Saturable metabolism of continuous high-dose ifosfamide with mesna and GM-CSF: a pharmacokinetic study in advanced sarcoma patients. Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK)

Primary Culture of Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma: Molecular Characterization and Response to Anticancer Agents

Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) is an aggressive mesenchymal neoplasm with no specific line of differentiation. Eribulin, a novel synthetic microtubule inhibitor, has shown anticancer activity in several tumors, including soft tissue sarcomas (STS). We investigated the molecular biology of UPS, and the mechanisms of action of this innovative microtubule-depolymerizing drug. A primary culture from a patient with UPS was established and characterized in terms of gene expression. The activity of eribulin was also compared with that of other drugs currently used for STS treatment, including trabectedin. Finally, Western blot analysis was performed to better elucidate the activity of eribulin. Our results showed an upregulation of epithelial mesenchymal transition-related genes, and a downregulation of epithelial markers. Furthermore, genes involved in chemoresistance were upregulated. Pharmacological analysis confirmed limited sensitivity to chemotherapy. Interestingly, eribulin exhibited a similar activity to that of standard treatments. Molecular analysis revealed the expression of cell cycle arrest-related and pro-apoptotic-related proteins. These findings are suggestive of aggressive behavior in UPS. Furthermore, the identification of chemoresistance-related genes could facilitate the development of innovative drugs to improve patient outcome. Overall, the results from the present study furnish a rationale for elucidating the role of eribulin for the treatment of UPS.

Myxofibrosarcoma primary cultures: molecular and pharmacological profile

Background:

Myxofibrosarcoma (MFS), formerly considered as a myxoid variant of malignant fibrous histiocytoma, is the most common sarcoma of the extremities in adults and is characterized by a high frequency of local recurrence. The clinical behavior of MFS is unpredictable and the efficacy of chemotherapy is still not well documented. Furthermore, given the relatively recent recognition of MFS as a distinct pathologic entity its cellular and molecular biology has still not been extensively studied in patient-derived preclinical models. We examined the molecular biology and treatment outcomes of high-grade, patient-derived MFS primary cultures.

Methods:

A total of three patient-derived MFS primary cultures were analyzed. We evaluated the role of CD109 expression and also looked for a correlation between transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) expression and sensitivity of the primary cultures to different drugs.

Results:

CD109 was a promising marker for the identification of more aggressive high-grade MFS and a potential therapeutic target. The results also highlighted the potential role of TGF-β in chemoresistance. Pharmacological analysis confirmed the sensitivity of the cultures to chemotherapy. The most active treatments were epirubicin alone and epirubicin in combination with ifosfamide, the latter representing the current standard of care for soft tissue sarcomas (STSs), including MFS.

Conclusions:

Our results provide a starting point for further research aimed at improving the management of MFS patients undergoing chemotherapy.

Managing sarcoma: where have we come from and where are we going?

Sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of neoplasms of mesenchymal origin. Approximately 80% arise from soft tissue and 20% originate from bone. To date more than 100 sarcoma subtypes have been identified and they vary in molecular characteristics, pathology, clinical presentation and response to treatment. While sarcomas represent <1% of adult cancers, they account for approximately 21% of paediatric malignancies and thus pose some of the greatest risks of mortality and morbidity in children and young adults. Metastases occur in one-third of all patients and approximately 10-20% of sarcomas recur locally. Surgery in combination with preoperative and postoperative therapies is the primary treatment for localized sarcoma tumours and is the most promising curative possibility. Metastasized sarcomas, on the other hand, are treated primarily with single-agent or combination chemotherapy, but this rarely leads to a complete and robust response and often becomes a palliative form of treatment. The heterogeneity of sarcomas results in variable responses to current generalized treatment strategies. In light of this and the lack of curative strategies for metastatic and unresectable sarcomas, there is a need for novel subtype-specific treatment strategies. With the more recent understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of some of these tumours, the treatment of sarcoma subtypes with targeted therapies is a rapidly evolving field. This review discusses the current management of sarcomas as well as promising new therapies that are currently underway in clinical trials.

