Phase II study of concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: long-term follow-up results. Japan Clinical Oncology Group Protocol 8902

History of Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) Lung Cancer Study Group

The Japan Clinical Oncology Group Lung Cancer Study Group has been carrying out clinical studies, exploring new strategies of treatment, supportive therapies (antiemetics, etc.), etc., for a variety of cancers, including not only small cell lung cancer and non-small cell lung cancer but also rare chest tumours (represented by thymoma) and cancer-associated conditions (cancerous pericarditis, cancerous pleuritis, etc.). In this review, an overview of all studies conducted from 1985 to 2019 is provided.

Upfront surgery in patients with clinical skip N2 lung cancer based on results of modern radiological examinations

Background

Direct lymphatic drainage from a primary tumor to the right paratracheal or aortic window lymph nodes is often noted in pN2 disease. This multi-institutional retrospective study investigated the outcomes of upfront surgery in patients with clinical skip N2 disease (N2 disease without N1 disease) and a tumor in the right upper lobe or left upper segment based on results of modern radiological examinations, including positron emission tomography (PET).

Methods

We identified 143 patients with cN2 disease who underwent upfront surgery in 12 institutions under the Thoracic Surgery Study Group of Osaka University between January 2006 and December 2013. Among 143 patients, 94 who underwent PET were analyzed. We classified these patients into Group A (n=39; clinical skip N2 disease and a tumor in the right upper lobe or left upper segment) and Group B (n=55; other).

Results

The median follow-up was 56.5 months. Among the 94 patients, 50 (53.2%) had skip N2 disease and 65 (69.1%) had a tumor in the right upper lobe or left upper segment. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates of the 94 patients with cN2 disease was 47.9%. The 5-year OS rates for the cN2pN0/1 (n=22) and cN2pN2 (n=70) groups were 74.9% and 41.2%, respectively (P=0.034). The univariate analysis of OS revealed no significant differences in age, sex, histology, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, tumor size, PET findings, and number of metastatic lymph nodes when these parameters were dichotomized. A significantly better 5-year OS rate was observed in Group A than in Group B (64.0% vs. 37.0%; P=0.039). The multivariate analysis of OS revealed that Group A was a significantly prognostic factor (P=0.030).

Conclusions

Patients with cN2 disease in Group A had a more favorable prognosis. Upfront surgery may be a treatment option for such selected patients with non-small lung cancer in the specific group.

Treatment-Related Death during Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Studies

Treatment related death (TRD) is the worst adverse event in chemotherapy and radiotherapy for patients with cancer, the reports for TRDs were sporadically. We aimed to study TRDs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT), and determine whether high radiation dose and newer chemotherapy regimens were associated with the risk of TRD. Data from randomized clinical trials for locally advanced/unresectable NSCLC patients were analyzed. Eligible studies had to have at least one arm with CCRT. The primary endpoint was TRD. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) for TRDs were calculated. In this study, a total of fifty-three trials (8940 patients) were eligible. The pooled TRD rate (accounting for heterogeneity) was 1.44% for all patients. In 20 trials in which comparison of TRDs between CCRT and non-CCRT was possible, the OR (95% CI) of TRDs was 1.08 (0.70-1.66) (P = 0.71). Patients treated with third-generation chemotherapy and concurrent radiotherapy had an increase of TRDs compared to those with other regimens in CCRT (2.70% vs. 1.37%, OR = 1.50, 95% CI: 1.09-2.07, P = 0.008). No significant difference was found in TRDs between high (≥ 66 Gy) and low (< 66 Gy) radiation dose during CCRT (P = 0.605). Neither consolidation (P = 0.476) nor induction chemotherapy (P = 0.175) had significant effects with increased TRDs in this study. We concluded that CCRT is not significantly associated with the risk of TRD compared to non-CCRT. The third-generation chemotherapy regimens may be a risk factor with higher TRDs in CCRT, while high dose radiation is not significantly associated with more TRDs. This observation deserves further study.

Outcomes of initial surgery in patients with clinical N2 non-small cell lung cancer who met 4 specific criteria

PURPOSE

The role of surgery for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with clinical mediastinal lymph node metastasis (N2) remains controversial. We specified 4 criteria for performing initial surgery in these patients (single-station N2, non-bulky N2, N2 with regional mode of spread, and N2 without N1) and examined the outcomes to validate the treatment options.

METHODS

Between September 2002 and December 2010, of 1290 patients who underwent complete resection for NSCLC, 808 patients underwent initial standard resection, including 779 patients with cN0-1 and 29 with cN2. We compared the outcomes, and evaluated patients with cN2-pN2.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 45.5 months (3-119 months). Seventy (9.0 %) and 24 (82.8 %) patients had p-N2 in the cN0-1 and cN2 groups, respectively (p < 0.0001). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates in the cN0-1 and cN2 groups were 73.3 and 50.6 %, respectively (p = 0.0053), and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 81.3 and 71.1 %, respectively (p = 0.051). The 5-year DFS and OS of patients with cN2-pN2 were 52.5 and 72.6 %, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with clinical N2 disease based on our criteria represent a highly specific group with a favorable prognosis. Resection should therefore be the initial treatment for these patients.

