Stenosis quantification from post-stenotic signal loss in phase-contrast MRA datasets of flow phantoms and renal arteries

Abdominal Magnetic Resonance Angiography

MR imaging hardware and software improvements have led to new applications for contrast-enhanced and noncontrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in the abdomen and pelvis. Higher magnetic field strength MR imaging scanners have greater signal-to-noise ratio and contrast-to-noise ratio, which is used to improve spatial resolution or temporal resolution for these techniques. New noncontrast-enhanced sequences offer high-resolution magnetic resonance angiography without contrast and provide additional hemodynamic information. Magnetic resonance angiography is particularly well suited to imaging patients with chronic mesenteric ischemia, renal vascular disease, pelvic congestion syndrome, and vascular malformations.

Effects of contour propagation and background corrections in different MRI flow software packages

Background

Velocity-encoded magnetic resonance imaging (VENC-MRI) is a commonly used technique in cardiac examinations. This technique utilizes the phase shift properties of protons moving along a magnetic field gradient. VENC-MRI offers a unique way of measuring the severity of valve regurgitation by directly quantifying the regurgitation flow volume.

Purpose

To compare flow analysis results of different software programs and to assess the effect of background correction in sample patient cases.

Material and Methods

A phantom was built out of Polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) which provides tubes of different diameters. These tubes can be connected to an external water circuit to generate a water flow inside the tubes. Expected absolute flow quantities inside the tubes were determined from preset tube- and flow-parameters. Different flow conditions were measured with a VENC-MRI sequence and the images evaluated using different software packages. In a second step six randomly selected patients showing different degrees of aortic insufficiency were evaluated in clinical terms.

Results

The contour propagation algorithms used in the software packages performed differently even on static phantom geometry. In terms of clinical evaluation the software packages performed similarly. Enabling background correction or leaving out manual correction of propagated contours changed results for severity of aortic insufficiency.

Conclusion

Turning on background correction and manual correction of propagated contours in MRI flow volume measurements is strongly recommended.

Renal arteries: isotropic, high-spatial-resolution, unenhanced MR angiography with three-dimensional radial phase contrast

PURPOSE

To prospectively compare a new three-dimensional (3D) radial phase-contrast magnetic resonance (MR) angiographic method with contrast material-enhanced MR angiography for anatomic assessment of the renal arteries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An institutional review board approved this prospective HIPAA-compliant study. Informed consent was obtained. Twenty-seven subjects (mean age, 52.6 years ± 20.5 [standard deviation]) were imaged with respiratory-gated phase-contrast vastly undersampled isotropic projection reconstruction (VIPR) prior to contrast-enhanced MR angiographic acquisition with a 3.0-T clinical system. The imaging duration for phase-contrast VIPR was 10 minutes and provided magnitude and complex difference ("angiographic") images with 3D volumetric (320 mm) coverage and isotropic high spatial resolution (1.25 mm(3)). Quantitative analysis consisted of comparing vessel diameters between the two techniques. Qualitative assessment included evaluation of the phase-contrast VIPR and contrast-enhanced MR angiographic techniques for artifacts, noise, and image quality. Bland-Altman analysis was used for comparison of quantitative measurements, and the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for comparison of qualitative scores.

RESULTS

Phase-contrast VIPR images were successfully acquired in all subjects. The vessel diameters measured with phase-contrast VIPR were slightly greater than those measured with contrast-enhanced MR angiography (mean bias = 0.09 mm). Differences in mean artifact, quality scores for the proximal renal arteries, and overall image quality scores between phase-contrast VIPR and contrast-enhanced MR angiographic techniques were not statistically significant (P = .31 and .29, .27 and .39, and .43 and .69 for readers 1 and 2, respectively). The quality scores for the segmental renal arteries were higher for phase-contrast VIPR than for contrast-enhanced MR angiography (P < .05). Although the noise scores were higher with phase-contrast VIPR than with contrast-enhanced MR angiography and were statistically significant (P < .05), the presence of noise did not interfere with the ability to interpret the images.

CONCLUSION

Isotropic, high-spatial-resolution, unenhanced MR angiography of the renal arteries is feasible with 3D radial undersampling.

Renal MR angiography

The high accuracy of renal MR angiography makes it well suited for diagnosing renal vascular disease. A comprehensive examination includes three-dimensional gadolinium MR angiography to assess lumenal anatomy and functional techniques to assess the hemodynamic significance of any stenosis identified. Postprocessing is critical to provide reformations, maximum intensity projections, and optional volume-rendered images to display arteries in an angiographic format for optimal demonstration of any vascular lesions. It is important to review source images to avoid missing pathologic findings. As MR imaging continues to develop, the renal MR angiography examination will likely expand to include extensive functional information about creatinine clearance, flow, and response to pharmacologic agents as well as spectroscopy, diffusion, perfusion, phase contrast, and other techniques.

Current awareness

In order to keep subscribers up-to-date with the latest developments in their field, John Wiley & Sons are providing a current awareness service in each issue of the journal. The bibliography contains newly published material in the field of NMR in biomedicine. Each bibliography is divided into 9 sections: 1 Books, Reviews ' Symposia; 2 General; 3 Technology; 4 Brain and Nerves; 5 Neuropathology; 6 Cancer; 7 Cardiac, Vascular and Respiratory Systems; 8 Liver, Kidney and Other Organs; 9 Muscle and Orthopaedic. Within each section, articles are listed in alphabetical order with respect to author. If, in the preceding period, no publications are located relevant to any one of these headings, that section will be omitted.