The effect of dexamethasone on the uptake of cisplatin in 9L glioma and the area of brain around tumor

Analysis of concordance with antiemetic guidelines in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients with cancer using a large-scale administrative database

Object

The appropriate use of antiemetics is important for the prevention of chemotherapy‐induced nausea and vomiting (CINV); however, little is known about the rate of concordance with antiemetic guidelines for CINV in the field of pediatric, adolescent, and young adult.

Methods

Using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination system in Japan, we identified patients <30 years of age who were diagnosed with cancer between July 2010 and March 2016. We have assessed concordance with the ASCO antiemetic guidelines for each emetic risk category of chemotherapeutic drugs. Furthermore, we have assessed the risk factors of discordance with the antiemetic guidelines using a logistic regression.

Results

In total, 21 106 patients who underwent chemotherapy were included. The rates of concordance with the guidelines in each emetic risk category of chemotherapeutic drugs were 51.1% in high risk, ≥18 years of age; 21.5% in high risk, <18 years of age; 32.1% in moderate risk; 52.0% in low risk; and 51.6% in minimal risk. The main reason for the discordance was underuse of antiemetics, especially steroids. The factors for discordance were younger age, use of moderate and high emetic risk chemotherapeutic drugs, hematological malignancy, and brain tumor.

Conclusion

There is substantial scope to improve the antiemetic practice and reduce the risk of discordance with the antiemetic guidelines in pediatric, adolescent, and young adult patients. The risk factors are different from those in adults. Further investigations to evaluate the causes of discordance are warranted.

Glucocorticoids in the management of peritumoral brain edema: a review of molecular mechanisms

Peritumoral brain edema (PTBE) is mediated by blood-brain barrier breakdown. PTBE results from interstitial vasogenic brain edema due to vascular endothelial growth factor and other inflammatory products of brain tumors. Glucocorticoids (GCs) are the mainstay for treatment of PTBE despite significant systemic side effects. GCs are thought to affect multiple cell types in the edematous brain. Here, we review preclinical studies of GC effects on edematous brain and review mechanisms underlying GC action on tumor cells, endothelial cells, and astrocytes. GCs may reduce tumor cell viability and suppress vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) production in tumor cells. Modulation of expression and distribution of tight junction proteins occludin, claudin-5, and ZO-1 in endothelial cells likely plays a central role in GC action on endothelial cells. GCs may also have an effect on astrocyte angiopoietin production and limited effect on astrocyte aquaporin. A better understanding of these molecular mechanisms may lead to the development of novel therapeutics for management of PTBE with a better side effect profile.

2016 updated MASCC/ESMO consensus recommendations: Prevention of acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in children

PURPOSE

To update the 2009 recommendations for the prevention of acute chemotherapy-induced emesis in children.

METHODS

We updated the original systematic literature search. Randomized studies were included in the evidence to support this guideline if they were primary studies fully published in full text in English or French; included only children less than 18 years old or, for mixed studies of adults and children, reported the pediatric results separately or the median or mean age was no more than 13 years; evaluated acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) prophylaxis; provided sufficient information to permit determination of the emetogenicity of the antineoplastic therapy administered or the study investigators stated the emetogenicity of the chemotherapy administered; included an implicit or explicit definition of complete acute CINV response; described the antiemetic regimen in full; and reported the complete acute CINV response rate as a proportion.

RESULTS

Twenty-five randomized studies, including eight published since 2009, met the criteria for inclusion in this systematic review. Prophylaxis with a 5-HT3 antagonist (granisetron or ondansetron or palonosetron or tropisetron) ± dexamethasone ± aprepitant is recommended for children receiving highly or moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. For children receiving chemotherapy of low emetogenicity, a 5-HT3 antagonist is recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of several randomized trials were used to update recommendations for the prevention of acute CINV. However, significant research gaps remain and must be addressed before CINV control in children can be optimized.

