Gentamicin pharmacokinetics in preterm infants with a patent and a closed ductus arteriosus

Gentamicin in Neonates with Hemodynamically Significant Patent Ductus Arteriosus

Background

Gentamicin has been shown to cause vasodilation in preclinical studies. Hemodynamically significant patent ductus arteriosus (hsPDA) is a commonly observed congenital heart disorder in preterm neonates. Concomitant gentamicin theoretically shall delay the closure/result in nonclosure of ductus arteriosus (DA). Similarly, hsPDA can alter the pharmacokinetics of gentamicin and so trough gentamicin concentrations. We carried out the present study to evaluate the association between gentamicin use and closure of hsPDA (treated with acetaminophen) as well as the effect of hsPDA on trough concentrations.

Methods

This study was a prospective, observational study that included 60 neonates diagnosed with hsPDA by echocardiography and 102 neonates without hsPDA. Demographic details, size of DA as per echocardiography at the end of treatment with acetaminophen, gentamicin-dosing regimen, and trough concentrations were collected. Standard definitions were adhered in classifying the gestational age, birth weights, and size of DA. The numerical values are reported in median (range).

Results

Neonates with hsPDA had significantly lower daily doses of gentamicin [4.5 (2.5-10), 7 (3.2-13) mg; P < 0.001] but longer duration of therapy [8 (3-14), 5 (3-7) days; P < 0.001] than those without hsPDA in very preterm neonates. No significant differences were observed in the trough concentrations of gentamicin between the groups. No association was observed between gentamicin use and closure of DA. However, those with successful closure of DA received gentamicin for a longer duration [6 (3-10), 4 (3-14) days; P < 0.05] that was independent of acetaminophen duration and had received higher cumulative doses of gentamicin.

Conclusion

In conclusion, we observed a significantly longer duration of gentamicin therapy in neonates with hsPDA compared to those without hsPDA. No significant differences were observed in the rates of closure of DA with concomitant gentamicin administration and gentamicin trough concentrations.

Targeting Lower Serum Trough Concentrations: A New Gentamicin Dosing Strategy for Suspected Neonatal Early-Onset Sepsis

OBJECTIVE

Neonatal gentamicin dosing algorithms are not designed to achieve serum trough concentrations ≤1 mcg/mL. The purpose of our study was to evaluate a new gentamicin algorithm based on serum creatinine (SCr) and gestational age (GA) designed to achieve serum gentamicin trough concentrations ≤1 mcg/mL.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a level IIIB neonatal intensive care unit. The incidence of elevated serum gentamicin troughs for this study was compared with the center's previously published results to evaluate the proposed dosing algorithm. Patients were included if gentamicin was administered within the first 7 days of life and a serum gentamicin trough concentration and a baseline SCr concentration were obtained. Patients were further subdivided into groups based on GA for data analysis: ≤30 weeks (group 1), 30-34 weeks (group 2), and ≥35 weeks (group 3). The SCr was considered mildly elevated (0.81-0.99 mg/dL) or elevated (≥1 mg/dL). The respective outcomes between the post-algorithm and control groups were examined using intention-to-treat analysis and Bayesian modeling to calculate rate differences.

RESULTS

Of the 2377 patients evaluated, 366 met the inclusion criteria. Significantly lower percentages of elevated serum gentamicin troughs were noted in groups 2 and 3 subsequent to the implementation of the dosing algorithm with 16% and 15% lower rate differences, respectively. Regardless of GA, there were significantly fewer elevated serum troughs in the post-implementation groups than in the control with mildly elevated and elevated SCr p < 0.001.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a dosing algorithm based on SCr significantly reduced the number of elevated serum trough rates in neonates with a GA greater than 30 weeks.

