Prevalence of acid-reducing agents (ARA) in cancer populations and ARA drug-drug interaction potential for molecular targeted agents in clinical development

Playing Hide-and-Seek with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Can We Overcome Administration Challenges?

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have demonstrated significant efficacy against various types of cancers through molecular targeting mechanisms. Over the past 22 years, more than 100 TKIs have been approved for the treatment of various types of cancer indicating the significant progress achieved in this research area. Despite having significant efficacy and ability to target multiple pathways, TKIs administration is associated with challenges. There are reported inconsistencies between observed food effect and labeling administration, challenges of concomitant administration with acid-reducing agents (ARA), pill burden and dosing frequency. In this context, the objective of present review is to visit administration challenges of TKIs and effective ways to tackle them. We have gathered data of 94 TKIs approved in between 2000 and 2022 with respect to food effect, ARA impact, administration schemes (food and PPI restrictions), number of pills per day and administration frequency. Further, trend analysis has been performed to identify inconsistencies in the labeling with respect to observed food effect, molecules exhibiting ARA impact, in order to identify solutions to remove these restrictions through novel formulation approaches. Additionally, opportunities to reduce number of pills per day and dosing frequency for better patient compliance were suggested using innovative formulation interventions. Finally, utility of physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling (PBPK) for rationale formulation development was discussed with literature reported examples. Overall, this review can act as a ready-to-use-guide for the formulation, biopharmaceutics scientists and medical oncologists to identify opportunities for innovation for TKIs.

Do proton pump inhibitors affect the effectiveness of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors in advanced HR positive, HER2 negative breast cancer? A meta-analysis

Background

The CDK 4/6 inhibitors, including palbociclib and ribociclib, are the standard first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive (HR+) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer. Proton pump inhibitors are one of the most globally prescribed types of medications as part of the treatment for gastroesophageal reflux and heartburn complaints. Medication interactions have been demonstrated, leading to a decrease in the effectiveness of chemotherapy drugs such as capecitabine and pazopanib. However, their role and interaction with targeted therapies such as CDK inhibitors are still poorly understood.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases for studies that investigated the use of PPI with CDK 4/6 inhibitors versus CDK4/6 alone for advanced or metastatic breast cancer. We systematically searched for the currently available CDK inhibitors: palbociclib, ribociclib and abemaciclib. We computed hazard ratios (HRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used DerSimonian and Laird random-effect models for all endpoints. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics. R, version 4.2.3, was used for statistical analyses.

Results

A total of 2,737 patients with advanced breast cancer in 9 studies were included, with six studies described the status menopausal as 217 (7.9%) pre-menopause and 1851 (67.6%) post-menopause, for endocrine sensitivity only five studies described1489 (54.4%) patients were endocrine-sensitive and 498 (182%) endocrine-resistent, 910 (33.2%) patients used PPIs. The overall Progression-Free Survival was in favor of the PPI non-users (HR 2.0901; 95% CI 1.410-2.9498; p < 0.001). As well as the subgroup taking palbociclib, revealing statistical relevance for the PPI non-users (HR 2.2539; 95% CI 1.3213-3.8446; p = 0.003) and ribociclib subgroup with a slight decrease in hazard ratio (HR 1.74 95% CI 1.02-2.97; p = 0.04; I2 = 40%). In the multivariate analysis, there was no statistical signifance with ECOG (HR 0.9081; 95% CI 0.4978-16566; p 0.753) and Age (HR 1.2772; 95% CI 0.8790-1.8559; p = 0.199). Either, the univariate analysis did not show statistical significance.

Conclusion

Women with HR+ and HER2-advanced metastatic breast undergoing treatment with targeted therapies, specifically CDK 4/6 inhibitors, should be monitored for the use of proton pump inhibitors. Therefore, the use of PPIs should be discussed, weighing the advantages and disadvantages for specific cases. It should be individualized based on the necessity in clinical practice for these cases.

Systematic Review Registration

identifier CRD42023484755.

Assessing and mitigating pH-mediated DDI risks in drug development - formulation approaches and clinical considerations

pH-mediated drug-drug interactions (DDI) is a prevalent DDI in drug development, especially for weak base compounds with highly pH-dependent solubility. FDA has released a guidance on the evaluation of pH-mediated DDI assessments using in vitro testing and clinical studies. Currently, there is no common practice of ways of testing across the academia and industry. The development of biopredictive method and physiologically-based biopharmaceutics modeling (PBBM) approaches to assess acid-reducing agent (ARA)-DDI have been proven with accurate prediction and could decrease drug development burden, inform clinical design and potentially waive clinical studies. Formulation strategies and careful clinical design could help mitigate the pH-mediated DDI to avoid more clinical studies and label restrictions, ultimately benefiting the patient. In this review paper, a detailed introduction on biorelevant dissolution testing, preclinical and clinical study requirement and PBPK modeling approaches to assess ARA-DDI are described. An improved decision tree for pH-mediated DDI is proposed. Potential mitigations including clinical or formulation strategies are discussed.

Use of Betaine HCl with Pepsin in Esophageal Cancer Patient: A Case Report

The principal mechanisms surrounding gastrointestinal (GI) side effects due to chemotherapy are unclear, whereas the information regarding symptom management of patients with esophageal cancer post-esophagectomy is lacking. Esophagectomy patients are left with significant anatomical changes to the GI tract, including the cutting of the vagus nerve, which regulates gastric secretions, gastric acid pH, and motility. A 76-year-old male patient self-referred himself to the clinical dietitian for nutritional management of chronic nausea, fatigue, weight loss, and dumping syndrome 9 months post-esophagectomy, which was not responsive to medications. A physical functional nutritional assessment with evaluation of diet history and elimination suggested gastric hypochlorhydria. Gastric acid is needed for the active absorption of iron, zinc, B complex vitamins, especially B12, and digestion of consumed proteins. A digestive supplement, betaine hydrochloric acid with pepsin (BHClP), was introduced, and the patient ingested 1 capsule containing 500 mg betaine hydrochloride and 23.5 mg pepsin prior to protein-containing meals and reported a substantial decrease in GI symptoms while eating a regular diet with no limitations. He gained necessary weight and energy for daily activities. After a few months, the patient discontinued BHClP, and GI symptoms and dumping syndrome returned, leading to a loss of 7.5% of his body weight. The patient reinitiated the supplement and GI symptoms dissipated, and weight was restored. BHClP provided metabolic therapeutic benefit to optimize the patient's oral intake, preventing further complications and malnutrition. The success with BHClP for this patient case suggests that more research is needed to fully realize the mechanisms and clinical usage.

Sodium citrate buffer improves pazopanib solubility and absorption in gastric acid-suppressed rat model

Pazopanib exhibits pH-dependent solubility and its absorption depends primarily on the stomach pH. Significant decrease of pazopanib absorption by coadministration with proton pump inhibitors in clinical situation need to be overcome. Thus, the purpose of this study is firstly to investigate the effect of acidic beverages and sodium citrate buffer on the solubility of pazopanib and secondly to examine the effect of sodium citrate buffer on pazopanib absorption in a rat model with esomeprazole-mediated gastric acid suppression. Pazopanib solubility decreased with increasing pH of sodium citrate buffer in vitro. Interestingly, its solubility in some acidic beverages was significantly lower than that in sodium citrate buffer of the same pH. The AUC0-24h of pazopanib administered in tap water to rats treated with esomeprazole (ESP rats) was 66 % lower than that in the control rats treated with saline. However, AUC0-24h was 4.8 times higher in ESP rats that received pazopanib with sodium citrate buffer (pH 2.3) compared to ESP rats that received pazopanib with tap water. Our results indicate that the drug-drug interactions between pazopanib and proton pump inhibitors can be overcome, at least in part, by suspending pazopanib in sodium citrate buffer.

Effects of H2-Receptor Antagonists on the Exposure of Dacomitinib

Dacomitinib is an irreversible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and EGFR-activating mutations. Proton-pump inhibitors decreased dacomitinib exposure. This analysis summarizes the effect of Histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) on dacomitinib exposure. A within-patient comparison of the steady-state trough concentrations (Ctrough,ss) of dacomitinib and its active metabolite and active moiety with and without concomitant use of H2RAs was conducted using a linear mixed effects model with pooled data from 11 clinical studies in patients with NSCLC. An oral absorption physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model was constructed and verified using clinical pharmacokinetic (PK) data after a single dose of dacomitinib in healthy volunteers to estimate the effect of gastric pH altered by an H2RA on dacomitinib's PKs. The adjusted geometric mean of the dacomitinib Ctrough,ss of the dacomitinib parent, metabolite and active moiety following co-administration with an H2RA was approximately 86%, 104% and 100% relative to that following dacomitinib 45 mg administration without an H2RA (p > 0.05). The PBPK modeling showed negligible change in dacomitinib maximum concentration (Cmax) and area under the drug concentration-time curve (AUC) over 0-24 h after H2RA administration when compared with those administered dacomitinib alone. Co-administration of an H2RA with dacomitinib is not expected to have any clinically relevant effect on dacomitinib exposure.

