Phase I/pharmacokinetic study of the topoisomerase I inhibitor GG211 administered as a 21-day continuous infusion

Topoisomerase Inhibitors and Targeted Delivery in Cancer Therapy

DNA topoisomerases are enzymes that catalyze the alteration of DNA topology with transiently induced DNA strand breakage, essential for DNA replication. Topoisomerases are validated cancer chemotherapy targets. Anticancer agents targeting Topoisomerase I and II have been in clinical use and proven to be highly effective, though with significant side effects. There are tremendous efforts to develop new generation of topoisomerase inhibitors. Targeted delivery of topoisomerase inhibitors is another way to reduce the side effects. Conjugates of topoisomerases inhibitors with antibody, polymer, or small molecule are developed to target these inhibitors to tumor sites.

Biologically active quinoline and quinazoline alkaloids part I

Quinoline and quinazoline alkaloids, two important classes of N-based heterocyclic compounds, have attracted tremendous attention from researchers worldwide since the 19th century. Over the past 200 years, many compounds from these two classes were isolated from natural sources, and most of them and their modified analogs possess significant bioactivities. Quinine and camptothecin are two of the most famous and important quinoline alkaloids, and their discoveries opened new areas in antimalarial and anticancer drug development, respectively. In this review, we survey the literature on bioactive alkaloids from these two classes and highlight research achievements prior to the year 2008 (Part I). Over 200 molecules with a broad range of bioactivities, including antitumor, antimalarial, antibacterial and antifungal, antiparasitic and insecticidal, antiviral, antiplatelet, anti-inflammatory, herbicidal, antioxidant and other activities, were reviewed. This survey should provide new clues or possibilities for the discovery of new and better drugs from the original naturally occurring quinoline and quinazoline alkaloids.

Perspectives on biologically active camptothecin derivatives

Camptothecins (CPTs) are cytotoxic natural alkaloids that specifically target DNA topoisomerase I. Research on CPTs has undergone a significant evolution from the initial discovery of CPT in the late 1960s through the study of synthetic small-molecule derivatives to investigation of macromolecular constructs and formulations. Over the past years, intensive medicinal chemistry efforts have generated numerous CPT derivatives. Three derivatives, topotecan, irinotecan, and belotecan, are currently prescribed as anticancer drugs, and several related compounds are now in clinical trials. Interest in other biological effects, besides anticancer activity, of CPTs is also growing exponentially, as indicated by the large number of publications on the subject during the last decades. Therefore, the main focus of the present review is to provide an ample but condensed overview on various biological activities of CPT derivatives, in addition to continued up-to-date coverage of anticancer effects.

Evaluation of the cytotoxic effect of camptothecin solid lipid nanoparticles on MCF7 cells

Camptothecin (CPT) and its analogs exhibit remarkable anti-tumor activity, due to their ability to inhibit DNA topoisomerase I. However, its use is limited by the lack of solubility and stability of the active lactone form. An attractive alternative is the encapsulation of CPT within liposomes. In this study, CPT was incorporated into solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) based on the triglyceride, Compritol 888 ATO, using supercritical fluid technology without requiring the use of harmful solvents. This drug delivery system was characterized and its cytotoxicity effect was evaluated by measuring MCF7 and MCF10A cell viability as a function of drug loading during a 48-h treatment. Results showed that after 10 h of treatment, MCF7 cells displayed an IC50 of 0.23±0.034 μM at a 1:5 (CPT:SLN) loading and 0.22±0.027 μM at a 1:10 loading, whereas MCF10A cells displayed an IC50 of 0.40±0.036 μM at 1:5 and 0.60±0.063 μM at 1:10. On the other hand, the IC50 of free CPT was 0.57±0.035 μM and 1.07±0.077 μM for MCF7 and MCF10A cells, respectively. Cellular uptake and retention measurements in both cells displayed a two-fold increase when using the SLN formulation. The results from this study showed that the cytotoxic effects of CPT in a SLN formulation improved when compared with those seen with free CPT. The results of this study showed that delivery of CPT as a SLN formulation could be a promising strategy for enhancing its chemotherapeutic effects.

