Synthesis and Characterization of Coordinatively Unsaturated Alkynyl- and Aryl-Cobalt Complexes with 15 Valence Electrons, TpiPr2Co−R, Bearing the Hydrotris(3,5-diisopropylpyrazolyl)borato Ligand (TpiPr2)

C(sp)-H, S-H, and Sn-H Bond Activation with a Cobalt(I) Pincer Complex

This study focuses on the stoichiometric reactions of {2,6-(iPr2PO)2C6H3}Co(PMe3)2 with terminal alkynes, thiols, and tin hydrides as part of an effort to develop catalytic, two-electron processes with cobalt. This specific Co(I) pincer complex proves to be effective for cleaving the C(sp)-H, S-H, and Sn-H bonds to give oxidative addition products with the general formula {2,6-(iPr2PO)2C6H3}CoHX(PMe3) (X = alkynyl, thiolate, and stannyl groups) along with the free PMe3. These reactions typically reach completion when the substituents on acetylene, sulfur, and tin are electron-withdrawing groups (e.g., phenyl, pyridyl, and alkenyl groups). In contrast, alkyl-substituted acetylenes, 1-pentanethiol, and tributyltin hydride are partially converted due to the equilibria with the corresponding oxidative addition products. The Co(I) pincer complex is not a hydrothiolation catalyst but capable of catalyzing the hydrostannation of terminal alkynes with Ph3SnH to produce β-(Z)-alkenylstannanes selectively.

Cobalt(ii) acyl intermediates in carbon-carbon bond formation and oxygenation

The organocobalt scorpionate compounds ToMCoR (ToM = tris(4,4-dimethyl-2-oxazolinyl)phenylborate; R = Bn, 1; CH2SiMe3, 2; Ph, 3; Et, 4; nBu, 5; Me, 6) react in carbonylation, oxidation, and carboxylation reactions via pathways that are distinctly influenced by the nature of the organometallic moiety. The compounds are prepared by reaction of ToMCoCl with the corresponding organolithium or organopotassium reagents. Compounds 1-6 were characterized by 8-line hyperfine coupling to cobalt in EPR spectra and solution phase magnetic measurements (μeff = 4-5μB) as containing a high-spin cobalt(ii) center. The UV-Vis spectra revealed an intense diagnostic band at ca. 700 nm (ε > 1000 M-1 cm-1) associated with the tetrahedral organocobalt(ii) center that was assigned to a d ← d transition on the basis of configuration interaction (CI) calculations. Complexes 1-6 react rapidly with CO to form equilibrating mixtures of the low spin organocobalt carbonyl ToMCo(R)CO, acyl ToMCoC([double bond, length as m-dash]O)R, and acyl carbonyl ToMCo{C([double bond, length as m-dash]O)R}CO. The 1H and 11B NMR spectra contained only one set of signals for the CO-treated solutions, whereas the solution-phase IR spectra contained up to two νCO and three νC([double bond, length as m-dash]O)R signals with intensities varying depending on the R group (R = Bn, 7; CH2SiMe3, 8; Ph, 9; Et, 10; nBu, 11; Me, 12). Single crystal X-ray diffraction of ToMCo{C([double bond, length as m-dash]O)Et}CO (10) supports its assignment as a square pyramidal cobalt(ii) acyl carbonyl complex. Upon evaporation of volatiles, solutions of 8-12 revert to the CO-free organocobalt starting materials 2-6, whereas attempts to isolate benzyl-derived 7 provide an unusual α-alkoxyketone species, characterized by single crystal X-ray diffraction. Despite the differences observed in the carbonylation of 1-6 as a result of varying the R group, compounds 7-12 all react rapidly with O2 through an oxygenation pathway to afford the corresponding carboxylate compounds ToMCoO2CR (R = Bn, 13; CH2SiMe3, 14; Ph, 15; Et, 16; nBu, 17; Me, 18). In contrast, the insertion of CO2 into the Co-C bond in 1-6 requires several days to weeks.

Rapid and ordered carbonylation and oxygenation of a cobalt(ii) methyl

The oxidative carbonylation of To^MCoMe (1; To^M = tris(4,4-dimethyl-2-oxazolinyl)phenylborate) involves its rapid, reversible reaction with CO to form To^MCo{C(O)Me}CO (2) followed by rapid reaction with O₂ yielding To^MCoOAc (3), in contrast to the slow direct carboxylation of To^MCoMe by CO₂.