Clinical impact of proton pump inhibitors and other co-medications on advanced melanoma patients treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors

PURPOSE

While several studies reported the influence of co-medications on immune checkpoint therapy and chemotherapy, it remains poorly studied with targeted therapy. Targeted therapies inhibiting BRAF and MEK had significantly improved management of advanced melanoma with BRAFV600 mutation over the last decade, we aimed to investigate the possible influence of co-mediations on the efficacy and toxicity of these targeted therapies (TT).

METHODS

We conducted an observational study identifying patients with advanced melanoma treated with BRAF/MEK inhibitors between 2013 and 2020 in the Bordeaux University Hospital. Co-medications given within 1 month before until 3 months after the initiation of targeted therapy were recorded and classified by their mechanism or by their metabolism. Survival data were analyzed with univariable and multivariable cox regression and the combined effect of multiple factors was evaluated using a factor analysis of mixed data (FAMD). The impact of co-medications on toxicity related to TT was also assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 192 patients were included. Although several co-medications were associated with significantly shorter overall survival (OS) and/or progression-free survival (PFS), PPIs was the only co-medication with a significant impact in multivariable analysis considering all co-medications and specific prognostic factors. Co-medications did not influence the risk, type, or timing of TT-related toxicity. Additional FAMD revealed the impact of each factor on the oncological outcomes. In a subgroup of patients, residual plasma TT concentration was available and did not differ between PPIs users and non-users.

CONCLUSION

Co-medications, especially PPIs, must be carefully assessed at the time of TT initiation.

Altering distribution profile of palbociclib by its prodrugs

Palbociclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor, is currently used clinically for treating hormone receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative breast cancer. Additionally, it has the potential to be utilized in the treatment of various tumors, including malignant glioblastoma. Previous research has indicated that palbociclib is a substrate for two efflux transporters, P-glycoprotein (P-gp; MDR1) and breast cancer-resistant protein (BCRP), which restrict the brain exposure of palbociclib. In the present study, our objective was to alter the brain distribution pattern of palbociclib by creating and assessing two novel prodrugs through in vitro, in situ, and in vivo evaluations. To this end, we synthesized two prodrugs of palbociclib by attaching it to the tyrosine promoiety at the para- (PD1) and meta-(PD2) position via a carbamate bond. We hypothesized that the prodrugs could bypass efflux transporter-mediated drug resistance by leveraging the l-type amino acid transporter (LAT1) to facilitate their transport across the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and into cancer cells, such as glioma cells that express LAT1. The compounds PD1 and PD2 did not show selective binding and had limited inhibitory effects on LAT1 in three cell lines (MCF-7, U87-MG, HEK-hLAT1). However, PD1 and PD2 demonstrated the ability to evade efflux mechanisms, and their in vitro uptake profiles were comparable to that of palbociclib, indicating their potential for effective cellular transport. In in situ and in vivo studies, brain uptake was not significantly improved compared to palbociclib, but the pharmacokinetic profiles showed encouraging enhancements. PD1 exhibited a higher AUCbrain/plasma ratio, suggesting safer dosing, while PD2 showed favorable long-acting pharmacokinetics. Although our prodrug design did not significantly improve palbociclib brain delivery due to the potential size limitation of the prodrugs, the study provides valuable insights for future prodrug development and drug delivery strategies targeting specific transporters.

Dasatinib anhydrate containing oral formulation improves variability and bioavailability in humans

Dasatinib monohydrate indicated for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia displays pH-dependent solubility. The aim of reported development program of novel dasatinib anhydrate containing formulation was to demonstrate improved absorption and lower pharmacokinetic variability compared to dasatinib monohydrate. In a bioavailability study comparing formulations containing 110.6 mg and 140 mg of dasatinib as anhydrate and monohydrate, respectively, both Cmax and AUC of dasatinib were within standard 80.00-125.00% range, while the intra- and inter-subject variability for AUC0-inf after the test product was approximately 3-fold and 1.5-fold less than after the reference, respectively.In a drug-drug interaction study, omeprazole 40 mg reduced the mean AUC0-inf of dasatinib by 19%, when the test was ingested 2 h before the 5th omeprazole dose. This decrease of exposure is clinically irrelevant and substantially less than after the reference. Co-prescription analysis supports the importance of pH-dependent solubility of dasatinib, as >21% of patients were treated concomitantly with a PPI and dasatinib despite warnings against this co-medication in the SmPC.The novel dasatinib anhydrate containing formulation demonstrated improved absorption and less pharmacokinetic variability compared to dasatinib monohydrate product, which may translate into improved clinical outcomes, although this needs to be proven by an appropriate trial.

PPIs therapy has a negative impact on the clinical outcomes of advanced SCLC patients treated with PD-L1 inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors has emerged as a first-line therapeutic strategy for advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC), which can stimulate T-cell activation, thereby preventing tumor avoidance of immunologic surveillance, whereas, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) can play an important role in regulating immune function. This study assessed whether the concomitantly use of PPIs affected outcomes of immunotherapy in advanced SCLC.

METHODS

Data from advanced SCLC patients who firstly treated with PD-L1 inhibitors between July 2018 and February 2021 was retrospectively analyzed. The impact of concomitant medications (especially PPIs) on objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Of 208 patients, 101 received immunotherapy concomitant PPIs. The median PFS of patients receiving PPIs (6.6 months) were significantly shorter than those without PPIs (10.6 months), and so was OS. There was associated with a 74.9% increased risk of progression and 58.3% increased risk of death. Both first-line and post-first-line immunotherapy, patients treated PPIs had poorer PFS.

CONCLUSION

PPIs therapy has a negative impact on the clinical outcomes of advanced SCLC patients treated with PD-L1 inhibitors.

Australian data on the utilisation and duration on treatment of ibrutinib with a proton pump inhibitor in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia

In Australia, over half of patients with relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukaemia treated with ibrutinib use concomitant proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). High gastric pH reduces the bioavailability of some Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors. There was no difference in duration on ibrutinib with or without concomitant PPI (unadjusted P = 0.61; adjusted hazard ratio: 1.23, 95% confidence interval: 0.75-2.02, P = 0.411). PPI use does not affect ibrutinib treatment persistence.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and their interaction with proton pump inhibitors-related interstitial nephritis

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized cancer therapy and outcomes, leading to an expanding use in millions of patients worldwide. However, they can cause a spectrum of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Essentially, any organs can be affected by irAEs, which have emerged as therapy-limiting side effects. In the kidneys, ICI-associated acute interstitial nephritis (ICI-AIN) leads to acute kidney injury (AKI) in 2%-5% of patients on ICI therapy. AKI associated with ICI therapy pathologically presents with AIN in nearly 90% of the cases, but the pathophysiology of ICI-AIN remains to be defined. The generation of autoreactive T cells in patients receiving AIN-inducible drugs, such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), is one of the leading theories, supported by a higher incidence of ICI-AIN in patients on these AIN-inducible drugs. In this review, we will discuss our understanding of the incidence, potential pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical presentations, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of PPI-related AIN and its interaction with ICI therapy.

The Association between Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Effectiveness of CDK Inhibitors in HR+/HER- Advanced Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

There have been many clinical questions regarding whether the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) could deteriorate the effects of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors (CDKIs) in HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of this clinical question, including studies enrolling HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer patients treated with CDKIs (Palbociclib or Ribociclib) and reporting at least one comparative survival outcome, either overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS), between concomitant PPI users and non-users. Eight studies met the eligibility criteria, with a total of 2584 patients included (PPI users: 830, PPI non-users: 1754), demonstrating that concomitant PPI use was associated with significantly higher risks of all-cause mortality (HR = 2.03; 95% CI, 1.49 to 2.77; I2 = 0%) and disease progression (HR = 1.75; 95% CI, 1.26 to 2.43; I2 = 59%) in breast cancer patients taking Palbociclib. In contrast, there were no significant survival impacts of PPIs on Ribociclib (HR = 1.46; 95% CI, 0.91 to 2.34; I2 = 36%). Additionally, there was no significant difference in the risk associated with CDKI dose reduction due to drug toxicity (RR = 1.12; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.29). Therefore, when HR+/HER2- advanced breast cancer patients require the use of PPIs, it may be reasonable to consider using Ribociclib.

Despite warnings, co-medication with proton pump inhibitors and dasatinib is common in chronic myeloid leukemia, but XS004, a novel oral dasatinib formulation, provides reduced pH-dependence, minimizing undesirable drug-drug interactions

BACKGROUND

Dasatinib and other tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have revolutionized the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, as a lipophilic weak base, crystalline monohydrate, dasatinib (Sprycel®) is poorly soluble, rendering a pH-dependent absorption and a highly variable bioavailability. Thus, co-medication with proton pump inhibitors (PPI) profoundly impairs dasatinib uptake and is clearly recommended against. XS004 is a novel oral immediate release and amorphous solid dispersion (ASD) formulation of dasatinib and is bioequivalent to the original crystalline dasatinib at 30% lower dosages. XS004 is designed to mitigate gastric pH dependency, thus optimizing absorption and bioavailability.

