bridge triplet in an isolated alpha-helical peptide

Salt bridges between oppositely charged side chains are well-known to stabilize protein structure, though their contributions vary considerably. Here we study Glu-Lys and Lys-Glu salt bridges, formed when the residues are spaced i, i + 4 surface of an isolated alpha-helix in aqueous solution. Both are stabilizing by -0.60 and -1.02 kcal/mol, respectively, when the interacting residues are fully charged. When the side chains are spaced i, i + 4, i + 8, forming a Glu-Lys-Glu triplet, the second salt bridge provides no additional stabilization to the helix. We attribute this to the inability of the central Lys to form two salt bridges simultaneously. Analysis of these salt bridges in protein structures shows that the Lys-Glu interaction is dominant, with the side chains of the Glu-Lys pair far apart.