Blood-brain barrier, cytotoxic chemotherapies and glioblastoma

INTRODUCTION

Glioblastomas (GBM) are the most common and aggressive primary malignant brain tumors in adults. The blood brain barrier (BBB) is a major limitation reducing efficacy of anti-cancer drugs in the treatment of GBM patients. Areas covered: Virtually all GBM recur after the first-line treatment, at least partly, due to invasive tumor cells protected from chemotherapeutic agents by the intact BBB in the brain adjacent to tumor. The passage through the BBB, taken by antitumor drugs, is poorly and heterogeneously documented in the literature. In this review, we have focused our attention on: (i) the BBB, (ii) the passage of chemotherapeutic agents across the BBB and (iii) the strategies investigated to overcome this barrier. Expert commentary: A better preclinical knowledge of the crossing of the BBB by antitumor drugs will allow optimizing their clinical development, alone or combined with BBB bypassing strategies, towards an increased success rate of clinical trials.

Principles of pharmacotherapy

This chapter will review the challenges in pharmacotherapy in primary brain tumors that include the presence of the blood-brain barrier, a blood-tumor barrier, active drug efflux pumps, and high plasma protein binding of agents. The approaches to improve the delivery of drugs to the brain will be discussed. Often the management of brain tumors involves the use of corticosteroids and enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications that can have significant drug interactions that may impact the efficacy or toxicity of drugs used to treat these patients. Various techniques used to assess drug distribution to the brain will be reviewed.

Preclinical high-dose acetaminophen with N-acetylcysteine rescue enhances the efficacy of cisplatin chemotherapy in atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors

BACKGROUND

Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors (AT-RT) are pediatric tumors of the central nervous system with limited treatment options and poor survival rate. We investigated whether enhancing chemotherapy toxicity by depleting intracellular glutathione (GSH; a key molecule in cisplatin resistance) with high dose acetaminophen (AAP), may improve therapeutic efficacy in AT-RT in vitro.

PROCEDURE

BT16 (cisplatin-resistant) and BT12 (cisplatin-sensitive) AT-RT cell lines were treated with combinations of AAP, cisplatin, and the anti-oxidant N-acetylcysteine (NAC). Cell viability, GSH and peroxide concentrations, mitochondrial damage, and apoptosis were evaluated in vitro.

RESULTS

AAP enhanced cisplatin cytotoxicity in cisplatin-resistant BT16 cells but not cisplatin-sensitive BT12 cells. Baseline GSH levels were elevated in BT16 cells compared to BT12 cells, and AAP decreased GSH to a greater magnitude in BT16 cells than BT12 cells. Unlike BT12 cells, BT16 cells did not have elevated peroxide levels upon treatment with cisplatin alone, but did have elevated levels when treated with AAP + cisplatin. Both cell lines had markedly increased mitochondrial injury when treated with AAP + cisplatin relative to either drug treatment alone. The enhanced toxic effects were partially reversed with concurrent administration of NAC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that AAP could be used as a chemo-enhancement agent to potentiate cisplatin chemotherapeutic efficacy particularly in cisplatin-resistant AT-RT tumors with high GSH levels in clinical settings.

The thrombospondin-1 mimetic ABT-510 increases the uptake and effectiveness of cisplatin and paclitaxel in a mouse model of epithelial ovarian cancer

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) comprises approximately 90% of ovarian cancers and arises from the surface epithelium. Typical treatment of EOC involves cytoreductive surgery combined with chemotherapy. More recent therapies have targeted the tumor vasculature using antiangiogenic compounds such as thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1). TSP-1 mimetic peptides such as ABT-510 have been created and have been in various clinical trials. We have previously shown that ABT-510 reduces abnormal vasculature associated with tumor tissue and increases the presence of mature blood vessels. It has been hypothesized that treatment with antiangiogenic compounds would allow increased delivery of cytotoxic agents and enhance treatment. In this study, we evaluated the potential role of ABT-510 and various chemotherapeutics (cisplatin and paclitaxel) on tumor progression, angiogenesis, and the benefits of combinational treatments on tissue uptake and perfusion using an orthotopic syngeneic mouse model of EOC. Animals were treated with ABT-510 (100 mg/kg per day) alone or in combination with cisplatin (2 mg/kg per 3 days) or paclitaxel (10 mg/kg per 2 days) at 60 days after tumor induction. Radiolabeled and fluorescently labeled paclitaxel demonstrated a significant increase in tumor uptake after ABT-510 treatment. Combined treatment with ABT-510 and cisplatin or paclitaxel resulted in a significant increase in tumor cell and tumor endothelial cell apoptosis and a resultant decrease in ovarian tumor size. Combined treatment also regressed secondary lesions and eliminated the presence of abdominal ascites. The results from this study show that through vessel normalization, ABT-510 increases uptake of chemotherapy drugs and can induce regression of advanced ovarian cancer.