METHODS

We investigated the prevalence of dasatinib and PPI co-medication among chronic-phase CML patients in a real-world setting and assessed the plasma pharmacokinetics (PK) of XS004 with and without PPI co-medication (omeprazole) in healthy volunteers.

RESULTS

Using the Swedish CML and Prescribed Drug Registers, we identified 676 TKI-treated CML patients; 320 (47%) had been prescribed PPI at some point after CML diagnosis. Among dasatinib-treated patients, the 2-year cumulative PPI co-medication was 24%. Interestingly, the 5-year overall survival was significantly lower for TKI-treated CML patients with versus without PPI co-medication (79% vs. 94%; hazard ratio 3.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.1-5.3; p < .0001). When assessing PK of XS004, neither Cmax nor area under the plasma concentration curve levels in plasma were significantly altered by the PPI co-medication.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, despite warnings, PPI co-medication is common among dasatinib-treated CML patients in a real-world setting. The new XS004 ASD formulation of dasatinib provided, in contrast to original crystalline dasatinib, superior pH independence with stable bioavailability, thereby minimizing drug-drug interactions. This may improve the long-term efficacy and tolerability of dasatinib in CML.

Acid suppressants reduce the therapeutic effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors and increase the risk of acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are used in cancer immunotherapy; however, they can lead to immune-related adverse events (irAEs) through immune function of patients. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to assess the concomitant effect of acid suppressants (ASs) on ICIs, including several subgroup analyses.

METHODS

We identified related studies and generated the forest plot. The primary endpoint was defined as the change in progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with or without ASs administration. We also evaluated the effect of ASs on the incidence of irAEs.

RESULTS

The total hazard ratio (HR) of ASs on PFS with ICI treatment was 1.39 and the 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was 1.21-1.59 (Z: p < 0.00001). Moreover, the total HR of ASs on OS was 1.40 and the 95% CI was 1.21-1.61 (Z: p < 0.00001), suggesting that ASs reduced ICI's therapeutic effect. The total odds ratio (OR) for evaluating the effect of ASs on irAEs was 1.23 with a 95% CI of 0.81-1.88 (Z: p = 0.34). However, ASs significantly worsened acute kidney injury (AKI) (total OR 2.10; 95% CI 1.74-2.53 (Z, p < 0.00001)). Furthermore, although proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) reduced ICI's therapeutic effect, histamine H2-receptor antagonists (H2RAs) did not affect OS.

CONCLUSIONS

It was shown that ASs, especially PPIs, reduced ICI's therapeutic effect, while H2RAs had no effect, and ASs did not affect irAEs; however, it is a risk factor for ICIs-induced AKI.

Drug-drug interactions of protein kinase inhibitors in chronic myeloid leukaemia patients: A study using the French health insurance database

The introduction of protein kinase inhibitors (PKIs) for chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML) has considerably improved prognosis of the disease but has also demonstrated a great potential for drug-drug interactions. Using the French health insurance databases, we aim to investigate the frequency, identify the associated factors and describe the potential consequences of potential drug-drug interactions (pPKI-DIs) between PKIs and concurrent medications in CML. A retrospective cohort study has been performed among patients with CML identified in the French healthcare database from 2011 to 2014. A pPKI-DI is defined as the presence of drugs listed as 'interacting' on the same day as PKI dispensing (co-dispensing) or in its coverage period (co-medication) during the first year of follow-up. The list of interacting drugs is based on the summary of products characteristics (SPCs) and Thesaurus of interactions. We performed specific nested case-control comparisons to investigate the association between PKI-DI and each of the three potential outcomes (death, hospitalisation for adverse drug reactions and switch to another PKI). We included 3480 patients; 1429 (41%) had a co-dispensing pPKI-DI, and 2153 (62%) had a co-medication pPKI-DI; 50% of the pPKI-DIs were 'to be taken into account', and 17% were 'not recommended'. The PKI with the most interactions was imatinib, and additional common drug classes included statins, benzodiazepines and proton pump inhibitors. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the use of a higher number of additional drugs, comorbidities at baseline, high number of prescribers and higher ages were potential risk factors. Nilotinib and dasatinib showed a tendency towards a higher risk of pPKI-DI compared to imatinib. Despite the fact that some PKI-DIs were potentially clinically relevant, we did not find any significant association with death, hospitalisation for adverse drug reactions and switching. These findings should increase awareness to help reduce the prevalence of PKI-drug interactions and thereby ensure better management of CML patients.

Neuroprotective effect of lansoprazole against cisplatin-induced brain toxicity: Role of Nrf2/ARE and Akt/P53 signaling pathways

Cisplatin is a chemotherapeutic agent usually used in treating different patterns of malignancies. One of the significant apparent complications of cisplatin chemotherapy is brain toxicity. The present study was conducted to evaluate the protective effects of lansoprazole on cisplatin-induced cortical intoxication. Thirty-two rats were allocated into four groups (8 rats/group); group I: received only a vehicle for 10 days, group II: lansoprazole was administered (50 mg/kg) via oral gavage for 10 days, group III: On 5th day of the experiment, rats were given cisplatin (10 mg/kg) i.p. once to induce cortical injury. Group IV: rats were given lansoprazole for 5 days before cisplatin and 5 days afterward. Lansoprazole administration significantly improved cisplatin-induced behavioral changes, as evidenced by decreasing the immobility time in forced swimming and open field tests. Besides, lansoprazole improved cortical histological changes, restored cortical redox balance, enhanced Nrf2/ARE expression, cisplatin-induced neuronal apoptosis, and dampened cisplatin inflammation. In addition, lansoprazole modulated cortical Akt/p53 signal. The present work was the first to show that lansoprazole co-administration reduced cortical toxicity in cisplatin-treated rats via multiple signaling pathways. The current findings provided crucial information for developing novel protective strategies to reduce cisplatin cortical toxicity.

Comprehensive clinical pharmacology characterization of AZD4635 in healthy participants to support dosing considerations

AIMS

Two phase 1 studies characterized the oral bioavailability of AZD4635 (potential anticancer therapy) and factors that may influence its pharmacokinetics (PKs; food, smoking, proton-pump inhibitors [PPIs] and CYP1A2 inhibitors) to support continued clinical development of AZD4635.

METHODS

Study 1 (comparative PK study; nonsmokers) consists of Part A and Part B. Participants (fasted) in Part A were administered 50 mg of AZD4635 either as nanosuspension or capsule. In Part B, these participants were administered a 50-mg capsule either following a high-fat meal or with a PPI in the fasted state. In Study 2 (CYP1A2 mediated drug-drug interaction study), a 25-mg AZD4635 capsule was administered to smokers and nonsmokers (fasted) with or without 100 mg of fluvoxamine.

RESULTS

In Study 1 (N = 21), AZD4635 exposure was comparable between the capsule and nanosuspension. The high-fat meal produced a 12% decrease in AUCinf , a ≥50% reduction in Cmax and delayed absorption (Tmax : 4.0 h vs 1.5 h) for the capsule. The PPI did not affect the oral bioavailability of the AZD4635 capsule. In Study 2 (N = 28), AZD4635 + fluvoxamine (compared with AZD4635 alone) produced ~5-fold increases in AUCinf , 2-fold increases in Cmax and prolonged AZD4635 elimination half-life in smokers (22.7 vs 9.0 h) and nonsmokers (22.4 vs 9.2 h). All treatment regimens were well tolerated. The most common adverse events included dizziness, nausea and headache.

CONCLUSIONS

The high-fat meal reduced the rate but not the extent of AZD4635 absorption. The effect of gastric pH on AZD4635 was minimal. Smoking had no effect on the exposure (Cmax and AUCinf ) of AZD4635, while fluvoxamine increased AZD4635 Cmax and total exposure. No new safety concerns were identified.

Influence of proton pump inhibitors on the pathological response of rectal cancer: a multicentre study

Background

The standard neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer involves fluoropyrimidines and radiotherapy and, most recently, total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). A drug-drug interaction between fluoropyrimidines and proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) was suggested, with a negative impact on oncological outcomes in breast, colon and gastric cancers. Little is known about such an effect on rectal tumours. We aimed to evaluate the impact of PPI utilisation on the pathological response after chemoradiation for rectal cancer.

Materials and methods

Retrospective multicentre study of rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine (cohort 1) or 5-fluororuracil (5-FU) (cohort 2); TNT with oxaliplatin-based regimens was allowed. The pathological response was considered a complete (ypCR) or complete + partial (ypCR + ypPR) according to American Joint Committee on Cancer. PPI use was considered at any time during the neoadjuvant period if concomitant to fluoropyrimidines.

