Dose-intense therapy with etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin, and epirubicin (VIP-E) in 100 consecutive patients with limited- and extensive-disease small-cell lung cancer

High-dose Chemotherapy in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Improvements in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) therapy with conventional doses of drugs with or without radiotherapy have been poor, and the 5-year survival is discouraging. Since SCLC is highly sensitive to radiotherapy and chemotherapy, some studies have tried to improve survival by increasing the dose of the drugs. Within conventional ranges, dose intensity can be increased with the support of hematopoietic growth factors (G/GM-CSF) and/or shortening treatment intervals (eg weekly regimens). However, dose intensity could be increased by only 20-30% and a survival advantage was not definitively obtained. Given its high chemosensitivity already two decades ago, SCLC was one of the first malignancies deemed suitable for maximizing dose and dose intensity with the support of autologous bone marrow transplantation (ABMT). On the whole, results were disappointing and the procedure was nearly abandoned. Nowadays, some interest is emerging again due to the improvements in supportive care such as the availability of hematopoietic growth factors and the peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC).

Small cell lung cancer: therapies and targets

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains a fatal disease due to limited therapeutic options. Systemic chemotherapy is the bedrock of treatment for both the limited and extensive stages of the disease. However, the established management paradigm of platinum-based chemotherapy has reached an efficacy plateau. A modest survival improvement, approximately 5%, was witnessed with the addition of cranial or thoracic radiation to systemic chemotherapy. Other strategies to improve outcome of platinum-based chemotherapy in the last two decades have met with minimal success. The substitution of irinotecan for etoposide in the frontline treatment of SCLC achieved significant efficacy benefit in Japanese patients, but similar benefit could not be reproduced in other patient populations. Salvage treatment for recurrent or progressive SCLC is particularly challenging, where topotecan remains the only agent with regulatory approval to date. Ongoing evaluation of biologic agents targeting angiogenesis, sonic hedgehog pathway, DNA repair pathway, and immune checkpoint modulators hold some promise for improved outcome in SCLC. It is hoped that the coming decade will witness the application of new molecular biology and genomic research techniques to improve our understanding of SCLC biology and identification of molecular subsets that can be targeted appropriately using established and emerging biological agents similar to the accomplishments of the last decade with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Small cell carcinoma originating from the cavernous sinus

BACKGROUND

We report a rare case of small cell carcinoma originating from the right cavernous sinus in a 55-year-old male. The patient had sudden onset of right abducens palsy following right oculomotor palsy.

METHODS

Post-contrast T1-weighted MRI revealed a mass lesion of 3-cm maximum size occupying the right cavernous sinus and extending to the right middle cranial fossa. After biopsy via the frontozygomatic approach, one radiosurgery treatment was followed by four cycles of chemotherapy (cisplatin together with VP-16 therapy), after which the lesion diminished dramatically in size.

RESULTS

Complete remission has currently been achieved. The patient recovered from the extraocular muscle paresis and returned to his previous work. Although it is considered possible that small cell carcinoma can occur wherever neuroendocrine cells exist, a lesion originating in the cranium is extremely rare. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of small cell carcinoma of intracranial origin.

A threefold dose intensity treatment with ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide for patients with small cell lung cancer: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

The dose intensity of chemotherapy can be increased to the highest possible level by early administration of multiple and sequential high-dose cycles supported by transfusion with peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs). A randomized trial was performed to test the impact of such dose intensification on the long-term survival of patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

METHODS

Patients who had limited or extensive SCLC with no more than two metastatic sites were randomly assigned to high-dose (High, n = 69) or standard-dose (Std, n = 71) chemotherapy with ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE). High-ICE cycles were supported by transfusion with PBPCs that were collected after two cycles of treatment with epidoxorubicin at 150 mg/m(2), paclitaxel at 175 mg/m(2), and filgrastim. The primary outcome was 3-year survival. Comparisons between response rates and toxic effects within subgroups (limited or extensive disease, liver metastases or no liver metastases, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1, normal or abnormal lactate dehydrogenase levels) were also performed.