Optimizing emetic control in children receiving antineoplastic therapy: beyond the guidelines

Existing guidelines for the prevention of antineoplastic chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in children are constrained by the lack of robust evidence. Current guidelines recommend the use of a serotonin 5-HT(3) receptor antagonist plus a corticosteroid to prevent acute CINV. Consequently, antiemetic agents that are recommended for use in adult cancer patients do not appear in the current pediatric guidelines. In addition, there is no information to guide the selection of alternative antiemetic agents for children who either cannot receive the recommended agents or who do not respond adequately to the treatment. Possible barriers to adherence to the pediatric antiemetic selection guidelines that are currently available are discussed, and published pediatric experience with antiemetic agents recommended in the current adult antiemetic selection guidelines (dolasetron, tropisetron, palonosetron, aprepitant) is summarized in this review. The use of novel and emerging antiemetic therapeutic interventions {metopimazine, diphenhydramine (Benadryl)-lorazepam (Avitan)-dexamethasone (Decadron) [BAD], nabilone, acupuncture, midazolam, olanzapine, mirtazapine, gabapentin, droperidol} in children are explored.

Drug interactions at the blood-brain barrier: fact or fantasy?

There is considerable interest in the therapeutic and adverse outcomes of drug interactions at the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and the blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCSFB). These include altered efficacy of drugs used in the treatment of CNS disorders, such as AIDS dementia and malignant tumors, and enhanced neurotoxicity of drugs that normally penetrate poorly into the brain. BBB- and BCSFB-mediated interactions are possible because these interfaces are not only passive anatomical barriers, but are also dynamic in that they express a variety of influx and efflux transporters and drug metabolizing enzymes. Based on studies in rodents, it has been widely postulated that efflux transporters play an important role at the human BBB in terms of drug delivery. Furthermore, it is assumed that chemical inhibition of transporters or their genetic ablation in rodents is predictive of the magnitude of interaction to be expected at the human BBB. However, studies in humans challenge this well-established paradigm and claim that such drug interactions will be lesser in magnitude but yet may be clinically significant. This review focuses on current known mechanisms of drug interactions at the blood-brain and blood-CSF barriers and the potential impact of such interactions in humans. We also explore whether such drug interactions can be predicted from preclinical studies. Defining the mechanisms and the impact of drug-drug interactions at the BBB is important for improving efficacy of drugs used in the treatment of CNS disorders while minimizing their toxicity as well as minimizing neurotoxicity of non-CNS drugs.

Dexamethasone enhances calcium-activated potassium channel expression in blood-brain tumor barrier in a rat brain tumor model

This study was performed to determine whether dexamethasone (DEX) had an effect on calcium-activated potassium channels (KCa channels) in blood-brain tumor barrier (BTB).Using a rat brain glioma model, we found that the expression of KCa channels protein was significantly increased in brain tumor tissue. And bradykinin-induced increase of KCa channels protein was further enhanced after DEX pretreatment for 3 days. In addition, DEX pretreatment enhanced bradykinin-mediated up-regulation of the density of IKCa in the rat brain C6 cells in vitro BTB. Bradykinin markedly increased BTB permeability independent of DEX pretreatment. All of these results strongly suggest that DEX could regulate the target in the transcellular pathway of BTB-KCa channels.

Chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with brain metastases: have new chemotherapic agents changed the clinical outcome?

Brain metastasis occurs in 15-40% of cancer patients and is present in approximately 10-16% of patients with metastatic breast disease. However, little is known about prognostic factors enabling the early identification of breast cancer patients at risk of CNS metastases. Therapy for brain metastases should be based on several parameters, such as the assessment of prognostic variables, the extent of neurological and systemic disease, and its chemo-sensitivity to previously administered chemotherapy treatments. In view of the known close correlation between metastatic and primary tumor chemosensitivity, the type of chemotherapy chosen should depend more on the tumor histology than on the cerebral distribution of the single drug. More recent drugs with a high impact on the clinical outcome of metastatic breast cancer patients, such as taxanes or trastuzumab, play only a limited role in the treatment of brain metastases.

