Do the One-Electron Oxidized Derivatives of Some Six-Coordinate Low-Spin Iron(III) Porphyrins Feature Strong Metal−Ligand Ferromagnetic Coupling?

Effects of porphyrin deformation on the 13C and 1H NMR chemical shifts in high-spin five- and six-coordinate manganese(III) porphyrin complexes

As an extension of our study to reveal the effect of porphyrin deformation on the [Formula: see text]C and 1H NMR chemical shifts, both five- and six-coordinate high-spin (S [Formula: see text] 2) Mn(III) complexes such as Mn(Por)Cl and [Mn(Por)(CD3OD)2]Cl have been prepared, where Por is a porphyrin dianion such as TPP, OMTPP, and T[Formula: see text]PrP. Molecular structures of five-coordinate Mn(OMTPP)Cl and Mn(TiPrP)Cl have been determined by the X-ray crystallographic analysis. As expected, Mn(OMTPP)Cl and Mn(TiPrP)Cl have exhibited a highly saddled and highly ruffled porphyrin core, respectively. The [Formula: see text]C NMR spectra have revealed that these complexes generally exhibit the [Formula: see text]-pyrrole signals at the downfield positions and [Formula: see text]-pyrrole an. meso signals at the upfield positions. The results suggest that the spin polarization of Mn(III)–NP σ bonds, which occurs in all the high-spin Mn(III) complexes, is the major factor to determine the chemical shifts of the porphyrin carbon signals (Cheng, R.-J.; Chang, S.-H.; Hung, K.-C. Inorg. Chem. 2007; 46: 1948–1950). Although th. meso and [Formula: see text]-pyrrole signals are observed at the upfield and downfield positions, respectively, these signals are widely dispersed depending on the deformation mode of the porphyrin ring. The results have been explained in terms of the strong spin polarization of the Mn–NP bond together with the specific metal-porphyrin orbital interactions such as: (i) the a2u-dz2 interaction in five-coordinate complexes, (ii) the a2u-dxy interaction in ruffled complexes, and (iii) the a2u-dx2-y2 interaction in saddled complexes.

Electronic structure of low-spin six-coordinate iron(III) meso-tetrapropylchlorin complexes

Low-spin iron(III) tetrapropylchlorins [ Fe ( T n PrC ) L 2]± (L = HIm, 1-MeIm, DMAP, CN-, 4-CNPy, tBuNC) adopt the dxy-type ground state regardless of the nature of axial ligands. Among the complexes examined, [ Fe ( T n PrC )( t BuNC )2]+ has shown quite unique spectroscopic properties as described below. (1) 1 H NMR signals were extremely broad as compared with those of other complexes. In particular, 5,20- CH 2(α) signal was too broad to detect. (2) No signals except C γ were observed in 13 C NMR spectra. (3) Tetragonal splitting parameter (|Δ|) estimated by the EPR g values at 4.2 K reached as much as 12.4 λ, which is the largest |Δ| value among all the low-spin iron(III) porphyrins and porphyrinoids reported previously. On the basis of these results, we have concluded that [ Fe ( T n PrC )( t BuNC )2]+ adopts the low-spin iron(III) with (dxz, dyz)4(dxy)1 electronic ground state at 4.2–30 K where the EPR spectra are taken, while it should be expressed as the low-spin Fe ( II ) chlorin π-radical cation [ Fe II ( T n PrC .)( t BuNC )2]+ at ambient temperature where the NMR spectra are taken.

Equilibrium between Fe(IV) porphyrin and Fe(III) porphyrin radical cation: new insight into the electronic structure of high-valent iron porphyrin complexes

UV-Vis, NMR, and Mössbauer studies have revealed that [Fe(TMP)(N3)2], showing the Mössbauer parameters quite similar to those of the ferryl species of MauG, CytP450BM3, Cyt P450CAM, and CPO, exists as equilibrium mixtures of Fe(IV) porphyrin and Fe(III) porphyrin radical cation.