RESULTS

Median relative dose intensity in the High-ICE arm was 293% (range = 174%-392%) of that in the Std-ICE arm. The 3-year survival rates were 18% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 10% to 29%) and 19% (95% CI = 11% to 30%) in the High-ICE and Std-ICE arms, respectively. No differences were observed between the High-ICE and Std-ICE arms in overall response (n = 54 [78%, 95% CI = 67% to 87%] and n = 48 [68%, 95% CI = 55% to 78%], respectively) or complete response (n = 27 [39%, 95% CI = 28% to 52%] and n = 24 [34%, 95% CI = 23% to 46%], respectively). Subgroup analyses showed no benefit for any outcome from High-ICE treatment. Hematologic toxicity was substantial in the Std-ICE arm (grade > or = 3 neutropenia, n = 49 [70%]; anemia, n = 17 [25%]; thrombopenia, n = 17 [25%]), and three patients (4%) died from toxicity. High-ICE treatment was predictably associated with severe myelosuppression, and five patients (8%) died from toxicity.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term outcome of SCLC was not improved by raising the dose intensity of ICE chemotherapy by threefold.

Increasing Chemotherapy in Small‐Cell Lung Cancer: From Dose Intensity and Density to Megadoses

The hypothesis that increasing cytotoxic dose intensity will improve cancer cure rates is compelling. Although supporting evidence for this hypothesis has accrued for several tumor types, including lymphomas, breast cancer, and testicular cancers, it remains unproven. Small-cell lung cancer is extremely chemo- and radiosensitive, with a response rate of 80% achieved routinely, but few patients are cured by chemoradiotherapy. In this setting, increased cytotoxic dose intensity might improve cure rates. The finding that response rates in small-cell lung cancer correlate with received cytotoxic dose intensity merely confirms that "less is worse" and "more is better." Within conventional ranges, dose intensity can be increased with the support of hematopoietic growth factors and/or by shortening treatments intervals; however, dose intensity could be increased by only 20%-30%, and a survival advantage has not been clearly demonstrated. Given its high chemosensitivity, small-cell lung cancer was one of the first malignancies deemed suitable for increasing dose intensity and even for the use of a megadose with the support of autologous bone marrow transplantation. Some interest is emerging again due to improvements in supportive care, such as the availability of hematopoietic growth factors and peripheral blood progenitor cells.

Double-cycle, high-dose ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide followed by peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation for small cell lung cancer

PURPOSES

To determine the tolerability and feasibility of double-cycle, high-dose chemotherapy followed by peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation (PBSCT) after conventional chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy for small cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with previously untreated SCLC received two cycles of cisplatin, 80 mg/m2, and etoposide, 300 mg/m2 (cisplatin-etoposide [PE]). Later, they were administered high-dose etoposide, 1,500 mg/m2, followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for collection of peripheral blood stem cells. After two additional cycles of PE, the patients received high-dose ifosfamide, 10 g/m2, carboplatin, 1,200 mg/m2, and etoposide, 1,000 mg/m2 (ifosfamide-carboplatin-etoposide [ICE]) followed by PBSCT twice at 3-month to 4-month intervals. Patients with limited disease (LD) concurrently received 50 Gy of irradiation with the last two cycles of PE.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients, including 11 patients with LD, were enrolled. Fifteen patients could receive high-dose ICE followed by PBSCT twice, and 3 patients could receive it once. The median number of CD34+ cells collected was 13.11 x 10(6)/kg. The median numbers of days to neutrophil counts > or = 500/microL and platelet counts > or = 50,000/microL were 10 days and 14.5 days after the first PBSCT, and 10 days and 15 days after the second PBSCT, respectively. Grade 3 diarrhea occurred in one cycle, and grade 3 renal toxicity occurred in two cycles. The overall response rate was 100%, with an 83.3% rate of complete or near-complete response. The 2-year and 5-year survival rates were 72% and 55% in patients with LD and 43% and 0% in patients with extensive disease, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Double-cycle, high-dose ICE therapy followed by PBSCT is tolerable and feasible even after conventional chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy in patients with SCLC.

Combined Chemoradiotherapy in Small Cell Lung Cancer

Combined chemoradiotherapy is the established standard of care for limited stage small cell lung cancer; it provides cure in 15% to 25% of patients. Early concurrent therapy imparts a 5% long-term survival benefit compared with sequential therapy. Hyperfractionated delivery of radiotherapy may provide a small incremental benefit when compared with standard fractionation. Radiotherapy dose escalation and reduced radiotherapy volumes are feasible; however, survival benefit has not been confirmed. Cisplatin and etoposide remain the preferred chemotherapy agents. New chemotherapeutic agents and novel treatment approaches are under intense investigation.