Chemotherapy delivery issues in central nervous system malignancy: a reality check

PURPOSE

This review assesses the current state of knowledge regarding preclinical and clinical pharmacology for brain tumor chemotherapy and evaluates relevant brain tumor pharmacology studies before October 2006.

RESULTS

Chemotherapeutic regimens in brain tumor therapy have often emerged from empirical clinical studies with retrospective pharmacologic explanations, rather than prospective trials of rational chemotherapeutic approaches. Brain tumors are largely composed of CNS metastases of systemic cancers. Primary brain tumors, such as glioblastoma multiforme or primary CNS lymphomas, are less common. Few of these tumors have well-defined optimal treatment. Brain tumors are protected from systemic chemotherapy by the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and by intrinsic properties of the tumors. Pharmacologic studies of delivery of conventional chemotherapeutics and novel therapeutics showing actual tumor concentrations and biologic effect are lacking.

CONCLUSION

In this article, we review drug delivery across the BBB, as well as blood-tumor and -cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) barriers, and mechanisms to increase drug delivery to CNS and CSF tumors. Because of the difficulty in treating CNS tumors, innovative treatments and alternative delivery techniques involving brain/cord capillaries, choroid plexus, and CSF are needed.

Current therapeutic approaches in patients with brain metastases

The development of brain metastases is often viewed as the end stage of a disease course and engenders skepticism about the efficacy of treatment. Aggressive management of brain metastases is effective in both symptom palliation and the prolongation of life. The majority of patients with controlled intracranial metastases will expire from systemic disease rather than from recurrence of these metastases. Single brain metastases should be treated with surgical resection or stereotactic radiosurgery, though it is unclear at this time if one modality is more effective than the other. Surgical resection is preferred when a pathologic diagnosis is needed, for tumors larger than 3.5 cm, or when immediate tumor mass decompression is required. Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) should be applied for single tumors less than 3.5 cm in surgically inaccessible areas and for patients who are not surgical candidates. Small tumors (ie, < 3.5 cm) that cause minimal edema and are surgically accessible may be treated with either surgery or SRS. There is controversy over whether whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) can be omitted following surgical resection or SRS. Omission of WBRT increases intracranial tumor recurrence; however, this has not been correlated with decreased survival. Clinicians who choose to omit upfront WBRT are obligated to monitor the patient closely for intracranial recurrence, at which time further salvage therapy in the form of surgery, SRS, or WBRT may be considered. Histology is of particular importance when considering WBRT for patients with radioresistant tumors such as melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, or sarcoma. WBRT may be of less clinical benefit in this setting. Chemotherapy has been demonstrated to improve response rates when used as an adjunct to radiation therapy. These improvements in response rates have not been correlated with an improvement in median survival. Noncytotoxic radiosensitizing agents such as motexafin and efaproxiral show promise. Phase III trials to assess the benefit of motexafin in patients with metastatic lung cancer and efaproxiral in patients with metastatic breast cancer are ongoing. Targeted therapies offer promise in achieving therapeutic efficacy while minimizing side effects. Surgical adjuncts such as BCNU (carmustine) wafers and the GliaSite Radiation System (Cytyc Corporation, Marlborough, MA) may be useful in the future in achieving optimal local tumor control.

A pilot study of ondansetron plus metopimazine vs. ondansetron monotherapy in children receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a Bayesian randomized serial N-of-1 trials design

GOALS OF WORK

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting is problematic in paediatric brain tumour treatment protocols which often discourage the use of corticosteroids as anti-emetics. The dopamine receptor antagonist, metopimazine, is an effective anti-emetic in combination with ondansetron in adults. The present study was designed to assess its efficacy in children with cancer, a group in which it has not been studied previously.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a series of randomized, multiple-crossover, double-blind, placebo-controlled N-of-1 trials comparing ondansetron/metopimazine with ondansetron monotherapy in children with brain tumours receiving highly emetogenic therapy and combined the individual results using Bayesian statistical modeling.

