Preliminary results on the activity of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) in refractory/recurrent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma patients

Rituximab, gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in relapsed or refractory indolent and mantle cell lymphoma: results of a multicenter phase I/II-study of the German Low Grade Lymphoma Study Group

Rituximab, gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (R-GemOx) has demonstrated to be effective and safe in lymphoma patients. We aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of oxaliplatin in combination with rituximab and gemcitabine and to explore the efficacy and safety of R-GemOx in relapsed or refractory (r/r) indolent and mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). In this single-arm, phase I/II trial, we enrolled 55 patients with r/r indolent lymphoma and MCL not suitable for autologous stem-cell transplantation. Patients received 4 cycles of R-GemOx. In the dose escalation group, 70 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin was applied and interindividually increased by 10 mg/m2 until the MTD was reached together with fixed doses of rituximab and gemcitabine. At the oxaliplatin MTD, an extension cohort was opened. Primary aim was to detect an overall response rate (ORR) greater than 65% (α = 0.05). Oxaliplatin 70 mg/m2 (MTD) was chosen for the extension cohort after 3 of 6 patients experienced a DLT at 80 mg/m2. Among 46 patients evaluable for the efficacy analysis ORR was 72% (33/46), missing the primary aim of the study (p = 0.21). After a median follow-up of 7.9 years, median PFS and OS were 1.0 and 2.1 years. Most frequent grade ≥ 3 adverse events were cytopenias. R-GemOx induces decent response rates in r/r indolent lymphoma and MCL, though novel targeted therapies have largely replaced chemotherapy in the relapse setting. Particularly in MCL, R-GemOx might be an alternative option in late relapses or as bridging to CAR-T-cells. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov on Aug 4th, 2009, number NCT00954005.

The rationale for combination therapy in patients with aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: ten questions

Rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone immunochemotherapy remains standard of care for first-line treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). High-dose chemotherapy and stem cell transplantation is offered to most relapsing/refractory patients who respond to salvage therapy. This Q&A review evaluates recommended management strategies for second and subsequent lines of therapy in patients with DLBCL, outlining the relative efficacies of currently available options including novel agents such as ibrutinib and CAR-T cells. The combination of pixantrone and rituximab is currently under investigation as a second-line treatment for patients ineligible for stem cell transplantation, while pixantrone monotherapy is the only therapeutic option approved for multiply relapsed and refractory DLBCL beyond the second line at this time.

Management of Multiply Relapsed Aggressive Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: New Perspectives

Patients with refractory/relapsed (R/R) non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) make up a very heterogeneous population with a poor life expectancy. The objective of this symposium was to provide an overview of the current treatment landscape for aggressive NHL, as well as the future research on new treatments. Transplant-eligible patients receive salvage chemotherapy, followed by high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). Patients who fail transplant or are transplant-ineligible generally receive palliative treatment or enter clinical trials; there is no standard of care and thus there is a high unmet clinical need. Pixantrone is currently indicated for adult patients with multiply R/R aggressive B-cell NHL, thereby filling the unmet clinical need in this field. The symposium started with a brief overview of the meeting objectives. This was followed by an overview of the current and future treatment landscape for aggressive NHL, including a case study of a patient with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) with multiple relapses receiving pixantrone as monotherapy. The results and post hoc analysis of the CORAL and the SCHOLAR1 studies were reviewed, including the relative merits of combination therapy versus monotherapy for patients with relapsed DLBCL who had failed second-line salvage therapy. The symposium ended with an outline of the profile and mechanism of action of pixantrone, and evidence from the PIX301 study that provided the basis for regulatory approval for the use of pixantrone in third and fourth-line treatment of R/R aggressive B-cell NHL. The clinical efficacy and safety of pixantrone were reviewed, together with a future perspective on the ongoing PIX306 trial. The symposium concluded with the presentation of two clinical cases of patients treated with pixantrone, a ‘Question and Answer’ session, and a panel discussion.

