Leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, and gemcitabine: a phase I study

DRSPRING: Graph convolutional network (GCN)-Based drug synergy prediction utilizing drug-induced gene expression profile

Great efforts have been made over the years to identify novel drug pairs with synergistic effects. Although numerous computational approaches have been proposed to analyze diverse types of biological big data, the pharmacogenomic profiles, presumably the most direct proxy of drug effects, have been rarely used due to the data sparsity problem. In this study, we developed a composite deep-learning-based model that predicts the drug synergy effect utilizing pharmacogenomic profiles as well as molecular properties. Graph convolutional network (GCN) was used to represent and integrate the chemical structure, genetic interactions, drug-target information, and gene expression profiles of cell lines. Insufficient amount of pharmacogenomic data, i.e., drug-induced expression profiles from the LINCS project, was resolved by augmenting the data with the predicted profiles. Our method learned and predicted the Loewe synergy score in the DrugComb database and achieved a better or comparable performance compared to other published methods in a benchmark test. We also investigated contribution of various input features, which highlighted the value of basal gene expression and pharmacogenomic profiles of each cell line. Importantly, DRSPRING (DRug Synergy PRediction by INtegrated GCN) can be applied to any drug pairs and any cell lines, greatly expanding its applicability compared to previous methods.

Chemotherapy in patients with hepatobiliary cancers and abnormal hepatic function

Sorafenib and cisplatin plus gemcitabine currently represent first-line treatment standards in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and biliary cancer, respectively. Conventional cytotoxic agents (monotherapy or combination therapy) have demonstrated activity in the second-line setting or in those in which first-line agents are contraindicated. A strategy for safe yet effective administration of such systemic therapies in patients with advanced hepatobiliary cancer and abnormal liver function needs to be strongly considered. Here, we highlight the safety and tolerability of systemic therapies routinely used for the treatment of advanced hepatobiliary cancer in patients with hepatic dysfunction. Based on data from available clinical studies, we review dosing strategies recommended for chemotherapy and targeted therapy in those with liver dysfunction. Dose modifications for many agents in this population remain empiric due to limited clinical evidence. Future dedicated phase I studies are needed to provide further dosing considerations for combination therapy in those with abnormal liver function in which data is lacking.

A phase I trial of gemcitabine, S-1 and LV combination (GSL) therapy in advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

In our previous randomized controlled trial, the addition of S-1 to gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer did not prolong overall survival (OS) significantly, despite its higher response rate and longer progression-free survival (PFS). Leucovorin is known to enhance efficacy of S-1, and we conducted this phase I trial of combination therapy of gemcitabine, S-1 and leucovorin (GSL).

METHODS

Patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who had received no prior chemotherapy were eligible for this study. Gemcitabine was administered at an escalating dose of 600, 800 and 1,000 mg/m(2) over 30 min on day 1, and oral S-1 at a dose of 40 mg/m(2) twice daily and oral leucovorin at a dose of 25 mg twice daily on days 1-7, every 2 weeks. A standard "3 + 3" phase I dose escalation design was utilized.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients were enrolled across three dose levels. Three patients developed DLTs: two patients in level 1 (grade 3 anorexia in 1 and grade 3 anorexia, stomatitis and diarrhea in 1) and one patient in level 2 (grade 3 deep vein thrombosis). No DLT was observed in level 3. Response rate and the disease control rate were 33 and 93 %, respectively. The median PFS and OS were 5.4 and 16.6 months. Ten of 12 patients (83 %) with elevated CA19-9 at baseline had a ≥ 50 % decline.

CONCLUSIONS

RD of gemcitabine in GSL was determined as 1,000 mg/m(2). GSL was well tolerable and showed promising results in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Multicenter, randomized phase II trial of bevacizumab plus folinic acid, fluorouracil, gemcitabine (FFG) versus bevacizumab plus folinic acid, fluorouracil, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) as first-line therapy for patients with advanced colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

To assess safety and efficacy of folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, gemcitabine (FFG) and folinic acid, fluorouracil, oxaliplatin (FOLFOX4) regimens with added bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with advanced colorectal cancer (CRC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with Stage III unresectable or Stage IV adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum were randomly assigned to either FFG weekly for 6 weeks of an 8-week cycle or FOLFOX4 every 2 weeks. After FDA approval, bevacizumab 5 mg/kg was added every 2 weeks. Treatment continued until disease progression. Planned enrollment was 190 patients. Primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included evaluation of adverse events, time to progression (TTP), and overall survival (OS). Disease Control Rate (DCR; % of patients with complete or partial responses or stable disease) was a post hoc analysis.