First-line chemotherapy in metastatic small-cell lung cancer (SCLC)

The overall treatment results in metastatic small-cell lung cancer have not been changed in the last decades. The prognosis of the disease is still poor with median survival times of less than one year and nearly no chance of cure. This article intends to summarize the current status of treatment in m-SCLC and especially focuses on the aspects of choice of drugs and efforts of treatment intensification either by dose escalation or shortening of treatment intervals. Furthermore the currently available data about the activity of newer drugs, including taxanes and topoisomerase I inhibitors are reported. These cytostatic agents widen the therapeutic options in the treatment of SCLC and will hopefully improve the outcome of the patients in the next years.

Management of small cell lung cancer

Small cell lung carcinoma typically presents as a central endobronchial lesion in chronic cigarette smokers with hilar enlargement and disseminated disease. The diagnostic pathology should be reviewed by a pathologist accomplished in reading pulmonary pathology, and, if any doubt exists in the diagnosis, additional special stains or diagnostic material should be obtained. Patients with extensive stage disease should be managed by combination chemotherapy, whereas patients with limited stage disease should be treated with etoposide/cisplatin plus concurrent chest irradiation. The chemotherapy should be administered for 4 to 6 months and then should be discontinued. Prophylactic cranial irradiation should be given to patients who achieve a complete remission. Patients should be retreated with chemotherapy if they develop a relapse of their small cell lung cancer. The patients who are followed in complete remission should be observed carefully for second cancers, and appropriate therapy should be administered if the cancer reappears.

Chemotherapy as treatment of primary and recurrent small cell lung cancer

Chemotherapy is the treatment of choice in metastatic stage of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). Radiation therapy, surgery and other forms of therapy are only included in special treatment situations, particularly for different local problems. A wide range of chemotherapeutic agents have proven to be effective in SCLC, including carboplatin, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, epirubicin, etoposide, ifosfamide, teniposide and vincristine. However, treatment results could not be improved over the last 10 years and the median survival of patients with metastatic disease is limited to 7-10 months. New agents like docetaxel, gemcitabine, irinotecan, paclitaxel, topotecan and vinorelbine have shown promising results in phase-II investigations. Yet, no evidence is provided from randomized trials to employ these drugs in first line treatment. Clearly, polychemotherapy is superior to single agent treatment. Compared to the combination of cisplatin and etoposide, no other combination has clearly shown improved results in large phase-III randomised trials, yet. The combination of cisplatin and irinotecan has also shown promising results in a single randomised trial with the need to be confirmed in larger settings. Neither extending the initial treatment beyond the median number of six cycles, nor maintenance treatment have-so far-resulted in any increase in survival results for patients with metastasised SCLC. Nor has dose-intensification, which causes significantly higher toxicities in patients, shown a clear impact on the overall survival of these patients. Brain metastases represent a high frequent complication associated with SCLC. In these cases, the combination of chemotherapy and whole brain radiation therapy is advocated. Second-line treatment should always be considered in patients with relapse or failure to first-line therapy. In addition to a rechallenging with the prior drug combination or selecting a different potentially non-cross resistant one, monotherapy with topotecan proved to be effective as well. In summary, up to now, no standard chemotherapy combination exists for metastatic SCLC. The individual therapy strategy can only be selected by considering the clinically relevant conditions of the patient.

Dose intensive chemotherapy in small cell lung cancer

The rationale for treatment intensification is to overcome the occurrence of drug resistance and to improve the outcome in SCLC. Several different approaches have been tested in the past two decades. Increasing the dose of conventional chemotherapy has failed to improve survival in extensive stage. In limited stage patients one randomized trial demonstrated a significant survival advantage by a 20% increase of the dose of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide given during the first cycle of chemotherapy. Shortening treatment intervals is achievable by weekly chemotherapy or by use of hematopoietic growth factors. Neither weekly chemotherapy, tested in four randomized trials, nor the application of hematopoietic growth factors significantly improved survival. However, two studies described a better survival for patients receiving chemotherapy in shorter treatment intervals. In one trial a 3-week interval was superior to a 4-week interval, and in a second one a 2-week interval superior to a 3-week interval. One smaller study, comparing a 4-week interval with a 2-week interval with stem cell augmentation by whole blood, revealed no difference in survival between both groups. A randomized trial comparing chemotherapy in intervals as short as possible with or without growth factor application showed no difference for the two groups. Thus, growth factor application seems not to be essential for treatment in short intervals and was not associated with superior survival in randomized trials. To achieve a more than two-fold increase in dose intensity some kind of stem cell support is mandatory. Several phase II trials with small patient numbers tested the concept of late intensification with bone marrow support in the 1980s. These trials did not show any convincing benefit. There is one randomized trial available testing the late intensification approach in which a superior progression free survival and a trend for better survival was demonstrated, but this difference was not statistically significant due to a high mortality rate and a substantial number of local relapses in the high dose arm. Newer concepts involving high dose therapy are combining high dose strategies with approaches for better local tumor control, administer high dose regimens earlier in the treatment course, or use multiple sequential high dose cycles. With these approaches 3-year survival rates of up to 40% have been reported. So up to date, the superiority of an intensified treatment strategy has not been demonstrated in a convincing way and further controlled trials will be necessary to clarify the role of dose intense chemotherapy in SCLC.

