Vestiges of early molecular processes leading to the genetic code

A self-referential model for the formation of the genetic code

A model for the formation of the genetic code is presented where protein synthesis is directed initially by tRNA dimers. Proteins that are resistant to degradation and efficient RNA-binders protect the RNAs. Replication becomes elongational producing poly-tRNAs from which the mRNAs and ribosomes are derived. Attributions are successively fixed to tRNAs paired through the perfect palindromic anticodons, with the same bases at the extremities (5'ANA: UNU 3'; GNG: CNC; principal dinucleotides, pDiN). The 5' degeneracy is then developed. The first pairs to be encoded correspond to the hydropathy correlation outliers (Gly-CC: Pro-GG and Ser-GA: Ser-CU) and to the sector of homogeneous pDiN, composed by two pyrimidines or two purines. These amino acids are preferred in the N-ends of proteins, stabilizers of proteins against catabolism and strong RNA-binders. The next pairs complete the sector of homogeneous pDiN (Asp, Glu-UC: Leu-AG and Asn, Lys-UU: Phe-AA). This set of nine amino acids forms the protein cores with the predominant aperiodic conformation. Next enter the pairs with mixed pDiN (one purine and one pyrimidine), the RY attributions composing the protein N-ends and the YR attributions the C-ends. The last pair contains the main punctuation signs (Ile, Met, iMet-AU: Tyr, Stop-UA). The model indicates that genetic information emerged during the process of formation of the coding/decoding system and that genes were defined by the proteins. Stable proteins constructed the nucleoprotein system by binding to the RNAs that produced them. In this circular rationale, genes are memories in a metabolic system for production of proteins that stabilize it. The simplicity and the highly deterministic character of the process suggest that the Last Universal Common Ancestor populations could be composed, in early stages, of lineages bearing similar genetic codes.

Amino acid biogenesis, evolution of the genetic code and aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) ensure the fidelity of the translation of the genetic code, covalently attaching appropriate amino acids to the corresponding nucleic acid adaptor molecules-tRNA. The fundamental role of aminoacylation reaction catalysed by aaRSs implies that representatives of the family are thought to be among the earliest proteins to appear. Based on sequence analysis and catalytic domain structure, aaRSs have been partitioned into two classes of 10 enzymes each. However, based on the structural and sequence data only, it will not be easily understood that the present partitioning is not governed by chance. Our findings suggest that organization of amino acid biosynthetic pathways and clustering of aaRSs into different classes are intimately related to one another. A plausible explanation for such a relationship is dictated by early link between aaRSs and amino acids biosynthetic proteins. The aaRSs catalytic cores are highly relevant to the ancient metabolic reactions, namely, amino acids and cofactors biosynthesis. In particular we show that class II aaRSs mostly associated with the primordial amino acids, while class I aaRSs are usually related to amino acids evolved lately. Reasoning from this we propose a possible chronology of genetic code evolution.

On the relative content of G,C bases in codons of amino acids corresponding to class I and II aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases

We have analyzed the relative G,C content from protein coding regions of 530 organisms and found that the ratio of the G,C content of the codons of the amino acids corresponding to Class II and Class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases decreases in a statistically significant way from prokaryotes to animals. This can be interpreted assuming that an initial asymmetry between the G,C content of codons of Class I and II amino acids existed and has decreased in the course of evolution.

On the classes of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and the error minimization in the genetic code

As a consequence of the existence of two classes of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs), we defined two types of mutations: g (mutations that do not change the class of the involved amino acids) and u (those which change the class). We have found that the mean chemical distance resulting from g mutations is smaller than that corresponding to u mutations, indicating that g mutations are responsible for most of the known minimization of the genetic code. This supports models for the origin and evolution of the code, in which new amino acids were added after duplications or modification of existing aaRSs.