RESULTS

The trial was stopped prematurely due to low enrollment. Of 84 enrolled patients (42 to each arm), 36 patients (18 in each arm) received bevacizumab. ORR was greater (P = .002) for FOLFOX4 (17/42; 40.5%) than for FFG (4/42; 9.5%); however, TTP, OS, and DCR results were not statistically different comparing FOLFOX4 and FFG. Peripheral neuropathy was more frequent (P = <.001) with FOLFOX4 (18/42; 42.9%) than with FFG (1/42; 2.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

FFG and FOLFOX4 were generally well tolerated. Based on ORR, FOLFOX4 was superior to FFG. However, differences in TTP and OS comparing regimens were inconclusive. General use of gemcitabine as a biomodulator of 5-fluorouracil in CRC cannot be recommended at this time and the regimen remains investigational.

Zoledronic acid determines S-phase arrest but fails to induce apoptosis in cholangiocarcinoma cells

Cholangiocarcinoma is the second most common primary hepatic neoplasia and the only curative therapy is surgical resection or liver transplantation. Biphosphonates (BPs) are an emerging class of drugs widely used to treat bone diseases and also appear to possess direct antitumor activity. In two human cholangiocarcinoma cell lines (TFK-1 and EGI-1) we investigated, for the first time, the activity of zoledronic acid by determining proliferation, cell cycle analysis and apoptosis. The results obtained indicate that zoledronic acid induces cell-narrowing and growth inhibition, both reversed by 25 microM GGOH, and significantly affects the colony-forming ability of these cells. The inhibition by zoledronic acid of Rap1A prenylation was reversed in cell co-treated with GGOH. At 10-50 microM zoledronic acid exerted an S-phase cell cycle arrest which was confirmed by changes in the level of cyclins and of regulators p27(KIP1) and pRb. Interestingly, the expression level of cyclin A (putative S-phase marker) shows a dose-dependent increment in contrast to the decrement of cyclin D1 (putative G1 phase marker). However, neither hypodiploid cells nor cleaved PARP or caspase-3 was detected. The lack of TP53 or loss of its function, the large constitutive expressions of anti-apoptotic proteins Bcl-xL and HSP27 together with the low level of the pro-apoptotic Bax are the likely factors which protect cells from apoptosis. In conclusion, our study indicates that zoledronic acid induces S-phase arrest and cell-narrowing, both reversed by GGOH and, by changing the delicate balance between pro- and anti-apoptotic proteins, allows survival of cholangiocarcinoma cells.

Chemotherapy for advanced cholangiocarcinoma: what is standard treatment?

Cholangiocarcinoma is a relatively uncommon malignancy, that presents late in the vast majority of cases. Overall survival rates are extremely poor and treatment options remain limited in patients with inoperable, recurrent or metastatic disease. Systemic chemotherapy has historically had little impact on the natural history of this disease, owing to both the absence of agents with substantial activity and the overall morbidity of treatment in this patient population. Response rates with 5-fluorouracil have been 10% at best, with a median survival of 6 months. However, there has been interest in the use of newer cytotoxic drugs and combination regimens in advanced cholangiocarcinoma, and Phase II trials have reported much improved results. This review examines this data and assesses whether a new standard of care for advanced cholangiocarcinoma can be found.

A Phase II study of capecitabine combined with gemcitabine in patients with advanced gallbladder carcinoma

Capecitabine and gemcitabine are used in the treatment of a variety of solid tumors including pancreatic and biliary tract carcinomas. The authors evaluated survival, response, and toxicity associated with using a combination of capecitabine and gemcitabine to treat patients with unresectable or metastatic gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBC). Eligible patients had histologically- or cytologically-confirmed GBC, no prior systemic therapy with capecitabine or gemcitabine, Karnofsky Performance Status 70%, serum total bilirubin up to three times normal, and measurable disease. Treatment consisted of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 IV on Days 1 and 8 concurrent with administration of capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 PO BID on Days 1 through 14, on a 3-week cycle. Tumor response was assessed by the response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST criteria) and survival was calculated from initiation of CapGem therapy. A total of 24 patients were enrolled. Median age at the time of diagnosis was 62 years (range, 41-78 years). Fourteen patients had undergone prior surgery. Results showed that eight patients achieved partial response (33%) with an additional 10 patients achieving stable disease (42%). The overall median time to disease progression was 6.0 months (95% CI, 3.8-8.1 months) and overall survival was 16 months (95% CI, 13.8-18.3 months). The one-year survival rate was 58%. No Grade 4 toxicity was seen. Transient Grade 3 neutropenia/ thrombocytopenia and manageable nausea, hand-foot syndrome and anorexia were the most common toxicities. Our study shows that CapGem is an active and well-tolerated chemotherapy regimen in patients with advanced GBC.

