Salvage treatment for germ cell cancer after failed high-dose therapy

Long-term follow-up of Anglian Germ Cell Cancer Group surveillance versus patients with Stage 1 nonseminoma treated with adjuvant chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

To study survival and late events after adjuvant chemotherapy in Stage 1 nonseminoma.

METHODS

From 1978 to 1986, all patients had surveillance. From 1986, adjuvant chemotherapy (initially a 3-day regimen of etoposide, bleomycin, and cisplatin, but, more recently, bleomycin, Oncovin, and cisplatin) was offered to patients at a high risk of relapse (greater than 30%).

RESULTS

A total of 382 patients with Stage 1 nonseminoma treated between 1978 and 2000 were reviewed. Of the 234 patients treated by surveillance, 71 (30%) had relapses (5 after 2 years), 6 died (2.6%) of germ cell cancer, and 3 developed second primary testicular cancer. Of the 148 men treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, 6 (4%) had relapses and 2 (1.4%) died of chemoresistant cancer. After one course of etoposide, bleomycin, and cisplatin, 3 (6.5%) of 46 developed a relapse; after two courses, 1 (3.6%) of 28 did so; and after bleomycin, Oncovin, and cisplatin every 10 days x2, 2 (2.7%) of 74 patients did so. Of the high-risk patients who were offered adjuvant treatment, 24% declined. As a consequence, the relapse rate of the surveillance patients only fell from 36% to 27% after the introduction of adjuvant therapy, although for the total cohort treated in the adjuvant era, the relapse rate was 16%.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant chemotherapy is more effective than retroperitoneal lymph node dissection for reducing the relapse risk in high-risk Stage 1 nonseminoma. However, given the uncertainty about the incidence of postchemotherapy late events, surveillance and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection remain justified alternatives. With positron emission tomography and laparoscopy showing increasing promise in these cases, quality-of-life studies and greater patient involvement in treatment selection are needed.

Computed tomography 21 days after chemotherapy, three-dimensional estimates of metastatic volume and the need for surgery in patients with germ cell cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether the response visible on computed tomography (CT) 21 days after the first course of chemotherapy in patients with nonseminomatous germ cell tumour predicts the need for surgery and whether three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction adds to the diagnostic accuracy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

CT scans from 52 patients treated with cisplatin-based chemotherapy were assessed for tumour shrinkage by measuring the changes of a one-dimensional (1D) measurement of the maximum transverse diameter, and comparing CT scans before, 21 days after the first course and at the end of chemotherapy (1D method). In a subset of patients, using a special formula, the 1D-derived 2D and 3D shrinkage (2Dder and 3Dder) were compared with four other computed or calculated methods (1D, 2D, 3Dcalc, 3Dcomp).

RESULTS

At day 21, in 32 of 52 patients (62%) there was < 50% tumour shrinkage using the 1D assessment; 21 of them (66%) needed surgery, compared with none of the 20 patients with > 50% tumour shrinkage by day 21 (chi2 = 22.83, P < 0.001). The 1D method showed significantly less shrinkage than all the other methods but when this was used to derive a 3D shrinkage, assuming the mass to be spherical (3Dder), it was not statistically different from that of 3Dcomp.

CONCLUSIONS

The assessment of the response from 1D CT scan estimates 21 days after initiating chemotherapy identifies a subgroup of patients who have a high probability of needing surgery. Although expected to be more accurate, the 3Dcomp estimate of tumour shrinkage was no better than the 3Dder estimate.

Sixty percent salvage rate for germ-cell tumours using sequential m-BOP, surgery and ifosfamide-based chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

In germ-cell tumours (GCT), there is continuing controversy over the relative merits of dose dense therapy (increased frequency over a given time) versus vertical intensification (increased dose per fraction). The value of using a cisplatin-based dose dense approach in the salvage setting has not been documented and in addition the role of methotrexate remains uncertain. This paper reviews results from our investigations of these issues.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1987 and 1996, 65 patients with relapsing or refractory germ-cell tumour received weekly m-BOP (methotrexate, bleomycin, vincristine and cisplatin) as salvage therapy. Residual masses were excised if possible and patients progressing after this received cisplatin and ifosfamide based chemotheraphy with or without high dose chemotherapy (HDCT) consolidation.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 33 months, 34% are progression free following m-BOP, 11% who had surgery for residual masses which showed viable cancers are progression free. A further 15% who progressed following m-BOP with or without surgery were rendered progression free by third-line therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of m-BOP as second line therapy with deferment of cisplatin and ifosfamide based treatment to third line therapy with consolidation of third line responses with HDCT, leads to an overall progression-free survival of 60%. It does not appear that M-BOP prejudiced the response to third line therapy suggesting a lack of cross resistance. The potentially lower risk of leukaemia and infertility from m-BOP requires further evaluation.