Influence of Metal Coordination on the Gas-Phase Chemistry of the Positional Isomers of Fluorobenzoate Complexes

Organolanthanide Complexes Containing Ln-CH3 σ-bonds: Unexpectedly Similar Hydrolysis Rates for Trivalent and Tetravalent Organocerium

We report the gas-phase preparation, isolation, and reactivity of a series of organolanthanides featuring the Ln-CH3 bond. The complexes are formed by decarboxylating anionic lanthanide acetates to form trivalent [LnIII(CH3)(CH3CO2)3]- (Ln = La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Tb, Tm, Yb, Lu), divalent [EuII(CH3)(CH3CO2)2]-, and the first examples of tetravalent organocerium complexes featuring CeIV-Calkyl σ-bonds: [CeIV(O)(CH3)(CH3CO2)2]- and [CeIV(O)(CH3)(NO3)2]-. Attempts to isolate PrIV-CH3 and TbIV-CH3 were unsuccessful; however, fragmentation patterns reveal that the oxidation of LnIII to a LnIV-oxo-acetate complex is more favorable for Ln = Pr than for Ln = Tb. The rate of Ln-CH3 hydrolysis is a measure of bond stability, and it decreases from LaIII-CH3 to LuIII-CH3, with increasing steric crowding for smaller Ln stabilizing the harder Ln-CH3 bond against hydrolysis. [EuII(CH3)(CH3CO2)2]- engages in a much faster hydrolysis versus LnIII-CH3. The surprising observation of similar hydrolysis rates for CeIV-CH3 and CeIII-CH3 is discussed with respect to sterics, the oxo ligand, and bond covalency in σ-bonded organolanthanides.

Gas-phase formation of Grignard-type organolanthanide (III) ions RLnCl3 - : The influences of lanthanide center and hydrocarbyl group

RATIONALE

Compared with organomagnesium compounds (Grignard reagents), the Grignard-type organolanthanides (III) exhibit several utilizable differences in reactivity. However, the fundamental understanding of Grignard-type organolanthanides (III) is still in its infancy. Decarboxylation of metal carboxylate ions is an effective method to obtain organometallic ions that are well suited for gas-phase investigation using electrospray ionization (ESI) mass spectrometry in combination with density functional theory (DFT) calculations.

METHODS

The (RCO₂ )LnCl₃ ^- (R = CH₃ , Ln = La-Lu except Pm; Ln = La, R = CH₃ CH₂ , CH₂ CH, HCC, C₆ H₅ , and C₆ H₁₁ ) precursor ions were produced in the gas phase via ESI of LnCl₃ and RCO₂ H or RCO₂ Na mixtures in methanol. Collision-induced dissociation (CID) was employed to examine whether the Grignard-type organolanthanide (III) ions RLnCl₃ ^- can be obtained via decarboxylation of lanthanide chloride carboxylate ions (RCO₂ )LnCl₃ ^- . DFT calculations can be used to determine the influences of lanthanide center and hydrocarbyl group on the formation of RLnCl₃ ^- .

RESULTS

When R = CH₃ , CID of (CH₃ CO₂ )LnCl₃ ^- (Ln = La-Lu except Pm) yielded decarboxylation products (CH₃ )LnCl₃ ^- and reduction products LnCl₃ ·^- with a variation in the relative intensity ratio of (CH₃ )LnCl₃ ^- /LnCl₃ ·^- . The trend is as follows: (CH₃ )EuCl₃ ^- /EuCl₃ ·^-  < (CH₃ )YbCl₃ ^- /YbCl₃ ·^-  ≈ (CH₃ )SmCl₃ ^- /SmCl₃ ·^-  < other (CH₃ )LnCl₃ ^- /LnCl₃ ·^- , which complies with the trend of Ln (III)/Ln (II) reduction potentials in general. When Ln = La and hydrocarbyl groups were varied as CH₃ CH₂ , CH₂ CH, HCC, C₆ H₅ , and C₆ H₁₁ , the fragmentation behaviors of these (RCO₂ )LaCl₃ ^- precursor ions were diverse. Except for (C₆ H₁₁ CO₂ )LaCl₃ ^- , the four remaining (RCO₂ )LaCl₃ ^- (R = CH₃ CH₂ , CH₂ CH, HCC, and C₆ H₅ ) ions all underwent decarboxylation to yield RLaCl₃ ^- . (CH₂ CH)LaCl₃ ^- and especially (CH₃ CH₂ )LaCl₃ ^- are prone to undergo β-hydride transfer to form LaHCl₃ ^- , whereas (HCC)LaCl₃ ^- and (C₆ H₅ )LaCl₃ ^- are not. A minor reduction product, LaCl₃ ·^- , was formed via C₆ H₅ radical loss of (C₆ H₅ )LaCl₃ ^- . The relative intensities of RLaCl₃ ^- compared to (RCO₂ )LaCl₃ ^- decrease as follows: HCC > CH₂ CH > C₆ H₅  > CH₃  > CH₃ CH₂  >> C₆ H₁₁ (not visible).

CONCLUSION

A series of Grignard-type organolanthanide (III) ions RLnCl₃ ^- (R = CH₃ , Ln = La-Lu except Pm; Ln = La, R = CH₃ CH₂ , CH₂ CH, HCC, and C₆ H₅ ) were produced from (RCO₂ )LnCl₃ ^- via CO₂ loss, whereas (C₆ H₁₁ )LaCl₃ ^- did not. The experimental and theoretical results suggest that the reduction potentials of Ln (III)/Ln (II) couples as well as the bulkiness and hybridization of hydrocarbyl groups play important roles in promoting or limiting the formation of RLnCl₃ ^- via decarboxylation of (RCO₂ )LnCl₃ ^- .

Dual-Ligand Strategy for the Preparation of Gas-Phase Uranyl(VI) Benzyne Complexes from Uranyl(VI) Benzoates

The uranyl(VI) benzyne complex (η²-C₆H₄)UO₂Cl^- was prepared in the gas phase by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry coupled with collision-induced dissociation. It was formed via a dual-ligand strategy that requires the elimination of benzoic acid or benzene/CO₂ from the uranyl dibenzoate precursor (C₆H₅CO₂)₂UO₂Cl^-. This contrasts the known strategy for the formation of gas-phase benzyne complexes that would result from CO₂/HCl elimination from (C₆H₅CO₂)UO₂Cl₂^-, during which only one benzoate ligand is involved. Such dual-ligand strategy can be extended to the preparation of a series of methyl- and halo-substituted benzyne complexes of uranyl(VI). Density functional theory calculations at the B3LYP level reveal that the benzyne complex (η²-C₆H₄)UO₂Cl^- features a metallacyclopropene structure with the C₆H₄^2- ligand coordinated to uranium(VI) through two polarized U-C_benzyne σ bonds, in accordance with the reactivity test toward water. Dehydrochlorination of the benzyne complex (η²-C₆H₄)UO₂Cl^- from (C₆H₅)UO₂Cl₂^- that originates from decarboxylation of (C₆H₅CO₂)UO₂Cl₂^- with a single benzoate ligand is neither kinetically nor thermodynamically favorable than simple C₆H₅ radical loss to give U^VO₂Cl₂^-. This arises from the presence of an accessible V oxidation state for uranium and accounts for the necessity for the dual-ligand strategy in the preparation of uranyl(VI) benzyne complexes from uranyl benzoate precursors.