Results

From January 2007 to November 2020, 251 patients received capecitabine and 196 5-FU. The rates of PPI use in cohorts 1 and 2 were 20.3% and 26.5%, respectively. TNT was offered to 18.3% in cohort 1. PPI use did not influence ypCR in cohort 1 (yes versus no: 29.4% versus 19.5%; p = 0.13) or 2 (yes versus no: 25.0% versus 26.4%; p = 1.0). Similar ypCR + ypPR were observed in both cohorts 1 (76.5% versus 72.0%; p = 0.60) and 2 (86.5% versus 76.4%; p = 0.16). PPI use was not associated with pathological response in multivariable analysis. PPI users experienced more grade 3 or higher diarrhoea and infections.

Conclusion

PPI concomitant to capecitabine/5-FU chemoradiation did not influence the pathological response in rectal cancer but was associated with more treatment-related adverse events.

Association between concomitant proton pump inhibitor use and survival of patients with metastatic prostate cancer receiving abiraterone acetate: a post-hoc analysis of pooled data from three randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Evidence suggests proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use may attenuate the effect of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) in metastatic prostate cancer via the modification of gut microbiota. This study aimed to examine whether concomitant PPI use is associated with survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and AAP.

METHODS

Post-hoc analysis was conducted in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated in the LATITUDE, COU-AA-301, and COU-AA-302 trials (ADT vs. ADT plus AAP). PPI users and non-users were compared for restricted mean overall survival time (RMOST) and restricted mean progression-free survival time (RMPFST) based on inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW)-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves. IPTW-adjusted Cox regression models were used to assess heterogeneity of treatment effect.

RESULTS

In patients treated with AAP, PPI use was associated with inferior RMOST [difference (95% confidence interval): -4.2 (-7.0 to -1.4)] and RMPFST [-3.5 (-6.6 to -0.4)] compared with non-users. However, RMOST and RMPFST were similar between PPI users and non-users in patients treated with ADT alone [RMOST, -2.6 (-5.8 to 0.6); RMPFST, -1.7 (-4.8 to 1.4)]. Interaction term analyses did not show evidence of heterogeneity in treatment effect between AAP and ADT, despite the prominent treatment effect shown in mCSPC vs. mCRPC.

CONCLUSIONS

PPI use may be associated with inferior survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer who receive ADT plus AAP. Discontinuing unnecessary PPI use might improve those outcomes.

Concomitant Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Palbociclib Among Patients With Breast Cancer

Importance

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used drugs to relieve gastrointestinal tract symptoms, but their acid-inhibitory action negatively affects the bioavailability and clinical outcomes of orally administered concomitant drugs.

Objective

To identify the clinical outcomes of patients with advanced breast cancer who concomitantly use PPIs and palbociclib.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective cohort study used nationwide claims data between November 1, 2016, and July 31, 2021, in South Korea. Patients with breast cancer receiving palbociclib between November 1, 2017, and July 31, 2020, were identified. Patients whose prescriptions for palbociclib and PPI overlapped by at least 33% were classified into a concomitant PPI group. Patients who never received PPI during the palbociclib treatment period were classified into a nonconcomitant PPI group. Patients were selected through 1:3 propensity score matching for analyses.

Exposures

Concomitant use of PPIs with palbociclib.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Time to progression and death. These outcomes were presented as progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) of concomitant PPI use associated with clinical PFS and/or OS.

Results

A total of 344 women were included in the concomitant PPI group and 966 in the nonconcomitant PPI group. Among 1310 patients identified after matching, 1108 (84.6%) were older than 50 years; 1111 (84.8%) were treated with letrozole and anastrozole (endocrine sensitive); and 199 (15.2%) were treated with fulvestrant (endocrine resistant). The median clinical PFS in the concomitant PPI group was shorter than that of the nonconcomitant PPI group (25.3 [95% CI, 19.6-33.0] vs 39.8 [95% CI, 34.9 to not applicable] months; P < .001), and the HR was 1.76 (95% CI, 1.46-2.13). Concomitant use of PPI was also associated with shorter OS (HR, 2.71 [95% CI, 2.07-3.53]). Both clinical PFS and OS in the concomitant PPI group were consistently poor in patients receiving endocrine-sensitive and endocrine-resistant treatment.

Conclusions and Relevance

These findings suggest that concomitant use of PPIs with palbociclib may hinder the complete therapeutic benefits of palbociclib in patients with breast cancer.

Effect of Concurrent Proton Pump Inhibitors With Palbociclib Tablets for Metastatic Breast Cancer

BACKGROUND

Palbociclib is indicated for the treatment of hormone receptor positive (HR+) human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) in combination with an aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant. Two retrospective studies found that concurrent proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use with palbociclib capsules significantly reduced progression free survival (PFS) versus patients without a PPI. Palbociclib tablets were released in 2020 without restriction on PPI use. No study to date has evaluated the combination of palbociclib tablets with concurrent PPI use.

METHODS

Patients were retrospectively evaluated after they received palbociclib tablets for the treatment of HR+ HER2- MBC in the first line setting with or without a PPI. Patients were assigned to the no PPI use arm if they never used a PPI and the PPI use arm if they used a PPI for >50% of the duration of palbocicib therapy. The primary endpoint was PFS. The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and adverse events.

RESULTS

Eighty-two patients were identified; 50 in the no PPI use group and 32 in the PPI use group. The median PFS was 20.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 16.07 to not estimable) in the no PPI use arm versus 21.0 months (95% CI, 15.15 to not estimable) in the PPI use arm (P = 0.95). Median OS was not reached in either arm. Adverse effects did not differ between arms.

CONCLUSION

Use of a concurrent PPI with palbociclib tablets does not significantly reduce PFS in patients treated for HR+ HER2- MBC.

In vitro, in-vivo, and in-silico investigation of physicochemical interactions between pioglitazone and rifampicin

There is a possibility of in-situ physicochemical interactions between concomitantly administered drugs. This study aimed to investigate such physicochemical interactions between pioglitazone and rifampicin. Pioglitazone exhibited significantly higher dissolution in the presence of rifampicin, while the dissolution of rifampicin remained unaffected. The solid-state characterization of precipitates recovered after pH-shift dissolution experiments revealed the conversion of pioglitazone into an amorphous form in the presence of rifampicin. The Density Function Theory (DFT) calculations showed the intermolecular hydrogen bonding between rifampicin and pioglitazone. In-situ conversion of pioglitazone in amorphous form and subsequent supersaturation of GIT milieu translated into significantly higher in-vivo exposure of pioglitazone and its metabolites (M-III and M-IV) in Wistar rats. Therefore, it is advisable to consider the possibility of physicochemical interactions between concomitantly administered drugs. Our findings may be beneficial in tailoring the dose of concomitantly administered drugs, particularly for chronic conditions that entail polypharmacy.

The Impact of Concomitant Proton Pump Inhibitors Therapy on Clinical Outcome of Cancer Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In patients with advanced cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy, there are conflict perspectives about the influence of concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). We are aimed at exploring the influence of concomitant PPIs exposure on clinical outcome among cancer patients receiving ICIs treatment.

METHODS

We searched relevant literatures in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library without language restrictions. We extracted the data from selected studies and calculated the pooled hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs through professional software for overall survival and progression-free survival among cancer patients undergoing ICIs therapy exposed to PPIs.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies including 6716 advanced cancer patients receiving ICIs treatment were appropriate for analysis judging by pre-set inclusion and exclusion criteria. The result indicated that concomitant PPIs exposure was significantly related to shorter overall survival (HR=1.388; 95% CI: 1.278-1.498, P <0.001) and progression-free survival (HR=1.285; 95% CI: 1.193-1.384, P <0.001) among multiple cancer patients receiving ICIs therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis showed that concomitant PPIs exposure had an adverse impact on clinical outcome among patients receiving ICIs therapy. Clinical oncologists must be cautious of PPIs delivery during ICIs treatment.

Augmented nephroprotective effect of liraglutide and rabeprazole via inhibition of OCT2 transporter in cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats

AIMS

Cisplatin, a widely used anticancer treatment, has a marked nephrotoxic effect. This nephrotoxic effect is linked to the triggering of oxidative stress, inflammation, activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway as well as apoptosis. The purpose of the present research was to examine the possible ameliorative effect of liraglutide and/or rabeprazole on cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity in rats and to underline the potential molecular pathways involved.

MAIN METHODS

Rats were divided into five groups: Control, cisplatin, liraglutide (200 μg/kg/day, i.p), rabeprazole (10 mg/kg/day, orally) and liraglutide + rabeprazole combination groups. All treatments were given for 7 days. Cisplatin was given as a single dose (7 mg/kg, i.p) at day 4 to induce nephrotoxicity in all groups except the control group.

KEY FINDINGS

Treatment with liraglutide and/or rabeprazole prior to cisplatin maintained the function and morphology of kidney via decreasing cisplatin renal uptake by significant inhibition of OCT2. Besides, they showed a significant increase in GLP-1 receptor expression. Liraglutide and/or rabeprazole significantly attenuated the levels of TNF-α. ICAM, NF-κB, and downregulated MAPK pathway proteins such as JNK, and ERK1/2. Moreover, they maintained oxidant antioxidant balance by decreasing MDA level and increasing GSH level and CAT activity. Additionally, liraglutide and/or rabeprazole exhibited antiapoptotic effect evidenced by the decreased caspase-3 level and Bax expression and the increased Bcl-2 expression.