Biweekly dose-dense gemcitabine-oxaliplatin and dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial

AIM

We performed a phase II study to evaluate the efficacy of combination chemotherapy consisting of gemcitabine, dexamethasone and oxaliplatin (GemDOx) as a biweekly regimen and salvage therapy in patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

METHODS

Gemcitabine (1000 mg/m(2) ) and oxaliplatin (85 mg/m(2) ) were administered intravenously on days 1 and 15, and dexamethasone (40 mg) was administered orally on days 1-4.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients were enrolled, and most patients had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n = 18). The median age of the patients and median prior number of chemotherapy cycles were 53 (range, 26-74) years and 1 (range, 1-4) cycle, respectively. Only 17 (58.6%) and 9 (31.0%) patients completed two or more and four or more cycles, respectively, and the median number of received cycles was two (range, 1-8). Overall response rates were 27.6% (complete response in 13.8%) among intent-to-treat patients and 47.1% (complete response in 23.5%) among patients who had received at least two GemDOx cycles. Median progression-free survival and median overall survival were 3.9 and 20.5 months, respectively. The most-frequent grade 3 or 4 toxicity was neutropenia (22.9%), and no grade 3 or 4 peripheral neurotoxicity was noted.

CONCLUSION

GemDOx chemotherapy, therefore, showed modest activity against relapsed or refractory aggressive NHL, although toxicities were acceptable.

Pixantrone: merging safety with efficacy

Pixantrone is a novel anthracycline derivative, manufactured by Cell Therapeutics Incorporated, WA, USA. It was developed with the aim to retain the efficacy of anthracyclines and be less cardiotoxic. Initial safety trials and single-arm, Phase II trials have shown preliminary evidence of anticancer activity and manageable toxicity. These results were validated in multicenter, randomized clinical trials where pixantrone was used as single agent or in combination with other cytotoxics. Following the results of PIX301, it is now approved by the EMA for use as monotherapy in pretreated patients with refractory non-Hodgkin lymphomas. Ongoing trials are assessing the use of pixantrone in combination with other drugs.

Oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy (dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and oxaliplatin)±rituximab is an effective salvage regimen in patients with relapsed or refractory lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Patients affected by relapsed or primary refractory lymphomas currently have a poor prognosis and no standard salvage treatment options. This study was carried out to assess the efficacy and safety of a dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and oxaliplatin as salvage therapy in those patients, replacing cisplatin with oxaliplatin in the standard dexamethasone, cytarabine, and cisplatin scheme.

METHODS

Seventy patients with relapsed or refractory aggressive non-Hodgkin or Hodgkin lymphoma were treated from September 2001 to September 2007. The median age of patients was 51 years (range, 19-75 years). Histological subtypes were: diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (n=47) and Hodgkin lymphoma (n=23). The overall response rate was 73% (51 of 70), with 30 (43%) complete remissions and 21 (30%) partial remissions. Fifty-two patients were treated with dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and oxaliplatin as second-line chemotherapy. Forty-eight patients were enrolled in an autologous stem cell transplantation program; forty (83%) finally proceeded to high-dose consolidation and autografting.

RESULTS

No grade 3 or 4 nonhematological toxicity was demonstrated; in particular, no renal or neurotoxicity was reported. After a median follow-up period of 21 months (range, 2-87 months), 22 (31%) patients had died. Probabilities of 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 44% and 71%, respectively. In the chemosensitive patients, the PFS and OS were 52% and 83%, respectively. The only factor that significantly correlated with better OS was the response to therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

This study confirms that dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and oxaliplatin ± rituximab is an effective and feasible outpatient regimen for salvage therapy in patients affected by relapsed or refractory lymphoma. Moreover, the feasibility and efficacy of this scheme as an in vivo chemosensitive test in patients in autotransplantation programs was confirmed.

The complex clinical picture of presumably allergic side effects to cytostatic drugs: symptoms, pathomechanism, reexposure, and desensitization

The number of drugs used for the treatment of different types of cancers is constantly increasing and actually exceeds 100 distinct chemical formulations. The use of most cytotoxic agents is associated with potential hypersensitivity reactions, and the constant increase of their administration has caused an increase in incidence of these adverse effects, thus becoming a relevant problem for clinicians. Hypersensitivity reactions are common with platinum compounds, L-asparaginase, taxanes, procarbazine, and epipodophyllotoxins, whereas they are unusual, but always possible, with the other chemotherapeutic drugs. Reactions associated with individual drugs are discussed in detail. The mechanism underlying these hypersensitivity reactions involves IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions, nonallergic hypersensitivity reactions, and a few pathogenetically unclear reactions. More studies are needed to better understand, diagnose, treat, and prevent these reactions. To achieve this goal, a multidisciplinary approach to treat patients with cancer who have potential allergies is needed.