MAIN RESULTS

Ten of twelve enrolled patients completed at least one chemotherapy cycle on study (median=2.5 cycles, range 1-11). Two patients were unable to complete any cycles, and a further three patients withdrew from the study prior to completing all cycles because of an inability to tolerate the taste of the study drug. Combination therapy increased the proportion of days during which patients had no emesis (overall odds ratio=1.52, 95% credible region=0.32-6.40, probability of odds ratio>1=72%), decreased the number of emetic episodes per day (overall rate ratio=0.67, 95% credible region=0.15-3.14, probability of rate ratio<1=75%) and decreased parents' ratings of their child's distress. The drug was more effective during the delayed chemotherapy phase than the acute phase. No adverse events were attributed to metopimazine.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this pilot study, we believe that the high likelihood that metopimazine is an effective adjunct to ondansetron monotherapy suggests that this combination therapy is worthy of further study in children receiving emetogenic chemotherapy.

The effect of dexamethasone on the uptake of p-boronophenylalanine in the rat brain and intracranial 9L gliosarcoma

The steroid dexamethasone sodium phosphate (DEX) is routinely used to treat edema in brain tumor patients. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of DEX on the uptake of boronophenylalanine (BPA) using the rat 9L gliosarcoma tumor model and surrounding brain tissue. Two steroid dosage protocols were used. The high-dose DEX protocol involved five 3mg/kg intraperitoneal injections at 47, 35, 23, 11 and 1 h prior to the administration of the BPA for a total dose of 15 mg DEX/kg rat. The low-dose DEX administration protocol involved two doses of 1.5mg/kg at 17 h and 1h prior to BPA injection for a total dose of 3mg DEX/kg rat. The control animals received no pretreatment, prior to the administration of BPA. Seventeen days after tumor implantation, rats were injected i.p. with 0.014 ml/g body weight BPA solution (1200 mg BPA/kg; approximately 59 mg (10)B/kg). In all groups, rats were euthanized at 3h after BPA injection. Administration of the steroid had an effect on tumor weight, which decreased to approximately 78% (p > 0.05) of the control weight in the low-dose DEX group, and approximately 48% (p < 0.001) of the control weight in the high-dose DEX group. At 3 h after the administration of BPA, the concentration of boron in tumor was comparable (p > 0.1) in the control and high-dose DEX groups. The lowest mean value (73.8+/-1.6 microg/g) was obtained in the low-dose DEX group. This was significantly lower (p > 0.02) than the tumor boron contents in the high-dose DEX and control groups, which were 81.1+/-1.9 and 79.9+/-1.7 microg/g, respectively. Tumor:blood boron partition ratios for the control, low- and high-dose DEX groups were 2.3, 2.3 and 2.5, respectively. Boron concentrations were also measured in the normal brain and in the zone of brain adjacent to the tumor exhibiting edema. Although treatment with DEX had no appreciable effect on boron uptake in the normal brain of the rat, after the administration of BPA, it did impact on the boron levels in the zone of peritumoral edema. After the high-dose DEX administration protocol, boron levels in the zone of edema were reduced by approximately 14% (p < 0.02). This finding suggests that BPA targeting of tumor cells in the peritumoral zone could be compromised by DEX. These cells appear to play a critical role in tumor recurrence after BNCT or conventional radiotherapy.

The pathogenesis and treatment of brain metastases: a comprehensive review

Brain metastases are the most common intracranial tumors and their incidence is increasing. Untreated brain metastases are associated with a poor prognosis and a poor performance status. The role of surgery in the management of multiple brain metastases is still controversial. As more than 70% of patients have multiple metastases at the time of diagnosis, whole brain radiotherapy is the treatment of choice in most cases. Brain metastases are an ideal target for stereotactic radiosurgery, as they are better circumscribed than primary brain tumors. Currently, chemotherapy has a limited role in the treatment of most brain metastases. Several new therapies, with a good penetration through the blood brain barrier, such as temozolomide, have been used in brain metastases with different results depending on the histology of the primary tumor. A better understanding of the complex processes underlying the development of brain metastasis will enable us to develop more satisfactory targeted treatments.

