Surgical closure of macular hole using an absorbable macular plug

Vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole

BACKGROUND

A macular hole is an anatomic opening in the retina that develops at the fovea. Macular holes can be seen in highly myopic eyes or following ocular trauma, but the great majority are idiopathic. Pars plana vitrectomy was introduced to treat full-thickness macular holes, which if left untreated have a poor prognosis since spontaneous closure and visual recovery are rare.Vitrectomy is a surgical technique involving the removal of the vitreous body that fills the eye. The surgeon inserts thin cannulas into the eyes through scleral incisions to relieve traction exerted by the vitreous or epiretinal membranes to the central retina and to induce glial tissue to bridge and close the hole.

OBJECTIVES

The primary objective of this review was to examine the effects of vitrectomy for idiopathic macular hole on visual acuity. A secondary objective was to investigate anatomic effects on hole closure and other dimensions of visual function, as well as to report on adverse effects recorded in included studies.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Group Trials Register (4 March 2015), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2015, Issue 2), Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid MEDLINE In-Process and Other Non-Indexed Citations, Ovid MEDLINE Daily, Ovid OLDMEDLINE (January 1946 to March 2015), EMBASE (January 1980 to March 2015), Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature Database (LILACS) (January 1982 to March 2015), the Web of Science Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Science (CPCI-S) (January 1980 to March 2015), the ISRCTN registry (www.isrctn.com/editAdvancedSearch), ClinicalTrials.gov (www.clinicaltrials.gov) and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (www.who.int/ictrp/search/en). We did not use any date or language restrictions in the electronic searches for trials. We last searched the electronic databases on 4 March 2015.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials comparing vitrectomy (with or without internal limiting membrane peeling) to no treatment (that is observation) for macular holes.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Two review authors independently extracted the data. We estimated best corrected visual acuity and macular hole closure at 6 to 12 months of follow-up.

MAIN RESULTS

Three studies provided data on the comparison between vitrectomy and observation in eyes with macular hole and visual acuity less than 20/50. Two studies, conducted in the USA and published in 1996 and 1997, used a similar protocol and included participants with stage II macular hole (42 eyes randomised, 36 analysed, number of participants not reported) or participants with stage III/IV hole (129 eyes of 120 participants, 115 eyes in analyses). The third study, conducted in the UK and published in 2004, included 185 eyes of 174 participants with full-thickness macular hole (41 eyes with stage II holes and 74 eyes with stage III/IV holes in analyses). Studies were of good quality for randomisation and allocation concealment, whereas visual acuity measurement was unmasked.At 6 to 12 months, visual acuity was improved by about 1.5 Snellen lines (-0.16 logMAR, 95% confidence intervals -0.23 to -0.09 logMAR, 270 eyes, moderate-quality evidence). The chances of macular hole closure at 6 to 12 months were greatly increased using vitrectomy, yielding an odds ratio of 31.4 (95% confidence intervals 14.9 to 66.3, 265 eyes, high-quality evidence; raw sum data: 76% vitrectomy, 11% observation). Vitrectomy was beneficial both in smaller (stage II) and in larger (stage III/IV) macular holes.The largest study reported that cataract surgery was needed in about half of cases at two years after operation and that retinal detachment occurred in about 5% of operated eyes.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Vitrectomy is effective in improving visual acuity, resulting in a moderate visual gain, and in achieving hole closure in people with macular hole. However, these results may not apply to modern surgery due to technological improvements in vitrectomy techniques.

Surgical management of macular holes: a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

OBJECTIVE

The document describes macular hole surgery and examines the available evidence to address questions about the efficacy of the procedure for different stages of macular hole, complications during and after surgery, and modifications to the technique.

METHODS

A literature search conducted for the years 1968 to 2000 retrieved over 400 citations that matched the search criteria. This information was reviewed by panel members and a methodologist, and it was evaluated for the quality of the evidence presented.

RESULTS

There are three multicenter, controlled, randomized trials that constitute Level I evidence and compare the value of surgery versus observation for macular hole. There are three multicenter, controlled, randomized trials studying the use of adjuvant therapy in macular hole repair. Postoperative vision of 20/40 or better has been reported in 22% to 49% of patients in randomized trials. The risks of surgical complications include retinal detachment (3%), endophthalmitis (<1%), cataract (>75%), and late reopening the hole (2% to 10%).

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence does not support surgery for patients with stage 1 holes. Level I evidence supports surgery for stage 2 holes to prevent progression to later stages of the disease and further visual loss. Level I evidence shows that surgery improves the vision in a majority of patients with stage 3 and stage 4 holes. There is no strong evidence that adjuvant therapy used at the time of surgery results in improved surgical outcomes. Patient inconvenience, patient preference, and quality of life issues have not been studied.

The macular hole: report of an Australian surgical series and meta-analysis of the literature

PURPOSE

To report an Australian series of macular hole surgery by pars plana vitrectomy and fluid-gas exchange, and to identify factors influencing the outcome of the surgery through meta-analysis of the literature.

METHODS

Fifty-six consecutive cases of macular hole were treated by pars plana vitrectomy, fluid-gas exchange and face-down positioning for at least 7 days, and prospectively followed for 3-12 months. Thirty-six reports of macular hole surgery were reviewed. A meta-analysis on the pre- and postoperative parameters was performed on 389 cases, in which case-specific data-points were available.

RESULTS

In the current series, anatomical closure was achieved in all (100%) of 16 stage 2, and in 35 (87.5%) of 40 stage 3 or 4 macular holes. At least 2 logMAR lines of improvement in visual acuity were seen in 10 (62.5%) stage 2 and 20 (50.0%) stage 3 or 4 holes. Postoperative visual acuity was 6/12 or better in 10 (62.5%) stage 2 and 17 (42.5%) stage 3 or 4 holes. In both the current series and the meta-analysis, favourable surgical outcomes were associated with stage 2 macular holes, better preoperative visual acuity, and shorter preoperative duration. Adjuvant use was associated with a higher rate of anatomical closure but there was no clear benefit in terms of postoperative visual acuity.

CONCLUSION

Our experience and the results of the meta-analysis suggest that macular hole surgery should be offered as early as possible once full-thickness neuroretinal defect occurs.

Internal limiting membrane removal in the management of full-thickness macular holes

PURPOSE

To determine the effectiveness of removal of the internal limiting membrane in the treatment of full-thickness macular holes.

METHODS

Data were reviewed from a prospective study on 47 consecutive eyes with full-thickness macular holes undergoing vitrectomy, internal limiting membrane maculorhexis, and fluid-gas exchange. No eye underwent repeat macular hole surgery. A meta-analysis was performed to compare the outcomes of different surgical techniques in the treatment of full-thickness macular holes.

RESULTS

The outcome measures were disappearance of the submacular fluid and the change in best-corrected visual acuity. The surgery was anatomically successful in 44 of the 46 eyes (96%) and 39 of the eyes (85%) showed an improvement of at least two Snellen lines. Best-corrected final vision was 20/40 in 18 (39%) eyes. No permanent complications specifically caused by the removal of the macular internal limiting membrane were detected; the minor hemorrhages and retinal edema seen in most eyes resolved spontaneously. Retinal detachment developed and was successfully treated in three eyes (7%). A meta-analysis on 1,654 eyes from published reports showed that internal limiting membrane maculorhexis appears to significantly (P <.0001) increase the anatomical and functional success rates in macular hole surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Internal limiting membrane removal is an important development in the evolving field of macular hole surgery. A randomized, prospective, multicenter clinical trial should be performed to determine which surgical technique is the most beneficial in patients with full-thickness macular holes.