Role of chemotherapy in gastric MALT lymphoma, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and other lymphomas

Primary gastrointestinal lymphomas are relatively common, with the large majority occurring in the stomach. In the commonest histological subtype, i.e. diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLCBL), chemotherapy has widely been applied in the past, either following surgery or - in more recent years - as part of conservative management in combination with radiotherapy. Relatively little data, however, exist for chemotherapy as sole treatment modality in localised gastric DLBCL, which nevertheless are highly promising and suggest that combination therapy might overtreat a substantial proportion of patients. In gastric MALT-lymphoma, the use of chemotherapy has been restricted either to patients with a priori disseminated disease or individuals judged to be at high risk or failing local treatment approaches. Only a few prospective phase II studies have been performed, and one controlled trial has shown that chemotherapy was superior in terms of event free survival at ten years when compared to radiation and surgery. These suggest that systemic treatment approaches might be highly effective both in gastric DLBCL as well as MALT-lymphoma, and the scope of this article is to briefly summarize current data on chemotherapy in gastric and GI-lymphomas according to histologic subtypes.

Value of oxaliplatin treatment in heavily pretreated patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

In order to assess the efficacy and toxicity profile of oxaliplatin, a third generation platinum derivate active against several solid tumors, we carried out a study in a group of heavily pretreated patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Between August 2003 and May 2004, 19 pretreated patients were enrolled in a phase II trial and were treated with oxaliplatin. The drug was administered intravenously on day 1 of a 21-day schedule, at a dose of 130 mg/m2 for a total of 6 cycles. One (5%) patient achieved complete remission (CR) and 5 patients (27%) had partial response (PR), thus giving an overall response rate of 32%. The patient in CR suffered from an aggressive B NHL. One of the 5 patients in PR had an aggressive B NHL, whereas the remaining 4 had an indolent B NHL. The treatment was well tolerated with minimal hematologic and extrahematologic toxicity. These data suggest and confirm the efficacy and low toxicity of oxaliplatin in the treatment of patients with heavily pretreated NHL. Further trials using oxaliplatin alone or in combination with other conventional drugs are needed.

Oxaliplatin-DNA adduct formation in white blood cells of cancer patients

In this study, we investigated the kinetics of oxaliplatin-DNA adduct formation in white blood cells of cancer patients in relation to efficacy as well as oxaliplatin-associated neurotoxicity. Thirty-seven patients with various solid tumours received 130 mg m(-2) oxaliplatin as a 2-h infusion. Oxaliplatin-DNA adduct levels were measured in the first cycle using adsorptive stripping voltammetry. Platinum concentrations were measured in ultrafiltrate and plasma using a validated flameless atomic absorption spectrometry method. DNA adduct levels showed a characteristic time course, but were not correlated to platinum pharmacokinetics and varied considerably among individuals. In patients showing tumour response, adduct levels after 24 and 48 h were significantly higher than in nonresponders. Oxaliplatin-induced neurotoxicity was more pronounced but was not significantly different in patients with high adduct levels. The potential of oxaliplatin-DNA adduct measurements as pharmacodynamic end point should be further investigated in future trials.

Therapy of gastric mucosa associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma

Gastric mucosa associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma has recently been incorporated into the World Health Organization (WHO) lymphoma classification, termed as extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of MALT-type. In about 90% of cases this lymphoma is associated with H pylori infection which has been clearly shown to play a causative role in lymphomagenesis. Although much knowledge has been gained in defining the clinical features, natural history, pathology, and molecular genetics of the disease in the last decade, the optimal treatment approach for gastric MALT lymphomas, especially locally advanced cases, is still evolving. In this review we focus on data for the therapeutic, stage dependent management of gastric MALT lymphoma. Hence, the role of eradication therapy, surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy is critically analyzed. Based on these data, we suggest a therapeutic algorithm that might help to better stratify patients for optimal treatment success.

Therapy of gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma

Mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma is a relatively common lymphoma and comprises approximately 7% of all newly diagnosed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. It is mainly located in the stomach and has become a focus of interest due to its unique pathophysiological link with Helicobacter pylori (HP) and the consecutive response to HP eradication therapy. In view of this, HP eradication has become standard treatment for patients with localised disease, and recent data have suggested that HP-negative patients might benefit from antibiotic treatment. In case of non-response, however, the standard approach in such patients is unclear. Both radiation and chemotherapy have shown promising results, and at present there is only one randomised study, which nevertheless suggests chemotherapy as management of choice. The objective of this review is, therefore, to summarise and evaluate the data available for treatment of gastric MALT lymphoma and to highlight potential focus for further research.

