Intra-arterial chemotherapy for unresectable pancreatic cancer

Treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer using localized trans-arterial micro perfusion of gemcitabine: combined analysis of RR1 and RR2

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) comprises 40% of pancreatic cancer diagnoses and has a relatively poor prognosis. Trans-arterial micro perfusion (TAMP)-mediated chemotherapy delivery to the primary tumor is a novel approach worthy of investigation. The RR1 (dose escalation) and RR2 (observational) studies examined the safety and preliminary efficacy of TAMP-delivered gemcitabine for LAPC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

RR1 and RR2 data were pooled. Both studies enrolled patients with LAPC with histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma. Participant data, including age, sex, race, stage, previous treatments, toxicity, disease progression, and death, were collected. Median number of cycles and average treatment dosage were calculated. Overall survival (OS) was determined for the whole group and separately for patients who received and did not receive previous treatments. Aims of the analysis were to assess procedure safety, OS, and evaluate factors associated with OS.

RESULTS

The median age of the 43 patients enrolled in RR1 and RR2 was 72 years (range, 51-88 years). Median OS for the 35 eligible patients with stage III disease was 12.6 months (95% CI, 2.1-54.2 months). Previous chemoradiation was associated with significantly longer OS [27.1 months (95% CI, 8.4-40.6 months)] compared to previous systemic chemotherapy [14.6 months (95% CI, 6.4-54.2 months)] or no prior treatment [7.0 months (95% CI, 2.1-35.4 months)] (P < .001). The most common adverse events were GI related (abdominal pain, emesis, and vomiting); the most common grade 3 toxicity was sepsis.

CONCLUSION

Study results indicate that TAMP-mediated gemcitabine delivery in patients with LAPC is potentially safe, feasible, and provides potential clinical benefits.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02237157 (RR1) and NCT02591082 (RR2).

hENT1's role in adjuvant intra-arterial gemcitabine-based chemotherapy for resectable pancreatic cancer patients

BACKGROUND

We aimed to verify the role of hENT1 as a prognostic predictor for patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who underwent radical resection followed by intra-arterial infusion of gemcitabine-based regimen.

METHODS

We collected surgical samples from 102 patients with resectable PDAC who received radical resection followed by intra-arterial infusion of gemcitabine-based regimen. The hENT1 expression with the help of immunohistochemistry was conducted using formalin-fixed and paraffin embedded tissues. The Kaplan-Meier analyses and Cox regression were used to evaluate the mortality hazard associated with the discrepancy between strong and weak of hENT1 expression. Patients' clinical and pathological characteristics were compared between the two groups, then the role of hENT1 as a prognostic predictor was further explored.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients were included to assess the hENT1 expression. 50 patients were classified into high hENT1 expression group, the other 52 patients were attributed into low hENT1 expression group. High hENT1 expression was related to a significantly improved overall survival (OS) (p = 0.014) and disease-free survival (DFS) (p = 0.004). Both univariate (p = 0.001) and multivariate analyses (p < 0.001) indicated that high hENT1 expression was related to a decreased mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

High expression of hENT1 is positive prognostic factor for adjuvant intra-arterial gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in resectable PDAC.

Intra-Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Simple Summary

Pancreatic cancer has a very poor prognosis. The few available therapeutic options are characterized by low efficacy and high toxicity due to the intrinsic chemoresistance of this tumor type. To improve clinical results, some clinical trials have evaluated regional chemotherapy as a treatment option for PC. The pancreatic arterial infusion of chemotherapeutics has the aim of obtaining higher local concentrations of drugs and, at the same time, of limiting systemic toxicity. This therapeutic approach has already been successfully evaluated for the treatment of several types of tumors. Regarding advanced pancreatic cancers, only a few clinical studies have investigated the safety and efficacy of this treatment, with very promising results. Therefore, in this review, we summarize literature data on the clinical approaches to pancreatic arterial drug administration for the treatment of advanced PC to deepen knowledge on this topic.