CNS Metastases in Breast Cancer

As systemic therapy of metastatic breast cancer improves, CNS involvement is becoming a more widespread problem. This article summarizes the current knowledge regarding the incidence, clinical presentation, diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of CNS metastases in patients with breast cancer. When available, studies specific to breast cancer are presented; in studies in which many solid tumors were evaluated together, the proportion of patients with breast cancer is noted. On the basis of data from randomized trials and retrospective series, neurosurgery and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) may prolong survival in patients with single brain metastases. The treatment of multiple metastases remains controversial, as does the routine use of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) after either surgery or SRS. Although it is widely assumed that chemotherapy is of limited benefit, data from case series and case reports suggest otherwise. WBRT, neurosurgery, SRS, and medical therapy each have a role in the treatment of CNS metastases; however, neurologic symptoms frequently are not fully reversible, even with appropriate therapy. Studies specifically targeted toward this group of patients are needed.

Options for the prevention and management of acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in children

The current standard of care with respect to preventing acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) in children includes the administration of a 5-HT(3) antagonist with or without a corticosteroid, depending on the emetogenicity of the chemotherapy to be given. Problems in assessing the emetogenicity of chemotherapy regimens and nausea severity in children may influence the degree of success of CINV prophylaxis. Nevertheless, the majority of children who receive chemotherapy today experience moderate to complete control of acute CINV when given appropriate antiemetic prophylaxis. If children vomit or experience nausea despite appropriate prophylaxis, then measures must be taken to treat these symptoms since these children are likely to go on to experience delayed or anticipatory CINV. However, appropriate selection of interventions to treat acute CINV in children is limited by the lack of rigorous evidence to support one approach over another. Lorazepam is suggested as an immediate agent for the treatment of acute CINV. Doses and frequencies of the 5-HT(3) antagonist and corticosteroid administered for initial prophylaxis should also be maximized. Further treatment must be tailored to the circumstances and preferences of each child and family. Options include crossover to another 5-HT(3) antagonist, or administration of an adjunctive antiemetic such as metopimazine, low dose metoclopramide, domperidone, alizapride, nabilone, scopolamine, prochlorperazine, or chlorpromazine. Complementary interventions such as acupuncture, hypnosis, counseling, or ginger may also be of benefit. Further study is required to establish optimal antiemetic strategies in children.

Antiemetic effect of dexamethasone on cisplatin-induced early and delayed emesis in the pigeon

We investigated the ability of dexamethasone to attenuate cisplatin (4 mg/kg, i.v.)-induced early and delayed emesis. These appear within the first 8-h period (early phase) and between 8 and 48 h (delayed phase), respectively, after cisplatin administration in the pigeon. Dexamethasone (0.1 and 1 mg/kg, i.m.) reduced significantly the number of emetic responses to cisplatin by 56% and 82% (P<0.05), respectively, in the early phase, and by 41% and 66% (P<0.05), respectively, in the delayed phase. Dexamethasone (1 and 10 microg/kg, i.c.v.) reduced the number of emetic responses by 66% and 91% (P<0.05), respectively, in the early phase, and by 56% and 87% (P<0.05), respectively, in the delayed phase. Indomethacin (10 mg/kg, i.m.) did not suppress cisplatin-induced early and delayed emesis. Dexamethasone (1 mg/kg, i.m.) did not affect the content of platinum in the medulla oblongata after cisplatin administration. The above results suggest that dexamethasone has antiemetic effects on both the early and delayed emetic responses to cisplatin in pigeons, partially via its central site of action, and that the antiemetic mechanism of dexamethasone is related to factors other than its inhibition of prostanoid synthesis or its membrane stabilizing effect which reduces influx of cisplatin into the medulla oblongata.