Phase II study of oxaliplatin for treatment of patients with mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma

PURPOSE

Various chemotherapeutic regimens have been applied for treatment of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma, but no standard regimen has been identified to date. In view of the activity of oxaliplatin (L-OHP) in various types of lymphoma, we performed a phase II study to evaluate the activity of L-OHP for treatment of MALT lymphoma. The primary objective of this study was to determine the objective response rate according to WHO standard criteria.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 16 patients with MALT lymphoma of various sites of origin (four of the ocular adnexa, five of the salivary glands, three of the stomach, two of the lung, and one of the colon and the breast) were administered L-OHP at a dose of 130 mg/m2 infused during 2 hours every 3 weeks. Restaging was performed every two cycles; treatment was continued until complete remission (CR) or for a maximum of six cycles in responders.

RESULTS

Sixty-five cycles were administered (median, four; range, two to six); toxicity consisted of transient sensory neuropathy in eight patients and nausea/emesis WHO grade 2 in two patients, whereas hematologic adverse effects (thrombocytopenia and leukocytopenia grade 2) occurred in only one patient each. Fifteen patients responded to chemotherapy, with nine achieving CR (56%), six (37.5%) achieving partial response, and one achieving stable disease; the median time to response was 4 months (range; 2 to 4 months).

CONCLUSION

These data suggest L-OHP is a highly active agent for treatment of MALT lymphoma. However, a longer follow-up is needed to judge whether these remissions are durable.

Phase II study of oxaliplatin in patients with recurrent or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Oxaliplatin is a platinum derivative with a broad range of anticancer activity. The objective of the current Phase II trial was to investigate the activity of oxaliplatin in patients with recurrent or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL).

METHODS

Patients with recurrent and refractory NHL who received a maximum of 3 previous chemotherapy regimens were considered eligible if they had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 and adequate organ function. Oxaliplatin was administered in an outpatient setting at a dose of 130 mg/m(2) by 2-hour intravenous infusion every 21 days for < or = 6 cycles in the absence of disease progression.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients (23 with aggressive NHL and 8 with indolent NHL) were enrolled, of whom 30 were assessable for toxicity, response, and survival. The median patient age was 62 years, and 20% of the patients previously received platinum-containing therapy. Eighty-three percent of the patients were refractory to their last treatment regimens. Grade 3 and 4 toxic effects (according to the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria [version 2.0]) included sensory neuropathy (10%), neutropenia (17%), and thrombocytopenia (20%). Objective responses occurred in 8 (27%; 95% confidence interval, 13-47%) of the patients. Responses were observed in platinum-naive patients as well as in those previously treated with platinum. The overall median failure-free survival duration was 3.0 months (range, 0.1-18.1 months).

CONCLUSIONS

Oxaliplatin had favorable single-agent activity in previously treated patients with refractory lymphoma. The favorable safety profile and the ease of its administration in outpatient settings warrant investigating it in combination with other active drugs for the treatment of recurrent and refractory NHL.

Gemcitabine, cisplatin and methylprednisolone (GEM-P) is an effective salvage regimen in patients with relapsed and refractory lymphoma

There is currently no standard salvage chemotherapy regimen in relapsed and refractory lymphoma. Gemcitabine is a novel nucleoside analogue, which acts synergistically with cisplatin both in vitro and in clinical studies. We evaluated the combination of gemcitabine, cisplatin and methylprednisolone (GEM-P) in 41 heavily pretreated patients with relapsed and refractory Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. The best-achieved response rate (RR) was 79% (95% CI 64-91), with a complete RR of 21%. In patients with chemo-resistant disease, the RR was 63%. Myelosuppression was the main toxicity, the incidence of Grade 3 or 4 anaemia, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was 17.1, 61.0 and 53.7% respectively. Only one patient had neutropenic sepsis and none of the patients suffered from haemorrhage. Grade 3 or 4 nonhaematological toxicity was minimal and stem cell mobilisation was not inhibited. GEM-P is an effective salvage regimen and its use prior to autologous stem cell transplant warrants further investigation.

Clinical efficacy, tolerability, and safety of SAM486A, a novel polyamine biosynthesis inhibitor, in patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results from a phase II multicenter study

PURPOSE

SAM486A is a new inhibitor of S-adenosyl-methionine-decarboxylase, a key enzyme for polyamine biosynthesis. It is more potent than the first generation S-adenosyl-methionine-decarboxylase inhibitor methylglyoxal bis-guanylhydrazone. This Phase IIa study reports the findings of SAM486A monotherapy in patients with refractory or relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Forty-one previously treated patients with either diffuse large cell, follicular, or peripheral T-cell NHL were treated i.v. with 100 mg/m(2) SAM486A as a daily 1-h infusion for 5 days repeated every 3 weeks. Treatment was continued for a total of eight cycles or until disease progression.

