Reply to “Comment on 'Ruling Out Any Electrophilicity Equalization Principle'”

Hardness maximization or equalization? New insights and quantitative relations between hardness increase and bond dissociation energy

It has been overlooked that the change of hardness, η, upon bonding is intimately connected to thermochemical cycles, which determine whether hardness is increased according to Pearson's "maximum hardness principle" (MHP) or equalized, as expected by Datta's "hardness equalization principle" (HEP). So far the performances of these likely incompatible "structural principles" have not been compared. Computational validations have been inconclusive because the hardness values and even their qualitative trends change drastically and unsystematically at different levels of theory. Here I elucidate the physical basis of both rules, and shed new light on them from an elementary experimental source. The difference, Δη = η _mol - <η _at>, of the molecular hardness, η _mol, and the averaged atomic hardness, <η _at>, is determined by thermochemical cycles involving the bond dissociation energies D of the molecule, D ⁺ of its cation, and D ^- of its anion. Whether the hardness is increased, equalized or even reduced is strongly influenced by ΔD = 2D - D ⁺  - D ^-. Quantitative expressions for Δη are obtained, and the principles are tested on 90 molecules and the association reactions forming them. The Wigner-Witmer symmetry constraints on bonding require the valence state (VS) hardness, η _VS, instead of the conventional ground state (GS) hardness, η _GS. Many intriguingly "unpredictable" failures and systematic shortcomings of said "principles" are understood and overcome for the first time, including failures involving exotic and/or challenging molecules, such as Be_2, B₂, O₃, and transition metal compounds. New linear relationships are discovered between the MHP hardness increase Δη _VS and the intrinsic bond dissociation energy D _i . For bond formations, MHP and HEP are not compatible, and HEP does not qualify as an ordering rule.

Chemical potential of molecules contrasted to averaged atomic electronegativities: alarming differences and their theoretical rationalization

We present the first large-scale empirical examination of the relation of molecular chemical potentials, μ(0)(mol) = -½(I(0) + A(0))(mol), to the geometric mean (GM) of atomic electronegativities, <χ(0)(at)>(GM) = <½(I(0) + A(0))(at)>(GM), and demonstrate that μ(0)(mol) ≠ -<χ(0)(at)>(GM). Out of 210 molecular μ(0)(mol)values considered more than 150 are not even in the range min{μ(0)(at)} < μ(0)(mol) < max{μ(0)(at)} spanned by the μ(0)(at) = -χ(0)(at) of the constituent atoms. Thus the chemical potentials of the large majority of our molecules cannot be obtained by any electronegativity equalization scheme, including the "geometric mean equalization principle", ½(I(0) + A(0))(mol) = <½(I(0) + A(0))(at)>(GM). For this equation the root-mean-square of relative errors amounts to SE = 71%. Our results are at strong variance with Sanderson's electronegativity equalization principle and present a challenge to some popular practice in conceptual density functional theory (DFT). The influences of the "external" potential and charge dependent covalent and ionic binding contributions are discussed and provide the theoretical rationalization for the empirical facts. Support is given to the warnings by Hinze, Bader et al., Allen, and Politzer et al. that equating the chemical potential to the negative of electronegativity may lead to misconceptions.

On the electrophilic character of molecules through its relation with electronegativity and chemical hardness

Electrophilicity is an intrinsic property of atoms and molecules. It probably originates logistically with the involvement in the physical process of electrostatics of soaked charge in electronic shells and the screened nuclear charge of atoms. Motivated by the existing view of conceptual density functional theory that similar to electronegativity and hardness equalization, there should be a physical process of equalization of electrophilicity during the chemical process of formation of hetero nuclear molecules, we have developed a new theoretical scheme and formula for evaluating the electrophilicity of hetero nuclear molecules. A comparative study with available bench marking reveals that the hypothesis of electrophilicity and equalization, and the present method of evaluating equalized electrophilicity, are scientifically promising.