Treatment of advanced, metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: latest evidence and clinical considerations

Soft tissue sarcoma (STS) is a biologically heterogeneous malignancy with over 50 subtypes. Historically, there have been few systemic treatment options for this relatively rare disease. Traditional cytotoxic agents, such as anthracyclines, alkylating agents, and taxanes have limited clinical benefit beyond the first-line setting; across all high-grade STS subtypes, median overall survival remains approximately 12-18 months for advanced metastatic disease. The development of targeted therapies has led to recent US Food and Drug Administration approval of four new treatments for high-grade STS in the advanced metastatic setting. Among these, olaratumab is most notable for its improvement in overall survival for patients with anthracycline-naïve disease. Further progress in STS management will rely on novel trial design, subtype-specific therapies and validation of biomarkers to tailor therapy. Immunotherapy has shown promise as a new, but yet undiscovered frontier in the management of STS.

Activity of Eribulin in a Primary Culture of Well-Differentiated/Dedifferentiated Adipocytic Sarcoma

Eribulin mesylate is a novel, non-taxane, synthetic microtubule inhibitor showing antitumor activity in a wide range of tumors including soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Eribulin has been recently approved for the treatment of metastatic liposarcoma (LPS) patients previously treated with anthracyclines. This work investigated the mechanism of action of this innovative antitubulin agent in well-differentiated/dedifferentiated LPS (ALT/DDLPS) which represents one of the most common adipocytic sarcoma histotypes. A primary culture of ALT/DDLPS from a 54-year-old patient was established. The anticancer activity of eribulin on the patient-derived primary culture was assessed by MTT and tunel assays. Eribulin efficacy was compared to other drugs approved for the treatment of STS. Cell migration and morphology were examined after exposure to eribulin to better understand the drug mechanism of action. Finally, Western blot analysis of apoptosis and migration proteins was performed. The results showed that eribulin exerts its antiproliferative effect by the arrest of cell motility and induction of apoptosis. Our results highlighted the activity of eribulin in the treatment of ALT/DDLPS patients.

Anticancer activity of stabilized palifosfamide in vivo: schedule effects, oral bioavailability, and enhanced activity with docetaxel and doxorubicin

Palifosfamide, the DNA-alkylating metabolite of ifosfamide (IFOS), has been synthesized as a stabilized tris or lysine salt and found to have preclinical and clinical antitumor activity. Stabilized palifosfamide overcomes limitations of IFOS because of patient-to-patient variability in response resulting from variable prodrug activation, resistance and toxicities of metabolic byproducts, acrolein and chloroacetaldehyde. Palifosfamide represents an effective alternative to IFOS and other DNA-alkylating prodrugs. The antitumor activities of stabilized palifosfamide were investigated in vivo. Dose response, route and schedule of administration, and interaction with docetaxel or doxorubicin were investigated in NCr-nu/nu mice bearing established orthotopic mammary MX-1 tumor xenografts. Oral activity was investigated in P388-1 leukemia in CD2F1 mice. Oral and intraperitoneal bioavailabilities were compared in Sprague-Dawley rats. Stabilized palifosfamide administered by optimized regimens suppressed MX-1 tumor growth (P<0.05) by greater than 80% with 17% complete antitumor responses and up to three-fold increase in time to three tumor doublings over controls. Median survival in the P388-1 (P<0.001) model was increased by 9 days over controls. Oral bioavailability in rats was 48-73% of parenteral administration, and antitumor activity in mice was equivalent by both routes. Treatment with palifosfamide-tris combined with docetaxel or doxorubicin at optimal regimens resulted in complete tumor regression in 62-75% of mice. These studies support investigation of stabilized palifosfamide in human cancers by parenteral or oral administration as a single agent and in combination with other approved drugs. The potential for clinical translation of the cooperative interaction of palifosfamide-tris with doxorubicin by intravenous administration is supported by results from a recent randomized Phase-II study in unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma.

Systematic therapy for unresectable or metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas: past, present, and future

Unresectable or metastatic disease occurs in 40% to 60% of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients and portends a poor prognosis. For decades, doxorubicin has formed the backbone of systemic treatment, with response rates of approximately 26%. Patients progressing following first-line therapy were left with few proven options. No other cytotoxic chemotherapy agent or combination has demonstrated superiority to doxorubicin. Advances in targeted therapy of STS have been hindered by STS heterogeneity and poorly understood disease biology. Despite challenges, progress has been made in specific STS subtypes. Here, we highlight the challenges, progress, and lessons learned from STS trials published in the last 20 to 25 years.

