Simultaneous Absolute Quantification of the Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptides GIP1−42 and GIP3−42 in Mouse Plasma by LC/ESI-MS/MS: Preclinical Evaluation of DP-IV Inhibitors

A UHPLC/MS/MS method for the analysis of active and inactive forms of GLP-1 and GIP incretins in human plasma

Glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 and the glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) are incretin hormones that regulate the nutrient-stimulated insulin secretion from pancreatic β-cells. Their low plasma concentrations and rapid clearance pose certain methodological challenges for their detection and quantification. The currently available immunomediated techniques to monitor these hormones overestimate, to some extent, their actual concentration. Hence, the present study is aimed at developing a robust and reliable methodology for the identification and quantification of active and inactive forms of the incretins GLP-1 and GIP, in human plasma, by UHPLC-ESI-QqQ-MS/MS. A comparative study of different SPE cartridges was carried out, being identified OASIS HLB as the most efficient one, with recoveries up to 80%. The method provides adequate linearity, from 4.88 to 1250 nM, and low intervals of LOD and LOQ for each analyte (ranges from 0.01 to 3.42 nM and from 0.10 to 34.17 nM, respectively). The methodology described was validated upon a clinical trial with overweight subjects (n = 20) (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04016337), showing the capacity of the newly developed methodology to detect the augment of the plasma concentration of both GLP-1_7-36 and GLP-1_9-36 between 30 and 60 min after the consumption of a sucrose sweetened fruit-based beverage, while the plasma concentration of GIP remained in levels lower than the LOQ. The proposed methodology provides further insights into the mechanisms of action of bioactive compounds and food components in the frame of the glycemic control and would contribute to the assessment of the efficacy of antidiabetic drugs.

Degradation and Stabilization of Peptide Hormones in Human Blood Specimens

Plasma hormone peptides, including GLP-1, GIP, Glucagon, and OXM, possess multiple physiological roles and potential therapeutic and diagnostic utility as biomarkers in the research of metabolic disorders. These peptides are subject to proteolytic degradation causing preanalytical variations. Stabilization for accurate quantitation of these active peptides in ex vivo blood specimens is essential for drug and biomarker development. We investigated the protease-driven instability of these peptides in conventional serum, plasma, anticoagulated whole blood, as well as whole blood and plasma stabilized with protease inhibitors. The peptide was monitored by both time-course Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization Time-to-Flight Mass Spectrometry (MALDI –TOF MS) and Ab-based assay (ELISA or RIA). MS enabled the identification of proteolytic fragments. In non-stabilized blood samples, the results clearly indicated that dipeptidyl peptidase-IV (DPP-IV) removed the N-terminal two amino acid residues from GLP-1, GIP and OXM(1-37) and not-yet identified peptidase(s) cleave(s) the full-length OXM(1-37) and its fragments. DPP-IV also continued to remove two additional N-terminal residues of processed OXM(3–37) to yield OXM(5–37). Importantly, both DPP-IV and other peptidase(s) activities were inhibited efficiently by the protease inhibitors included in the BD P800* tube. There was preservation of GLP-1, GIP, OXM and glucagon in the P800 plasma samples with half-lives > 96, 96, 72, and 45 hours at room temperature (RT), respectively. In the BD P700* plasma samples, the stabilization of GLP-1 was also achieved with half-life > 96 hours at RT. The stabilization of these variable peptides increased their utility in drug and/or biomarker development. While stability results of GLP-1 obtained with Ab-based assay were consistent with those obtained by MS analysis, the Ab-based results of GIP, Glucagon, and OXM did not reflect the time-dependent degradations revealed by MS analysis. Therefore, we recommended characterizing the degradation of the peptide using the MS-based method when investigating the stability of a specific peptide.