Electronic structure of highly ruffled low-spin iron(III) porphyrinates with electron withdrawing heptafluoropropyl groups at the meso positions

Bis(pyridine)[meso-tetrakis(heptafluoropropyl)porphyrinato]iron(III), [Fe(THFPrP)Py(2)](+), was reported to be the low-spin complex that adopts the purest (d(xz), d(yz))(4)(d(xy))(1) ground state where the energy gap between the iron d(xy) and d(π)(d(xz), d(yz)) orbitals is larger than the corresponding energy gaps of any other complexes reported previously (Moore, K. T.; Fletcher, J. T.; Therien, M. J. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5196-5209). Although the highly ruffled porphyrin core expected for this complex contributes to the stabilization of the (d(xz), d(yz))(4)(d(xy))(1) ground state, the strongly electron withdrawing C(3)F(7) groups at the meso positions should stabilize the (d(xy))(2)(d(xz), d(yz))(3) ground state. Thus, we have reexamined the electronic structure of [Fe(THFPrP)Py(2)](+) by means of (1)H NMR, (19)F NMR, and electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy. The CD(2)Cl(2) solution of [Fe(THFPrP)Py(2)](+) shows the pyrrole-H signal at -10.25 ppm (298 K) in (1)H NMR, the CF(2)(α) signal at -74.6 ppm (298 K) in (19)F NMR, and the large g(max) type signal at g = 3.16 (4.2 K) in the EPR. Thus, contrary to the previous report, the complex is unambiguously shown to adopt the (d(xy))(2)(d(xz), d(yz))(3) ground state. Comparison of the spectroscopic data of a series of [Fe(THFPrP)L(2)](+) with those of the corresponding meso-tetrapropylporphyrin complexes [Fe(TPrP)L(2)](+) with various axial ligands (L) has shown that the meso-C(3)F(7) groups stabilize the (d(xy))(2)(d(xz), d(yz))(3) ground state. Therefore, it is clear that the less common (d(xz), d(yz))(4)(d(xy))(1) ground state can be stabilized by the three major factors: (i) axial ligand with low-lying π* orbitals, (ii) ruffled porphyrin ring, and (iii) electron donating substituent at the meso position.

Mechanistic Studies on Peroxide Activation by a Water-Soluble Iron(III)–Porphyrin: Implications for OO Bond Activation in Aqueous and Nonaqueous Solvents

The reactions of a water-soluble iron(III)-porphyrin, [meso-tetrakis(sulfonatomesityl)porphyrinato]iron(III), [Fe(III)(tmps)] (1), with m-chloroperoxybenzoic acid (mCPBA), iodosylbenzene (PhIO), and H(2)O(2) at different pH values in aqueous methanol solutions at -35 degrees C have been studied by using stopped-flow UV/Vis spectroscopy. The nature of the porphyrin product resulting from the reactions with all three oxidants changed from the oxo-iron(IV)-porphyrin pi-cation radical [Fe(IV)(tmps(*+))(O)] (1(++)) at pH<5.5 to the oxo-iron(IV)-porphyrin [Fe(IV)(tmps)(O)] (1(+)) at pH>7.5, whereas a mixture of both species was formed in the intermediate pH range of 5.5-7.5. The observed reactivity pattern correlates with the E degrees' versus pH profile reported for 1, which reflects pH-dependent changes in the relative positions of E degrees'(Fe(IV)/Fe(III) ) and E degrees'(P(*+)/P) for metal- and porphyrin-centered oxidation, respectively. On this basis, the pH-dependent redox equilibria involving 1(++) and 1(+) are suggested to determine the nature of the final products that result from the oxidation of 1 at a given pH. The conclusions reached are extended to water-insoluble iron(III)-porphyrins on the basis of literature data concerning the electrochemical and catalytic properties of [Fe(III)(P)(X)] species in nonaqueous solvents. Implications for mechanistic studies on [Fe(P)]-catalyzed oxidation reactions are briefly addressed.