Use of hematopoietic progenitors in whole blood to support dose-dense chemotherapy: a randomized phase II trial in small-cell lung cancer patients

PURPOSE

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is exquisitely chemosensitive, but few patients are cured by conventional chemoradiotherapy. Recent studies suggest that increased cytotoxic dose-intensity might improve survival. In this randomized phase II study, we tested the feasibility of dose intensification using sequential reinfusion of hematopoietic progenitors in whole blood.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

SCLC patients with a favorable prognosis were treated with six cycles of ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE), at 4-week (standard treatment) or 2-week (intensified treatment) intervals. Intensified treatment was supported by daily subcutaneous filgrastim injections and reinfusion of 750 mL of autologous blood collected immediately before each cycle.

RESULTS

Fifty consecutive patients were randomized to standard (n = 25) or intensified (n = 25) ICE. A total of 94% completed at least three treatment cycles, and 70% completed six cycles; 96% of treatments were given at full dose. The planned dose-intensity was 1.0 for standard and 2.0 for intensified ICE. The median received dose-intensity for cycles 1 through 3 was 0.99 (range, 0.33 to 1.02) for the standard treatment arm and 1.80 (range, 0.99 to 1.97) for the intensified treatment arm (P <.001). Over all six cycles, the median received dose-intensity was 0.95 (range, 0.17 to 1.03) for the standard treatment arm and 1.60 (range, 0.60 to 2.01) for the intensified treatment arm (P <.001). Febrile neutropenia was more common on the standard treatment arm (84% v 56%), resulting in more days of intravenous antibiotics (median, 10 v 3 days; P =.035). Transfusion requirements were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Sequential reinfusion of hematopoietic progenitors in whole blood can safely support substantial increases in dose-intensity of ICE chemotherapy for SCLC.

Cost analysis of autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation versus autologous bone marrow transplantation for patients with non Hodgkin's lymphoma and acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

We evaluated the costs of unpurged autologous stem cell transplantation in a non-randomised study of 54 consecutive patients with lymphoproliferative malignancies who have been transplanted at the Nijmegen University Hospital between July 1992 and March 1998. Thirty-five patients were transplanted with autologous peripheral stem cells (APSCT): 30 had non Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and 5 acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL). Nineteen patients were transplanted with autologous bone marrow stem cells (ABMT): 17 had NHL and 2 ALL. The number of progenitor cells (CFU-GM, BFU-E) and nucleated cells was significantly higher in peripheral blood transplants. The duration of cytopenia was shorter after APSCT. The leucocyte recovery to 0.5 x 10(9)/L was 13 days for recipients of peripheral stem cells compared to 20 days for bone marrow recipients (P <0.001). The platelet recoveries to 20 x 10(9)/L were 13 and 29 days, respectively (P = 0.001). This resulted in significantly shorter admission duration 24 days after APSCT versus 30 days (P = 0.003) after ABMT. Furthermore, a statistically significant difference between both groups was observed for antimicrobial costs (mean: fl 2,939 vs fl 4,888; P = 0.008), platelet transfusions (median: 3 vs 7 units; P = 0.01) and erythrocyte transfusions (median: 6 vs 10 units; P = 0.03). The mean overall costs were lower in patients transplanted with stem cells from peripheral blood: fl 34,178 versus fl 43,469 (P = 0.007). This study suggests that the APSCT results in significant cost savings due to shorter hospital stay and less costs of supportive care, despite higher mobilisation costs. The costs of blood transfusions and antimicrobials for patients with ALL were significantly higher when compared to patients with NHL.