Role of trabectedin in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma

Interest in marine natural products has allowed the discovery of new drugs and trabectedin (ET-743, Yondelis), derived from the marine tunicate Ecteinascidia turbinata, was approved for clinical use in 2007. It binds to the DNA minor groove leading to interferences with the intracellular transcription pathways and DNA-repair proteins. In vitro antitumor activity was demonstrated against various cancer cell lines and soft tissue sarcoma cell lines. In phase I studies tumor responses were observed also in osteosarcomas and different soft tissue sarcoma subtypes. The most common toxicities were myelosuppression and transient elevation of liver function tests, which could be reduced by dexamethasone premedication. The efficacy of trabectedin was established in three phase II studies where it was administered at 1.5 mg/m2 as a 24 h intravenous infusion repeated every three weeks, in previously treated patients. The objective response rate was 3.7%–8.3% and the tumor control rate (which included complete response, partial response and stable disease) was obtained in half of patients for a median overall survival reaching 12 months. In nonpretreated patients the overall response rate was 17%. Twenty-four percent of patients were without progression at six months. The median overall survival was almost 16 months with 72% surviving at one year. Predictive factors of response are being explored to identify patients who are most likely to respond to trabectedin. Combination with other agents are currently studied with promising results. In summary trabectedin is an active new chemotherapeutic agents that has demonstrated its role in the armamentarium of treatments for patients with sarcomas.

The pharmacologic basis of ifosfamide use in adult patients with advanced soft tissue sarcomas

The treatment outcome of patients with locally advanced and metastatic soft tissue sarcomas is poor. Doxorubicin is regarded as standard treatment, but its use is featured by the occurrence of cardiotoxicity. This hinders the administration of this drug at high doses or in combination with, in theory, attractive newly developed targeted drugs, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathway inhibitors. The combination of doxorubicin and VEGF pathway inhibitors has been shown to yield an unacceptable high rate of cardiomyopathy. Ifosfamide is the only drug that consistently shows response rates comparable to those of doxorubicin. The lack of cardiotoxicity renders this drug a much more attractive alternative than doxorubicin to be explored at high doses or as part of new drug combinations. This review addresses the clinical pharmacology, metabolism, and present role of ifosfamide in the treatment of locally advanced and/or metastatic soft tissue sarcomas, excluding gastrointestinal stromal tumors, the Ewing-like sarcomas, and other small blue round cell tumors. Furthermore, this review focuses on the anticipated growing role of ifosfamide in the development of new treatment strategies.

Docetaxel–ifosfamide combination in patients with HER2-non-overexpressing advanced breast cancer failing prior anthracyclines

The feasibility of the docetaxel-ifosfamide combination, as well as the definition of maximum tolerated doses (MTD) in a previous phase I study, led us to continue evaluating the regimen in an extended phase II study in patients with HER2-non-overexpressing, anthracycline pre-treated advanced breast cancer. Patients with histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer failing prior anthracycline-based chemotherapy were treated with docetaxel 100 mg/m2 over 1 h on day 1 followed by ifosfamide 5 g/m2 divided over days 1 and 2 (2.5 g/m2/day over 1 h), and recycled every 21 days with prophylactic granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) administration from day 3-until a neutrophil count >10,000/microl. Between March 1999 and June 2002, 71 patients with a median age of 55 years (range, 28-72) and performance status (World Health Organization; WHO) of 1 (range, 0-2) were treated; all were assessable for toxicity and 70 patients for response. Clinical response rates (RRs), on an intention-to-treat basis were: 41/71 [58%; 95% CI, 46.5-69.5%]; 7 complete remissions (CRs), 34 partial remissions (PRs), 15 stable disease (SD) and 15 progressive disease (PD). The median response duration was 7.5 months (2-28 months), median time-to-progression (TTP) 6 months (0.1-30 months), and median overall survival (OS) 12 months (0.1-36 months). Grade 3/4 toxicities included; neutropenia in 63% of patients-with 52% developing grade 4 neutropenia (>or=7 days) and in 11% of these febrile neutropenia (FN), while no grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was observed. Other toxicities included; peripheral neuropathy grade 2 only in 7%, grade 1/2 reversible central nervous system (CNS) toxicity in 11%, no renal toxicity, grade 2 myalgias in 7%, grade 3 diarrhea in 4%, skin/nail toxicity in 11%, and grade 1/2 fluid retention in 28% of patients. The present report has demonstrated encouraging activity of the docetaxel-ifosfamide combination in anthracycline-pretreated, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. Therefore, future randomized phase III studies versus single-agent docetaxel or currently established combinations of the latter with other agents in this setting with established clinical activity, such as capecitabine or gemcitabine, will be warranted.

