Four-day infusion of fluorouracil plus vinorelbine as salvage treatment of heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer

Redefining the Incidence and Profile of Fluoropyrimidine-Associated Cardiotoxicity in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aim: The cardiac toxicity that occurs during administration of anti-tumor agents has attracted increasing concern. Fluoropyrimidines have been used for more than half a century, but their cardiotoxicity has not been well clarified. In this study, we aimed to assess the incidence and profile of fluoropyrimidine-associated cardiotoxicity (FAC) comprehensively based on literature data. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases and clinical trials on studies investigating FAC. The main outcome was a pooled incidence of FAC, and the secondary outcome was specific treatment-related cardiac AEs. Random or fixed effects modeling was used for pooled meta-analyses according to the heterogeneity assessment. PROSPERO registration number: (CRD42021282155). Results: A total of 211 studies involving 63,186 patients were included, covering 31 countries or regions in the world. The pooled incidence of FAC, by meta-analytic, was 5.04% for all grades and 1.5% for grade 3 or higher. A total of 0.29% of patients died due to severe cardiotoxicities. More than 38 cardiac AEs were identified, with cardiac ischemia (2.24%) and arrhythmia (1.85%) being the most frequent. We further performed the subgroup analyses and meta-regression to explore the source of heterogeneity, and compare the cardiotoxicity among different study-level characteristics, finding that the incidence of FAC varied significantly among different publication decades, country/regions, and genders. Patients with esophagus cancer had the highest risk of FAC (10.53%), while breast cancer patients had the lowest (3.66%). The treatment attribute, regimen, and dosage were significantly related to FAC. When compared with chemotherapeutic drugs or targeted agents, such a risk was remarkably increased (χ2 = 10.15, p < 0.01; χ2 = 10.77, p < 0.01). The continuous 5-FU infusion for 3–5 consecutive days with a high dosage produced the highest FAC incidence (7.3%) compared with other low-dose administration patterns. Conclusions: Our study provides comprehensive global data on the incidence and profile of FAC. Different cancer types and treatment appear to have varying cardiotoxicities. Combination therapy, high cumulative dose, addition of anthracyclines, and pre-existing heart disease potentially increase the risk of FAC.

Salvage Treatment with Epirubicin and/or Paclitaxel in Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients Relapsed after High-dose Chemotherapy with Peripheral Blood Progenitor Cells

Aims and Background

To evaluate feasibility and efficacy of paclitaxel as a single agent or in combination with epirubicin in breast cancer taxane-naive patients who have failed previous high-dose chemotherapy.

Methods

Since February 1995, we have treated 32 patients in first relapse or progression after high-dose chemotherapy. Nineteen patients had metastatic breast cancer, 12 more than 3 involved axillary lymph nodes, and 1 inflammatory breast cancer at inclusion to the program. The median time to relapse after high-dose chemotherapy was 12 months (range, 2-43). At relapse, 12 patients were treated with epirubicin (90 mg/m2) plus paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) administered on day 1 every 21 days. In 20 patients who had previously received more than 350 mg/m2 of a cumulative dose of epirubicin and in one patient pretreated with chemotherapy containing mitoxantrone, we employed paclitaxel (175 mg/m2) alone. A median number of five courses was administered (range, 2-10).

Results

The overall response rate after 3 courses (29 of 32 patients were assessable) was 55% and after 6 courses (21 of 32 patients were assessable) was 57%. The median time to progression was 7 months (95% CI, 5.7-9.2), and median survival was 27.5 months (95% CI, 17.8-37.0). Toxicity was recorded for 180 cycles (epirubicin + paclitaxel for 62 cycles and paclitaxel alone for 118 cycles). The main toxicity in both regimens was hematologic. We observed WHO grade 3-4 neutropenia (in 8 patients, 25%), for which G-CSF (5 μg/kg/day sc) was employed. WHO grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia occurred in 2 patients (6%) and WHO grade 3 anemia in 1 patient (3%).

Conclusions

Our study showed that paclitaxel (alone or in combination with epirubicin) is feasible as salvage treatment in heavily pretreated patients.