Preterm Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model. Part II: Applications of the Model to Predict Drug Pharmacokinetics in the Preterm Population

BACKGROUND

Preterm neonates are usually not part of a traditional drug development programme, however they are frequently administered medicines. Developing modelling and simulation tools, such as physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models that incorporate developmental physiology and maturation of drug metabolism, can be used to predict drug exposure in this group of patients, and may help to optimize drug dose adjustment.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess and verify the predictability of a preterm PBPK model using compounds that undergo diverse renal and/or hepatic clearance based on the knowledge of their disposition in adults.

METHODS

A PBPK model was developed in the Simcyp Simulator V17 to predict the pharmacokinetics (PK) of drugs in preterm neonates. Drug parameters for alfentanil, midazolam, caffeine, ibuprofen, gentamicin and vancomycin were collated from the literature. Predicted PK parameters and profiles were compared against the observed data.

RESULTS

The preterm PBPK model predicted the PK changes of the six compounds using ontogeny functions for cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2, CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 after oral and intravenous administrations. For gentamicin and vancomycin, the maturation of renal function was able to predict the exposure of these two compounds after intravenous administration. All PK parameter predictions were within a twofold error criteria.

CONCLUSION

While the developed preterm model for the prediction of PK behaviour in preterm patients is not intended to replace clinical studies, it can potentially help with deciding on first-time dosing in this population and study design in the absence of clinical data.

Standard-dose gentamicin does not increase risk of patent ductus arteriosus

BACKGROUND

Rates of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) and infection are high in preterm infants. Preterm infants with infection are more likely to develop symptomatic PDA, a potentially fatal disease. Clinically, gentamicin is widely used for early-onset infection in neonates including preterm infants. A recent study demonstrated that standard-dose gentamicin itself, not infection, increased risk of PDA in mice, suggesting that gentamicin should be avoided in neonates with a risk of PDA. This claim has been insufficiently investigated in subsequent in-vivo experiments. We reevaluated the in-vivo effect of standard-dose gentamicin on patency of the rat ductus arteriosus (DA).

METHODS

1) To evaluate the effect of gentamicin on DA patency duration, gentamicin was intraperitoneally injected immediately after birth. 2) To evaluate the effect of gentamicin on DA reopening, gentamicin was intraperitoneally injected 30 min after birth. In both scenarios, 30 min after gentamicin administration, rapid whole-body freezing was performed and the inner diameter of the DA was measured.

RESULTS

Standard-dose gentamicin (5 μg/g) did not prolong patency of the DA or increase the likelihood of DA reopening in rat neonates. High-dose gentamicin (100 μg/g), however, significantly prolonged patency of the DA and was associated with DA reopening in rat neonates, although the dilative effect did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSION

Standard-dose gentamicin does not increase the risk of PDA in rat neonates. This study suggests that standard-dose gentamicin can be used to treat infection in neonates without increasing PDA morbidity.

A review of population pharmacokinetic models of gentamicin in paediatric patients

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES

Gentamicin is often used for the treatment of Gram-negative infections. Due to pharmacokinetic variability in paediatric patients, appropriate dosing of gentamicin in the paediatric population is challenging. This article reviews published population pharmacokinetic models of gentamicin in paediatric patients, identifies covariates that significantly influence gentamicin pharmacokinetics, and determines whether there is a consensus on proposed dosing for intravenous gentamicin in this population.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched for articles published until the end of 2017. If the articles described population pharmacokinetic models of gentamicin in the paediatric population (after intravenous administration of gentamicin), the following data were extracted: type of study, year of publication, population characteristics and number of patients, gentamicin dosing, total number of gentamicin (serum and/or plasma) concentrations, type of population modelling approach, developed model with pharmacokinetic parameters and covariates included.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

In most of the studies, one- or two-compartment modelling was applied. The mean estimated gentamicin clearance for newborns, infants and the complete paediatric population was 0.048, 0.13 and 0.067 L/h/kg, respectively, and the mean predicted volume of distribution was 0.475, 0.35 and 0.33 L/kg, respectively. The values reflect differences in body composition and kidney maturation within the different paediatric populations. Gentamicin pharmacokinetics were most influenced by age, body size and renal function.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