Abstract

Advanced pancreatic cancer (PC) has a very poor prognosis due to its chemoresistant nature. Nowadays, only a few therapeutic options are available for PC, and the most effective ones are characterized by low response rates (RRs), short progression-free survival and overall survival, and severe toxicity. To improve clinical results, small series studies have evaluated loco-regional chemotherapy as a treatment option for PC, demonstrating its dose-dependent sensitivity towards the tumor. In fact, pancreatic arterial infusion (PAI) chemotherapy allows higher local concentrations of chemotherapeutic agents, sparing healthy tissues with a lower rate of adverse events compared to systemic chemotherapy. This therapeutic approach has already been evaluated in different types of tumors, especially in primary and metastatic liver cancers, with favourable results. With regard to advanced PC, a few clinical studies have investigated the safety and efficacy of PAI with promising results, especially in terms of RRs compared to systemic chemotherapy. However, clear evidence about its efficacy has not been established yet nor have the underlying mechanisms leading to its success. In this review, we aim to summarize the literature data on the clinical approaches to pancreatic arterial drug administration in terms of techniques, drug pharmacokinetics, and clinical outcomes for advanced PC.

Gemcitabine-Based Regional Intra-Arterial Infusion Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

The present study was carried out to investigate the prognostic factors in patients who received intra-arterial infusion for advanced pancreatic cancer. In addition, the detailed procedure of intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy was described. A total of 354 patients with advanced unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma were recruited from January 2012, to April 2015, at Zhongshan Hospital Fudan University, Shanghai, China. Demographic and clinic characteristics of the patients were extracted from electronic medical records. Restricted cubic spline was used to assess the nonliner regression between baseline CA19-9 value and overall survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the association between overall survival and clinical characteristics. Of all 354 included patients, 230 (65%) were male (male/female ratio = 1.8), and 72 (20%) patients were diagnosed with detectable distant metastases. Pretreatment CA19-9 value of patients with metastases was significantly higher as compared to those with locally advanced cancer (median: 922.30 vs 357.00 U/mL, P = 0.0090). Totally 274 patients completed 1 cycle of intra-arterial infusion, whereas 80 patients received 2 or more cycles of the chemotherapy. For all the 354 patients, median OS was 7.0 months (95% CI: 6.0, 8.0 months) with a 6-, 12-, and 18-month survival rate of 0.48, 0.28, and 0.18, respectively. The median OS of patients, who received 1 cycle of intra-arterial infusion therapy, was 6.0 months (95% CI: 5.0, 8.0 months), which was similar to 7.0 months (95% CI: 6.0, 9.0 months) in patients who received 2 or more cycles. Restricted cubic spline revealed the nonline association between baseline CA19-9 and prognosis. The Cox proportional hazard model showed that age, CA19-9 baseline, CA19-9 value, and tumor location were significantly associated with the OS. In conclusion, the gemcitabine-based RIAC presented a potential treatment method for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Young age, pretreatment CA19-9 value <1000 U/mL, and tumor located at the head of pancreas indicated better response to the regional intra-arterial chemotherapy and better overall survival.

Combinational therapy: new hope for pancreatic cancer?

Pancreatic cancer is a devastating disease with a low overall survival rate. Chemotherapy is the most common treatment for patients presenting with advanced pancreatic cancer. Gemcitabine achieves a modest improvement in overall survival and is the gold standard for advanced pancreatic cancer treatment. Capecitabine and S-1, derivatives of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), offers minimal clinical benefits. Folfirinox represents a new and aggressive regimen that might benefit patients of metastatic pancreatic cancer with good performance status. Other chemotherapy drugs such as platinums and irinotecan do not provide significant improvement in overall survival, but have been used as part of combinational therapies. Comparing to systemically delivered chemotherapy, regional intra-arterial chemotherapy achieves higher local drug concentration in tumors with lower systemic drug toxicity, and may serve as a better treatment regimen. Although there have been progress made in chemotherapeutic strategies against pancreatic cancer, the overall survival is not significantly improved in the last decade. Recently, development of chemotherapy in combination with molecular targeted therapies holds great promise in pancreatic cancer treatment, especially in patients with metastatic disease. Growing bodies of preclinical and clinical evidences indicate that the combination of conventional modalities with specific molecular targeted therapy increase the efficacy of the monotherapy without an increase in toxicity. In this review, we summarized the current regimens of chemotherapy and molecular targeted therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer and highlighted the novel combinational treatments tested in recent clinical trials.

Intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin in advanced pancreatic cancer: a feasibility study

OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to examine the efficacy and tolerability of intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin in advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Sixteen patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (12 Stage IVa and 4 Stage IVb with liver metastasis) were enrolled. The catheter for intra-arterial infusion was placed at the position to distribute chemotherapeutic drugs to both the pancreatic tumor and the liver. Continuous infusion of 5-FU (250 mg/m(2) per day, 7 days) with intermittent bolus injection of cisplatin (5 mg/m(2) per day, 5 days) was repeated twice via the catheter, followed by intermittent injection of 5-FU (375 or 750 mg/m(2)) or cisplatin (7.5 mg/m(2)) once a week. The survival of these patients was compared with that of the matched historical control patients treated with other modalities.

RESULTS

In 12 Stage IVa locally advanced patients, the response rate was 58.3% (7 partial response). The median survival time was 22.0 months, and the 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 83.3%, 41.7%, and 16.7%, respectively. The locally advanced patients treated with intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy showed significantly better survival than the control patients. In contrast, Stage IVb patients with liver metastasis showed no response to the treatment (response rate, 0%). Treatment was discontinued in 2 patients until recovery from hematologic or hepatic toxicity, but fatal adverse events were not observed.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy with 5-FU and cisplatin is tolerable and feasible treatment to improve the prognosis in locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients without distant metastasis.

Prognostic factors in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma treated with intra-arterial chemotherapy

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to identify the prognostic factors of a large group of patients with pancreatic cancer who underwent the same regimen of intra-arterial chemotherapy.

METHODS

5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m2), leucovorin (100 mg/m2), epirubicin (60 mg/m2), and carboplatin (300 mg/m2) were administered every 3 weeks into celiac axis (FLEC regimen). Kaplan-Meyer survival curve for univariate analysis and Cox regression model for multivariate one were used to determine factors predictive of survival.

RESULTS

Data of 211 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who underwent FLEC regimen were analyzed. Eighty-nine had locally advanced disease, and 112 had distant metastases. Median overall survival was 9.2 months. In both univariate and multivariate analyses, pain reduction after treatment (< or =30% of baseline level vs >30%; overall survival, 7.6 vs 11.5 months), stage of disease (III vs IV; overall survival, 10.5 vs 6.6 months), and number of administered cycles (< or =3 vs >3; overall survival, 5.9 vs 12.3 months) were significant and independent predictors of survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Pain reduction, stage of disease, and number of administered cycles are independent prognostic factors of overall survival in a multivariate analysis of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer receiving FLEC regimen intra-arterially.

Is it relevant that intra-arterial chemotherapy may be effective for advanced pancreatic cancer?

Unresectable pancreatic cancers have an extremely dismal prognosis and chemoresistant nature. The treatment of pancreatic cancer is still problematic. Gemcitabine is a promising new agent that has been studied recently for palliation of advanced pancreatic cancer. However, the response rates have been highly variable, and are often irreproducible. To improve this low response rate, various treatments are needed because no standard treatment exists. Intra-arterial chemotherapy is considered to take advantage of the first pass effect of the drug, generating higher local drug concentrations in tumor cells with lower toxicity. Regional intra-arterial chemotherapy may provide high levels of cytostatic concentrations within the tumor and, simultaneously, a low rate of systemic side effects compared with systemic administration of anti-neoplastic drugs. Intra-arterial chemotherapy has been introduced as an alternative treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer. Further clinical trials of this method should be subjected to a prospective randomized controlled study for advanced pancreatic cancer.