Biotransformation and in vivo stability of protein biotherapeutics: impact on candidate selection and pharmacokinetic profiling

Historically, since the metabolism of administered peptide/protein drugs ("biotherapeutics") has been expected to undergo predictable pathways similar to endogenous proteins, comprehensive biotherapeutic metabolism studies have not been widely reported in the literature. However, since biotherapeutics have rapidly evolved into an impressive array of eclectic modalities, there has been a shift toward understanding the impact of metabolism on biotherapeutic development. For biotherapeutics containing non-native chemical linkers and other moieties besides natural amino acids, metabolism studies are critical as these moieties may impart undesired toxicology. For biotherapeutics that are composed solely of natural amino acids, where end-stage peptide and amino acid catabolites do not generally pose toxicity concerns, the understanding of biotherapeutic biotransformation, defined as in vivo modifications such as peripherally generated intermediate circulating catabolites prior to end-stage degradation or elimination, may impact in vivo stability and potency/clearance. As of yet, there are no harmonized methodologies for understanding biotherapeutic biotransformation and its impact on drug development, nor is there clear guidance from regulatory agencies on how and when these studies should be conducted. This review provides an update on biotherapeutic biotransformation studies and an overview of lessons learned, tools that have been developed, and suggestions of approaches to address issues. Biotherapeutic biotransformation studies, especially for certain modalities, should be implemented at an early stage of development to 1) understand the impact on potency/clearance, 2) select the most stable candidates or direct protein re-engineering efforts, and 3) select the best bioanalytical technique(s) for proper drug quantification and subsequent pharmacokinetic profiling and exposure/response assessment.

Simultaneous quantification of davalintide, a novel amylin-mimetic peptide, and its active metabolite in beagle and rat plasma by online SPE and LC-MS/MS

BACKGROUND

Davalintide, an investigational therapeutic peptide for the treatment of obesity, is rapidly metabolized by enzymatic cleavage of its N-terminal lysine residue to produce an active des-Lys metabolite in vivo. While a sensitive ELISA assay is available, it is unable to distinguish davalintide from its metabolite. Consequently, we developed an online SPE-LC-MS/MS method for simultaneous quantification of the drug and its active metabolite in beagle and rat plasma samples and compared the resulting pharmacokinetic profiles with those determined by ELISA.

RESULTS

The total concentration of active drug measured by ELISA correlated well with the total concentration of davalintide and its metabolite using online SPE-LC-MS/MS.

CONCLUSION

The technique is a viable alternative to immunochemistry-based methods for peptide quantitation in terms of sensitivity, reproducibility and specificity, and importantly, does not require developing antibody-based reagents.

Rationally designed cyclic analogues of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone: enhanced enzymatic stability and biological properties

This article describes the rational design, synthesis and pharmacological properties of amide-linked cyclic analogues of Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone (LHRH) with substitutions at positions 1 (Pro), 6 (D-Leu/D-Trp), 9 (Aze) and 10 (BABA/Acp). These LHRH analogues fulfil the conformational requirements that are known in the literature (bend in the 5-8 segment) to be essential for receptor recognition and activation. Although, they are characterised by an overall low binding affinity to the LHRH-I receptor, the cyclic analogues that were studied and especially the cyclo(1-10)[Pro(1), D-Leu(6), BABA(10)] LHRH, exhibit a profoundly enhanced in vitro and in vivo stability and improved pharmacokinetics in comparison with their linear counterpart and leuprolide. Upon receptor binding, cyclo(1-10)[Pro(1), D-Leu(6), BABA(10)] LHRH causes testosterone release in C57/B16 mice (in vivo efficacy) that is comparable to that of leuprolide. Testosterone release is an acutely dose dependent effect that is blocked by the LHRH-I receptor antagonist, cetrorelix. The pharmacokinetic advantages and efficacy of cyclo(1-10)[Pro(1), D-Leu(6), BABA(10)] LHRH render this analogue a promising platform for future rational drug design studies towards the development of non-peptide LHRH mimetics.

Peptide and protein drugs: the study of their metabolism and catabolism by mass spectrometry

Peptide and protein drugs have evolved in recent years into mainstream therapeutics, representing a significant portion of the pharmaceutical market. Peptides and proteins exhibit highly diverse structures, broad biological activities as hormones, neurotransmitters, structural proteins, metabolic modulators and therefore have a significant role as both therapeutics and biomarkers. Understanding the metabolism of synthetic or biotechnologically derived peptide and protein drugs is critical for pharmaceutical development as metabolism has a significant impact on drug efficacy and safety. Although the same principles of pharmacokinetics and metabolism of small molecule drugs apply to peptide and protein drugs, there are few notable differences. Moreover, the study of peptide and protein drug metabolism is a rather complicated process which requires sophisticated analytical techniques, and mass spectrometry based approaches have provided the capabilities for efficient and reliable quantification, characterization, and metabolite identification. This review article will focus on the current use of mass spectrometry for the study of the metabolism of peptide and protein drugs.