RESULTS

Two patients, both with large B-cell lymphoma, showed a complete response at cycle 3 that was maintained for >or=13 and >or=28 months. Five patients had a partial response, and 3 had stable disease at last follow-up. The overall response rate (complete response plus partial response) was 18.9% for evaluable patients (7 patients). Anemia was the primary hematological toxicity and observed in 7 (17.1%) patients. Five patients experienced grade 3/4 anemia. Four patients (9.8%) experienced grade 3/4 febrile neutropenia and grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia, respectively. Nonhematological toxicities were mild to moderate in intensity. The most frequent side effects were nausea (39%), vomiting (22%), diarrhea (19.5%), asthenia (17.1%), abdominal pain (14.6%), and flushing (9.8%).

CONCLUSION

SAM486A has a promising clinical activity in patients with poor prognosis NHL and manageable safety profile. To further define the role of SAM486A, in the treatment of NHL, additional studies are warranted.

Tumour-inhibiting platinum complexes--state of the art and future perspectives

Thirty years after the onset of the first clinical studies with cisplatin, the development of antineoplastic platinum drugs continues to be a productive field of research. This article reviews the current preclinical and clinical status, including a discussion of the molecular basis for the activity of the parent drug cisplatin and platinum drugs of the second and third generation, in particular their interaction with DNA. Further emphasis is laid on the development of third generation platinum drugs with activity in cisplatin-resistant tumours, particularly on chelates containing 1,2-diaminocyclohexane (DACH) and on the promising and more recently evolving field of non-classic ( trans- and multinuclear) platinum complexes. The development of oral platinum drugs and drug targeting strategies using liposomes, polymers or low-molecular-weight carriers in order to improve the therapeutic index of platinum chemotherapy are also covered.

Gemcitabine, cisplatin and methylprednisolone chemotherapy (GEM-P) is an effective regimen in patients with poor prognostic primary progressive or multiply relapsed Hodgkin's and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine, cisplatin and methylprednisolone (GEM-P) for patients with relapsed or refractory Hodgkin's disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Twenty-one patients were treated with gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2 d 1, 8 and 15), cisplatin (100 mg/m2 d 15) and methylprednisolone (1000 mg d 1-5) given every 28 d. Of these, 20 patients were evaluable for response. The median age was 38 years (range 17-64 years). Histological subtypes were: nodular sclerosing HD (n = 10), diffuse large B cell (n = 5), T cell-rich B cell (n = 2), follicular (n = 2), mantle cell (n = 1) and enteropathy-associated T-cell lymphoma (n = 1). The median remission duration prior to receiving GEM-P was only 42 d. The overall objective response rate was 80%[95% confidence interval (CI): 56-94%], including five complete and 11 partial responses. GEM-P induced responses in all histological subtypes, primary progressive disease and patients who had received a previous autograft. The only grade 3-4 toxicity was myelosuppression. However, no cases of febrile neutropenia or haemorrhage with thrombocytopenia were encountered. Median survival has not yet been reached and survival probability at 1 year was 60.8% (95% CI: 31.9-80.5%). In conclusion, GEM-P is a novel combination salvage therapy for poor-prognostic primary progressive or multiply relapsed lymphoma patients. It has clinically significant activity with a favourable toxicity profile.

A dose-escalation and pharmacokinetic study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors

BACKGROUND

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin have broad antineoplastic activity and favorable toxicity. We conducted a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated doses (MTDs) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of the combination in patients with advanced solid tumors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Sixty-eight patients with advanced stage solid tumors were enrolled. Treatment was first-line for 35% of patients, second-line for 27%, and third-line for 38%. Gemcitabine was administered at escalating doses of 1000-2000 mg/m(2) as a 30-min intravenous (i.v.) infusion on days 1 and 8 and oxaliplatin at 60-130 mg/m(2) as a 4-h i.v. infusion on day 8 every 21 days without growth factor support.