Raltitrexed plus Gemcitabine (TOMGEM) in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

OBJECTIVES

This multicenter phase II study was designed to determine the activity and tolerance of gemcitabine and raltitrexed in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-three chemonaive patients with measurable disease received the TOMGEM regimen consisting of Raltitrexed 3 mg/m(2) in 15 min followed by Gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) in 30 min on day 1, Gemcitabine alone 1,000 mg/m(2) on day 8 and repeated on day 21.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients (median age: 62; locally advanced/metastatic disease: 5/28) were enrolled; the total number of cycles administered was 173 (median: 4). There were 10 partial response (confirmed), 2 stable disease (SD) >/=24 weeks, 7 SD <24 weeks, and 14 progressive disease for a response rate of 30.3% (95% CI: 14-46%); a clinical benefit was observed in 8/30 patients assessed (30%); median duration of response was 9.1 months. National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria grade III or IV neutropenia/thrombocytopenia were observed in 42 and 12% of the patients, respectively. Relevant nonhematological toxicities (grade III-IV) were rare although one toxic death was observed. Median time to progression was 2.8 months; one-year survival was 21%; median survival was 4.7 months.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that the combination of raltitrexed/gemcitabine is a very convenient regimen with an acceptable toxicity, and is active in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Ribonucleotide activation by enzyme ribonucleotide reductase: understanding the role of the enzyme

This article focuses on the first step of the catalytic mechanism for the reduction of ribonucleotides catalyzed by the enzyme Ribonucleotide Reductase (RNR). This corresponds to the activation of the substrate. In this work a large model of the active site region involving 130 atoms was used instead of the minimal gas phase models used in previous works. The ONIOM method was employed to deal with such a large system. The results gave additional information, which previous small models could not provide, allowing a much clearer evaluation of the role of the enzyme in this step. Enzyme-substrate interaction energies, specific transition state stabilization, and substrate steric strain energies were obtained. It was concluded that the transition state is stabilized in 4.0 kcal/mol by specific enzyme-substrate interactions. However, this stabilization is cancelled by the cost in conformational energy for the enzyme to adopt the transition state geometry; the overall result is that the enzyme machinery does not lead to a rate enhancement in this step. It was also found that the substrate binds to the active site with almost no steric strain, emphasizing the complementarity and specificity of the RNR active site for nucleotide binding. The main role of the enzyme at the very beginning of the catalytic cycle was concluded to be to impose stereospecifity upon substrate activation and to protect the enzyme radical from the solvent, rather than to be an reaction rate enhancement.

Neoadjuvant induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation: a phase I trial of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil for advanced pancreatic/gastrointestinal malignancies

The authors developed a strategy that includes a novel approach of induction full-dose chemotherapy followed by traditional chemoradiation as a neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer. Here they report the results of a phase I/II trial of gemcitabine, cisplatin, and 5-FU for patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies.

A novel biweekly multidrug regimen of gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and folinic acid (FA) in pretreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma

Previous results suggest that GEM affects 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) metabolism and pharmacokinetics in cancer patients, while combined with oxaliplatin, levo-folinic acid, and 5-FU (GOLF regimen), at doses achievable in cancer patients, determines high cytotoxic and proapoptotic antitumour activity in colon cancer cells in vitro. On these bases we designed a phase I-II clinical trial testing the GOLF regimen in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma, who had received at least a prior line of chemotherapy. In total, 29 patients (20 males and nine females) enrolled in the study received every 2 weeks, gemcitabine (patients #1-3 received 600 mg m(-2); patients # 4-6 received 850 mg m(-2); while patients # 7-29 received 1000 mg m(-2)) on the day 1, levo-folinic acid (100 mg m(-2)) on the days 1 and 2; 5-fluorouracil (400 mg m(-2)) in bolus injection, followed by a 22-h continuous infusion (800 mg m(-2)) on the days 1 and 2, and oxaliplatin (85 mg m(-2)), 6 h after the 5-FU bolus on day 2. The most frequent side effect was grade I-II haematological toxicity. In total, 28 patients were evaluable for response: three achieved a complete response, nine a partial response, 10 had a stable disease, and six progressed. The average time to progression and overall survival of the patients was, respectively, 7.26 and 22 months. Our GOLF combination is well tolerated and seems promising for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

Gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil, and leucovorin in advanced biliary tract and gallbladder carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine has broad activity in a variety of solid tumors including biliary tract carcinomas. The authors evaluated 6-month survival, response, and toxicity associated with a combination of gemcitabine, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), and leucovorin (LV) in patients with unresectable or metastatic biliary tract or gallbladder adenocarcinoma (ACA).