Preoperative radio-chemotherapy in early breast cancer patients: long-term results of a phase II trial

PURPOSE

This phase II trial aimed to investigate the efficacy of concurrent radio- (RT) and chemotherapy (CT) in the preoperative setting for operable, non-metastatic breast cancer (BC) not amenable to initial breast-conserving surgery (BCS).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2001 to 2003, 59 women were included. CT consisted of four cycles of 5-FU, 500 mg/m(2)/d, continuous infusion (d1-d5) and vinorelbine, 25 mg/m(2) (d1 and d6). Starting concurrently with the second cycle, RT delivered 50 Gy to the breast and 46 Gy to the internal mammary and supra/infra-clavicular areas. Breast surgery and lymph node dissection were then performed. Adjuvant treatment consisted of a 16 Gy boost to the tumor bed after BCS, FEC (four cycles of fluorouracil 500 mg/m(2), cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m(2), and epirubicin 100 mg/m(2), d1; d21) for pN1-3 and hormone-therapy for positive hormone receptors BC.

RESULTS

The in-breast pathological complete response rate was 27%. BCS was performed in 41 (69%) pts. Overall and distant-disease free survivals at 5 years were respectively 88% [95% CI 80-98] and 83% [95% CI 74-93] whereas locoregional and local controls were 90% [95% CI 82-97] and 97% [95% CI 92-100]. Late toxicity (CTCAE-V3) was assessed in 51 pts (86%) with a median follow-up of 7 years [5-8]. Four (8%) experienced at least one grade III toxicities (one telangectasia and three fibroses). Cosmetic results, assessed in 35 of the 41 pts (85%) who retained their breasts, were poor in four pts (11%).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative concurrent administration of RT and CT is an effective regimen. Long-term toxicity is moderate. This association deserves further evaluations in prospective trials.

Cost Effectiveness of Ixabepilone Plus Capecitabine for Metastatic Breast Cancer Progressing After Anthracycline and Taxane Treatment

Purpose

Using data from a recent randomized trial, we evaluated the cost effectiveness of ixabepilone plus capecitabine versus capecitabine alone in patients with predominantly metastatic breast cancer considered to be taxane-resistant and previously treated with or resistant to an anthracycline.

Methods

We developed a stochastic decision-analytic model to represent data collected in the trial on medical resource use, health-related quality of life, and clinical outcomes. Estimates of overall survival were conditional on level of tumor response. We assigned monthly costs and utility weights according to periods defined by the duration of study treatment, time from discontinuation of the study drug until disease progression, and from progression until death and were specific to the level of response and receipt of subsequent therapy. Medical resources were valued in 2008 US dollars. We performed Monte Carlo simulations and sensitivity analyses to evaluate model uncertainty.

Results

Overall survival was significantly associated with level of tumor response (P < .001). Total costs were estimated at $60,900 for patients receiving ixabepilone plus capecitabine and $30,000 for patients receiving capecitabine alone. The estimated gain in life expectancy with ixabepilone was 1.96 months (95% CI, 1.36 to 2.64 months); the estimated gain in quality-adjusted survival was 1.06 months (95% CI, 0.09 to 2.03 months). The resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $359,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (95% CI, $183,000 to $4,030,000). In sensitivity analyses, the results were robust to changes in numerous inputs and assumptions.

Conclusion

Addition of ixabepilone to capecitabine adds approximately $31,000 to overall medical costs and affords approximately 1 additional month of quality-adjusted survival.

Results of a phase I trial of intravenous vinorelbine plus oral capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy of metastatic breast cancer

The management of metastatic breast cancer becomes increasingly intricate, requiring new drugs and combinations. We present here the results of a phase I study evaluating the maximal tolerated dose of vinorelbine combined with capecitabine as first-line chemotherapy. Vinorelbine was administered intravenously on days 1 and 15, and capecitabine was given orally twice daily from day 1 to 14 (three cycles every 21 days). Three out of six patients receiving vinorelbine at 25mg/m2/day and capecitabine at 2000 mg/m2/day presented with a dose-limiting toxicity, consisting of protracted grade 3 neutropenia, hand-foot syndrome and/or liver test disturbances. Despite of a dose reduction in vinorelbine (20mg/m2/day), one patient among four developed a dose-limiting febrile neutropenia. This regimen cannot be recommended as first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. These findings are not in agreement with previous publications of this schedule, or with promising results using both drugs orally.