SIGNIFICANCE

The current study showed that both liraglutide and rabeprazole exerted a nephroprotective effect against cisplatin-induced renal toxicity in rats. Interestingly, co-treatment with both drugs showed an augmented effect.

Does Proton Pump Inhibitors Decrease the Efficacy of Palbociclib and Ribociclib in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer?

Background and Objectives: This investigation aimed to determine the impacts of concurrent proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) on progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer managed with palbociclib or ribociclib as either the initial or subsequent line of therapy option. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, patients were classified as “concurrent PPIs” if PPIs were given for at least two-thirds of the palbociclib or ribociclib therapy period, and “no concurrent PPIs” if no PPIs were given during the period of palbociclib or ribociclib therapy. Each patient was also classified as endocrine-sensitive or endocrine-resistant according to the duration of previous endocrine responses. “Concurrent PPIs” and “no concurrent PPIs” groups were compared with each other in terms of PFS. This comparison was performed for both ribociclib and palbociclib groups. Results: The research included 220 patients in total. The PFS of 57 patients on palbociclib using concomitant PPIs was 14.4 months. Among 63 patients using palbociclib without concomitant PPIs, the PFS was 15.8 months. No statistically significant difference was found with PPI use (p = 0.82). Among 29 patients using ribociclib concurrently with PPIs, the PFS was 22.4 months. Among 71 patients using ribociclib without PPIs, the PFS was 20.2 months. No statistically significant difference was found with PPI use (p = 0.40). Conclusion: The results of our investigation showed that concomitant use of the most commonly used PPIs in the study (lansoprazole, pantoprazole, and esomeprazole) with palbociclib or ribociclib did not have any detrimental effects on PFS. Where appropriate, PPIs can be used concurrently with palbociclib and ribociclib. However, the effect of PPIs on cycling-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors deserves further investigation.

Acalabrutinib Maleate Tablets: The Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Model behind the Drug Product Dissolution Specification

Acalabrutinib maleate tablets correspond to an improved formulation compared to acalabrutinib capsules as they can be dosed with and without acid reducing agents and therefore benefit more cancer patients. The dissolution specification for the drug product was determined using all the information available on the drug safety, efficacy, and in vitro performance. In addition, a physiologically based biopharmaceutics model was developed for acalabrutinib maleate tablets on the back of a previously published model for acalabrutinib capsules to establish that the proposed drug product dissolution specification would ensure safe and effective products for all patients including those under acid reducing agent treatment. The model was built, validated, and used to predict the exposure of virtual batches where the dissolution was slower than that of the clinical target. A combination of exposure prediction and the use of a PK-PD model allowed it to be demonstrated that the proposed drug product dissolution specification was acceptable. This combination of models enabled a larger safe space than would have been granted by consideration of bioequivalence only.

Clinical impact of tetracyclines and/or proton pump inhibitors on the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

This retrospective cohort study examined the impact of tetracyclines (TCs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) alone or in combination on the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

METHODS

Patients with NSCLC treated with gefitinib or erlotinib for at least 1 week between January 2009 and October 2021 were enrolled and divided into four groups based on the presence/absence of TC and/or PPI in the therapeutic regimen: TC-/PPI-, TC + /PPI-, TC-/PPI + , TC + /PPI + . Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were the primary and secondary endpoints, respectively.

RESULTS

The estimated median PFS and OS of 347 included patients with NSCLC were 8.57 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 7.66-9.48) months and 13.10 (95% CI: 11.03-15.17) months, respectively. Co-administration of EGFR-TKIs with PPIs decreased the PFS and OS, while that with TCs improved the PFS and OS. However, the concomitant use of EGFR-TKIs, TCs, and PPIs yielded survival rates similar to that of EGFR-TKI therapy alone.

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of EGFR-TKIs with other drugs poses a challenge in managing patients with NSCLC. Therefore, reassessing the indications and necessity of TC or PPI therapy is essential for patients receiving erlotinib or gefitinib. The benefits and risks of possible discontinuation due to the clinical relevance of this interaction should be considered.

The concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors in metastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND

Proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) are commonly used by patients with cancer, although they could reduce the absorption of oral anticancer targeted therapies. The US Food and Drug Administration states that the effect of PPIs on the efficacy of dabrafenib use by patients with metastatic melanoma is unknown. As a precautionary measure, the European Society for Medical Oncology recommends avoiding PPIs for patients receiving dabrafenib.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of the concomitant use of PPIs and BRAF/MEK inhibitors in patients with metastatic melanoma.

METHODS

Patients with advanced melanoma receiving BRAF/MEK inhibitors as first-line treatments between 2015 and 2017 in France were selected using the French National Health Insurance database. We compared time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS) according to concomitant PPI exposure. We balanced the baseline characteristics of patients exposed and nonexposed to PPIs using an overlap weighting method based on a propensity score.

RESULTS

The metastatic melanoma cohort comprised 1028 patients receiving BRAF/MEK inhibitors, including 361 (35.1%) patients using PPIs. PPI users had more comorbidities and a more severe metastatic disease. After having equally distributed metastatic sites and comorbidities across patients exposed and nonexposed to PPIs, concomitant PPI use was not associated with shorter TTD [weighted hazard ratio (wHR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.86-1.24] or OS (wHR 1.11, 95% CI 0.88-1.39). Consistent results were observed when restricting the population to patients receiving dabrafenib, or when narrowing exposure to PPIs with stronger inhibition of cytochromes.

CONCLUSIONS

In a population-based cohort of patients with advanced melanoma, the concomitant use of PPIs and BRAF/MEK inhibitors was not associated with worse outcome.

Current State and Challenges of Physiologically Based Biopharmaceutics Modeling (PBBM) in Oral Drug Product Development

Physiologically based biopharmaceutics modeling (PBBM) emphasizes the integration of physicochemical properties of drug substance and formulation characteristics with system physiological parameters to predict the absorption and pharmacokinetics (PK) of a drug product. PBBM has been successfully utilized in drug development from discovery to postapproval stages and covers a variety of applications. The use of PBBM facilitates drug development and can reduce the number of preclinical and clinical studies. In this review, we summarized the major applications of PBBM, which are classified into six categories: formulation selection and development, biopredictive dissolution method development, biopharmaceutics risk assessment, clinically relevant specification settings, food effect evaluation and pH-dependent drug-drug-interaction risk assessment. The current state of PBBM applications is illustrated with examples from published studies for each category of application. Despite the variety of PBBM applications, there are still many hurdles limiting the use of PBBM in drug development, that are associated with the complexity of gastrointestinal and human physiology, the knowledge gap between the in vitro and the in vivo behavior of drug products, the limitations of model interfaces, and the lack of agreed model validation criteria, among other issues. The challenges and essential considerations related to the use of PBBM are discussed in a question-based format along with the scientific thinking on future research directions. We hope this review can foster open discussions between the pharmaceutical industry and regulatory agencies and encourage collaborative research to fill the gaps, with the ultimate goal to maximize the applications of PBBM in oral drug product development.

The effect of concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors with CDK 4/6 inhibitors on survival in metastatic breast cancer

AIM

To evaluate the difference of progression free survival between the patients using concomitant proton pump inhibitors and non-users in the patients using CDK 4/6 inhibitors with HR + and HER2 negative mBC.

METHODS

We included 86 patients with HR + and HER 2 negative mBC treated with CDK 4/6 inhibitors in this study. Patients were divided into two categories according to their status of PPI use. The primary end points was progression free survival (PFS). We compared PPI users and non-users.

RESULTS

Forty-five (52.3%) patients used a PPI concomitantly with a CDK 4/6 inhibitor, and 41 (47.7%) did not. The median duration of follow-up was 10.68 (1.94-27.56) months. Of the patients, 50 (58.1%) palbociclib and 36 (41.9%) received ribociclib. The median progression free survival (mPFS) was 10.9 months (95% CI: 7.5-14.27) in the group with concomitant PPI use with a CDK 4/6 inhibitor, whereas the median progression free survival could not be reached in the group without concomitant PPI use (p = 0.04). In addition, concomitant PPI use with palbociclib was associated with a shorter PFS; there was no significant difference between the concomitant PPI users and non-users in terms of PFS in the patients using ribociclib.

CONCLUSION

Palbociclib and ribociclib are weak base drugs so their bioavailability is pH-dependent. PPIs can affect their solubility and their concentration in the plasma. Therefore, we must avoid concomitant use of PPIs and CDK 4/6 inhibitors. If we need to use concomitant PPI and CDK 4/6 inhibitors, we should prefer ribociclib than palbociclib.