Cancer therapies utilizing the camptothecins: a review of the in vivo literature

This review summarizes the in vivo assessment-preliminary, preclinical, and clinical-of chemotherapeutics derived from camptothecin or a derivative. Camptothecin is a naturally occurring, pentacyclic quinoline alkaloid that possesses high cytotoxic activity in a variety of cell lines. Major limitations of the drug, including poor solubility and hydrolysis under physiological conditions, prevent full clinical utilization. Camptothecin remains at equilibrium in an active lactone form and inactive hydrolyzed carboxylate form. The active lactone binds to DNA topoisomerase I cleavage complex, believed to be the single site of activity. Binding inhibits DNA religation, resulting in apoptosis. A series of small molecule camptothecin derivatives have been developed that increase solubility, lactone stability and bioavailability to varying levels of success. A number of macromolecular agents have also been described wherein camptothecin(s) are covalently appended or noncovalently associated with the goal of improving solubility and lactone stability, while taking advantage of the tumor physiology to deliver larger doses of drug to the tumor with lower systemic toxicity. With the increasing interest in drug delivery and polymer therapeutics, additional constructs are anticipated. The goal of this review is to summarize the relevant literature for others interested in the field of camptothecin-based therapeutics, specifically in the context of biodistribution, dosing regimens, and pharmacokinetics with the desire of providing a useful source of comparative data. To this end, only constructs where in vivo data is available are reported. The review includes published reports in English through mid-2009.

Alternative administration of camptothecin analogues

In order to improve the therapeutic index of camptothecin (CPT) analogues, alternative administration of CPT analogues is being evaluated. Topotecan, irinotecan, rubitecan, lurtotecan and 9-aminocamptothecin have been administered orally with response rates equivalent to that seen after intravenous administration, where applicable. Oral availability and administration of some of the newer CPT analogues, including diflomotecan (BN80915) and grimatecan (ST1481), have also shown promising results. Aerosolisation of liposomal 9-nitrocamptothecin has been studied in patients with advanced malignancies involving the lung, demonstrating systemic antitumour activity. Intrathecal administration of topotecan has been studied in children with refractory neoplastic meningitis. It is well tolerated and associated with some antitumour activity. Intraperitoneal administration of topotecan as consolidation therapy in patients with ovarian cancer has shown promising results. Transdermal administration of rubitecan has been studied in mice. So far, no CPT has been approved for an alternative route of administration.

Topoisomerase I Inhibitors in the Treatment of Gastrointestinal Cancer: From Intravenous to Oral Administration

This article reviews the current status of the topoisomerase I (top I) inhibitors in the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. We focus on oral drug administration, the mode of administration that is generally preferred by patients with cancer. However, the great majority of the studies have been performed with intravenous (I.V.) administration. The most extensively investigated GI malignancy in phase I/II studies is colorectal cancer (CRC), for which I.V. irinotecan is currently approved in the United States and Europe. We discuss the activity and efficacy of irinotecan as a single agent in CRC and in combination regimens. Also, results obtained with monotherapy and in combination treatment in other GI malignancies such as esophageal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer are discussed. Few phase I studies have been performed with oral irinotecan and its clinical activity has not yet been fully determined. Several top I inhibitors are discussed, including topotecan, 9-aminocamptothecin, rubitecan, exatecan, and lurtotecan. None of these agents, given orally or intravenously, have shown activity in CRC similar to that of I.V. irinotecan. However, several agents show promising results in other GI malignancies, eg, rubitecan and exatecan in pancreatic cancer. A complicating factor in the oral administration of the top I inhibitors is the often encountered low and variable oral bioavailability. This can partly be explained by the high affinity for the drug efflux pumps BCRP (ABCG2) and P-glycoprotein, which are highly expressed in the epithelial apical membrane of the GI tract. A novel approach to improve the oral bioavailability of the top I inhibitors by temporary blockade of the drug transporter BCRP is described.

A phase I study of OSI-211 and cisplatin as intravenous infusions given on days 1, 2 and 3 every 3 weeks in patients with solid cancers

BACKGROUND

OSI-211 (also known as NX211) is a liposomal preparation of the topoisomerase I inhibitor, lurtotecan, which has shown antitumor activity in phase I and II clinical trials. Cisplatin is a widely used antineoplastic agent with activity in a broad range of tumor types. This phase I trial was conducted to determine the recommended doses of these agents, and their pharmacokinetic properties and toxicities in patients with advanced solid malignancies.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Fourteen patients with advanced and/or metastatic solid malignancies were enrolled in this trial. The first planned dose level was OSI-211 0.9 mg/m(2) with cisplatin 25 mg/m(2) administered intravenously daily for the first three consecutive days of a 21-day cycle. Patients were evaluated for hematological and non-hematological toxicities, and pharmacokinetic studies were performed on both agents.