Treatment of advanced soft-tissue sarcomas using a combined strategy of high-dose ifosfamide, high-dose doxorubicin and salvage therapies

Having determined in a phase I study the maximum tolerated dose of high-dose ifosfamide combined with high-dose doxorubicin, we now report the long-term results of a phase II trial in advanced soft-tissue sarcomas. Forty-six patients with locally advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcomas were included, with age <60 years and all except one in good performance status (0 or 1). The chemotherapy treatment consisted of ifosfamide 10 g m⁻² (continuous infusion for 5 days), doxorubicin 30 mg m⁻² day⁻¹ × 3 (total dose 90 mg m⁻²), mesna and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. Cycles were repeated every 21 days. A median of 4 (1–6) cycles per patient was administered. Twenty-two patients responded to therapy, including three complete responders and 19 partial responders for an overall response rate of 48% (95% CI: 33–63%). The response rate was not different between localised and metastatic diseases or between histological types, but was higher in grade 3 tumours. Median overall survival was 19 months. Salvage therapies (surgery and/or radiotherapy) were performed in 43% of patients and found to be the most significant predictor for favourable survival (exploratory multivariate analysis). Haematological toxicity was severe, including grade ⩾3 neutropenia in 59%, thrombopenia in 39% and anaemia in 27% of cycles. Three patients experienced grade 3 neurotoxicity and one patient died of septic shock. This high-dose regimen is toxic but nonetheless feasible in multicentre settings in non elderly patients with good performance status. A high response rate was obtained. Prolonged survival was mainly a function of salvage therapies.

Phase I/II study of docetaxel, ifosfamide, and doxorubicin in advanced, recurrent, or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS)

BACKGROUND

Based on reports of the efficacy of docetaxel (T) in STS, we undertook a phase I/II trial to determine the response rate (RR), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of addition of T to doxorubicin (A) and ifosfamide (I) in advanced STS.

METHODS

Patients with advanced, recurrent, or metastatic STS, without prior chemotherapy, were enrolled in a dose escalation trial. Dose levels: I-A 40 mg/m(2); I 4.0 gm/m(2); T 40 mg/m(2), II-A 50; I 5.0; T 50, III-A 60; I 6.0; T 60, and IV-A 75; I 7.5; T 75. MTD was defined as the dose producing DLTs in >or=2 of 3-6 patients treated.

RESULTS

21 patients were accrued. Median age: 55 (28-78) years.

HISTOLOGY

leiomyosarcoma 10, spindle cell sarcoma 3, synovial sarcoma 2, angiosarcoma 1, fibrous histiocytoma 1, epitheliod hemangio-endothelioma 1, and 3 not specified. MTD was level III (A 60, I 6.0, and T 60). DLT was myelosuppression. All grade 4 toxicities were hematologic. Patients received median 2 cycles (range 2-9). Eight patients (38%) achieved partial response (PR). PR occurred after six cycles in 5 patients. 18 patients died. Median overall survival: 17 months (95% CI, 9.1-33.6 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The recommended Phase II dose of this combination is level III: A 60 mg/m(2), I 6.0 g/m(2), T 60 mg/m(2), with mesna and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. The RR is similar to that of AI in other trials, but the survival is better than anticipated.

Phase I trial and pharmacokinetic analysis of ifosfamide in cats with sarcomas

OBJECTIVE

To determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) and dose-limiting toxicosis (DLT) of ifosfamide in tumor-bearing cats.