Methods of joint evaluation of efficacy and toxicity in phase II clinical trials

Phase II clinical trials in oncology are usually conducted to evaluate the anti-tumor effect. Because phase I trials are small studies, the maximum tolerated dose of a new drug may not be precisely established and the recommended dose used may lead to excessive toxicity. We investigate the methods proposed by Conaway-Petroni and Bryant-Day allowing early termination of phase II clinical trials and based on joint evaluation of treatment efficacy and safety. Both study designs are computed to minimize the expected accrual under the null hypothesis. As two criteria are considered, the null hypothesis is an area. Each method defines two specific type I error risks. Bryant-Day demonstrate that response and toxicity may be considered as independent (Phi=1). We compare the properties of these two methods with exact calculation according to objective criteria and present one example from a study conducted in France. The two methods differ with regard to the definition of the risks and the assumption of independence. They are similar in terms of expected accruals when Phi=1. Deviations from the assumption of independence induce minor consequences on the type I error risks when the constraint on the type II error risk is less than 15%. Choosing Phi has a minimal impact on expected accrual. Finally, one type I error risk (alpha00) defined by Conaway-Petroni dramatically increases in the case of deviation from the assumption made on Phi. Due to its robustness in relation to a deviation from the independence assumption, we recommend the use of the Bryant-Day method in clinical practice.

Pathological response to preoperative concurrent chemo-radiotherapy for breast cancer: results of a phase II study

This study evaluated, in terms of pathological complete response (pCR) and acute toxicity, preoperative concurrent (5-fluorouracil (5-FU)-vinorelbine) chemoradiotherapy for large breast cancers. A total of 60 women were included in the study. Chemotherapy consisted of 4 cycles of 5-FU, 500 mg/m2/d, continuous infusion (d1-d5) and vinorelbine, 25 mg/m2 (d1; d6). Starting with the second cycle, radiotherapy delivered 50 Gy to the breast and 46 Gy to the internal mammary and supra/infra-clavicular lymph nodes. Breast surgery and axillary lymph node dissection were then performed. Four patients did not complete their chemotherapy. Breast conservation was possible in 69% of patients. The rate of pCR was 27%. Three factors were associated with pCR: histological grade 3, absence of hormonal receptors and high mitotic index. Grade 4 haematological toxicity occurred in 22% of patients. In conclusion, chemoradiotherapy demonstrated good efficacy, both in terms of pCR and in allowing breast conservation with acceptable tolerance.

Vinorelbine in the management of breast cancer: New perspectives, revived role in the era of targeted therapy

Vinorelbine is a semi-synthetic vinca alkaloid that has been shown active in many tumour types and is currently registered for the treatment of advanced breast cancer (ABC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This agent has a generally favourable safety profile, and may be suitable for use in special populations such as the elderly and/or frail patient. However, with the taxanes firmly established as standard second line treatment for ABC after failure of an anthracycline, vinorelbine has been generally relegated for use as third line therapy, in competition with the oral compound capecitabine. More recently, the exciting results observed with the combination of vinorelbine and trastuzumab in patients with Her-2 overexpressing/amplified tumours, as well as the development of a reliable formulation and revised schedule of oral vinorelbine with proven activity in ABC appear to have revived the interest in this compound in the management of this disease. There are still a number of unanswered questions that will have to be addressed by properly designed, adequately powered randomised clinical trials.

Dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study of an all-oral combination regimen of oral vinorelbine and capecitabine for patients with metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

A phase I study was performed to determine the maximal tolerated dose, recommended doses (RDs), safety and efficacy of oral vinorelbine when combined with capecitabine in an all-oral chemotherapy regimen in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), with pharmacokinetic blood sampling to investigate potential drug-drug interactions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-four patients with MBC received as first- or second-line chemotherapy, oral vinorelbine at a dose of 60 or 80 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 (and 15) with escalating doses of capecitabine from 1650 to 2500 mg/m2/day days 1-14 every 3 or 4 weeks. Three schedules were tested: day 1, day 8 and weekly regimens of oral vinorelbine with a 14-day course of capecitabine every 3 weeks; and a days 1 and 8 regimen of oral vinorelbine with a 14-day course of capecitabine every 4 weeks.