METHODS

A 4-week course included 1000 mg/m2 gemcitabine by intravenous infusion over 30 minutes on Days 1, 8, and 15, 25 mg/m2 LV by intravenous push, and 600 mg/m2 5-FU by intravenous push after LV.

RESULTS

Forty-two patients were enrolled in 6 months, 35 of whom had metastatic disease. Patients with biliary tract ACA included 24 with hepatic disease (19 patients had intrahepatic disease and 5 patients had extrahepatic disease) and 4 with disease in the ampulla of Vater. All patients were evaluable and received a median of 4 courses of treatment (range, 1-21 courses). Commonly occurring severe toxicity (NCI CTC Grade 3 or worse) included: dyspnea (four patients), nausea (four patients), fatigue (seven patients), thrombocytopenia (six patients), emesis (four patients), and diarrhea (four patients). Five partial responses (9.5%) occurred, 3 of which were sustained for > or = 8 weeks. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Thirty-two patients had disease progression and 38 died after a median follow-up of 20 months (range, 1.4-24 months). The median time to disease progression was 4.6 months (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 2.4-6.6%). The median survival period was 9.7 months (95% CI, 7-12%).

CONCLUSIONS

This combination regimen was manageable in patients with advanced biliary tract and gallbladder ACA. Of 42 patients, 24 (57%) survived > or = 6 months, satisfying the primary end point of the trial. The length of survival suggested that gemcitabine, 5-FU, and LV had benefit equivalent to gemcitabine alone.

Phase III study of gemcitabine in combination with fluorouracil versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial E2297

PURPOSE

Gemcitabine is generally considered to constitute first-line therapy for pancreatic cancer. To determine whether the addition of fluorouracil (5-FU) improves on the results from single-agent gemcitabine, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) compared gemcitabine plus bolus 5-FU with gemcitabine alone for patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This trial involved patients with biopsy-proven, advanced carcinoma of the pancreas not amenable to surgical resection. Patients were randomized to receive either gemcitabine alone (1,000 mg/m(2)/wk) weekly for 3 weeks of every 4 or to receive gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2)/wk) followed by 5-FU (600 mg/m(2)/wk) weekly on the same schedule. The primary end point of the trial was survival, with secondary end points of time to progression and response rate.

RESULTS

Of 327 patients enrolled over 18 months, 322 were eligible. Overall, the median survival was 5.4 months for gemcitabine alone and 6.7 months for gemcitabine plus 5-FU (P =.09). Progression-free survival for gemcitabine alone was 2.2 months, compared with 3.4 months for gemcitabine plus 5-FU (P =.022). Objective responses were uncommon and were observed in only 5.6% of patients treated with gemcitabine and 6.9% of patients treated with gemcitabine plus 5-FU. Most toxicities were hematologic or gastrointestinal; no significant differences were noted between the two treatment arms.

CONCLUSION

5-FU, administered in conjunction with gemcitabine, did not improve the median survival of patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma compared with single-agent gemcitabine. Further studies with other combinations of gemcitabine and 5-FU are not compelling, and clinical trial resources should address other combinations and novel agents.

A combination of a fixed dose rate infusion of gemcitabine associated to a bolus 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer, a report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD)

BACKGROUND

Laboratory evidences suggest the possibility that an infusion rate of 10 mg/m2/min may be more effective than the standard 30-min infusion of Gemcitabine (GEM).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-four patients with histologically verified locally unresectable and/or metastatic pancreatic carcinoma received GEM at the dose of 1,500 mg/m2 with an infusion rate of 10 mg/m2/min, associated to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) at the dose of 600 mg/m2. Both drugs were administered weekly for two consecutive weeks out of every three weeks.

RESULTS

One complete and five partial responses have been observed for an overall response rate of 17% (95% CI: 3%-27%). The time to progression was 3.7 months with a median survival of 5.7 months. A clinical benefit was obtained in 5 of 29 patients (17%). Grade 3-4 WHO toxicities included neutropenia (35%) and thrombocytopenia (10%).

CONCLUSION

It is unlikely that a fixed dose rate infusion of GEM, at least with this dose, can improve palliation in comparison with the standard 30-min infusion schedule in advanced pancreatic cancer.