ANIMALS

38 cats with resected, recurrent, or metastatic sarcomas.

PROCEDURE

The starting dosage of ifosfamide was 400 mg/m(2) of body surface area, IV, and dosages were increased by 50 to 100 mg/m(2) in cohorts of 3 cats. To protect against urotoxicosis, mesna was administered at a dosage equal to 20% of the calculated ifosfamide dosage. Diuresis with saline (0.9% NaCl) solution before and after administration of ifosfamide was used to minimize nephrotoxicosis. Samples for pharmacokinetic analysis were obtained after the MTD was reached.

RESULTS

38 cats were entered into this phase I study and were administered a single dose of ifosfamide at various dosages. The MTD was 1,000 mg/m(2), and neutropenia was the DLT. Seven of 8 episodes of neutropenia were on day 7 after treatment, and 1 cat developed severe neutropenia on day 5. Adverse effects on the gastrointestinal tract were generally mild and self-limiting, the most common of which was nausea during ifosfamide infusion. One cat had signs consistent with a drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction. There were no episodes of hemorrhagic cystitis or nephrotoxicosis. Correlations between pharmacokinetic variables and ifosfamide-associated toxicoses were not found. Preliminary evidence of antitumor activity was observed in 6 of 27 cats with measurable tumors.

CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The dosage of ifosfamide recommended to treat tumor-bearing cats is 900 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks. This dosage should be used in phase II clinical trials.

Long-term results of a multicenter SAKK trial on high-dose ifosfamide and doxorubicin in advanced or metastatic gynecologic sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Dose intensive chemotherapy has not been tested prospectively for the treatment of gynecologic sarcomas. We investigated the antitumor activity and toxicity of high-dose ifosfamide and doxorubicin, in the context of a multidisciplinary strategy for the treatment of advanced and metastatic, not pretreated, gynecologic sarcomas.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-nine patients were enrolled onto a phase I-II multicenter trial of ifosfamide, 10 g/m2 as a continuous infusion over 5 days, plus doxorubicin intravenously, 25 mg/m2/day for 3 days with Mesna and granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor every 21 days. Salvage therapy was allowed after chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Among the 37 evaluable patients, the tumor was locally advanced (n = 11), with concomitant distant metastases (n = 5) or with distant metastases only (n = 21). After a median of three (range 1-7) chemotherapy cycles, six patients experienced a complete response and 12 a partial response for an overall response rate of 49% (95% CI 32% to 66%). The response rate was higher in poorly differentiated tumors (62%) compared with moderately well differentiated ones (18%), but was not different according to histology subtypes. Eleven patients had salvage therapy, either immediately following chemotherapy (n = 7) or at time of progression (n = 4). With a median follow-up time of 5 years, the median overall survival was 30.5 months. Hematological toxicity was as expected neutropenia, thrombopenia and anemia > or = grade 3 at 50%, 34% and 33% of cycles respectively. No toxic death occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

High-dose ifosfamide plus doxorubicin is an active regimen for all subtypes of gynecological sarcomas. Its toxicity was manageable in a multicentric setting. The prolonged survival might be due to the multidisciplinary strategy that was possible in one-third of the patients.

