Substituents Effects in POP Pincer Complexes of Ruthenium

Double Intramolecular 1,2 C-H Addition of o-Methyl Groups To Form Ruthenium Pincer Double Tuck-In Complexes

Ruthenium pincer complexes have a rich history of coordination and reaction chemistries. In this work, we report our discoveries of previously unreported Ru pincer coordination geometries. We found that mono tuck-in κ4-ArPNHPRuLCl complexes react with NaN(SiMe3)2 producing double tuck-in mer-κ5-ArPNHPRuL complexes. Interestingly, when κ4-MesPNHPRuCl is dehydrohalogenated, the resulting double tuck-in complex binds N2, forming the nitrogen complex κ5-MesPNHPRuN2. The mer-κ5-ArPNHPRuL complexes thermally isomerize to the fac-κ5-ArPNHPRuL isomers, which is an uncommon reaction for pincer complexes. The mer-κ5-ArPNHPRuL complexes react with CO and CO2 to form amide κ4-ArPNHPRu(CO)L or carbamate κ5-ArPN(CO2)PRuL complexes, respectively, supporting the hypothesis that the κ4-ArPNPRuL amide intermediates are accessible and reactive.

E-Selective Synthesis and Coordination Chemistry of Pyridine-Phosphaalkenes: Five Ligands Produce Four Distinct Types of Ru(II) Complexes

Pyridine-phosphaalkene (PN) ligands 2a-e were prepared in an E-selective fashion using phospha-Wittig methodology. Treatment of these five ligands, varying only in their 6-substituent with RuCl₂(PPh₃)₃, produced four distinct types of coordination complexes: pyridine-phosphaalkene-derived 3b,d, cyclized 4e, and six-coordinate 5a and 6c. Prolonged heating of 3b,d in THF resulted in C-H activation of the Mes* group and cyclization to give 4b,d featuring a bidentate pyridine-phospholane ligand bound to the metal center. Complex 5a, also possessing a newly formed phospholane ring, contained a different spatial arrangement of donors to Ru(II) with an agostic Ru-H-C interaction serving as the sixth donor to the transition metal center. Ligands 2b,d,e and Ru(II) complexes 3b, 4b,e and 5a were all characterized by X-ray crystallography. Six-coordinate 6c featured a structure similar to 4b,d,e, but with the CF₃ substituent acting as a weakly bound sixth ligand to the Ru(II) center, as observed by ³¹P{¹H} and¹⁹F NMR spectroscopy. The calculated structure of 6c established that the closest Ru- - -F contact was at 2.978 Å.

A Ruthenium Hydrido Dinitrogen Core Conserved across Multielectron/Multiproton Changes to the Pincer Ligand Backbone

A series of ruthenium(II) hydrido dinitrogen complexes supported by pincer ligands in different formal oxidation states have been prepared and characterized. Treating a ruthenium dichloride complex supported by the pincer ligand bis(di-tert-butylphosphinoethyl)amine (H-PNP) with reductant or base generates new five-coordinate cis-hydridodinitrogen ruthenium complexes each containing different forms of the pincer ligand. Further ligand transformations provide access to the first isostructural set of complexes featuring all six different forms of the pincer ligand. The conserved cis-hydridodinitrogen structure facilitates characterization of the π-donor, π-acceptor, and/or σ-donor properties of the ligands and assessment of the impact of ligand-centered multielectron/multiproton changes on N₂ activation. Crystallographic studies, infrared spectroscopy, and ¹⁵N NMR spectroscopy indicate that N₂ remains weakly activated in all cases, providing insight into the donor properties of the different pincer ligand states. Ramifications on applications of (pincer)Ru species in catalysis are considered.

Mild sp2Carbon-Oxygen Bond Activation by an Isolable Ruthenium(II) Bis(dinitrogen) Complex: Experiment and Theory

The isolable ruthenium(II) bis(dinitrogen) complex [Ru(H)₂(N₂)₂(PCy₃)₂] (1) reacts with aryl ethers (Ar–OR, R = Me and Ar) containing a ketone directing group to effect sp²C–O bond activation at temperatures below 40 °C. DFT studies support a low-energy Ru(II)/Ru(IV) pathway for C–O bond activation: oxidative addition of the C–O bond to Ru(II) occurs in an asynchronous manner with Ru–C bond formation preceding C–O bond breaking. Alternative pathways based on a Ru(0)/Ru(II) couple are competitive but less accessible due to the high energy of the Ru(0) precursors. Both experimentally and by DFT calculations, sp²C–H bond activation is shown to be more facile than sp²C–O bond activation. The kinetic preference for C–H bond activation over C–O activation is attributed to unfavorable approach of the C–O bond toward the metal in the selectivity determining step of the reaction pathway.