RESULTS

The MTD was defined at gemcitabine 1800 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 8. Twelve dose levels were evaluated and DLTs occurring during the first cycle consisted of grade 4 neutropenia, grade 3 asthenia or mucositis and grade 1-3 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia resulting in treatment delays. A total of 266 cycles were administered with only one episode of febrile neutropenia and no toxic deaths. Seven (3%) and 26 (10%) cycles were complicated by grade 4 and 3 neutropenia, respectively, three (1%) and 13 (5%) by grade 4 and 3 thrombocytopenia, and eight (3%) by grade 3 anemia. The most common non-hematological toxicity was grade 2/3 asthenia observed in 23% of cycles. Responses were observed in patients with a variety of epithelial neoplasms. The pharmacokinetic study revealed no significant interaction between the two drugs.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin has excellent tolerability and promising activity in patients with advanced solid tumors. As the MTD exceeds the recommended single-agent dose for gemcitabine, and a dose-response effect has not been established, we recommend using both drugs at full doses, e.g. gemcitabine 1200-1400 mg/m(2) on days 1 and 8 and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m(2) on day 8 for further phase II studies.

Gemcitabine and its combinations in the treatment of malignant lymphoma

Although combination chemotherapy can induce complete remission in a large proportion of patients with Hodgkin's disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), 30%-50% of patients will relapse. Gemcitabine has shown promising activity in heavily pretreated patients with HD and NHL even in those who have progressed after autologous stem cell transplantation. Its favorable toxicity profile allows development of combination regimens with other cytotoxic drugs and anti-CD20-targeted therapy, although hematologic toxicities appear to be greater than when gemcitabine is used as a single agent. Prolonged infusion of gemcitabine at a pharmacologically guided dose rate of 10 mg/m2/minute has demonstrated a pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic advantage although clinical efficacy of prolonged infusion needs to be established. Thus far, gemcitabine has been mainly tested in relapsed or refractory patients, and its inclusion in front-line therapy may bring about greater benefit. However, as gemcitabine has not been evaluated in randomized studies either alone or in combination with other chemotherapy drugs, its exact role in the treatment paradigm of lymphoma remains to be determined.

A literature review of single agent treatment of multiply relapsed aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

To analyze the available literature describing the treatment of relapsed aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) with single-agent chemotherapies, several comprehensive electronic and manual inspections of the literature were performed for the period from 1966 to the present. Each paper was examined to capture the following data: study type; patient demographics and characteristics; study endpoints, including responses, and method used to evaluate response; toxicities, and the power of the study. A wide variety of single-agent protocols continue to be studied, indicating no currently accepted standard therapy in this patient population. Reported response rates varied between 0 and 67%. The majority of trials were small, uncontrolled studies that used widely varying inclusion/exclusion criteria and had limited reporting of histology, response, prior treatments, and other key parameters. We were able to find only four agents, etoposide, vincristine, vinorelbine and possibly rituximab, with sufficient reproducible evidence to suggest greater than 30% activity (CR + PR rate) when given to patients with second or greater relapse of aggressive NHL. Consequently, the usefulness of the agents in these reports remains to be established in larger trials with more detailed reporting. The advantages that would be brought by an active non-myelosuppressive agent for patients having this condition emerge clearly from this review.

An oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory intermediate and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

This study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of substituting cisplatin with oxaliplatin in the DHAP (dexamethasone, cytarabine and cisplatin) regimen for patients with relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. Twenty-four evaluable patients with intermediate or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were treated at 3-weekly intervals with oxaliplatin (130 mg/m2, d 1), cytarabine (2 g/m2 for two doses, d 2) and dexamethasone (40 mg, d 1-4). The median age of the patients was 58 (range 18-70). Histological subtypes were diffuse large B cell, 20; mantle cell, two; anaplastic large cell, one; and peripheral T cell, one. The overall objective response rate (RR) was 50% [95% confidence interval (CI) = 29-71%] including four complete responses and eight partial responses. RR for those patients treated at first relapse was higher than those treated at second and subsequent relapse (77% versus 29%). Grade 3 and 4 toxicity was mainly haematological: anaemia 17%, neutropenia 75% and thrombocytopenia 75%. No grade 4 non-haematological toxicity was reported. No significant renal and neurotoxicity was demonstrated. Median survival was 10.6 months. Probabilities of 1-year progression-free survival and overall survival were 47% (95% CI = 26-66%) and 50% (95% CI = 23-72%) respectively. In conclusion, dexamethasone, cytarabine and oxaliplatin (DHAX) is a novel combination in salvage therapy for relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. It has clinically significant activity with an acceptable toxicity profile. Lack of renal toxicity makes DHAX an attractive cytoreductive regimen before high-dose chemotherapy.