Synthesis and characterization of coordinatively unsaturated nickel(II) and manganese(II) alkyl complexes supported by the hydrotris(3-phenyl-5-methylpyrazolyl)borate (Tp(Ph,Me)) ligand

The synthesis of several nickel(II) and manganese(II) alkyl complexes supported by hydrotris(3-phenyl-5-methylpyrazolyl)borate (Tp(Ph,Me)) ligand is reported. The metal halide complexes Tp(Ph,Me)MnCl(CH3CN) (1) and Tp(Ph,Me)NiCl (4) were used as precursors for synthesis of Tp(Ph,Me)MnCH2Si(Me)3 (2), Tp(Ph,Me)MnCH2Ph (3), Tp(Ph,Me)NiCH2Si(Me)3 (5) and Tp(Ph,Me)NiCH2Ph (6). The resulting Mn(II) and Ni(II) alkyl complexes, 2-3 and 5-6, were characterized by X-ray crystallography, NMR spectroscopy, and FT-IR spectroscopy. X-ray crystallographic analysis revealed distorted tetrahedral geometries for complexes 2-3 and 5 with a κ(3)-Tp(Ph,Me). Complex 6, on the other hand, was found to have a distorted square planar geometry with κ(2)-Tp(Ph,Me) and an η(3)-benzyl ligand. Transformations of 4 and Tp(Ph,Me)CoCl (10) via treatment with NaN3 to yield Tp(Ph,Me)NiN3 (11), Tp(Ph,Me)CoN3 (12), along with the synthesis of (Tp(Ph,Me))2Ni (8) and Tp(Ph,Me)NiCl(3-Ph-5MepzH) (9) are also reported.

Polyhedral Cobalt(II) and Iron(II) Siloxanes: Synthesis and X-ray Crystal Structure of [(RSi(OH)O2)Co(OPMe3)]4 and [(RSiO3)2(RSi(OH)O2)4(μ3-OH)2Fe8(THF)4] (R = (2,6-iPr2C6H3)N(SiMe3))

The cobalt(II) and iron(II) siloxane compounds were prepared by the reaction of lipophilic N-bonded silanetriol 1 with metal silylamides M[N(SiMe3)2]2 (M = Co (2), Fe (3)) in a 1:1 and 3:4 molar ratio, respectively. A plot of 1/chi versus temperature in the range of 2-300 K indicates the paramagnetic behavior of 2 and 3. The composition and molecular structures of 2 and 3 were fully determined by IR, elemental analysis, and X-ray crystal structural analyses. Compound 2 possesses a pseudo-4-fold (S4) symmetry, whereas 3 reveals an inversion center. Compound 2 represents a tetracobalt(II) drum while 3 exhibits an octairon(II) cage containing siloxane ligands.

Xenophilic Complexes Bearing a TpR Ligand, [TpRM?M?Ln] [TpR=TpiPr2, Tp# (TpMe2,4-Br); M=Ni, Co, Fe, Mn; M?Ln=Co(CO)4, Co(CO)3(PPh3), RuCp(CO)2]: The Two Metal Centers are Held Together not by Covalent Interaction but by Electrostatic Attraction

A series of dinuclear complexes, [Tp(R)M--M'L(n)] [Tp(iPr(2) )M--Co(CO)(4) (1; M=Ni, Co, Fe, Mn); Tp(#)M--Co(CO)(4) (1'; M=Ni, Co); Tp(#)Ni--RuCp(CO)(2) (3')] (Tp(iPr(2) )=hydrotris(3,5-diisopropylpyrazolyl)borato; Tp(#) (Tp(Me(2),4-Br))=hydrotris(3,5-dimethyl-4-bromopyrazolyl)borato), has been prepared by treatment of the cationic complexes [Tp(iPr(2) )M(NCMe)(3)]PF(6) or the halo complexes [Tp(#)M--X] with the appropriate metalates. Spectroscopic and crystallographic characterization of 1-3' reveals that the tetrahedral, high-spin Tp(R)M fragment and the coordinatively saturated carbonyl-metal fragment (M'L(n)) are connected only by a metal-metal interaction and, thus, the dinuclear complexes belong to a unique class of xenophilic complexes. The metal-metal interaction in the xenophilic complexes is polarized, as revealed by their nu(CO) vibrations and structural features, which fall between those of reference complexes: covalently bonded species [R--M'L(n)] and ionic species [M'L(n)](-). Unrestricted DFT calculations for the model complexes [Tp(H(2) )Ni--Co(CO)(4)], [Tp(H(2) )Ni--Co(CO)(3)(PH(3))], and [Tp(H(2) )Ni--RuCp(CO)(2)] prove that the two metal centers are held together not by covalent interactions, but by electrostatic attractions. In other words, the obtained xenophilic complexes can be regarded as carbonylmetalates, in which the cationic counterpart interacts with the metal center rather than the oxygen atom of the carbonyl ligand. The xenophilic complexes show divergent reactivity dependent on the properties of donor molecules. Hard (N and O donors) and soft donors (P and C donors) attack the Tp(R)M part and the ML(n) moiety, respectively. The selectivity has been interpreted in terms of the hard-soft theory, and the reactions of the high-spin species 1-3' with singlet donor molecules should involve a spin-crossover process.