Based on our review, the authors agree on a prolonged dosing interval for preterm and term newborns (up to 48 hours). However, there was no agreement on proposed dosing with respect to gestational age. In general, the proposed daily doses were lower compared to those initially applied for preterm newborns and comparable to those for term newborns. For infants and children, the dosing interval remained unchanged (24 hours), but the proposed daily doses were higher than actually applied. When differences in the paediatric population are considered and an appropriate population PK model with applicable covariates is applied, dosing can be individualized. In the future, studies of gentamicin pharmacokinetics in paediatric patients should focus on currently underestimated covariates, such as fat-free mass, concomitantly administered drugs, body temperature and critical illness because these can change gentamicin PK considerably. Consequently, different dosing is required and TDM becomes even more important.

Evaluation of evidence for pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics-based dose optimization of antimicrobials for treating Gram-negative infections in neonates

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVES

Neonates present a special subgroup of population in whom optimization of antimicrobial dosing can be particularly challenging. Gram-negative infections are common in neonates, and inpatient treatment along with critical care is needed for the management of these infections. Dosing recommendations are often extrapolated from evidence generated in older patient populations. This systematic review was done to identify the knowledge gaps in the pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics (PK-PD)-based optimized dosing schedule for parenteral antimicrobials for Gram-negative neonatal infections.

METHODS

Relevant research questions were identified. An extensive electronic and manual search methodology was used. Potentially eligible articles were screened for eligibility. The relevant data were extracted independently in a pre-specified data extraction form. Pooling of data was planned.

RESULTS

Of the 340 records screened, 24 studies were included for data extraction and incorporation in the review [carbapenems - imipenem and meropenem (n=7); aminoglycosides - amikacin and gentamicin (n=9); piperacillin-tazobactam (n=2); quinolones (n=2); third- and fourth-generation cephalosporins (n=4) and colistin nil]. For each of the drug categories, the information for all the questions that the review sought to answer was incomplete. There was a wide variability in the covariates assessed, and pooling of results could not be undertaken.

INTERPRETATION & CONCLUSIONS

There is a wide knowledge gap for determining the doses of antimicrobials used for Gram-negative infections in neonates. A different profile of newborns in the developing countries could affect the disposition of antimicrobials for Gram negative infections, necessitating the generation of PK-PD data of antimicrobials in neonates from developing countries. Further, guidelines for treatment of neonatal conditions may incorporate the evidence-based PK-PD-guided dosing regimens.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of aminoglycosides in neonates

The efficacy and toxicity of aminoglycosides show a strong direct positive relationship with blood drug concentrations, therefore, therapy with aminoglycosides in adults is usually guided by therapeutic drug monitoring. Dosing regimens in adults have evolved from multiple daily dosing to extended-interval dosing. This evolution has also taken place in neonates. Neonates, however, display large interindividual differences in the pharmacokinetics of aminoglycosides due to developmental differences early in life. The volume of distribution of aminoglycosides shows a strong relationship with bodyweight, which tends to be larger (corrected for bodyweight) in more premature infants and those with sepsis. Renal clearance of aminoglycosides increases with gestational age and accelerates immediately after birth. Because of these developmental influences, there is great inter- and intraindividual variability in the volume of distribution and clearance of these drugs, and investigators have established aminoglycoside dosing regimens based on bodyweight and/or gestational age. Widely practised dosing regimens comprise 4-5 mg/kg bodyweight of gentamicin every 24-48 hours as a first dose, followed by dose adjustment based on therapeutic drug monitoring. Although formal toxicity studies are scarce, there is no evidence that aminoglycoside toxicity in neonates differs from that in adults. Monitoring of blood drug concentrations and intelligent reconstruction of individual pharmacokinetic behaviour using a population pharmacokinetic model, optimally chosen blood sampling times and appropriate pharmacokinetic software, help clinicians to quickly optimize aminoglycoside dosing regimens to maximize the clinical effect and minimize the toxicity of these drugs.