Use of Gastrointestinal Simulator, Mass Transport Analysis, and Absorption Simulation to Investigate the Impact of pH Modifiers in Mitigating Weakly Basic Drugs' Performance Issues Related to Gastric pH: Palbociclib Case Study

It is well known that reduced gastric acidity, for example with concomitant administration of acid reducing agents, can result in variable pharmacokinetics and decreased absorption of weakly basic drugs. It is important to identify the risk of reduced and variable absorption early in development, so that product design options to address the risk can be considered. This article describes the utilization of in vitro and in silico tools to predict the effect of gastric pH, as well as the impact of adding pH modifiers, in mitigating the effect of acid reducing agents on weak base drugs' dissolution and absorption. Palbociclib, a weakly basic drug, was evaluated in low and high gastric pH conditions in a multicompartmental dissolution apparatus referred to as a gastrointestinal simulator (GIS). The GIS permits the testing of pharmaceutical products in a way that better assesses dissolution under physiologically relevant conditions of pH, buffer concentration, formulation additives, and physiological variations including GI pH, buffer concentrations, secretions, stomach emptying rate, residence time in the GI, and aqueous luminal volume. To predict drug dissolution in the GIS, a hierarchical mass transport model was used and validated using in vitro experimental data. Dissolution results were then compared to observed human clinical plasma data with and without proton pump inhibitors using a GastroPlus absorption model to predict palbociclib plasma profiles and pharmacokinetic parameters. The results showed that the in silico model successfully predicted palbociclib dissolution in the GIS under low and high gastric pH conditions with and without pH modifiers. Furthermore, the GIS data coupled with the in silico tools anticipated (1) the reduced palbociclib exposure due to proton pump inhibitor coadministration and (2) the mitigating effect of a pH-modifying agent. This study provides tools to help in the development of orally administered formulations to overcome the effect of elevated gastric pH, especially when formulating with pH modifiers.

Effect of Food on the Pharmacokinetics and Safety of a Novel c-Met Inhibitor SCC244: A Randomized Phase I Study in Healthy Subjects

Objective

This study aimed to investigate the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics and safety profiles of SCC244, a novel oral c-Met inhibitor in healthy Chinese male subjects.

Methods

It was a randomized, open-label, and 3-period crossover design, single-dose phase I clinical trial. A total of 18 healthy male subjects were enrolled. These subjects received a single oral 300 mg dose of SCC244 with a 14-day washout between each period. Blood samples were collected at the designated time points and determined using a validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental methods. Tolerability was assessed by physical examination, vital sign measurements, 12-lead ECG, clinical laboratory tests, and adverse events (AEs) monitoring throughout the study.

Results

Eighteen eligible subjects were enrolled in the study. The ratios (90% CI) of C_max values for SCC244 in high-fat and low-fat meal states to that observed in fasted state were 194.8% (174.3-217.7%) and 194.6% (174.1-217.5%), respectively. The ratios of AUC_0-t and AUC_0-inf in the high-fat meal state versus the fasted state were 237.4% (208.7-270.0%) and 235.9% (207.5-268.3%), respectively. The ratios of AUC_0-t and AUC_0-inf in the low-fat meal state versus the fasted state were 219.2% (192.7-249.3%) and 218.3% (192.0-248.3%), respectively. Median T_max values and mean t_1/2 were similar in all groups. The most common AEs were headache, blood fibrinogen decreased, head discomfort, dizziness, and protein urine presence. All AEs were Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade 1 (except 1 case of grade 2) and have resolved by the end of the study.

Conclusion

The bioavailability of the tablet formulation of SCC244 was significantly increased when administered with high- and low-fat meals. However, the meals did not affect the median T_max and t_1/2. Safety under different fed conditions was comparable to fasted conditions in this study.

The involvement of Nrf2/HO-1/cytoglobin and Ang-II/NF-κB signals in the cardioprotective mechanism of lansoprazole against cisplatin-induced heart injury

Cardiac toxicity is a serious adverse effect of cisplatin (CIS). Lansoprazole (LPZ) is a proton pump inhibitor with promising cardioprotective effects. Our study planned to examine the cardioprotective effect of LPZ against CIS-induced cardiac injury. To achieve this goal, thirty-two male rats were randomly allocated into 4 groups. CIS, 7 mg/kg, was injected i.p. on the 5^th day of the experiment. LPZ was administered via oral gavage at a dose of 50 mg/kg. The present study revealed that CIS injection induced a remarkable cardiac injury evidenced by an increase in serum ALP, AST, CK-MB, LDH, and troponin-I levels. The cardiac oxidative damage was also observed after CIS injection and mediated by down-regulation of GSH, SOD, GST, Nrf2, HO-1, PPAR-γ, and cytoglobin levels associated with the up-regulation of MDA content. Besides, CIS injection caused a significant inflammatory reaction mediated by alteration of cardiac NF-κB, STAT-3, p-STAT-3, and IκB expressions. Additionally, cardiac Ang-II expression was significantly increased in CIS control rats, while Ang 1-7 expression was significantly reduced relative to normal rats. In contrast, LPZ administration remarkably ameliorated these changes in the heart of CIS-intoxicated rats. Collectively, LPZ potently attenuated cardiac toxicity induced by CIS via regulation of Nrf2/HO-1, PPAR-γ, cytoglobin, IκB/NF-κB/STAT-3, and Ang-II/Ang 1-7 signals.

Influence of esomeprazole on the bioavailability of afatinib: A pharmacokinetic cross-over study in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Afatinib is an oral small-molecule kinase inhibitor (SMKI) approved for treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) driver mutation. Although oral administration is convenient, most SMKIs experience pH-dependent solubility. A drug-drug interaction between afatinib and proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) has, however, never been studied in humans. Hence, we performed a randomized, three-period cross-over study. Afatinib (30 mg or 40 mg) was administered without PPI (period A), concomitantly with esomeprazole (period B) and three hours after esomeprazole intake (period C). Primary objective was the area under the curve (AUC_0-24 h) comparing period A to period B and period A to period C. Secondary objectives were other pharmacokinetic parameters and toxicity. Linear mixed effect modelling was performed for differences in AUC_0-24 h and C_max between periods A and B and periods A and C. In 18 evaluable NSCLC patients, concomitant use of 40 mg esomeprazole decreased the steady-state afatinib AUC_0-24 h with 10.2% (95% CI -29.2 to +14.0%; p = 0.564) compared to afatinib administration without PPI. Esomeprazole intake three hours prior to afatinib did not significantly influence afatinib AUC_0-24 h (-0.6%; 95% CI -14.9 to +16.1%; p = 1.0). No differences in toxicity were observed. To conclude, esomeprazole did not change the exposure to afatinib in patients with NSCLC. Since there is no clinically relevant drug-drug interaction, esomeprazole can safely be co-administered with afatinib. This is important for clinical practice, because other EGFR-SMKIs (e.g. erlotinib and gefitinib) do experience clinically relevant drug-drug interactions with acid-suppressive agents.

Applications of bio-predictive dissolution tools for the development of solid oral dosage forms: Current industry experience

Development and optimization of orally administered drug products often require bio-predictive tools to help with informing formulation and manufacturing decisions. Reliable bio-predictive dissolution toolkits not only allow rational development of target formulations without having to conduct excessive in vivo studies but also help in detecting critical material attributes (CMAs), critical formulation variables (CFVs), or critical process parameters (CPPs) that could impact a drug's in vivo performance. To provide early insights for scientists on the development of a bio-predictive method for drug product development, this review summarizes current phase-appropriate bio-predictive dissolution approaches applicable to address typical concerns on solubility-limited absorption, food effect, achlorhydria, development of extended-release formulation, clinically relevant specification, and biowaiver. The selection of an in vitro method which can capture the key rate-limiting step(s) of the in vivo dissolution and/or absorption is considered to have a better chance to produce a meaningful in vitro-in vivo correlation (IVIVC) or in vitro-in vivo relationship (IVIVR).

Vitamin C Improves Dasatinib Concentrations Under Hypochlorhydric Conditions of the Simulated Stomach Duodenum Model

PURPOSE

pH-dependent drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with poorly soluble, weakly basic drugs may lead to clinical implications. Dasatinib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with reduced absorption in patients on acid-reducing agents (ARAs). The objective of this study is to investigate the influence of gastric pH on dasatinib supersaturation and determine if vitamin C (L-ascorbic acid) can improve dasatinib concentrations under simulated hypochlorhydric gastric conditions.

METHODS

A dynamic, in vitro, multi-compartment, simulated stomach duodenum (SSD) model mimicking fluid volumes and transfer rates was used to investigate the concentration of BCS class IIb drugs versus time curves. Dasatinib and lamotrigine were explored under normal, fasted, simulated gastric fluids (pH 2) (FaSGF), hypochlorhydric simulated gastric fluids (pH 4.5) (FaSGF_hypo) and FaSGF_hypo with 1000 mg of vitamin C.