Spin-State Tuning at Pseudotetrahedral d7 Ions: Examining the Structural and Magnetic Phenomena of Four-Coordinate [BP3]CoII−X Systems

Electronic structure, spin-state, and geometrical relationships for a series of pseudotetrahedral Co(II) aryloxide, siloxide, arylthiolate, and silylthiolate complexes supported by the tris(phosphino)borate [BP(3)] ligands [PhBP(3)] and [PhBP(i)()(Pr)(3)] ([PhB(CH(2)PPh(2))(3)](-) and [PhB(CH(2)P(i)()Pr(2))(3)](-), respectively) are described. Standard (1)H NMR, optical, electrochemical, and solution magnetic data, in addition to low-temperature EPR and variable temperature SQUID magnetization data, are presented for the new cobalt(II) complexes [PhBP(3)]CoOSiPh(3) (2), [PhBP(3)]CoO(4-(t)()Bu-Ph) (3), [PhBP(3)]CoO(C(6)F(5)) (4), [PhBP(3)]CoSPh (5), [PhBP(3)]CoS(2,6-Me(2)-Ph) (6), [PhBP(3)]CoS(2,4,6-(i)()Pr(3)-Ph) (7), [PhBP(3)]CoS(2,4,6-(t)()Bu(3)-Ph) (8), [PhBP(3)]CoSSiPh(3) (9), [PhBP(3)]CoOSi(4-NMe(2)-Ph)(3) (10), [PhBP(3)]CoOSi(4-CF(3)-Ph)(3) (11), [PhBP(3)]CoOCPh(3) (12), [PhBP(i)()(Pr)(3)]CoOSiPh(3) (14), and [PhBP(i)()(Pr)(3)]CoSSiPh(3) (15). The low-temperature solid-state crystal structures of 2, 3, 5-10, 12, and 15 are also described. These pseudotetrahedral cobalt(II) complexes are classified as featuring one of two limiting distortions, either umbrella or off-axis. Magnetic and spectroscopic data demonstrate that both S = (1)/(2) and S = (3)/(2) ground-state electronic configurations are accessible for the umbrella distorted structure type, depending on the nature of the X-type ligand, its denticity (eta(1) versus eta(3)), and the tripodal phosphine ligand employed. Off-axis distorted complexes populate an S = (1)/(2) ground-state exclusively. For those four-coordinate complexes that populate S = (1)/(2) ground states, X-ray data show two Co-P bond distances that are invariably shorter than a third Co-P bond. The pseudotetrahedral siloxides 2, 10, and 11 are exceptional in that they display gradual spin crossover in the solid state. The diamagnetic cobalt(III) complex {[PhBP(3)]CoOSiPh(3)}{BAr(4)} ({16}{BAr(4)}) (Ar = Ph or 3,5-(CF(3))(2)-C(6)H(3)) has also been prepared and structurally characterized. Accompanying electronic structure calculations (DFT) for complexes 2, 6, and {16}(+) support the notion of a close electronic structure relationship between these four-coordinate systems and octahedral, sandwich, and half-sandwich coordination complexes.

Solution and Solid-State Spin-Crossover Behavior in a Pseudotetrahedral d7 Ion

This Communication describes a pseudotetrahedral d7 complex, [PhBP3]Co(OSiPh3), that exhibits thermally induced spin-crossover both in solution and in the solid state. Magnetic crossover behavior is achieved by confluence of the X-type ligand and the tripodal auxiliary employed. Four-coordinate platforms of the present geometry type may offer a new approach to magnetic spin-crossover behavior distinct from their electronically related pseudooctahedral counterparts.