Hypoxic abdominal stop-flow perfusion in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: a phase II evaluation/trial

In the past decade, some authors have reported objective responses and prolonged median survival times using hypoxic abdominal perfusion (HAP) for the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. However, these promising results have not been confirmed by others, making it difficult to define the effectiveness of this loco-regional chemotherapy. The aim of this study, therefore, was to evaluate the response rate, time to disease progression and overall survival following HAP treatment of 22 consecutive patients with advanced pancreatic tumors. Within the period from 1999 to 2003, 22 patients with histological diagnosis of unresectable stage III/IV pancreatic cancer, not responsive to systemic chemotherapy, were treated with mitomycin C 30mg/m(2) and cisplatin 60mg/m(2) by HAP (stop flow technique). Immediately after perfusion, hemofiltration was performed to reduce systemic side toxic effects. Responses were assessed by CT-scan 30days from the end of treatment. Minor or partial responses were confirmed by a second CT-scan 4weeks later. Following 26 treatment cycles no death or technical complications were recorded; four patients (18.2%) achieved a partial response, 2 (9.1%) a minimal response and 13 (59.1%) stable disease. The remaining 3 patients (13.6%) showed progression of the disease. The median time to disease progression was 3 months (range 1-10). The median survival time from the start of regional chemotherapy was 6 months (range 1.9-16), with a 1-year survival rate of 9%. Our data show that HAP is a relatively effective second-line treatment for advanced stage pancreatic cancer with a low complication rate. We do not concur with the opinion of others that HAP is an inactive treatment approach. However, taking into account the invasiveness of this procedure, and associated morbidity and cost, HAP would not appear to be preferable to less invasive loco-regional chemotherapeutic alternatives.

Effects of low-dose warfarin and regional chemotherapy on survival in patients with pancreatic carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To report the effect of regional combination chemotherapy in a cohort of patients with inoperable pancreatic carcinoma treated with or without low-dose warfarin.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on 180 patients with pancreatic carcinoma. Patients received one of seven regimens of chemotherapy. Unrelated to the type of chemotherapy, some patients received 1.25 mg warfarin daily. The primary end-point was median survival.

RESULTS

Treatment with warfarin resulted in improved median survival from the start of regional therapy (warfarin versus no warfarin: 5.0 versus 2.3 months, n = 111 versus 69; p < 0.0001). This effect was not dependent on the type of chemotherapy used. Among the seven regimens examined, the one consisting of regional gemcitabine and mitomycin-C with systemic gemcitabine was associated with the longest median survival of 5.1 months from the start of regional therapy (p = 0.006) and 12.7 months from diagnosis. This regimen combined with warfarin was associated with improved median survival (7.1 months, n = 32).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with low-dose warfarin improved survival irrespective of the chemotherapy received. Of the regimens examined, the combination of regional gemcitabine and mitomycin-C with systemic gemcitabine was associated with the longest survival time. Survival was increased further by the addition of warfarin. These data provide a rationale, based on safety and efficacy, for a definitive study on the use of warfarin and combined regional and systemic chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic carcinoma.

Adjuvant intra-arterial 5-fluoruracil, leucovorin, epirubicin and carboplatin with or without systemic gemcitabine after curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

The role of adjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer remains controversial. Gemcitabine given systemically seems to be effective; intra-arterial chemotherapy (IAC) has a deep rationale.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The goal was to evaluate the impact of postoperative IAC followed or not by systemic gemcitabine in patients after curative resection for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. 5-fluoruracil 750 mg sq m(-1), leucovorin 75 mg sq m(-1), epirubicin 45 mg sq m(-1), carboplatin 225 mg sq m(-1) were administered every 3 weeks into celiac axis for three cycles (FLEC regimen), then gemcitabine at the dosage of 1 g sq m(-1) on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks for 3 months (FLECG regimen).