Metabolism and transport of oxazaphosphorines and the clinical implications

The oxazaphosphorines including cyclophosphamide (CPA), ifosfamide (IFO), and trofosfamide represent an important group of therapeutic agents due to their substantial antitumor and immuno-modulating activity. CPA is widely used as an anticancer drug, an immunosuppressant, and for the mobilization of hematopoetic progenitor cells from the bone marrow into peripheral blood prior to bone marrow transplantation for aplastic anemia, leukemia, and other malignancies. New oxazaphosphorines derivatives have been developed in an attempt to improve selectivity and response with reduced toxicity. These derivatives include mafosfamide (NSC 345842), glufosfamide (D19575, beta-D-glucosylisophosphoramide mustard), NSC 612567 (aldophosphamide perhydrothiazine), and NSC 613060 (aldophosphamide thiazolidine). This review highlights the metabolism and transport of these oxazaphosphorines (mainly CPA and IFO, as these two oxazaphosphorine drugs are the most widely used alkylating agents) and the clinical implications. Both CPA and IFO are prodrugs that require activation by hepatic cytochrome P450 (CYP)-catalyzed 4-hydroxylation, yielding cytotoxic nitrogen mustards capable of reacting with DNA molecules to form crosslinks and lead to cell apoptosis and/or necrosis. Such prodrug activation can be enhanced within tumor cells by the CYP-based gene directed-enzyme prodrug therapy (GDEPT) approach. However, those newly synthesized oxazaphosphorine derivatives such as glufosfamide, NSC 612567 and NSC 613060, do not need hepatic activation. They are activated through other enzymatic and/or non-enzymatic pathways. For example, both NSC 612567 and NSC 613060 can be activated by plain phosphodiesterase (PDEs) in plasma and other tissues or by the high-affinity nuclear 3'-5' exonucleases associated with DNA polymerases, such as DNA polymerases and epsilon. The alternative CYP-catalyzed inactivation pathway by N-dechloroethylation generates the neurotoxic and nephrotoxic byproduct chloroacetaldehyde (CAA). Various aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs) and glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are involved in the detoxification of oxazaphosphorine metabolites. The metabolism of oxazaphosphorines is auto-inducible, with the activation of the orphan nuclear receptor pregnane X receptor (PXR) being the major mechanism. Oxazaphosphorine metabolism is affected by a number of factors associated with the drugs (e.g., dosage, route of administration, chirality, and drug combination) and patients (e.g., age, gender, renal and hepatic function). Several drug transporters, such as breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP), multidrug resistance associated proteins (MRP1, MRP2, and MRP4) are involved in the active uptake and efflux of parental oxazaphosphorines, their cytotoxic mustards and conjugates in hepatocytes and tumor cells. Oxazaphosphorine metabolism and transport have a major impact on pharmacokinetic variability, pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationship, toxicity, resistance, and drug interactions since the drug-metabolizing enzymes and drug transporters involved are key determinants of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oxazaphosphorines. A better understanding of the factors that affect the metabolism and transport of oxazaphosphorines is important for their optional use in cancer chemotherapy.

Insights into oxazaphosphorine resistance and possible approaches to its circumvention

The oxazaphosphorines cyclophosphamide, ifosfamide and trofosfamide remain a clinically useful class of anticancer drugs with substantial antitumour activity against a variety of solid tumors and hematological malignancies. A major limitation to their use is tumour resistance, which is due to multiple mechanisms that include increased DNA repair, increased cellular thiol levels, glutathione S-transferase and aldehyde dehydrogenase activities, and altered cell-death response to DNA damage. These mechanisms have been recently re-examined with the aid of sensitive analytical techniques, high-throughput proteomic and genomic approaches, and powerful pharmacogenetic tools. Oxazaphosphorine resistance, together with dose-limiting toxicity (mainly neutropenia and neurotoxicity), significantly hinders chemotherapy in patients, and hence, there is compelling need to find ways to overcome it. Four major approaches are currently being explored in preclinical models, some also in patients: combination with agents that modulate cellular response and disposition of oxazaphosphorines; antisense oligonucleotides directed against specific target genes; introduction of an activating gene (CYP3A4) into tumor tissue; and modification of dosing regimens. Of these approaches, antisense oligonucleotides and gene therapy are perhaps more speculative, requiring detailed safety and efficacy studies in preclinical models and in patients. A fifth approach is the design of novel oxazaphosphorines that have favourable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties and are less vulnerable to resistance. Oxazaphosphorines not requiring hepatic CYP-mediated activation (for example, NSC 613060 and mafosfamide) or having additional targets (for example, glufosfamide that also targets glucose transport) have been synthesized and are being evaluated for safety and efficacy. Characterization of the molecular targets associated with oxazaphosphorine resistance may lead to a deeper understanding of the factors critical to the optimal use of these agents in chemotherapy and may allow the development of strategies to overcome resistance.

A Phase I Study of Prolonged Ambulatory Infusion of Ifosfamide with Oral Mesna

BACKGROUND

Oral mesna allows investigation of ifosfamide as a prolonged ambulatory infusion for dose-intense out-patient use.

