Development of a rapid and inexpensive assay for the nonspecific detection of antimicrobial residues in chicken egg yolks and neonatal yolk sacs

Efficacy and food safety considerations of poultry competitive exclusion products

Competitive exclusion (CE) products are anaerobic cultures of bacteria that are applied to poultry hatchlings to establish a protective enteric microbiota that excludes intestinal colonization by human food-borne pathogens. For safety of the poultry flock and human consumers, the identities of bacteria in CE products need to be known. A CE product is a culture of intestinal contents from adult chickens. It may be microbiologically defined by analysis of bacteria isolated from the culture, but many bacteria are hard to reliably isolate, identify, and characterize with conventional techniques. Sequence analysis of 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) genes may be more reliable than conventional techniques to identify CE bacteria. Bacteria in CE products may contain antimicrobial drug resistance and virulence mechanisms that could be transferred to the enteric bacteria of the food animal and to the human consumer. Detection methods for specific antimicrobial drug resistance and virulence genes and the integrase genes of conjugative transposons, mostly utilizing PCR technology, are being developed that can be applied to assess these risks in CE bacteria. With improvements in efficacy, bacterial identification, and detection and control of the possible risks of gene transfer, CE product technology can be made a more effective food safety tool.

Beneficial Effects of Cloacal Bacteria on Growth and Fledging Size in Nestling Pied Flycatchers (Ficedula Hypoleuca) in Spain

Effects of bacteria on avian hosts in the wild have received little attention until recently. Whereas the pathogenic effects of bacteria are well known, positive effects of symbiotic bacteria are more rarely considered. Nestling growth has important repercussions for offspring fitness in avian populations and may be affected by microbial colonization of the gut. Enterococcus faecalis is a common opportunistic pathogen, whereas E. faecium has been used as a growth promoter because it interacts competitively with pathogenic bacteria, E. faecalis included. We followed the growth in tarsus length and mass of 18 Pied Flycatcher (Ficedula hypoleuca) broods. Chicks were weighed and measured on days 4, 8, 10, and 13 after hatching. On day 13, wing length was also measured and cloacal swabs were taken of two chicks in each brood for detection of enterococci. In all, the methods used allowed us to detect six species of bacteria among a possibly much richer community. Most chicks had E. faecalis, whereas E. faecium was less prevalent. There was a negative association between scores for E. faecalis and for the rest of the species pooled. The presence of E. faecalis showed no detectable association with nestling mass or size at any age, whereas the presence of the other species showed significantly positive associations with mass and size on day 13, but not before. Presence of E. faecium on its own was positively associated with nestling mass and size shortly before fledging. E. faecium may act as a growth promoter in the wild through its competitive interactions with facultative pathogenic bacteria. The presence of some microbes are critically important in avian growth and development.

Evaluation of aviguard, a commercial competitive exclusion product for efficacy and after-effect on the antibody response of chicks to Salmonella

The competitive exclusion (CE) action of Aviguard (AG) and its effects on the antibody response of chicks were evaluated in this study. We observed that AG protected the chicks from overwhelming colonization. Fourteen days after infection, fewer AG-pretreated than nonpretreated chicks shed salmonellae from their coloaca in both infected groups, although much less from SE-infected chicks. Antibody titers of sera produced to Salmonella typhimurium (ST) and SE in pretreated and non-pretreated chicks were not significantly different. Immunoblotting showed that these antibodies reacted with SDS-PAGE-separated 71.4, 67.7, 44.0, and 30.3 kDa proteins detectable in the test strains. Few weak bands of doubtful significance were observed in the cross-reaction between the sera of ST- and SE-infected chicks with ST and SE antigens, respectively. Our study showed that AG protected chicks from overwhelming colonization by salmonellae, and neither altered the antigenic proteins of infecting salmonellae nor their recognition by specific antibodies produced in response to the infection.