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients entered the study. The first 24 received only IAC (FLEC regimen), the other 23 received the same intra-arterial regimen followed by systemic gemcitabine (FLECG regimen). After a median follow-up of 16.9 months, 29 patients recurred (61.7%). Median disease free survival (DFS) was 18 months and median overall survival (OS) was 29.7 months. One-year DFS was 59.4% and 1-year OS was 75.5%. Main grade 3 toxicity related to IAC was only nausea/vomiting in 4%; regarding gemcitabine, grade 3 toxicities were anaemia 8%, leukopenia 8%, thrombocitopenia 17%, nausea/vomiting 4%.

CONCLUSIONS

FLEC regimen with or without gemcitabine is active with a very mild toxicity and results are very encouraging in an adjuvant setting.

Combined irinotecan and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced pre-treated pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated the clinical activity and toxicity of combination chemotherapy with irinotecan and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer that had progressed despite > or =1 course of a gemcitabine-containing regimen.

METHODS

Thirty patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer and Karnofsky performance status > or =70 received oxaliplatin 60 mg/m2 on days 1 + 15 and irinotecan 60 mg/m2 on days 1 + 8 + 15 every 4 weeks. Patients were assessed on the basis of clinical benefit response, changes in serum tumour marker CA 19-9, objective tumour response, time to progressive disease (TTP), and survival.

RESULTS

Six patients (20%) had clinical benefit response (median duration of 7.2 months). CA 19-9 levels were reduced > or =50% from baseline in 8 patients (26%) and remained stable in 8 patients. CT scans revealed that 3 patients (10%) had a partial response and 7 (23%) had stable disease. Two patients (7%) were down-staged and underwent surgery. Median TTP was 4.1 months, median survival was 5.9 months and the 1-year survival rate was 23.3%. The most serious adverse events were grade 3-4 leukopenia in 2 patients (6%), grade 3 neuropathy in 2 (6%) and grade 3 diarrhoea in 1 (3%).

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy with irinotecan and oxaliplatin is an active and well-tolerated combination in patients with advanced pre-treated pancreatic cancer.

Carcinoma of pancreatic body and tail: are there improvements in diagnosis and treatment modalities over the past decade?

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF STUDY

The aim of the present study is to assess whether or not there has been improvement in the therapeutic strategy for body-tail pancreatic carcinoma over the past decade.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 215 patients suffering from cytologically and histologically documented ductal carcinoma in the pancreatic body-tail, observed from 1990 to 1999, were analysed. Changes in tumour stage at diagnosis, in the percentage of patients treated surgically, in resectability rates and in the use of anticancer therapies over the years were sought. Survival curves were evaluated in relation to the treatments adopted.

RESULTS

Over the 10-year period, no significant differences were observed with respect to the stage at diagnosis, resectability or type of surgery adopted. There was a significant increase in the percentage of unoperated patients (p < 0.0001) and, as expected, in the percentages of patients submitted to chemo- and/or radiotherapy (p < 0.0001). With the sole exception of tumour stage in the case of patients undergoing radiotherapy, a comparison between groups revealed no element of patient selection bias other than time. The survival of patients undergoing chemotherapy is significantly better, also at multivariate analysis, than that of patients not undergoing such therapy (13 vs. 5.8 months; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

There has been no change over the years in the direction of earlier diagnosis and the prognosis remains distinctly poor. More extensive use of anticancer therapies, however, has led to a significant increase in median survival. Radical resection, when possible, assures the longest survival.

Role of angiographic techniques in the preoperative staging and management of gastrointestinal neoplasms

Gastrointestinal neoplasms are very common diseases, and their management does not usually require angiography for diagnostic and staging purposes. However, angiography may be required for further refinements in staging of vascular involvement or to obtain a detailed preoperative anatomy of the vessels. Finally, angiographic techniques may be useful for palliative or preoperative locoregional chemotherapy, and to treat hemorrhagic complications. This article reviews the capabilities and limits of angiographic techniques in the assessment and management of tumors of the alimentary tract.