Long-term follow-up of phase II trial of docetaxel and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiation therapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Chemoradiation improves survival for patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but clinical outcomes beyond five years are rarely reported. The aim of the present study was to identify the long-term results of a phase II study of docetaxel and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiation.

METHODS

We previously reported short-term outcomes from the phase II study, which enrolled 42 patients (aged ≤ 75 years) with unresectable stage III NSCLC. We continued to follow these patients for long-term clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

At a median follow-up for all patients of 6.3 years (range: 5.2-7.1 years), the median survival time was 2.1 years and the actual five-year survival rate was 31%. Among 14 patients who were progression-free longer than two years, three patients died due to bacterial or fungal pneumonia and one died due to gall bladder cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Thirty-one percent of locally advanced patients having NSCLC treated with docetaxel and cisplatin and concurrent thoracic radiation survived beyond five years. Progression-free patients might be cautiously followed up taking precautions against emerging pneumonia.

Mature results of an individualized radiation dose prescription study based on normal tissue constraints in stages I to III non-small-cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

We previously showed that individualized radiation dose escalation based on normal tissue constraints would allow safe administration of high radiation doses with low complication rate. Here, we report the mature results of a prospective, single-arm study that used this individualized tolerable dose approach.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In total, 166 patients with stage III or medically inoperable stage I to II non-small-cell lung cancer, WHO performance status 0 to 2, a forced expiratory volume at 1 second and diffusing capacity of lungs for carbon monoxide >or= 30% were included. Patients were irradiated using an individualized prescribed total tumor dose (TTD) based on normal tissue dose constraints (mean lung dose, 19 Gy; maximal spinal cord dose, 54 Gy) up to a maximal TTD of 79.2 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions twice daily. Only sequential chemoradiation was administered. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and the secondary end point was toxicity according to Common Terminology Criteria of Adverse Events (CTCAE) v3.0.

RESULTS

The median prescribed TTD was 64.8 Gy (standard deviation, +/- 11.4 Gy) delivered in 25 +/- 5.8 days. With a median follow-up of 31.6 months, the median OS was 21.0 months with a 1-year OS of 68.7% and a 2-year OS of 45.0%. Multivariable analysis showed that only a large gross tumor volume significantly decreased OS (P < .001). Both acute (grade 3, 21.1%; grade 4, 2.4%) and late toxicity (grade 3, 4.2%; grade 4, 1.8%) were acceptable.

CONCLUSION

Individualized prescribed radical radiotherapy based on normal tissue constraints with sequential chemoradiation shows survival rates that come close to results of concurrent chemoradiation schedules, with acceptable acute and late toxicity. A prospective randomized study is warranted to further investigate its efficacy.

Five-Year Results of a Phase II Trial of Hyperfractionated Radiotherapy and Concurrent Daily Cisplatin Chemotherapy for Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 5-year results for a phase II trial of hyperfractionated radiotherapy (RT) and concurrent daily cisplatin chemotherapy. Between August 1994 and December 1999, 63 patients with stage IIIA and stage IIIB non-small-cell lung cancer were treated with RT to a dose of 69.6 Gy at 1.2 Gy twice daily with daily cisplatin at 6 mg/m. Thirty-seven patients elected to receive consolidation carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy. Recurrence and survival outcomes were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis. Acute and late side effects were scored by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grading system. Radiographic complete or partial tumor response was achieved in 34 of 63 (54%) of cases. Median absolute survival was 20.1 months. Median time to local recurrence and distant metastases were 10.6 and 8.6 months, respectively. Overall survival rates were 57%, 35%, and 23% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Survival was significantly greater for patients receiving consolidation chemotherapy (50% versus 20% at 3 years). Only 5 patients (7%) experienced Grade 3 or 4 esophagitis. There were 16 cases of Grade 1 or 2 pneumonitis; steroid therapy resolved symptoms in 9 patients. This regimen of hyperfractionated RT and chemotherapy achieved significant response, and 5-year survival rates with acceptable toxicity.