Can [M(H)2(H2)(PXP)] Pincer Complexes (M=Fe, Ru, Os; X=N, O, S) Serve as Catalyst Lead Structures for NH3 Synthesis from N2 and H2?

The potential of pincer complexes [M(H)(2)(H(2))(PXP)] (M=Fe, Ru, Os; X=N, O, S) to coordinate, activate, and thus catalyze the reaction of N(2) with classical or nonclassical hydrogen centers present at the metal center, with the aim of forming NH(3) with H(2) as the only other reagent, was explored by means of DF (density functional) calculations. Screening of various complexes for their ability to perform initial hydrogen transfer to coordinated N(2) showed ruthenium pincer complexes to be more promising than the corresponding iron and osmium analogues. The ligand backbone influences the reaction dramatically: the presence of pyridine and thioether groups as backbones in the ligand result in inactive catalysts, whereas ether groups such as gamma-pyran and furan enable the reaction and result in unprecedented low activation barriers (23.7 and 22.1 kcal mol(-1), respectively), low enough to be interesting for practical application. Catalytic cycles were calculated for [Ru(H)(2)(H(2))(POP)] catalysts (POP=2,5-bis(dimethylphosphanylmethyl)furan and 2,6-bis(dimethylphosphanylmethyl)-gamma-pyran). The height of activation barriers for the furan system is somewhat more advantageous. Formation of inactive metal nitrides has not been observed. SCRF calculations were used to introduce solvent (toluene) effects. The Gibbs free energies of activation of the numerous single reaction steps do not change significantly when solvent is included. The reaction steps associated with the formation of the active catalyst from precursors [M(H)(2)(H(2))(PXP)] were also calculated. The otherwise inactive pyridine ligand system allows for the generation of the active catalyst species, whereas the ether ligand systems show activation barriers that could prohibit practical application. Consequently the generation of the active catalyst species needs to be addressed in further studies.

Synthesis, characterization, and reactivity of [Ru(bpy)(CH3CN)3(NO2)]PF6, a synthon for [Ru(bpy)(L3)NO2] complexes

We report a high yield, two-step synthesis of fac-[Ru(bpy)(CH3CN)3NO2]PF6 from the known complex [(p-cym)Ru(bpy)Cl]PF6 (p-cym = eta(6)-p-cymene). [(p-cym)Ru(bpy)NO2]PF6 is prepared by reacting [(p-cymene)Ru(bpy)Cl]PF6 with AgNO3/KNO2 or AgNO2. The 15NO2 analogue is prepared using K15NO2. Displacement of p-cymene from [(p-cym)Ru(bpy)NO2]PF6 by acetonitrile gives [Ru(bpy)(CH3CN)3NO2]PF6. The new complexes [(p-cym)Ru(bpy)NO2]PF6 and fac-[Ru(bpy)(CH3CN)3NO2]PF6 have been fully characterized by 1H and 15N NMR, IR, elemental analysis, and single-crystal structure determination. Reaction of [Ru(bpy)(CH3CN)3NO2]PF6 with the appropriate ligands gives the new complexes [Ru(bpy)(Tp)NO2] (Tp = HB(pz)3-, pz = 1-pyrazolyl), [Ru(bpy)(Tpm)NO2]PF6 (Tpm = HC(pz)3), and the previously prepared [Ru(bpy)(trpy)NO2]PF6 (trpy = 2,2',6',2' '-terpyridine). Reaction of the nitro complexes with HPF6 gives the new nitrosyl complexes [Ru(bpy)TpNO][PF6]2 and [Ru(bpy)(Tpm)NO][PF6]3. All complexes were prepared with 15N-labeled nitro or nitrosyl groups. The nitro and nitrosyl complexes were characterized by 1H and 15N NMR and IR spectroscopy, elemental analysis, cyclic voltammetry, and single-crystal structure determination for [Ru(bpy)TpNO][PF6]2. For the nitro complexes, a linear correlation is observed between the nitro 15N NMR chemical shift and 1/nu(asym), where nu(asym) is the asymmetric stretching frequency of the nitro group.

Synthesis and Characterisation of Nonclassical Ruthenium Hydride Complexes Containing Chelating Bidentate and Tridentate Phosphine Ligands

The synthesis and characterisation of nonclassical ruthenium hydride complexes containing bidentate PP and tridentate PCP and PNP pincer-type ligands are described. The mononuclear and dinuclear ruthenium complexes presented have been synthesised in moderate to high yields by the direct hydrogenation route (one-pot synthesis) or in a two-step procedure. In both cases [Ru(cod)(metallyl)(2)] served as a readily available precursor. The influences of the coordination geometry and the ligand framework on the structure, binding, and chemical properties of the M--H(2) fragments were studied by X-ray crystal structure analysis, spectroscopic methods, and reactivity towards N(2), D(2), and deuterated solvents.