RESULTS

Significant supersaturation of dasatinib was observed in the duodenum compartment of the SSD model in FaSGF. A 90% reduction in dasatinib AUC_∞ was observed in FaSGF_hypo. Upon addition of vitamin C to FaSGF_hypo, drug concentrations were restored to those observed in FaSGF. Lamotrigine AUC_∞ in the duodenal compartment were similar in both FaSGF and FaSGF_hypo. The in vitro trends observed for dasatinib and lamotrigine are reflective of the trends observed in vivo in subjects receiving treatment with ARAs.

CONCLUSIONS

The SSD model serves as a good in vitro tool for assessing the effect of pH-dependent DDIs on bioavailability of weakly basic drugs with solubility/ dissolution limited absorption. Vitamin C provides a promising approach for improving bioavailability of poorly soluble, weakly basic drugs in hypochlorhydric patients.

Impact of the Gastric Acid Suppressant Use on the Safety and Effectiveness of EGFR-TKIs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background The use of gastric acid suppressants (GASs) has an influence on the exposure of some epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and therefore may affect the effectiveness and safety of EGFR-TKIs. The impact of GASs, including proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and histamine type 2 receptor antagonists (H₂RAs), on the effectiveness and safety of EGFR-TKIs remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis to explore the impact of GASs on the effectiveness and safety of EGFR-TKIs in non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

Method We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang databases thoroughly from inception to 2nd February 2021, including the studies for NSCLC patients who used GASs, offering the adjusted hazard ratio (HR) of effectiveness outcomes such as overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) or adjusted odds ratio (OR) of the adverse drug reaction (ADRs), and the results were calculated with a random effect. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the quality. Stata 15.0 was used for meta-analysis.

Result Twelve studies were finally included. Nine of them were cohort studies, and three of them were case–control studies. For effectiveness outcomes, the use of GASs was associated with shorter PFS (HR 1.66 [1.40, 1.98]) and OS (HR 1.50 [1.31, 1.72]), and the use of PPIs was associated with shorter OS (HR 1.56 [1.21, 2.02]), regardless of the overlap time and type of EGFR-TKIs. For safety outcomes, the use of GASs (OR 1.98 [1.19, 3.31]) or PPIs (OR 1.91 [1.17, 3.12]) were both associated with an increased risk of hepatotoxicity.

Conclusion The concomitant use of GASs is associated with shorter PFS and OS for NSCLC patients taking EGFR-TKIs and is also associated with a higher risk of hepatotoxicity. The co-administration of GASs should be avoided; if they cannot be avoided, H₂RAs is a better choice.

Systematic Review Registration: (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42021235018), identifier (PROSPERO 2021 CRD42021235018)

An Open Label, Phase 1, Randomized, Seven-treatment, Seven-period, Crossover Study to Assess the Relative Bioavailability, pH Effect, Food Effect, and Dose Proportionality of CC-292, a Potent and Orally Available Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

CC-292 is a potent, selective, orally administered small molecule inhibitor of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK). To support the clinical investigation of CC-292, a randomized, seven-treatment, seven-period, crossover study was conducted to assess the relative bioavailability, pH effect, food effect, and dose-proportionality of two formulated tablets of CC-292.

METHODS

Healthy subjects (n = 24) were enrolled in the study and randomly assigned into different treatment sequences. Blood samples were collected at pre-specified time points to measure the drug concentrations in plasma. Statistical analyses were performed to compare the pharmacokinetics of CC-292 under different conditions.

RESULTS

The relative bioavailability of the newly developed formulation [spray-dried dispersion (SDD)] to the reference formulation (P22) was 1.24. When a single dose of CC-292 SDD tablet was administered under fed conditions, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC_∞) increased by 10.9% and the maximum plasma drug concentration C_max) decreased by 19.4% compared to when CC-292 was administered under fasted conditions. When a single dose of CC-292 SDD tablet was administered after multiple doses of omeprazole, the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC_∞) decreased by 36.8% and the maximum plasma drug concentration C_max) decreased by 48.1% compared to when CC-292 was administered alone. Over a dose range of 100-300 mg (SDD formulation), CC-292 exhibited more than dose-proportional increases of drug exposures.

CONCLUSIONS

CC-292 was well tolerated when administered to healthy subjects as single oral doses under all conditions. Food intake had no clinically relevant impact on CC-292 pharmacokinetics compared to fasted conditions. Therefore, CC-292 can be administered with or without food. Co-administration of CC-292 with multiple doses of omeprazole (40 mg) decreased the pharmacokinetic exposure of CC-292. However, the effect was not clinically relevant.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

NCT02433457.

Pharmacokinetics of asciminib in the presence of CYP3A or P-gp inhibitors, CYP3A inducers, and acid-reducing agents

Asciminib is a first‐in‐class inhibitor of BCR::ABL1, specifically targeting the ABL myristoyl pocket. Asciminib is a substrate of CYP3A4 and P‐glycoprotein (P‐gp) and possesses pH‐dependent solubility in aqueous solution. This report summarizes the results of two phase I studies in healthy subjects aimed at assessing the impact of CYP3A and P‐gp inhibitors, CYP3A inducers and acid‐reducing agents (ARAs) on the pharmacokinetics (PK) of asciminib (single dose of 40 mg). Asciminib exposure (area under the curve [AUC]) unexpectedly decreased by ~40% when administered concomitantly with the strong CYP3A inhibitor itraconazole oral solution, whereas maximum plasma concentration (C_max) decreased by ~50%. However, asciminib exposure was slightly increased in subjects receiving an itraconazole capsule (~3%) or clarithromycin (~35%), another strong CYP3A inhibitor. Macroflux studies showed that cyclodextrin (present in high quantities as excipient [40‐fold excess to itraconazole] in the oral solution formulation of itraconazole) decreased asciminib flux through a lipid membrane by ~80%. The AUC of asciminib was marginally decreased by concomitant administration with the strong CYP3A inducer rifampicin (by ~13–15%) and the strong P‐gp inhibitor quinidine (by ~13–16%). Concomitant administration of the ARA rabeprazole had little or no effect on asciminib AUC, with a 9% decrease in C_max. The treatments were generally well tolerated. Taking into account the large therapeutic window of asciminib, the observed changes in asciminib PK following multiple doses of P‐gp, CYP3A inhibitors, CYP3A inducers, or ARAs are not considered to be clinically meaningful. Care should be exercised when administering asciminib concomitantly with cyclodextrin‐containing drug formulations.

Proton pump inhibitors may reduce the efficacy of ribociclib and palbociclib in metastatic breast cancer patients based on an observational study

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 20-33% of all cancer patients are treated with acid-reducing agents (ARAs), most commonly proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), to reduce gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms. Palbociclib and ribociclib are weak bases so their solubility depends on different pH. The solubility of palbociclib dramatically decreases to < 0.5 mg/ml when pH is above 4,5 but ribociclibs' solubility decreases when pH increases above 6,5. In the current study, we aimed to investigate the effects of concurrent PPIs on palbociclib and ribociclib efficacy in terms of progression-free survival in metastatic breast cancer (mBC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We enrolled hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative mBC patients treated with endocrine treatment (letrozole or fulvestrant) combined palbociclib or ribociclib alone or with PPI accompanying our observational study. During palbociclib/ribociclib therapy, patients should be treated with "concurrent PPIs" defined as all or more than half of treatment with palbociclib/ribociclib, If no PPI was applied, it was defined as 'no concurrent PPI', those who used PPI but less than half were excluded from the study. All data was collected from real-life retrospectively.

RESULTS

Our study included 217 patients, 105 of whom received palbociclib and 112 received ribociclib treatment. In the study population CDK inhibitor treatment was added to fulvestrant 102 patients ( 47%), to letrozole 115 patients (53%). In the Palbociclib arm fulvestrant/letrozole ratio was 53.3/46.7%, in the ribociclib arm it was 41.07/58.93%. Of 105 patients who received palbociclib, 65 were on concomitant PPI therapy, 40 were not. Of the 112 patients who received ribociclib, 61 were on concomitant PPI therapy, 51 were not. In the palbociclib group, the PFS of the patients using PPIs was shorter than the PFS of the patients not using (13.04 months vs. unreachable, p < 0.001). It was determined that taking PPIs was an independent predictor of shortening PFS (p < 0.001) in the multivariate analysis, In the ribociclib group, the PFS of the patients using PPIs was shorter than the PFS of the patients not using (12.64 months vs. unreachable, p = 0.003). It was determined that taking PPIs was single statistically independent predictor of shortening PFS (p = 0.003, univariate analysis).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that concomitant usage of PPIs was associated with shorter PFS in mBC treated with both ribociclib and especially palbociclib. If it needs to be used, PPI selection should be made carefully and low-strength PPI or other ARAs (eg H2 antagonists, antacids) should be preferred.