Prognostically orientated multimodality treatment including surgery for selected patients of small-cell lung cancer patients stages IB to IIIB: long-term results of a phase II trial

Following mediastinoscopy, a prognostically orientated multimodality approach was chosen in selected small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients with hyperfractionated accelerated chemoradiotherapy (Hf-RTx) and definitive surgery (S). Stage IB/IIA patients had four cycles of cisplatin/etoposide (PE) and surgery. Stage IIB/IIIA patients had three cycles PE followed by one cycle concurrent chemoradiation including Hf-RTx and surgery. Most stage IIIB patients were not planned for surgery and had CTx followed by sequential RTx or one cycle concurrent CTx/RTx. Of 46 consecutive patients (stage IB six, IIA two, IIB/IIIA 22, IIIB 16) 43 (94%) showed an objective response. Twenty-three of patients (72%) planned for inclusion of S were completely resected (R0) (IB 6/6, IIA 2/2, IIB/IIIA 13/22, IIIB 2/2). Overall toxicity was acceptable--one patient died of septicaemia, no perioperative deaths occurred. Median follow-up of patients alive (n = 21) is 52 months (30+ - 75+). Median survival and 5-year survival rate of all patients are 36 months and 46%, in R0 patients 68 months and 63% (R0-IIB/IIIA/IIIB: not yet reached and 67%). This multimodality treatment including surgery proved highly effective with 100% local control and remarkable long-term survival after complete resection, even in locally advanced SCLC stages IIB/IIIA patients.

Moderate dose-escalation of combination chemotherapy with concomitant thoracic radiotherapy in limited-disease small-cell lung cancer: prolonged intrathoracic tumor control and high central nervous system relapse rate. Groupe d'Oncologie-Pneumologie Clinique de l'Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels and Liège, Belgium

BACKGROUND

The role of chemotherapy dose-intensification in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains unclear. This phase I-II study evaluates feasibility and outcome of combination chemotherapy at moderately elevated doses with concomitant thoracic radiotherapy in limited-disease SCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Moderately elevated doses of ifosfamide-epirubicin (cycles 1 and 3) and of carboplatin-etoposide (cycles 2 and 4) were given with G-CSF and peripheral blood stem-cell (PBSC) support. Thoracic radiotherapy (40 Gy) was given once daily during the first five days of each cycle.

RESULTS

Overall toxicity was acceptable; most common side-effects were myelosuppression and asthenia. All 35 eligible patients responded (23 CR, 12 PR). Median time to progression was 15 months: median overall survival was 24.6 months. Only 6 of 25 relapsing patients (24%) presented with a locoregional recurrence while 12 of 25 (48%) relapsed in the central nervous system (CNS).

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen is a feasible dose-intensification with an acceptable toxicity profile. Its efficacy was demonstrated by a 100% response rate, an excellent local tumor control rate and a median survival of 24.6 months. In the absence of PCI, CNS relapse is a major problem if adequate local control is achieved.

Standard- and high-dose etoposide, ifosfamide, carboplatin, and epirubicin in 100 patients with small-cell lung cancer: a mature follow-up report

