Unipolar recording in cardiac electrophysiologic studies

Real-time feedback of dynamic cardiac repolarization properties

Arrhythmia is a major health problem and is the subject of much research and computational modeling. The impact of this research has been limited by the availability of human data and by difficulties in its translation to clinical practice. This paper describes an expert system for analysis of cardiac electrogram signals, detecting local activation and repolarization times using heuristic algorithms that incorporate automatic rejection of measurements that are deemed to be unreliable. The fully-automated system operates in real-time to provide feedback to cardiologists of derived dynamic repolarization models, which could dramatically enhance research capabilities and produce novel diagnostic techniques and therapies.

A unipolar coronary sinus mapping study of patients with left-sided atrioventricular accessory pathways

So-called unipolar 'PQS pattern' is widely accepted as a hallmark of successful catheter ablation of the left-sided atrioventricular accessory pathway. However, the unipolar nature of the electrogram and the site-dependent appearance of this characteristic pattern are poorly understood. Therefore, unipolar coronary sinus (CS) mapping was performed using a multipolar fine electrode in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White (WPW) syndrome associated with an antegrade left-sided accessory pathway (case group) and those with a concealed left-sided accessory pathway or atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (control group) under sinus rhythm and fixed high right atrial, CS ostial, and distal pacing. In both groups, the unipolar CS atrial electrogram showed intrinsic negative deflection (initial positive followed by negative parts) with considerable variation depending on the recording site. This unipolar configuration of the atrial electrogram was not influenced by different activation sequences during pacing at various sites. The case group exhibited a unipolar 'PQS pattern' at successful ablation sites for the left lateral to anterolateral accessory pathway. However, this was not true for the left posteroseptal accessory pathway, possibly because the negative part of the atrial electrogram distorted the 'PQS pattern' as an intervening dip. In conclusion, the site-dependent variations of the unipolar CS atrial electrogram underlie the limited usefulness of the 'PQS pattern' in left posteroseptal accessory pathway localization.