RESULTS

With oral vinorelbine at 60 mg/m2, the RDs were established as oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus capecitabine 2250 mg/m2/day days 1-14 and oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m2/week plus capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/day days 1-14. With oral vinorelbine at 80 mg/m2, the RD was oral vinorelbine 80 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 plus capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/day days 1-14. Neutropenia was the main dose-limiting toxicity of the combination; it was reported in 40 patients (90.9%), with grade 3 in 14 patients (31.8%) and 6.2% of cycles, and grade 4 in 12 patients (27.3%) and 4.3% of cycles. Complications were rare with only three patients experiencing febrile neutropenia (one episode each). The most frequent non-haematological toxicity was gastrointestinal; however, the incidence of grade 3 was low, with no episode of grade 4. Hand-foot syndrome was reported in 14 patients (31.8%) and 22.6% of cycles, with grade 2 in two patients (4.5%) and 1.2% of cycles (two episodes each). No episode of grade 3 was observed. Objective responses were reported in 18 patients (three complete responses and 15 partial responses), yielding a response rate of 40.9% in the intention-to-treat population according to the investigator assessment. Results from the pharmacokinetic study demonstrated the absence of mutual pharmacokinetic interactions when both drugs were co-administered.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of oral vinorelbine and capecitabine is safe and easy to administer in an outpatient setting. This all-oral combination chemotherapy may offer a good alternative to the intravenous route for patients with MBC. Based on these promising results, a phase II study has started using oral vinorelbine 60 mg/m2/week with capecitabine 2000 mg/m2/day days 1-14 every 3 weeks as first-line chemotherapy in patients with MBC.

Use of heparin to lower the incidence of phlebitis induced by anti-neoplastic agents used in ovarian cancer

AIM

To investigate whether heparin infusion with the administration of anti-neoplastic agents in ovarian cancer can reduce the occurrence of phlebitis as a complication of chemotherapy.

METHODS

The subjects were 20 patients with ovarian cancer who developed phlebitis following their first course of anti-cancer chemotherapy. In the subsequent chemotherapy course, 10 patients received heparin infusion of 5000 U, starting 3 h before the administration of anti-neoplastic agents and continuing concomitantly with the agents for 12 h. The other 10 patients (control) were treated with anti-neoplastic agents alone.

RESULTS

Only one (10%) of 10 patients who had received heparin developed phlebitis, while eight patients (80%) in the control group did (P=0.005). In the heparin group, there were no toxic effects of heparin observed. The prothrombin time, activated partial thromboplastin time, fibrinogen, and platelet count did not differ before and after the completion of chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent infusion of heparin and anti-neoplastic agents in ovarian cancer is a safe and effective method of preventing phlebitis induced by chemotherapy.

Second Line Chemotherapy with 5 Fluorouracil and Vinorelbine in Anthracycline and Taxane Pretreated Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and Vinorelbine (Vin) are active in the second line therapy of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We conducted a multi-institutional phase II study to assess the activity of the combination of 5-FU and Vin in anthracycline and taxane pretreated patients with MBC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with MBC previously treated with anthracyclines and taxanes, who had measurable or evaluable disease, were treated with folinic acid 200 mg/m2 IV, 5-FU 400 mg/m2 IV bolus, and 5-FU 600 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 24 hours on days 1, 2, 15, and 16 and Vin 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15 of a 28-day cycle, for six cycles. Response rate, time to disease progression, overall survival, and toxicity were evaluated.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were enrolled and 35 were evaluable for response. Grade III and IV neutropenia was seen in four and three patients, respectively. At a median follow-up of 19.5 months, 33 patients have progressed, 14 during treatment and 19 during the follow-up period, and 23 have died for an overall survival of 12.3 months. The time to progression was six months. Eight patients had a partial response and 14 had stable disease for a clinical benefit rate of 63%.

CONCLUSION

The combination of 5-FU and Vin is well tolerated and is a good option for the palliative care of patients with MBC.