The role of chemotherapy in brain metastases

Despite the widely held belief of the resistance to chemotherapy of brain metastases, central nervous system metastases of a malignancy are equally sensitive to chemotherapy as its metastases elsewhere in the body. This is due to the fact that the blood-brain barrier is disrupted in contrast enhancing brain metastases, and does not limit the response to chemotherapy. Therefore, the response rate of the primary tumour. Up-front chemotherapeutic treatment instead of radiotherapy of brain metastases should therefore be based on the chemosensitivity of the primary tumor to the used regimen, and not on the question whether the used agent penetrates an intact blood-brain barrier. First-line chemotherapy for brain metastases or with only minor neurological signs and symptoms, and who have an indication for systematic chemotherapy for metastases elsewhere in the body. In contrast, central nervous system micrometastases may hide behind an intact barrier, and this may be clinically relevant in patients that can be cured with chemotherapy (like in small cell lung cancer). Cytochrome P450 3A4 inducing anti-epileptic drugs like phenytoin, carbamazepine and phenobarbital may significantly increase the metabolism of many chemotherapeutic agents like CPT11 and paclitaxel (but also of newer biological agents like many tyrosine kinase inhibitors). These anti-epileptic drugs should be avoided in patients requiring chemotherapy with agents metabolised through the cytochrome P450.

Medical decompressive therapy for primary and metastatic intracranial tumours

Medical decompressive therapy (MDT) with corticosteroids and mannitol is often used in patients with primary or metastatic brain tumours. This review highlights the lack of sound evidence regarding the indications and dosage schedule of steroids, prolonged use of which may cause debilitating complications. The available evidence supports the short-term use of MDT for raised intracranial pressure or progressive neurological deficits, but in the absence of these symptoms, MDT is not recommended for stable focal deficits, abnormal higher mental functions, seizures, or as prophylaxis during cranial irradiation. A practical stepladder guideline (based on symptom severity) is proposed with a starting daily dexamethasone dose of 6 mg for non-severe headache and or vomiting; 12 mg for progressive focal neurological deficit with or without non-severe headache or vomiting; and 24 mg dexamethasone with mannitol for severe headache, vomiting, or altered consciousness. Depending on the clinical response, dose can be increased to the next step(s) or tapered every 48 h (more slowly in patients who are dependent on steroids). A scheme for the assessment of efficacy and toxicity prevention is also proposed. The proposed guidelines may be used as a template for further clinical research.

Cytotoxic chemotherapy: advances in delivery, pharmacology, and testing

Adjuvant treatment of malignant gliomas, the most common types of primary brain tumors, with intravenous (iv) chemotherapy has not significantly improved survival for patients with these forms of cancer. A major factor in the failure of iv chemotherapy is the blood-brain barrier (BBB), a physiologic impediment to the delivery of cytotoxic chemotherapeutic drugs to the central nervous system (CNS). Intra-arterial and intrathecal infusion, blood-brain barrier disruption, high-dose chemotherapy, intratumoral administration, and convection-enhanced delivery are methods developed to overcome the BBB. Although some of these methods may increase the local concentration-time profile, improvement in clinical outcomes has yet to be definitively established. New methods for assessment of drug delivery to the brain tumor will assume increasing importance in the study of new cytotoxic chemotherapeutic drugs for these types of cancer. Pharmacokinetic studies are critical components of these clinical trials and allow assessment of drug delivery to the CNS and brain tumor. Additionally, pharmacokinetic studies will remain an important component of early clinical trials, particularly for identifying significant drug interactions involving the various supporting medications that are typically used in this patient population.

The accumulation of topotecan in 9L glioma and in brain parenchyma with and without dexamethasone administration

The accumulation of the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan in brain tumor as well as in brain around tumor (BAT) and normal brain following an intravenous bolus of topotecan of 0.5 mg/kg was investigated in rats bearing a 9L glioma. Also the influence of dexamethasone (Dex) on the uptake of topotecan was examined. Tumor, BAT and brain tissue as well as whole blood were collected at 1 h after an i.v. bolus of topotecan. Concentrations of total topotecan in tumor, BAT and brain were quantified with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and compared with concentrations in plasma of total topotecan. In brain tumor tissue the mean total topotecan concentration was 96 +/- 33 ng/g which was 20-fold higher than the accumulation of topotecan in normal brain tissue. In BAT intermediate concentrations of 13 +/- 4.9 ng/g were reached. Mean total topotecan concentration in plasma was 100 +/- 25 ng/ml. We did not find an influence of Dex on the uptake of topotecan in either tissue. We conclude that high tissue concentrations of topotecan can be reached in experimental brain tumors in rats. This observation may be useful in the design of clinical studies with topotecan.