Phase I study of cisplatin, vinorelbine, and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer

To determine the recommended phase II dose of vinorelbine in combination with cisplatin and thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), 18 patients received cisplatin (80 mg/m2) on day 1 and vinorelbine (20 mg/m2 in level 1, and 25 mg/m2 in level 2) on days 1 and 8 every 4 weeks for 4 cycles. TRT consisted of a single dose of 2 Gy once daily for 3 weeks followed by a rest of 4 days, and then the same TRT for 3 weeks to a total dose of 60 Gy. Fifteen (83%) patients received 60 Gy of TRT and 14 (78%) patients received 4 cycles of chemotherapy. Ten (77%) of 13 patients at level 1 and all 5 patients at level 2 developed grade 3-4 neutropenia. Four (31%) patients at level 1 and 3 (60%) patients at level 2 developed grade 3-4 infection. None developed > or = grade 3 esophagitis or lung toxicity. Dose-limiting toxicity was noted in 33% of the patients in level 1 and in 60% of the patients in level 2. The overall response rate (95% confidence interval) was 83% (59-96%) with 15 partial responses. The median survival time was 30.4 months, and the 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year survival rates were 72%, 61%, and 50%, respectively. In conclusion, the recommended dose is the level 1 dose, and this regimen is feasible and promising in patients with stage III NSCLC.

Long-term follow-up of patients with unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy: a retrospective analysis of the data from the Japan Clinical Oncology Group trials (JCOG0003A)

To clarify the long-term survival data and factors that are correlated with survival outcome of unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) following chemoradiotherapy, we analyzed patients who entered the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) clinical trials for unresectable locally advanced NSCLC. Between October 1989 and August 1997, 240 patients (male 207, female 33; PS (performance status) 0 58, PS 1 172, PS 2 9, unknown 1; stage IIB 2, IIIA 62, IIIB 175, unknown 1) entered the 6 trials. All patients received chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The associations between survival outcome and treatment-related factors were analyzed using Cox regression analysis. Median survival times and 5-year survival rates in the trials were 11.9-19.7 months and 0-17.6%, respectively. Median survival time was 16.1 months and the 5- and 7-year survival rates of all 240 patients were 14.4% and 12.0%, respectively. No deaths were observed 7 years after initiation of the treatment or later. For stage IIIA and IIIB patients, the 5-year survival rates were 16.3% and 13.4%, respectively. Node status and age were significantly associated with survival, but no factors of the treatment were associated with survival of patients with unresectable locally advanced NSCLC. The present retrospective analysis showed that approximately 12% of patients with unresectable locally advanced NSCLC could be cured by various chemoradiotherapy regimens.

Preliminary results of radiotherapy with or without weekly paclitaxel in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

In this study our objective was to evaluate the therapeutic significance of concurrent paclitaxel and radiotherapy compared with radiotherapy alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with stage III A/B NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive either radiotherapy alone (group 2) or concurrent weekly paclitaxel with radiotherapy (group 1) in GMMA. Radiotherapy was given as a split-course schedule with the total dose of 56 Gy. Paclitaxel, 60 mg/m(2), was administered only to group 1 on the first day of each radiotherapy week. To assess differences between values, P values were calculated with the chi(2) test. A Mann Whitney U-test was used to assess significant differences between the two values. Actuarial survival curves were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

There were 25 patients who underwent chemoradiotherapy and 26 who underwent radiotherapy only. Median follow-up was 14 months. The overall response rate was 92% and 70% for groups 1 and 2, respectively ( P= 0.003). Median survival was 15.2 months for group 1, and 12.0 months for group 2 ( P= 0.027).

CONCLUSION

Based on this response and the toxicity profile, outpatient split-course radiotherapy and weekly paclitaxel seems to be feasible and safe.

Use of chemo-radiotherapy in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in the Western countries for both men and women. Approximately 40% of patients present with locally advanced and/or unresectable disease. While small improvements in outcome have occurred for this group of patients in the last decade, 5-year survival remains low, ranging from 5 to 20%. Distant metastases and loco-regional progression remain significant patterns of failure. Up to the late 1980s, the standard management for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was conventional thoracic radiotherapy, but when treated with radiotherapy alone, less than 10% of patients survived for 5 years or more. 60-70% failed at distant sites and less than 20% achieved durable local control. The addition of chemotherapy reduces the rate of distant failure, improves survival and the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy has become the standard of care of patients with locally advanced NSCLC. Current developments aim to optimise individual components of combined modality schedules, increase their synergism and minimise toxicity.

Is there a standard strategy in the management of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer?

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality in the United States for both men and women. Twenty to thirty percent of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) present with locally advanced, unresectable tumors. While small improvements in outcome have occurred for this group of patients in the last decade, 5-year survival remains low, ranging from 5 to 20%. Distant metastases and loco-regional progression remain significant patterns of failure. Up to the late 1980s, the standard management was conventional thoracic radiotherapy for locally advanced NSCLC, but when treated with radiotherapy alone, less than 10% of patients survived for 5 years or more. Sixty to seventy percent failed at distant sites and less than 20% achieved durable local control. The addition of chemotherapy reduces the rate of distant failure, improves survival and the combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy has become the standard of care of patients with locally advanced NSCLC. Current developments aim to optimise individual components of combined modality schedules, increase their synergism and minimise toxicity.