Bimetallic Catalyst Particle Nanostructure. Evolution from Molecular Cluster Precursors

Dispersion and distribution of bimetallic oxides in SBA-15, and their enhanced activity for reverse water gas shift reaction

Bimetallic oxides could be well distributed on the SBA-15 surface, and exhibited high catalytic perforation for RWGS reaction.

The atomic structural dynamics of γ-Al2O3 supported Ir-Pt nanocluster catalysts prepared from a bimetallic molecular precursor: a study using aberration-corrected electron microscopy and X-ray absorption spectroscopy

This study describes a prototypical, bimetallic heterogeneous catalyst: compositionally well-defined Ir-Pt nanoclusters with sizes in the range of 1-2 nm supported on γ-Al(2)O(3). Deposition of the molecular bimetallic cluster [Ir(3)Pt(3)(μ-CO)(3)(CO)(3)(η-C(5)Me(5))(3)] on γ-Al(2)O(3), and its subsequent reduction with hydrogen, provides highly dispersed supported bimetallic Ir-Pt nanoparticles. Using spherical aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy (C(s)-STEM) and theoretical modeling of synchrotron-based X-ray absorption spectroscopy (XAS) measurements, our studies provide unambiguous structural assignments for this model catalytic system. The atomic resolution C(s)-STEM images reveal strong and specific lattice-directed strains in the clusters that follow local bonding configurations of the γ-Al(2)O(3) support. Combined nanobeam diffraction (NBD) and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM) data suggest the polycrystalline γ-Al(2)O(3) support material predominantly exposes (001) and (011) surface planes (ones commensurate with the zone axis orientations frequently exhibited by the bimetallic clusters). The data reveal that the supported bimetallic clusters exhibit complex patterns of structural dynamics, ones evidencing perturbations of an underlying oblate/hemispherical cuboctahedral cluster-core geometry with cores that are enriched in Ir (a result consistent with models based on surface energetics, which favor an ambient cluster termination by Pt) due to the dynamical responses of the M-M bonding to the specifics of the adsorbate and metal-support interactions. Taken together, the data demonstrate that strong temperature-dependent charge-transfer effects occur that are likely mediated variably by the cluster-support, cluster-adsorbate, and intermetallic bonding interactions.

Metal Core Bonding Motifs of Monodisperse Icosahedral Au13 and Larger Au Monolayer-Protected Clusters As Revealed by X-ray Absorption Spectroscopy and Transmission Electron Microscopy

The atomic metal core structures of the subnanometer clusters Au13[PPh3]4[S(CH2)11CH3]2Cl2 (1) and Au13[PPh3]4[S(CH2)11CH3]4 (2) were characterized using advanced methods of electron microscopy and X-ray absorption spectroscopy. The number of gold atoms in the cores of these two clusters was determined quantitatively using high-angle annular dark field scanning transmission electron microscopy. Multiple-scattering-path analyses of extended X-ray absorption fine structure (EXAFS) spectra suggest that the Au metal cores of each of these complexes adopt an icosahedral structure with a relaxation of the icosahedral strain. Data from microscopy and spectroscopy studies extended to larger thiolate-protected gold clusters showing a broader distribution in nanoparticle core sizes (183 +/- 116 Au atoms) reveal a bulklike fcc structure. These results further support a model for the monolayer-protected clusters (MPCs) in which the thiolate ligands bond preferentially at 3-fold atomic sites on the nanoparticle surface, establishing an average composition for the MPC of Au180[S(CH2)11CH3]40. Results from EXAFS measurements of a gold(I) dodecanethiolate polymer are presented that offer an alternative explanation for observations in previous reports that were interpreted as indicating Au MPC structures consisting of a Au core, Au2S shell, and thiolate monolayer.

Adenosylcobinamide Plus Exogenous, Sterically Hindered, Putative Axial Bases: A Reinvestigation into the Cause of Record Levels of Co−C Heterolysis