Dual-Monoclonal, Sandwich Immunoassay Specific for Glucose-Dependent Insulinotropic Peptide1-42, the Active Form of the Incretin Hormone

BACKGROUND

Glucose-dependent insulinotropic peptide (GIP) is an incretin peptide secreted by intestinal K cells that stimulates insulin secretion in a glucose-dependent manner. It is secreted as an active, intact 42–amino acid peptide GIP1-42, which is rapidly degraded by dipeptidyl peptidase 4 to GIP3-42, which is inactive. There is currently no described monoclonal antibody–based sandwich immunoassay to quantify concentrations of GIP1-42, the active form of the peptide.

METHODS

To create a sandwich ELISA for GIP1-42, we generated a monoclonal antibody specific for the intact N-terminus of the peptide, which was further optimized to increase its affinity. We used this antibody as a conjugate antibody in a sandwich ELISA and paired it with an anti–total GIP capture monoclonal antibody to create a dual monoclonal sandwich ELISA for GIP1-42.

RESULTS

The sandwich ELISA was highly specific for GIP1-42 and did not recognize GIP3-42. The ELISA demonstrated a broad dynamic range and a lower limit of quantification of 5 ng/L. Using the ELISA, we were able to show that GIP1-42 concentrations in healthy volunteers increased dramatically in the postprandial state compared to the fasting state. GIP1-42 values were correlated with total GIP values overall; however, there was substantial interindividual variation.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of an N-terminal–specific monoclonal antibody in a sandwich ELISA format provides a robust and convenient method for measuring concentrations of GIP1-42, the active form of the incretin hormone. This ELISA should help to improve our understanding of the role of GIP1-42 in regulating glucose-dependent insulin secretion.

Bioanalytical approaches to analyzing peptides and proteins by LC–MS/MS

Peptides and proteins have been utilized as therapeutic agents for over 40 years. Traditional approaches to quantify these molecules in biological matrices have utilized immunoassay approaches that can be time inefficient, lack assay specificity and have limited analytical ranges. The advances in sample preparation technologies, chromatographic systems and their chemistries, mass spectrometers and their software over the last decade have meant that LC–MS/MS approaches to peptide and protein quantification are feasible and can overcome the problems associated with quantification by immunoassay. In this article we present an overview of the challenges and approaches to overcome them when performing quantitative bioanalysis of peptides and proteins by LC–MS/MS.

Sensitive liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry assay for absolute quantification of ITIH4-derived putative biomarker peptides in clinical serum samples

To explore the potential of peptide fragments derived from inter-alpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain-4 (ITIH(4)) as serum markers for different cancer types, sensitive and specific analytical assays are required. Liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) would be suitable; however, a previously developed method for quantification of eight ITIH(4) fragments (ITIH(4)-21, -22, -25, -26, -27, -28, -29 and -30) was found to be insensitive for clinical use. A more sensitive LC/MS/MS assay has now been developed and validated, which was further optimized to facilitate analyses of large sets of clinical serum samples. Benefits compared to the previous method include reduction of sample volume (100 microL), omission of protein precipitation and evaporation and transferring solid-phase extraction (SPE) to a 96-well format. Chromatographic separation on an XBridge BEH300 C(18) column, using a water/methanol gradient containing acetic acid, was coupled to triple quadrupole mass spectrometric detection, applying heated electrospray ionization. Method validation revealed deviations from nominal concentrations below 10.1% and intra- and inter-assay precisions below 17.4 and 20.0%, respectively, at the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) for all peptides. The reported changes resulted in more rapid and efficient analyses and reduced LLOQs for the six less abundant peptides (1.2; 1.0; 1.2; 2.0; 2.0 and 2.0 ng/mL vs. 2.1; 2.0; 2.5; 2.6; 2.2 and 2.4 ng/mL for ITIH(4)-21, -22, -25, -27, -28 and -29, respectively). The method has shown its applicability by quantifying all peptides in appropriate concentration ranges in serum from healthy volunteers and application to clinical samples from breast cancer patients.