RESULTS

The recommended phase II dose was determined to be 0.7 mg/m(2) OSI-211 given with 25 mg/m(2) cisplatin. Dose-limiting neutropenia was seen in two of three patients at the starting dose level. Three of 11 patients at the second (lower) dose level experienced dose-limiting thrombocytopenia; febrile neutropenia was also seen in one patient. Non-hematological toxicities were generally manageable and included fatigue, nausea and vomiting. Considerable variability was seen in both hematological toxicities and pharmacokinetics. One complete response and three partial responses were seen.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended phase II dose for this combination is 0.7 mg/m(2) OSI-211 with 25 mg/m(2) cisplatin given as an intravenous infusion on days 1, 2 and 3 of a 21-day cycle. The main toxicity was myelosuppression. Preliminary evidence of antitumor activity was seen.

Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of a low-clearance, unilamellar liposomal formulation of lurtotecan, a topoisomerase 1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced leukemia

BACKGROUND

OSI-211 is a low-clearance, unilamellar liposomal formulation of a water-soluble camptothecin analogue, lurtotecan. OSI-211 has significant activity in severe combined immunodeficient mouse models of human leukemia.

METHODS

This study was conducted to define the dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) and pharmacokinetics of OSI-211 in patients with refractory myeloid leukemias. Patients with refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), or chronic myelogenous leukemia in blastic phase (CML-BP) were eligible. OSI-211 was given as an intravenous infusion over 30 minutes daily for 3 days. The starting dose was 1.5 mg/m2 per day (4.5 mg/m2 per course). The dose was escalated by 50% until Grade 2 toxicity was observed and then by 30-35% until the DLT was defined. Serial plasma and urine samples were collected, and drug levels were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (18 patients [90%] with AML, and 1 patient each [5%] with MDS and CML-BP) were treated. Mucositis and diarrhea were considered to be the DLTs. The maximum tolerated dose was 3.7 mg/m2 per day. Fourteen of 18 evaluable patients (78%) with AML or MDS achieved transient bone marrow aplasia. The mean systemic clearance of lurtotecan in plasma was 0.946 +/- 1.53 L/hour/m2. Urinary recovery of lurtotecan was 6.66% +/- 5.26% (range, 1.05-18.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Liposomal encapsulation of lurtotecan altered its metabolism significantly. There was no evident correlation between exposure, as measured by plasma pharmacokinetics of lurtotecan, and clinical response or toxicities. OSI-211 merits further study in hematologic malignancies.

OSI-211, a novel liposomal topoisomerase I inhibitor, is active in SCID mouse models of human AML and ALL

OSI-211 (liposomal lurtotecan), was evaluated using several different dose schedules (1mg/kg, d1-5, 1.75 mg/kg d1, 3, 5 and 6 mg/kg d1, 8) in severe combined immunodeficient (SCID) mouse models of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) and acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) with early treatment (ET, days 6-8) or late treatment (LT, days 15-19), examining early and advanced disease, respectively. Due to the aggressive nature of the Molt-4 model, the ET and LT were accelerated to day 3 or 4 and day 8 post-implant, respectively. For each model, 2 x 10(7) (KBM-3B) or 1 x 10(7) (Molt-4, HL-60 and CEM) leukemia cells were injected intravenously into the tail vein. Each control and test group consisted of eight animals. All three schedules (1mg/kg qd1-5, 1.75 mg/kg d1, 3, 5 and 6 mg/kg d1, 8) increased the life span of OSI-211 treated animals in each model, with a tendency toward improved efficacy with the 6 mg/kg d1, 8 schedule. As a result, the activity of the 6 mg/kg d1, 8 schedule is detailed for each model. ET significantly (P<0.005) increased survival in the KBM-3B model with 86% long-term survivors (LTS). Using PRC analysis, human beta-globin gene sequences in one or several tissues were amplified in all but 3 LTS, suggesting minimal residual disease in 26 of the 29 LTS. LT also significantly (P<0.005) improved average life span in the KBM-3B model, with an average ILS=196+/-11% and one LTS. Treatment of HL-60 leukemia animals significantly (P<0.005) increased life span, with an ILS=213+/-9% and two LTS for ET, and with an ILS=219+/-4% and no LTS for LT. Treatment of Molt-4 animals, the most aggressive leukemia model tested, significantly (P<0.005) increased life span, with an average ILS=181+/-3% and no LTS for ET and an average ILS=172+/-1% with no LTS for LT. In the CEM model, ET resulted in a significantly (P<0.005) improved ILS=244+/-24% with one LTS. In comparison to OSI-211, treatment with DaunoXome, the liposomal formulation of daunorubicin, a drug with clinical efficacy in AML and ALL, had no effect on survival in the KBM-3B, nor Molt-4 A4 leukemia models when administered at its maximum or near maximum tolerated doses of 3mg/kg d1, 8. These data demonstrate that OSI-211 has potent antileukemia activity in preclinical SCID mouse AML and ALL leukemia models, supporting the clinical investigation of OSI-211 for hematological malignancies.