A reinvestigation of an earlier Ph.D. thesis (Sirovatka, J. M. Ph.D. Thesis, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, 1999) is reported herein. That thesis examined the thermolysis reaction of AdoCbi(+)BF(4)(-) in ethylene glycol solution with exogenous bases, N-methylimidazole (N-Me-Im) and the sterically hindered 1,2-dimethylimidazole, (1,2-Me(2)-Im), 2-methylpyridine (2-Me-py), and 2,6-dimethylpyridine (2,6-Me(2)-py). In the present work, multiple purities of each base have been utilized as a check to see if impurities in the nitrogenous bases are causing the observed homolysis and heterolysis product distributions as others have implied (Trommel, J. S.; Warncke, K.; Marzilli, L. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 3358). The "impurity hypothesis" is disproven by a series of results, including the following: N-Me-Im displays an invariant 52 +/- 10% heterolysis and the 1,2-Me(2)-Im system displays an invariant 83 +/- 7% heterolysis as a function of different base purification methods. Moreover, 2-Me-py and 2,6-Me(2)-py also display an invariant approximately 16 +/- 5% heterolysis as a function of different purification methods. What is responsible for the high levels of Co-C heterolysis in the AdoCbi(+) plus sterically bulky base thermolyses was uncovered via a revisitation of our four, earlier alternative hypotheses for the enhanced Co-C heterolysis (Sirovatka, J. M.; Finke, R. G. Inorg. Chem. 1999, 38, 1697). Our prior number one alternative hypothesis is shown to be correct: the added bases simply deprotonate the ethylene glycol solvent, forming ethylene glycolate anion and base-H(+)() as the key agents behind the previously ill-understood Co-C heterolyses. Also reported are Co(II)Cbi(+) titrations with five bases (1,2-Me(2)-Im, N-Me-Im, pyridine, 2-MePy, and 2,6-Me(2)-py). These experiments confirm Marzilli and co-workers' (op. cit.) results by showing that sterically hindered bases do not bind to Co(II)Cbi(+); therefore, Co(II)Cbi(+) EPR literature showing binding of bulky pyridines is erroneous as is the previously reported binding of bulky pyridine bases to Co(II)Cbi(+) by UV-vis spectroscopy (Sirovatka, J. Ph.D. Thesis, op. cit.). Also reported is our current best synthesis and purification of AdoCbi(+)BF(4)(-), work that builds off our 1987 synthesis of AdoCbi(+)BF(4)(-) (Hay, B. P.; Finke, R. G. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 8012). Finally, the multiple, compounding errors which have caused problems in this project are listed, notably errors in the protein X-ray crystallography literature, the EXAFS literature, the Co(II)Cbi(+) plus bulky-bases EPR literature, the misleading B(12)-model literature, the erroneous experimental work (Sirovatka, op. cit.) and thus incorrect conclusions in one of our prior papers, as well as the erroneous implications in parts of the Marzilli and co-workers paper (op. cit.). It is hoped that a forthright reporting of these errors will help others avoid similar mistakes in the future when studying complex, bioinorganic systems.

Disulfides of manganese carbonyl. Synthesis of Mn(2)(CO)(7)(mu-S2) and its reactions with tertiary phosphines and arsines

The reaction of Mn(2)(CO)(9)(NCMe) with thiirane yielded the sulfidomanganese carbonyl compounds Mn(2)(CO)(7)(mu-S(2)), 2, Mn(4)(CO)(15)(mu(3)-S(2))(mu(4)-S(2)), 3, and Mn(4)(CO)(14)(NCMe)(mu(3)-S(2))(mu(4)-S(2)), 4, by transfer of sulfur from the thiirane to the manganese complex. Compound 3 was obtained in better yield from the reaction of 2 with CO, and compound 4 is obtained from the reaction of 2 with NCMe. The reaction of 2 with PMe(2)Ph yielded the tetramanganese disulfide Mn(4)(CO)(15)(PMe(2)Ph)(2)(mu(3)-S)(2), 5, and S=PMe(2)Ph. The reaction of 5 with PMe(2)Ph yielded Mn(4)(CO)(14)(PMe(2)Ph)(3)(mu(3)-S)(2), 6, by ligand substitution. The reaction of 2 with AsMe(2)Ph yielded the new complexes Mn(4)(CO)(14)(AsMe(2)Ph)(2)(mu(3)-S(2))(2), 7, Mn(4)(CO)(14)(AsMe(2)Ph)(mu(3)-S(2))(mu(4)-S(2)), 8, Mn(6)(CO)(20)(AsMe(2)Ph)(2)(mu(4)-S(2))(3), 9, and Mn(2)(CO)(6)(AsMe(2)Ph)(mu-S(2)), 10. Reaction of 2 with AsPh(3) yielded the monosubstitution derivative Mn(2)(CO)(6)(AsPh(3))(mu-S(2)), 11. Reaction of 7 with PMe(2)Ph yielded Mn(4)(CO)(15)(AsMe(2)Ph)(2)(mu(3)-S)(2), 12. The phosphine analogue of 7, Mn(4)(CO)(14)(PMe(2)Ph)(2)(mu(3)-S(2))(2), 13, was prepared from the reaction of Mn(2)(CO)(9)(PMe(2)Ph) with Me(3)NO and thiirane. Compounds 2-9 and 11-13 were characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Compound 2 contains a disulfido ligand that bridges two Mn(CO)(3) groups that are joined by a Mn-Mn single bond, 2.6745(5) A in length. A carbonyl ligand bridges the Mn-Mn bond. Compounds 3 and 4 contain four manganese atoms with one triply bridging and one quadruply bridging disulfido ligand. Compounds 5 and 6 contain four manganese atoms with two triply bridging sulfido ligands. Compound 9 contains three quadruply bridging disulfido ligands imbedded in a cluster of six manganese atoms.