Free Energy Reconstruction in Bidirectional Force Spectroscopy Experiments: The Effect of the Device Stiffness

Seeding the multi-dimensional nonequilibrium pulling for Hamiltonian variation: indirect nonequilibrium free energy simulations at QM levels

The combination of free energy simulations in the alchemical and configurational spaces provides a feasible route to access the thermodynamic profiles under a computationally demanding target Hamiltonian. Normally, due to the significant differences between the computational cost of ab initio quantum mechanics (QM) calculations and those of semi-empirical quantum mechanics (SQM) and molecular mechanics (MM), this indirect method could be used to obtain the QM thermodynamics by combining the SQM or MM results and the SQM-to-QM or MM-to-QM corrections. In our previous work, a multi-dimensional nonequilibrium pulling framework for Hamiltonian variations was introduced based on bidirectional pulling and bidirectional reweighting. The method performs nonequilibrium free energy simulations in the configurational space to obtain the thermodynamic profile along the conformational change pathway under a selected computationally efficient Hamiltonian, and uses the nonequilibrium alchemical method to correct or perturb the thermodynamic profile to that under the target Hamiltonian. The BAR-based method is designed to achieve the best generality and transferability and thus leads to modest (∼20 fold) speedup. In this work, we explore the possibility of further accelerating the nonequilibrium free energy simulation by employing unidirectional pulling and using the selection criterion to obtain the initial configurations used to initiate nonequilibrium trajectories following the idea of adaptive steered molecular dynamics (ASMD). A single initial condition is used to seed the whole multi-dimensional nonequilibrium free energy simulation and the sampling is performed fully in the nonequilibrium ensemble. Introducing very short ps-length equilibrium sampling to grab more initial seeds could also be helpful. The ASMD scheme estimates the free energy difference with the unidirectional exponential average (EXP), but it does not follow exactly the requirements of the EXP estimator. Another deficiency of the seeding simulation is the inherently sequential or serial pulling due to the inter-segment dependency, which triggers some problems in the parallelizability of the simulation. Numerical tests are performed to grasp some insights and guidelines for using this selection-criterion-based ASMD scheme. The presented selection-criterion-based multi-dimensional ASMD scheme follows the same perturbation network of the BAR-based method, and thus could be used in various Hamiltonian-variation cases.

BAR-based multi-dimensional nonequilibrium pulling for indirect construction of QM/MM free energy landscapes: from semi-empirical to ab initio

The indirect method for the construction of quantum mechanics (QM)/molecular mechanics (MM) free energy landscapes provides a cheaper alternative for free energy simulations at the QM level. The indirect method features a direct calculation of the free energy profile with a computationally efficient but less accurate Hamiltonian (i.e. low-level Hamiltonian) and a low-level-to-high-level correction. In the thermodynamic cycle, the direct low-level calculation along the physically meaningful reaction coordinate is corrected via the alchemical method, which is often achieved with perturbation-based techniques. In our previous work, a multi-dimensional nonequilibrium pulling framework is proposed for the indirect construction of QM/MM free energy landscapes. Previously, we focused on obtaining semi-empirical QM (SQM) results indirectly from direct MM simulations and MM to SQM corrections. In this work, we apply this method to obtain results under ab initio QM Hamiltonians by combining direct SQM results and SQM to QM corrections. A series of SQM and QM Hamiltonians are benchmarked. It is observed that PM6 achieves the best performance among the low-level Hamiltonians. Therefore, we recommend using PM6 as the low-level theory in the indirect free energy simulation. Considering its higher similarity to the high-level Hamiltonians, PM6 corrected with the bond charge correction could be more accurate than the existing AM1-BCC model. Another central result in the current work is a basic protocol of choosing the strength of restraints and an appropriate time step in nonequilibrium free energy simulation at the stiff spring limit. We provide theoretical derivations to emphasize the importance of using a sufficiently large force constant and choosing an appropriate time step. It is worth noting that a general rule of thumb for choosing the time step, according to our derivation, is that a time step of 1 fs or smaller should be used, as long as the stiff spring approximation is employed, even in simulations with constraints on bonds involving hydrogen atoms.