METHODS

Cohorts of 3 patients received escalating doses of ifosfamide from 200 to 1,000 mg/m2/day as continuous ambulatory infusion with oral mesna at 30% of the ifosfamide dose every 6 h commencing 2 h prior to ifosfamide infusion as uroprotection on a 14-day schedule with cycles repeated every 28 days.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients received a median of three cycles. Dose-limiting toxicities with cycle 1 were lethargy and hepatotoxicity at 1,000 mg/m2/14 days. Transient transaminase elevation was seen at all dose levels. The other grade 3 toxicities were single episodes of anaemia, granulocytopenia, nausea and hypotension. The best response was stable disease in a patient with thyroid cancer.

CONCLUSION

Ambulatory infusion of 600 mg/m2 ifosfamide with 180 mg/m2 oral mesna was considered suitable for phase II trials and delivers dose-intense out-patient therapy without urotoxicity.

Pharmacology of Ifosfamide

Ifosfamide is a bifunctional alkylating agent, used as a racemic mixture by intravenous route in the treatment of various tumors. It is an oxazaphosphorine derivative with a structural formula similar to that of cyclophosphamide. As a prodrug it requires activation in the liver by a cytochrome mixed-function oxidase system. Among various metabolites, ifosforamide mustard probably represents the most important cytotoxic compound able to produce irreparable cross-links between DNA strands. Resistance is due to the ability of neoplastic cells to repair DNA damages. Acrolein may induce hemorrhagic cystitis, whereas chloroacetaldehyde may be responsible both for nephro- and neurotoxicity. A thiol donor (mesna) can prevent urotoxic effects but not nephro- and neurotoxicity. Pharmacokinetics is markedly influenced by route of administration and duration of treatment, age, co-medication, liver and renal function.

Phase I-II study of docetaxel and ifosfamide combination in patients with anthracycline pretreated advanced breast cancer

Given the established individual activity of docetaxel and ifosfamide in anthracycline pretreated advanced breast cancer, the present phase I-II study aimed to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and activity of the docetaxel-ifosfamide combination in this setting. Cohorts of three to six patients with histologically confirmed metastatic breast cancer after prior anthracycline-based chemotherapy were treated at successive dose levels (DLs) with escalated doses of docetaxel 70-100 mg x m(-2) over 1 h on day 1 followed by ifosfamide 5-6 g x m(-2) divided over days 1 and 2 (2.5-3.0 g x m(-2) day(-1) over 1 h), and recycled every 21 days. G-CSF was added once dose-limiting neutropenia was encountered at a certain DL and planned to be incorporated prophylactically in subsequent higher DLs. In total, 56 patients with a median age of 54.5 (range, 32-72) years and performance status (WHO) of 1 (range, 0-2) were treated at five DLs as follows: 21 in phase I DLs (DL1: 3, DL2: 6, DL3: 3, DL4: 6, and DL5: 3) and the remaining 35 were treated at DL4 (total of 41 patients at DL4), which was defined as the level for phase II testing. All patients were assessable for toxicity and 53 for response. Dose-limiting toxicity (with the addition of G-CSF after DL2) was reached at DL5 with two out of three initial patients developing febrile neutropenia (FN). Clinical response rates, on an intention-to-treat basis, in phase II were: 53.6% (95% CI, 38.3-68.9%); three complete remissions, 19 partial remissions, seven stable disease, and 12 progressive disease. The median response duration was 7 months (3-24 months), median time to progression 6.5 month (0.1-26 month), and median overall survival 13 months (0.1-33 months). Grade 3/4 toxicities included time to progression neutropenia in 78% of patients-with 63% developing grade 4 neutropenia (<or=7 days) and in 12% of these FN, while no grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia was observed. Other toxicities included peripheral neuropathy grade 2 only in 12%, grade 1/2 reversible CNS toxicity in 17%, no renal toxicity, grade 2 myalgias in 10%, grade 3 diarrhoea in 10%, skin/nail toxicity in 17%, and grade 2 fluid retention in 2% of patients. One patient in the study treated at phase II died as a result of acute liver failure after the first cycle. In conclusion, the present phase I-II study determined the feasibility of the docetaxel-ifosfamide combination, defined the MTD and demonstrated the encouraging activity of the regimen in phase II, thus warranting further randomised phase III comparisons to single-agent docetaxel or combinations of the latter with other active agents.

Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ifosfamide and its metabolites

This review discusses several issues in the clinical pharmacology of the antitumour agent ifosfamide and its metabolites. Ifosfamide is effective in a large number of malignant diseases. Its use, however, can be accompanied by haematological toxicity, neurotoxicity and nephrotoxicity. Since its development in the middle of the 1960s, most of the extensive metabolism of ifosfamide has been elucidated. Identification of specific isoenzymes responsible for ifosfamide metabolism may lead to an improved efficacy/toxicity ratio by modulation of the metabolic pathways. Whether ifosfamide is specifically transported by erythrocytes and which activated ifosfamide metabolites play a key role in this transport is currently being debated. In most clinical pharmacokinetic studies, the phenomenon of autoinduction has been observed, but the mechanism is not completely understood. Assessment of the pharmacokinetics of ifosfamide and metabolites has long been impaired by the lack of reliable bioanalytical assays. The recent development of improved bioanalytical assays has changed this dramatically, allowing extensive pharmacokinetic assessment, identifying key issues such as population differences in pharmacokinetic parameters, differences in elimination dependent upon route and schedule of administration, implications of the chirality of the drug and interpatient pharmacokinetic variability. The mechanisms of action of cytotoxicity, neurotoxicity, urotoxicity and nephrotoxicity have been pivotal issues in the assessment of the pharmacodynamics of ifosfamide. Correlations between the new insights into ifosfamide metabolism, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics will rationalise the further development of therapeutic drug monitoring and dose individualisation of ifosfamide treatment.

The clinical pharmacology of alkylating agents in high-dose chemotherapy

Alkylating agents are widely used in high-dose chemotherapy regimens in combination with hematological support. Knowledge about the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of these agents administered in high doses is critical for the safe and efficient use of these regimens. The aim of this review is to summarize the clinical pharmacology of the alkylating agents (including the platinum compounds) in high-dose chemotherapy. Differences between conventional and high doses will be discussed.

Metabolism and pharmacokinetics of oxazaphosphorines

The 2 most commonly used oxazaphosphorines are cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide, although other bifunctional mustard analogues continue to be investigated. The pharmacology of these agents is determined by their metabolism, since the parent drug is relatively inactive. For cyclophosphamide, elimination of the parent compound is by activation to the 4-hydroxy metabolite, although other minor pathways of inactivation also play a role. Ifosfamide is inactivated to a greater degree by dechloroethylation reactions. More robust assay methods for the 4-hydroxy metabolites may reveal more about the clinical pharmacology of these drugs, but at present the best pharmacodynamic data indicate an inverse relationship between plasma concentration of parent drug and either toxicity or antitumour effect. The metabolism of cyclophosphamide is of particular relevance in the application of high dose chemotherapy. The activation pathway of metabolism is saturable, such that at higher doses (greater than 2 to 4 g/m2) a greater proportion of the drug is eliminated as inactive metabolites. However, both cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide also act to induce their own metabolism. Since most high dose regimens require a continuous infusion or divided doses over several days, saturation of metabolism may be compensated for, in part, by auto-induction. Although a quantitative distinction may be made between the cytochrome P450 isoforms responsible for the activating 4-hydroxylation reaction and those which mediate the dechloroethylation reactions, selective induction of the activation pathway, or inhibition of the inactivating pathway, has not been demonstrated clinically. Mathematical models to describe and predict the relative contributions of saturation and autoinduction to the net activation of cyclophosphamide have been developed. However, these require careful validation and may not be applicable outside the exact regimen in which they were derived. A further complication is the chiral nature of these 2 drugs, with some suggestion that one enantiomer may have a favourable profile of metabolism over the other. That the oxazaphosphorines continue to be the subject of intensive investigation over 30 years after their introduction into clinical practice is partly because of their antitumour activity. Further advances in analytical and molecular pharmacological techniques may further optimise their use and allow rational design of more selective analogues.