Dexamethasone, high-dose cytarabine, and oxaliplatin (DHAOx) as salvage treatment for patients with initially refractory or relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Dexamethasone. cytarabine (ara-C), and cisplatin (DHAP) can be used effectively to treat patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). We hypothesized that substitution of cisplatin by oxaliplatin (L-OHP) could result in less toxicity and greater efficacy. L-OHP is active in patients with lymphoma. It produces mild myelosuppression and is devoid of renal toxicity. We report on a phase II study of dexamethasone, high-dose ara-C, and L-OHP (DHAOx) used to treat patients with NHL who were previously treated with chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fifteen patients were given DHAOx. They had failed to achieve a CR with initial chemotherapy or had recurrent disease. DHAOx consisted of dexamethasone, 40 mg/day (days 1 to 4): L-OHP, 130 mg/m2 (day 1); and ara-C, 2,000 mg/m2 every 12 h (day 2). Treatment was repeated every 21 days.

RESULTS

Patients received a median of four courses of DHAOx. Myelosuppression and transient sensory peripheral neuropathy were the most prominent toxic effects. Serum creatinine levels did not increase in patients with normal renal function, nor in patients who had renal impairment before DHAOx. The median follow-up time from the start of DHAOx treatment was 17 months. Eight patients (53%) achieved a CR, and three patients (20%) had a PR. Responses were achieved by patients with lymphomas of various histologies that included mainly the follicular subtype, and by patients with and without resistance to prior chemotherapy. None of the eight responders have relapsed from CR at 4+. 6+, 14+, 15+, 19+, 20+, 24+, and 24+ months. They had various types of therapy after DHAOx. Disappearance of molecular markers was observed in all four patients who achieved a CR and whose tumor cells carried molecular abnormalities.

CONCLUSION

DHAOx possesses characteristics of toxicity which compare favorably to those reported with DHAP, and it is useful as a salvage treatment for patients with NHL. Larger studies are required to establish the therapeutic potential of the regimen.

New drug development in non-Hodgkin lymphomas

The non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL) are characterized by initial responsiveness to a variety of chemotherapeutic regimens. Nevertheless, most patients progress and die from their disease. A number of new agents with unique mechanisms of action are in clinical development. Agents that are currently considered to be the most promising include those that induce apoptosis; those that interfere with cell cycling, tumor-associated angiogenesis, farnesylation of the Ras gene, and histone deacetylase; and those that inhibit the proteasome, among others. Increasing insights into the differences between tumors and among patients will lead to more individualized therapeutic strategies using agents directed at specific genetic and immunologic targets. More rapid accrual to high-quality clinical studies will facilitate dissemination of new agents to patients and lead to an increased cure rate for NHL.

Oxaliplatin. A review of its pharmacological properties and clinical efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer and its potential in other malignancies

Oxaliplatin is a platinum compound that inhibits DNA synthesis, primarily by causing intrastrand cross-links in DNA. Oxaliplatin has a broad spectrum of antineoplastic activity and has demonstrated a lack of cross-resistance with other platinum compounds. In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, intravenous oxaliplatin has been trialled as a monotherapy and in combination with other agents. The highest response rates were achieved when oxaliplatin was used in combination with fluorouracil/folinic acid (leucovorin; calcium folinate), typically > or = 50% in the first-line setting and 13 to 45% as a second-line therapy. First-line triple therapy with oxaliplatin and fuorouracil/folinic acid achieved significantly higher response rates and longer median progression-free survival than fluorouracil/folinic acid therapy alone. However, no significant difference in the median duration of overall survival was found. This may be a consequence of the subsequent use of oxaliplatin and/or surgery after disease progression in patients who relapsed after fluorouracil/folinic acid therapy alone. Neoadjuvant therapy with oxaliplatin/fluorouracil/folinic acid has proven beneficial in enabling surgical removal of previously unresectable liver metastases. In 2 studies, surgery with curative intent was performed in 16 and 51% of patients with initially unresectable liver metastases following oxaliplatin/fluorouracil/folinic acid therapy; the 5-year survival rates were 40 and 50%, respectively. In patients with advanced ovarian cancer, first-line therapy with oxaliplatin/cyclophosphamide achieved an objective response rate which did not differ significantly from that of cisplatin/cyclophosphamide (33 vs 42%). In addition, oxaliplatin has shown efficacy in patients with platinum-pretreated ovarian cancer and achieved objective response rates similar to paclitaxel in this setting (16 vs 17%). Promising results have also been found with oxaliplatin in patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, breast cancer, mesothelioma and non-small cell lung cancer. Reversible, cumulative, peripheral sensory neuropathy is the principle dose-limiting factor of oxaliplatin therapy. Haematological and gastrointestinal toxicities occur frequently but are generally mild to moderate in intensity.