Phase I and pharmacologic study of liposomal lurtotecan, NX 211: urinary excretion predicts hematologic toxicity

PURPOSE

To determine the maximum-tolerated and recommended dose, toxicity profile, and pharmacokinetics of the liposomal topoisomerase I inhibitor lurtotecan (NX 211) administered as a 30-minute intravenous infusion once every 3 weeks in cancer patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

NX 211 was administered by peripheral infusion. Dose escalation decisions were based on all toxicities during the first cycle as well as pharmacokinetic parameters. Serial plasma, whole blood, and urine samples were collected for up to 96 hours after the end of infusion, and drug levels were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients (16 women; median age, 56 years; range, 39 to 74 years) received 77 courses of NX 211 at dose levels of 0.4 (n = 3), 0.8 (n = 6), 1.6 (n = 3), 3.2 (n = 6), 3.8 (n = 6), and 4.3 mg/m(2) (n = 5). Neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the dose-limiting toxicities and were not cumulative. Other toxicities were mild to moderate. Nine patients had stable disease while undergoing treatment. The systemic clearance of lurtotecan in plasma and whole blood was 0.82 +/- 0.78 L/h/m(2) and 1.15 +/- 0.96 L/h/m(2), respectively. Urinary recovery (Fu) of lurtotecan was 10.1% +/- 4.05% (range, 4.9% to 18.9%). In contrast to systemic exposure measures, the dose excreted in urine (ie, dose x Fu) was significantly related to the percent decrease in neutrophil and platelet counts at nadir (P <.00001).

CONCLUSION

The dose-limiting toxicities of NX 211 are neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. The recommended dose for phase II studies is 3.8 mg/m(2) once every 3 weeks. Pharmacologic data suggest a relationship between exposure to lurtotecan and NX 211-induced clinical effects.

Alternative administration of camptothecin analogues

The binding of camptothecin (CPT) to the DNA-topoisomerase complex is reversible, but it needs to be maintained for maximal inhibitory activity. It is also dependent on the chemical structure of CPT. The lactone form is thought to be necessary for the activity. In human serum, the equilibrium between lactone and carboxylate is in favor of the latter. For these reasons, alternative administration of CPT analogues is being evaluated. The ideal compound would remain in lactone form and would expose the host for long periods of time to its effects. Oral administration of irinotecan (CPT-11) and topotecan (TPT) is discussed by other investigators. We studied oral rubitecan and reported a low lactone to total drug area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUCP) ratio (14.7%), with low plasma concentration over time despite repeated administrations and the presence of an enterohepatic cycle. Aerosolization of a liposomal formulation of rubitecan is currently under study. Six patients have been treated once a day for 5 days every 3 weeks. The dose was 6.7 micrograms/kg/day. Plasma levels are dose for dose higher than those after oral administration, but the ratio of lactone versus total drug is low. No toxicity was observed. The study will continue with increasing doses and lengths of administration. Intrathecal administration of topotecan has been studied in a phase I trial in children. Doses of 0.4 mg are tolerated without toxicity, and clinical responses have been seen in patients with refractory meningial carcinomatosis. Phase II studies are planned. Intraperitoneal (i.p.) administration of topotecan has been studied in a phase I trial as a 24-hour infusion in 5% dextrose at pH 3.5 every 21 days. Dose-limiting toxicity is 4 mg/m2. Toxic effects are neutropenia, anemia, emesis, fever, and pain. Five of 10 patients with ascites had symptomatic relief. Pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrates a second-order kinetics with elimination half-lives of 0.49 and 2.7 hours. The peritoneal to plasma AUC ratio was 31.2. Intramuscular, transdermal, and subcutaneous administrations have been extensively studied in the mouse.