Untargeted metabolomics analysis of omeprazole-enhanced chemosensitivity to cisplatin in mice with non-small cell lung cancer

Drug resistance of tumors remains a major barrier in cisplatin (CDDP)-based chemotherapy. Omeprazole (OME) is often utilized during chemotherapy to alleviate gastrointestinal symptoms. In a previous investigation, we demonstrated a protective effect of OME against CDDP-induced kidney injury. To further establish whether OME could enhance chemosensitivity to CDDP and the underlying mechanisms, an in vivo tumor-bearing mouse model with CDDP-resistant A549 non-small cell lung cancer (A549/CDDP) was established in the current study. A high-performance liquid chromatography-time of flight mass spectrometry (HPLC-TOF/MS)-based untargeted metabolomics approach for tumor tissue and serum was employed to explore the mechanisms underlying the enhanced therapeutic effects of co-administration of CDDP and OME. Notably, tumor weights of mice in the CDDP + OME group were significantly decreased compared with those treated with CDDP alone. HE and TUNEL staining revealed more significant apoptosis of tumor cells in the group co-administered CDDP + OME relative to CDDP alone. Overexpression of multidrug resistance-associated protein 2 in CDDP-resistant tumors was significantly reversed upon treatment with CDDP + OME. PCA score plots of the groups co-treated with CDDP + OME were clearly separated from those treated with CDDP alone in metabolomics analysis for tumor and serum samples, clearly suggesting that co-administration of OME enhances the antitumor effect of CDDP. Subsequently, 10 and 7 metabolites in CDDP + OME group with significant changes in tumor and serum compared with CDDP group, respectively, were identified. Pathway analysis both in tumor and serum samples revealed regulation of the metabolism of purines, several amino acids and riboflavin in enhanced chemotherapy with both OME and CDDP. The collective findings provide beneficial novel insights into drug-drug interactions, which could improve the application of CDDP in clinical practice.

Potentially Hazardous Drug-Drug Interactions Associated With Oral Antineoplastic Agents Prescribed in Chinese Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital Settings: A Multicenter Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Oral administration increases the risk of interactions, because most oral antineoplastic agents (OAAs) are taken on a daily basis. Interactions can increase exposure to antitumoral agents or cause treatment failure. Potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) are commonly observed in patients with cancer, while the extent to which OAAs related hazardous DDIs remains unclear. Methods: We studied the contraindication patterns between oral antineoplastic agents and other medications among cancer patients in two tertiary care teaching hospitals in China. A total of 20 clinically significant hazardous DDI pairs that involved 30 OAAs were identified based on the predetermined criteria. Patient medications were checked for DDIs by using the US Food and Drug Administration approved labeling. Descriptive statistics and uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were carried out. Results: In this study, 13,917 patients were included and a total of 297 DDIs were identified. The results revealed that proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), dexamethasone and fluoroquinolones were the most often involved hazardous DDIs with OAAs. The most prevalent contraindication is the simultaneous use of certain molecular targeted agents and PPIs. In the result of the multivariate analysis, younger age (0-20 group), increasing number of drugs and patient treated with targeted therapy had a higher risk for DDIs. Conclusion: The prevalence of OAAs related hazardous DDIs appears to be low in the cancer patients. However, physicians and clinical pharmacologists should be aware of the potential hazardous DDIs when prescribing OAAs, especially certain pH-dependent molecular targeted agents and potential QTc prolonging drugs.

Ameliorating cancer cachexia by inhibiting cancer cell release of Hsp70 and Hsp90 with omeprazole

BACKGROUND

Cancer cachexia, characterized by muscle and fat tissue wasting, is a major determinant of cancer-related mortality without established treatment. Recent animal data revealed that cancer cells induce muscle wasting by releasing Hsp70 and Hsp90 as surface proteins on extracellular vesicles (EVs). Here, we test a therapeutic strategy for ameliorating cancer cachexia by inhibiting the release of Hsp70 and Hsp90 using proton pump inhibitor omeprazole.

METHODS

Omeprazole effect on Hsp70/90 release through EVs by Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC) cells in vitro, serum levels of Hsp70/90 and Hsp70/90-carrying EVs in LLC tumour-bearing mice, and LLC-induced muscle protein degradation pathways in C2C12 myotubes and mice were determined. Omeprazole effect on endolysosomal pH and Rab27b expression in LLC cells were analysed.

RESULTS

Omeprazole treatment of LLC cells inhibited Hsp70/90 and Hsp70/90-carrying EV release in a dose-dependent manner (1 to 10 μM) and attenuated the catabolic activity of LLC cell-conditioned medium on C2C12 myotubes. Systemic omeprazole administration to LLC tumour-bearing mice (5 mg/kg/day subcutaneously) for 2 weeks blocked elevation of serum Hsp70, Hsp90, and Hsp70/90-carrying EVs, abrogated skeletal muscle catabolism, and prevented loss of muscle function as well as muscle and epididymal fat mass without altering tumour growth. Consequently, median survival increased by 23.3%. Mechanistically, omeprazole increased cancer cell endolysosomal pH level dose-dependently (0.1 to 1 μM) by inhibiting vacuolar H⁺ -ATPase. Further, omeprazole suppressed the highly elevated expression of Rab27b, a key regulator of EV release, in LLC cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Omeprazole ameliorates cancer cachexia by inhibiting cancer cell release of Hsp70 and Hsp90.

[Drug-drug interactions of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in treatment of non-small-cell lung carcinoma]

The development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors has revolutionized the treatment strategy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer with activating EGFR mutations, ALK or ROS-1 gene rearrangements. The Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency have approved several inhibitors for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer : five tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting EGFR (erlotinib, gefitinib, afatinib, osimertinib and dacomitinib) and six tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting ALK (crizotinib, céritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, lorlatinib and entrectinib). Interestingly, these tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments are administered orally. While this route of administration improves the treatment flexibility and provides a comfortable and preferable option for patients, it also increases the risk of drug-drug interactions. The latter may result in changes in pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors or their concomitant treatments, with subsequent risks of increasing their toxicity and/or reducing their effectiveness. This review provides an overview of drug-drug interactions with tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting EGFR and ALK, as well as practical recommendations to guide oncologists and clinical pharmacists in the process of managing drug-drug interactions during the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Concomitant Gastric Acid Suppressants on the Survival of Patients with Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The influence of concomitant use of gastric acid suppressants (AS) on survival of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is inconsistent according to previous studies. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the effect of additional AS in patients with NSCLC taking TKIs.

METHODS

Relevant observational studies were identified by a search of Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. Only studies with multivariate analyses were included. A random-effect model was used to combine the results.

RESULTS

Thirteen retrospective studies with 12259 patients were included. Pooled results showed that concomitant use of AS was associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS, adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.31 to 1.89, P < 0.001; I ² = 65%) and overall survival (OS, adjusted HR: 1.38, 95% CI: 1.19 to 1.61, P < 0.001; I ² = 70%) in NSCLC patients taking TKIs. Sensitivity analysis limited to studies including NSCLC with EGFR mutation showed consistent results (HR for PFS: 1.53, P=0.003; HR for OS: 1.43, P=0.001). Subgroup analyses indicated that the association between concomitant use of AS and poor survival was not significantly affected by the category of AS used (proton pump inhibitors or histamine type-2 receptor antagonists) or the country of the study (Asian or non-Asian, P for subgroup analysis all >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant use of AS in patients with NSCLC taking TKIs may be associated with poor survival outcomes.

Effects of Acid-Reducing Agents on the Pharmacokinetics of Lazertinib in Patients with EGFR Mutation-Positive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Lazertinib is an irreversible, mutant-selective epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI). Co-administration of TKIs with acid-reducing agents (ARAs) can lead to potential drug-drug interactions, which decreases solubility and absorption of TKIs and is ultimately associated with reduced efficacy of TKIs. This retrospective analysis evaluated the effect of ARAs on the pharmacokinetics of lazertinib using data obtained from patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

METHODS

In a total of 234 patients with lazertinib pharmacokinetics observed at steady state, dose-normalized (DN) area under the concentration-time curve (AUC_ss), maximum concentration (C_max,ss), and/or trough concentration on day 15 (C_D15) were compared between a group receiving ARA concomitantly for at least 4 days (ARA group) and another group not receiving ARA (non-ARA group) in a dose-proportional range. Additionally, a comparison of pharmacokinetic parameters at a therapeutic dose of 240 mg once daily was evaluated.

RESULTS

Geometric mean ratios (GMRs) with 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of ARA group to non-ARA group for DNAUC_ss, DNC_max,ss, and DNC_D15 at 40 mg to 320 mg once daily showing the dose proportionality were 0.8743 (0.7285-1.0493), 0.9035 (0.7482-1.0910), and 0.9126 (0.7364-1.1311), respectively. GMRs with 90% CIs for AUC_ss, C_max,ss, and C_D15 at 240 mg were 0.9136 (0.6637-1.2576), 0.9012 (0.6703-1.2116), and 0.8850 (0.6463-1.2118), respectively.

CONCLUSION

All pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly different between the two groups (p values > 0.05), indicating that co-administered ARAs did not significantly affect the steady state pharmacokinetics of lazertinib. Therefore, no dose adjustment of lazertinib is required in patients receiving concomitant ARAs.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV IDENTIFIERS

NCT03046992, NCT04075396.