CONCLUSION

Oxaliplatin in combination with fluorouracil/folinic acid is an effective treatment option for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, both as a first-line therapy and in patients refractory to previous chemotherapy. Although preliminary results failed to show any overall survival advantage of this regimen over fluorouracil/folinic acid alone, this may be a consequence of trial design and requires further examination. Additional clinical investigation of oxaliplatin in patients with other cancers is warranted given the promising results achieved in early trials, most notably in patients with platinum-pretreated ovarian cancer.

Oxaliplatin clinical activity: a review

Oxaliplatin (Eloxatin), a recently developed third-generation cisplatin analogue with a 1,2-diaminocyclohexane (DACH) carrier ligand, has displayed preclinical and clinical activity in a wide variety of tumour types. Synergistic with 5-FU in colorectal cancer (CRC), the combination has proven efficacy in 5-FU-resistant advanced disease and in previously untreated CRC, as demonstrated in controlled phase III trials, while evaluation in the adjuvant setting is ongoing. Due to its excellent safety profile, its unique mechanism of action and lack of cross-resistance with other active agents in CRC, oxaliplatin has also been combined with CPT-11 and Raltitrexed with promising results. Trials in pretreated and untreated advanced ovarian cancer (AOC), as a single agent or in combination with cisplatin, cyclophosphamide or paclitaxel, indicate a yet to be defined role in AOC and confirm its lack of cross-resistance with cis/carboplatin. Clinical investigations of single agent and combination therapies in breast, lung, prostate and germ-cell carcinomas, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and malignant mesothelioma are being pursued. While the role of oxaliplatin in medical oncology is yet to be fully defined, it appears to be an important new anticancer agent.

Oxaliplatin: pharmacokinetics and chronopharmacological aspects

Oxaliplatin is the first clinically available diaminocyclohexane platinum coordination complex. The drug is non-cross-resistant with cisplatin or carboplatin and is one of the few active drugs against human colorectal cancer. Its cytotoxicity is synergistic with fluorouracil and folinic acid (leucovorin), the reference treatment for this disease. The main cumulative dose-limiting toxicity of oxaliplatin is peripheral sensory neuropathy. The drug can also produce diarrhoea, vomiting and haematological suppression. Unlike cisplatin, no renal failure or peripheral motor neuropathy have been reported and the sensory neuropathy is partly reversible. Unlike carboplatin, oxaliplatin produces only mild to moderate haematological toxicity. Oxaliplatin undergoes biotransformation into aquated forms in the blood, where 3 species can be found: total platinum, ultrafilterable or 'free' platinum and erythrocyte platinum. Flameless atomic absorption (FAAS) is used for assaying platinum concentration in various tissues. Inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), with a >10-fold lower sensitivity threshold than FAAS, was also used for the determination of oxaliplatin pharmacokinetics. The pharmacokinetics of oxaliplatin are described by a 3-compartment model. The drug rapidly crosses the cellular membrane as a result of its lipophilicity. Hence, at the end of a 2-hour infusion, approximately 40% of the blood platinum is found in erythrocytes. The distribution half-life of ultrafiltrated plasma platinum ranges from 10 to 25 minutes and its terminal elimination half-life is 26 hours (determined with FAAS) or 270 hours (ICP-MS). The elimination half-life of erythrocytic platinum is 12 to 50 days, close to that of erythrocytes. 30 to 50% of the platinum is recovered in the urine within 2 to 5 days, with renal clearance accounting for half of the total clearance of ultrafiltrated platinum. The total clearance of this species is correlated with the glomerular filtration rate. No pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship has been established for oxaliplatin. Pharmacokinetic alterations produced by fluorouracil + folinic acid or irinotecan were minimal if any. The prolonged stability of oxaliplatin makes it suitable for continuous infusions over 4 to 5 days, with a delivery rate which can be either constant or chronomodulated (peak rate at 1600h), using programmable ambulatory pumps. Chronomodulation significantly reduces toxicity and improves antitumour activity as compared with constant rate infusion. These differences in pharmacodynamic properties were paralleled by differences in plasma concentration time courses. The different drug concentration profiles achieved with different infusional modalities may be useful tools for understanding the relationship between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oxaliplatin and may lead to further optimisation of its administration schedule and its combination with other drugs.