Synthesis and Characterization of Mixed-Phosphine Osmium Polyhydrides: Hydrogen Delocalization in [OsH5P3]+ Systems

A Lead-μ2-Tetrylide Complex with Osmium(IV) Terminal Components

A bare lead atom is a σ-donor ligand capable of linearly bonding and stabilizing two units of a classical polyhydride complex, with a high-valent metal center. As a proof of concept, we have prepared and characterized the μ2-tetrylide complex (PiPr3)2H4Os═Pb═OsH4(PiPr3)2 in the reaction of OsH6(PiPr3)2 with Pb{N(SiMe3)2}2. Although the Pb-Os bonds exhibit electrostatic interaction, the main orbital interactions result from two dative σ bonds from the lead atom to the osmium centers. The latter also provide much weaker π-backdonations.

Metathesis between E-C(spn ) and H-C(sp3 ) σ-Bonds (E=Si, Ge; n=2, 3) on an Osmium-Polyhydride

The silylation of a phosphine of OsH₆(PⁱPr₃)₂ is performed via net‐metathesis between Si−C(spⁿ) and H−C(sp³) σ‐bonds (n=2, 3). Complex OsH₆(PⁱPr₃)₂ activates the Si−H bond of Et₃SiH and Ph₃SiH to give OsH₅(SiR₃)(PⁱPr₃)₂, which yield OsH₄{κ¹‐P,η²‐SiH‐[ⁱPr₂PCH(Me)CH₂SiR₂H]}(PⁱPr₃) and R−H (R=Et, Ph), by displacement of a silyl substituent with a methyl group of a phosphine. Such displacement is a first‐order process, with activation entropy consistent with a rate determining step occurring via a highly ordered transition state. It displays selectivity, releasing the hydrocarbon resulting from the rupture of the weakest Si‐substituent bond, when the silyl ligand bears different substituents. Accordingly, reactions of OsH₆(PⁱPr₃)₂ with dimethylphenylsilane, and 1,1,1,3,5,5,5‐heptamethyltrisiloxane afford OsH₅(SiR₂R′)(PⁱPr₃)₂, which evolve into OsH₄{κ¹‐P,η²‐GeH‐[ⁱPr₂PCH(Me)CH₂SiR₂H]}(PⁱPr₃) (R=Me, OSiMe₃) and R′−H (R′=Ph, Me). Exchange reaction is extended to Et₃GeH. The latter reacts with OsH₆(PⁱPr₃)₂ to give OsH₅(GeEt₃)(PⁱPr₃)₂, which loses ethane to form OsH₄{κ¹‐P,η²‐GeH‐[ⁱPr₂PCH(Me)CH₂GeEt₂H]}(PⁱPr₃).

Reduction of Benzonitriles via Osmium-Azavinylidene Intermediates Bearing Nucleophilic and Electrophilic Centers

The reduction of the N≡C bond of benzonitriles promoted by OsH₆(PⁱPr₃)₂ (1) has been studied. Complex 1 releases a H₂ molecule and coordinates 2,6-dimethylbenzonitrile to afford the tetrahydride OsH₄{κ¹- N-(N≡CC₆H₃Me₂)}(PⁱPr₃)₂ (2), which is thermally stable toward the insertion of the nitrile into one of the Os-H bonds. In contrast to 2,6-dimethylbenzonitrile, benzonitrile and 2-methylbenzonitrile undergo insertion, via Os(η²-N≡CR) intermediates, to give the azavinylidene derivatives OsH₃(═N═CC₆H₄R)(PⁱPr₃)₂ [R = H (3) or Me (4)]. The analysis by means of computational tools (EDA-NOCV) of the bonding situation in these compounds suggests that the donor-acceptor nature of the osmium azavinylidene bond dominates over the mixed electron-sharing/donor-acceptor and pure electron-sharing bonding modes. The N atom is strongly nucleophilic, whereas one of the hydrides is electrophilic. In spite of the different nature of these centers, the migration of the latter to the N atom is kinetically prevented. However, the use of water as a proton shuttle allows hydride migration, as a consequence of a significant decrease in the activation barrier. The resulting phenylaldimine intermediates evolve by means of orthometalation to give OsH₃{κ²- N, C-(NH═CHC₆H₃R)}(PⁱPr₃)₂ [R = H (5) or Me (6)]. The presence of electrophilic and nucleophilic centers in 3 confers upon it the ability to activate σ-bonds, including H₂ and pinacolborane (HBpin). The reaction with the latter gives OsH₃{κ²- N, C-[N(Bpin)═CHC₆H₄]}(PⁱPr₃)₂ (7).

Coordination chemistry and catalysis with secondary phosphine oxides

Review on synthesis, coordination chemistry and catalysis with secondary phosphine oxides.

Primary and Secondary Phosphane Complexes of Metalloporphyrins: Isolation, Spectroscopy, and X-ray Crystal Structures of Ruthenium and Osmium Porphyrins Binding Phenyl- or Diphenylphosphane

[Ru(II)(por)(PH(n)Ph(3-n))2], [Os(II)(por)(CO)(PH(n)Ph(3-n))] (n=1, 2), and [Os(II)(F20-tpp){P(OH)Ph2}(PHPh2)] (F20-tpp=5,10,15,20-tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)porphyrinato dianion) were prepared from the reaction of [M(II)(por)(CO)] (M=Ru, Os) or [Os(VI)(por)O2] with the respective primary/secondary phosphane and characterized by 1H NMR, 31P NMR, UV/Vis, and IR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and elemental analysis. The reaction of [Os(VI)(por)O2] with PHPh2 also gave minor amounts of [Os(II)(por){P(OH)Ph2}2]. [Ru(II)(F20-tpp)(PH2Ph)2] exhibits a remarkable stability toward air and shows a reversible metal-centered oxidation couple at E(1/2)=0.39 V versus [Cp2Fe](+/0) in the cyclic voltammogram. The structures of [Ru(II)(F20-tpp)(PH2Ph)2] x 2CH2Cl2, [Ru(II)(4-Cl-tpp)(PHPh2)2] x 2CH2Cl2 (4-Cl-tpp=5,10,15,20-tetrakis(p-chlorophenyl)porphyrinato dianion), [Ru(II)(F20-tpp)(PHPh2)2], and [Os(II)(F20-tpp){P(OH)Ph2}2] were determined by X-ray crystallography and feature Ru-P distances of 2.3397(11)-2.3609(9) A and an Os-P distance of 2.369(2) A.

Effect of weak interactions on the H...H distance in stretched dihydrogen complexes

Computational and experimental results presented in this paper demonstrate that the H-H distance in stretched dihydrogen complexes can be hypersensitive to a variety of weak intra- and intermolecular interactions, including those with bulky ligands and solvent molecules, hydrogen-bonding interactions, or ion-pairing. Particularly, the complex IrH(H...H)Cl(2)(P(i)Pr(3))(2) which contains a stretched dihydrogen ligand in the crystalline form, as shown by neutron diffraction, is a trihydride in solution. The difference is due to the intermolecular Ir-Cl...H-Ir hydrogen bonding in the solid.