Growth factors in gliomas: antisense and dominant negative mutant strategies

Interactions between pattern formation and domain growth

In this paper we develop a theoretical framework for investigating pattern formation in biological systems for which the tissue on which the spatial pattern resides is growing at a rate which is itself regulated by the diffusible chemicals that establish the spatial pattern. We present numerical simulations for two cases of interest, namely exponential domain growth and chemically controlled growth. Our analysis reveals that for domains undergoing rapid exponential growth dilution effects associated with domain growth influence both the spatial patterns that emerge and the concentration of chemicals present in the domain. In the latter case, there is complex interplay between the effects of the chemicals on the domain size and the influence of the domain size on the formation of patterns. The nature of these interactions is revealed by a weakly nonlinear analysis of the full system. This yields a pair of nonlinear equations for the amplitude of the spatial pattern and the domain size. The domain is found to grow (or shrink) at a rate that depends quadratically on the pattern amplitude, the particular functional forms used to model the local tissue growth rate and the kinetics of the two diffusible species dictating the resulting behaviour.

Cloning and in vitro characterization of alpha 1(I)-collagen 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 transgenes as models for osteoblast-selective inactivation of natural glucocorticoids

The NAD-dependent enzyme, 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type II (11 beta HSD2), catalyzes the unidirectional conversion of biologically active glucocorticoids to inactive metabolites. In vivo, 11 beta HSD2 protects the mineralocorticoid receptor from activation by glucocorticoids in mineralocorticoid target tissues such as kidney. The goal of the present study was to use targeted overexpression of 11 beta HSD2 as a novel means of disrupting glucocorticoid signaling in osteoblastic cells. Rat 11 beta HSD2 complementary DNA was cloned downstream of a 2.3- and 3.6-kb alpha 1(I)-collagen (Col1a1) promoter fragment to produce the expression plasmids Col2.3-HSD2 and Col3.6-HSD2, respectively, which were transiently and/or stably transfected in osteoblastic ROS 17/2.8 and MC3T3-E1 cells. Transgene messenger RNA and protein were detected in transfected cells by Northern blot analysis and immunostaining, respectively. Transfection of 11 beta HSD2 led to higher rates of conversion of [(3)H]corticosterone to [(3)H]dehydrocorticosterone and reduced glucocorticoid-dependent regulation of a mouse mammary tumor virus promoter-reporter construct, cell growth, and messenger RNA markers compared with transfection of a control vector. Expression of 11 beta HSD2 under the control of Col1a1 promoter fragments may provide a novel model to study the role of glucocorticoid signaling in osteoblastic cells.

Targeted drug delivery for brain cancer treatment

The blood brain barrier (BBB) and the systemic toxicity of conventional chemotherapy present obstacles to the success of future blood-borne drug therapies of brain tumors. The work with polymer-encapsulated cancer drugs suggests an alternative and more focused treatment approach. Our experimental strategy integrates direct intracerebral drug delivery, sustained drug release from liposomes or polymer implants, and increased targeting of the drug either by chemically modifying the drug or by using tumor-specific carriers. This review will present some of the recent work on targeted drug delivery for brain cancer treatment.

Autocrine growth regulation by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor in human gliomas with tumor progression

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and/or their receptors are increasingly detected in solid human tumors, although little is known about their function in tumor growth and invasion. We analyzed RNA and protein expression of both factors and their receptors in 22 human gliomas (WHO grade II, III, and IV) and derived cell cultures. G-CSF, GM-CSF, and/or their receptors were expressed in all tumors and derived cell cultures, but coexpression of both factors and receptors was almost exclusively found in grade IV glioblastomas and thus correlated with advanced tumor stage. The functional significance of G-CSF and GM-CSF as regulators for glioma cells was demonstrated by 1) stimulation of proliferation and migration in tumor cells expressing one or both receptors by the corresponding factor; 2) inhibition of growth and migration of glioma cells expressing G-CSF, GM-CSF, and their receptors by neutralizing antibodies to both factors. These results indicate a significant role for both factors in the autocrine regulation of growth and migration in late-stage malignant gliomas and suggest a shift from paracrine to autocrine regulation with tumor progression. The implication of G-CSF and GM-CSF in glioblastoma growth regulation could make these factors further prognostic indicators and raises questions concerning their use in cancer therapy.

Gene therapy for gliomas: molecular targets, adenoviral vectors, and oncolytic adenoviruses

Currently, most of the approved clinical gene therapy protocols involve cancer patients and several of the therapies are designed to treat brain tumors. Two factors promoting the use of gene therapy for gliomas are the failure and toxicity of conventional therapies and the identification of the genetic abnormalities that contribute to the malignancy of gliomas. During the malignant progression of astrocitic tumors several tumor suppressor genes are inactivated, and numerous growth factors and oncogenes are overexpressed progressively. Thus, theoretically, brain tumors could be treated by targeting their fundamental molecular defects, provided the gene-drug can be delivered to a sufficient number of malignant cells. However, gene therapy strategies have not been abundantly successful clinically, in part because the delivery systems are still imperfect. In the first part of this brief review we will discuss the most common targets for gene therapy in brain tumors. In the second part, we will review the evolution of adenoviruses as gene vehicles. In addition, we will examine the role of recombinant mutant oncolytic adenoviruses as anticancer tools. From the results to date it is clear that gene therapy strategies for brain tumors are quite promising but more critical research is required, mainly in the vector field, if the strategies are to achieve their true potential in ameliorating patients with gliomas.