BACKGROUND

We conducted a phase I-II trial to assess the feasibility and activity of a combination chemotherapy regimen with etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin or carboplatin, and epirubicin in limited-disease (LD, stages I-IIIB) and extensive-stage (ED, stage IV) small-cell lung cancer (SCLC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Standard-dose chemotherapy (SDC) consisting of etoposide (500 mg/m2), ifosfamide (4000 mg/m2), cisplatin (50 mg/m2) and epirubicin (50 mg/m2) (VIP-E), followed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), was given to 100 patients with SCLC. Thirty patients with qualifying responses to VIP-E proceeded to high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) with autologous peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation (PBSCT) after etoposide (1,500 mg/m2), ifosfamide (12,000 mg/m2), carboplatin (750 mg/m2) and epirubicin (150 mg/m2) (VIC-E) conditioning. RESULTS OF STANDARD-DOSE VIP-E: Ninety-seven patients were evaluable for response. The objective response rate was 81% in LD SCLC (33% CR, 48% PR; excluding patients in surgical CR) and 77% in ED SCLC (18% CR, 58% PR). The treatment-related mortality (TRM) of SDC was 2%. Two additional patients in CR from their SCLC developed secondary non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLC), and both were cured by surgery. The median survival was 19 months in LD SCLC and 6 months in ED SCLC. The five-year survivals were 36% in LD and 0% in ED SCLC. RESULTS OF HIGH-DOSE VIC-E: HDC was feasible in 16% of ED-, and 58% of LD-patients. All HDC patients (n = 30) improved or maintained prior responses. Four patients died of early treatment-related complications (TRM 13%). Two additional patients in CR from their SCLC developed secondary malignancies (esophageal cancer, secondary chronic myelogenous leukemia). The median survivals were 26 months in LD SCLC, and 8 months in ED SCLC. The five-year survival was 50% in LD and 0% in ED SCLC.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite high response rates, survival after VIP-E SDC and VIC-E HDC in patients with ED SCLC is not superior to that achieved with less toxic traditional regimens. The high five-year survival rates achieved with these protocols in LD SCLC probably reflect both patient selection (high proportion of patients with prior surgical resection) and the high activity of our chemotherapy regimen in combination with radiotherapy. A study comparing protocols using simultaneous radiation therapy and chemotherapy, and other dose-escalated forms of SDC with HDC is needed to further define the role of this treatment modality in SCLC. Given the high rate of secondary malignancies observed in patients in CR > 2 years in our study, close follow-up and early treatment of these neoplasms may contribute to maintaining overall survival in patients with SCLC.

Early death during chemotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer: derivation of a prognostic index for toxic death and progression

Based on an increased frequency of early death (death within the first treatment cycle) in our two latest randomized trials of combination chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), we wanted to identify patients at risk of early non-toxic death (ENTD) and early toxic death (ETD). Data were stored in a database and logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictive factors for early death. During the first cycle, 118 out of 937 patients (12.6%) died. In 38 patients (4%), the cause of death was sepsis. Significant risk factors were age, performance status (PS), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and treatment with epipodophyllotoxins and platinum in the first cycle (EP). Risk factors for ENTD were age, PS and LDH. Extensive stage had a hazard ratio of 1.9 (P = 0.07). Risk factors for ETD were EP, PS and LDH, whereas age and stage were not. For EP, the hazard ratio was as high as 6.7 (P = 0.0001). We introduced a simple prognostic algorithm including performance status, LDH and age. Using a prognostic algorithm to exclude poor-risk patients from trials, we could minimize early death, improve long-term survival and increase the survival differences between different regimens. We suggest that other groups evaluate our algorithm and exclude poor prognosis patients from trials of dose intensification.

A pilot study of MVP (mitomycin-C, vinblastine and cisplatin) chemotherapy in small-cell lung cancer

MVP chemotherapy (mitomycin C 8 mg m(-2), courses 1, 2, 4 and 6, vinblastine 6 mg m(-2), cisplatin 50 mg m(-2)) is an active low-toxicity regimen in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Based on the single-agent activity of these agents in SCLC, we have conducted a phase II trial of MVP in SCLC. Fifty chemo-naive patients with SCLC were entered in this trial. There were 33 men and 17 women with median age 66 years (range 46-83 years); 18 patients had limited disease (LD) and 32 extensive disease (ED). WHO performance status (PS) was: three patients PS 0, 33 patients PS 1, ten patients PS 2, four patients PS 3. A maximum of six cycles was given in responding patients. On completion of chemotherapy, patients with LD obtaining complete response (CR)/good partial response (PR) received thoracic irradiation and those obtaining CR were offered entry into the ongoing MRC Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation Trial. The overall response was 79% with 17% CR and 62% PR. For LD patients, 38% obtained CR but for ED only one patient achieved CR. Median response duration for LD patients was 8 months and for ED patients 5 months. Median survival was 10 months for LD patients and 6 months for ED patients. There was complete resolution of symptoms in 24%, partial improvement in 68%, no change in 2% and progressive symptoms in 6%. As regards toxicity, 24% developed WHO grade 3/4 neutropenia, 16% grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia and 6% significant hair loss. Two patients died during the first week of treatment with neutropenic infection. Quality of life using the EORTC questionnaire (QLC-C30) with lung cancer module demonstrated significant improvements from baseline levels in emotional and cognitive functioning, global QOL, of pain, dyspnoea and cough. MVP, an effective palliative regimen for NSCLC, is also active against SCLC with low toxicity and merits comparison with more toxic conventional schedules.