Discovery of Orally Active 3-Pyridinyl-tropane As a Potent Nociceptin Receptor Agonist for the Management of Cough

In silico analysis of energy interactions between nociceptin/orfanin FQ receptor and two antagonists with potential antidepressive action

This study addresses the binding energies of NOPR-ligand complexes and presents the main amino acid residues involved in the interaction between these complexes.

The nociceptin receptor (NOPR) and its interaction with clinically important agonist molecules: a membrane molecular dynamics simulation study

The nociceptin receptor (NOPR) is an orphan G protein-coupled receptor that contains seven transmembrane helices. NOPR has a distinct mechanism of activation, though it shares a significant homology with other opioid receptors. Previously there have been reports on homology modeling of NOPR and also molecular dynamics simulation studies for a short period. Recently the crystal structure of NOPR was reported. In this study, we analyzed the time dependent behavior of NOPR docked with clinically important agonist molecules such as NOP (natural agonist) peptide and compound 10 (SCH-221510 derivative) using molecular dynamics simulations (MDS) for 100 ns. Molecular dynamics simulations of NOPR-agonist complexes allowed us to refine the system and to also identify stable structures with better binding modes. Structure activity relationships (SAR) for SCH221510 derivatives were investigated and reasons for the activities of these derivatives were determined. Our molecular dynamics trajectory analysis of NOPR-peptide and NOPR-compound 10 complexes found residues to be crucial for binding. Mutagenesis studies on the residues identified from our analysis could prove useful. Our results could also provide useful information in the structure-based drug design of novel and potent agonists targeting NOPR.

Diastereoselective syntheses of (3R*,4R*)- and (3R*,4S*)-4-aryl-3-methyl-4-piperidinemethanol and fluoro analogues

Two concise and high-yielding diastereoselective syntheses of 4-aryl-3-methyl-4-piperidinemethanols were realized from 1,3-dimethyl-4-piperidinone. The key reactions to control the C3-C4 relative stereochemistry were the alkoxymethylation of a metalloenamine generated from 4-aryl-3-methyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine that afforded the (3R*,4S*)-form and the nucleophilic substitution of a fluoroarene with deprotonated 3-methyl-4-piperidinenitrile giving the (3R*,4R*)-isomer. The corresponding fluoromethyl analogues were subsequently obtained through the fluorination of the piperidinemethanols using DAST.

Development of nociceptin receptor (NOP) agonists and antagonists

The nociceptin opioid (NOP) receptor is the most recently discovered member of the family of the opioid receptors; its endogenous agonist is the peptide nociceptin. Due to the subsequent elucidation of its physiological role in both central and peripheral nervous system and in some non-neural tissues, there is a rapidly growing interest in the pharmacological application of substances active on this receptor. Despite the current clinical use of a morphinane-based NOP/MOP mixed ligand (buprenorphine) as an analgesic and in the treatment of drug addictions, so far just a few clinical trials have been made with selective NOP ligands. However, the perspective of their utilization is rapidly growing. Agonists can find applications in the treatment of neuropathic pain, anxiety, cough, drug addition, urinary incontinence, anorexia, congestive heart failure, hypertension; and antagonists for pain, depression, Parkinson's disease, obesity, and as memory enhancers. Besides peptide ligands, which are still subjected to many pharmacological investigations, many different chemical classes of NOP ligands have been discovered: piperidines, nortropanes, spiropiperidines, 4-amino-quinolines and quinazolines, and others. The new advances in establishing structure-activity relationships, also with the help of modeling studies, can permit the development of more active and selective molecules.

Endogenous opiates and behavior: 2009

This paper is the 32nd consecutive installment of the annual review of research concerning the endogenous opioid system. It summarizes papers published during 2009 that studied the behavioral effects of molecular, pharmacological and genetic manipulation of opioid peptides, opioid receptors, opioid agonists and opioid antagonists. The particular topics that continue to be covered include the molecular-biochemical effects and neurochemical localization studies of endogenous opioids and their receptors related to behavior (Section 2), and the roles of these opioid peptides and receptors in pain and analgesia (Section 3); stress and social status (Section 4); tolerance and dependence (Section 5); learning and memory (Section 6); eating and drinking (Section 7); alcohol and drugs of abuse (Section 8); sexual activity and hormones, pregnancy, development and endocrinology (Section 9); mental illness and mood (Section 10); seizures and neurologic disorders (Section 11); electrical-related activity and neurophysiology (Section 12); general activity and locomotion (Section 13); gastrointestinal, renal and hepatic functions (Section 14); cardiovascular responses (Section 15); respiration and thermoregulation (Section 16); and immunological responses (Section 17).

The efficacy of a NOP1 agonist (SCH486757) in subacute cough

Currently, opiates are widely used as antitussives but have substantial side effects. Recently, it has been proposed that NOP1 receptor agonists may be useful as a novel approach to cough suppression. Therefore, we compared the effect of NOP1 receptor agonist SCH486757 with matched placebo and codeine in a multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group study in patients with subacute cough. The primary outcome was change in cough severity scores, with the key secondary outcome change in objective daytime cough counts. We studied 91 subjects with subacute cough [59 (65%) female, median age = 41(range = 18-64) years, and median cough duration = 33 (range = 16-99) days]. Subjects were randomised to receive either SCH486757 100 mg, codeine 30 mg, or matched placebo twice daily for 5 days. Cough severity was scored throughout using a diary card and objective cough frequency recorded for 8 h at baseline and on the first and last treatment days. There were no significant differences in changes in average cough severity scores from baseline to treatment between SCH486757 and placebo [mean change = -0.57 (-30.1%) vs. mean change = -0.49 (-19.7%); P = 0.56] or between codeine and placebo [mean change = -0.72 (-33.2%); P = 0.07 compared to placebo). Changes in objective cough counts also showed no differences between the three treatment groups. There were some hints of possible limited antitussive efficacy with SCH486757. Unfortunately, the maximum clinical dose is limited by its tendency to produce somnolence. If the therapeutic ratio of NOP1 agonists could be improved, these drugs may still prove to contain effective antitussives.