Prolonged neutropenia following anti CD20 therapy in a patient with relapsed follicular non-Hodgkin's lymphoma and corrected with IVIG

Case Report: High Doses of Intravenous Immunoglobulins as a Successful Treatment for Late Onset Immune Agranulocytosis After Rituximab Plus Bendamustine

Late onset neutropenia (LON) related to rituximab or rituximab plus chemotherapy is defined as an unexplained absolute neutrophil count of ≤1.5 × 10⁹/L starting at least four weeks after the last rituximab administration. LON is infrequent and its pathophysiology remains unknown. There are no guidelines or consensus strategies for the optimal management of patients developing LON. The majority of the patients recover promptly with no specific treatment and only some cases need to be managed with granulocytic colony stimulating factor (G-CSF), usually with a rapid response. Here, we describe a 69-year-old patient with Waldenström's macroglobulinemia who presented a septic event in the context of severe LON after rituximab plus bendamustine. The diagnosed of agranulocytosis was established by bone marrow examination. Interestingly, anti-neutrophil antibodies bound to the patient's granulocytes were found suggesting an autoimmune mechanism. The patient did not respond to G-CSF but achieved a rapid response after high doses of intravenous immunoglobulins with full white blood cell recovery.

Influence of R-CHOP Therapy on Immune System Restoration in Patients with B-Cell Lymphoma

OBJECTIVE

To assess the immunosuppressive effect of R-CHOP in patients with B-cell lymphoma at 2 years.

METHODS

Parameters of humoral and cell-mediated immunity were assessed in 89 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma or follicular lymphoma before and after 6-8 cycles of R-CHOP-14 or R-CHOP-21 regimen.

RESULTS

Data on pre- and posttreatment serum IgG (sIgG) levels were available for all 89 patients, while the corresponding data on serum CD20+, CD3+, CD4+, and CD8+ lymphocyte counts were available in only 43. Median sIgG levels significantly decreased from 1,221 mg/dl (baseline) to 733 mg/dl (after chemotherapy) (p < 0.001). Although CD20+ and CD4+ cell counts decreased (p < 0.001), no significant effect of chemotherapy on CD3+ and CD8+ cell counts was observed. CD20+ cell counts were restored to baseline levels at the 12-month follow-up. sIgG levels and CD4+ cell counts were not completely restored at 24 months, indicating a sustained immunosuppressive effect of R-CHOP in these patients. The incidence of infections over the 2-year period was 16.3-23.6%.

CONCLUSION

The immunosuppressive effect of R-CHOP in newly diagnosed cases of B-cell lymphoma tends to persist for >2 years, although sIgG levels were restored more quickly than CD4+ cell counts.

Severe and fatal adverse events risk associated with rituximab addition to B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL) chemotherapy: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody targetting the CD20 antigen with the ability to increase overall remission (OR) in B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL). A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to determine the risk of the most clinically relevant severe and fatal adverse events (AEs) associated with the use of rituximab in the treatment of B-NHL.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We included phase III clinical trials that used chemotherapy in combination with rituximab or chemotherapy alone as for B-NHL. Statistical analyses were conducted to calculate summary risk ratio (RR) of the relevant severe and fatal AEs related with rituximab.

RESULTS

Eight randomised controlled clinical trials were included in this meta-analysis. Summary RR obtained showed no statistically significant rituximab-associated increased risk in 13 severe adverse events (SAEs) (infection, fever, anaemia, thrombocytopaenia, granulocytopenia, liver toxicity, cardiac toxicity, neurologic toxicity, lung toxicity, mucositis, nausea/vomiting, diarrhoea, alopecia) except leukocytopenia (36.4% versus 31%; RR = 1.13; 95%CI, 1.01-1.27; P = 0.03). The incidences of fatal AEs showed noteworthy difference between rituximab group and control group (RR = 1.45; 95% CI, 1.04-2.02; P = 0.03).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis indicates that there was no proof of statistically higher incidence of most SAEs in rituximab containing group compared with chemotherapy alone. However, fatal infections were more frequently observed in patients who received rituximab. Considering the low-incidence infection-induced death during the treatment period, the effects of rituximab on infections need further investigation.

Does rituximab increase the incidence of infectious complications? A narrative review

BACKGROUND

Rituximab has increasingly been used for the treatment of hematological malignancies and autoimmune diseases, and its efficacy and safety are well established. Although clinical trials have shown conflicting results regarding the association of rituximab with infections, an increased incidence of infections has recently been reported in patients with lymphomas being treated with rituximab. However, clinical experience regarding the association of rituximab with different types of infection is lacking and this association has not been established in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

METHODS

All previous studies included in our literature review were found using a PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane database search of the English-language medical literature applying the terms 'rituximab', 'monoclonal antibodies', 'infections', 'infectious complications', and combinations of these terms. In addition, the references cited in these articles were examined to identify additional reports.

RESULTS

We performed separate analyses of data regarding the association of rituximab with infection in (1) patients with hematological malignancies, (2) patients with autoimmune disorders, and (3) transplant patients. Recent data show that rituximab maintenance therapy significantly increases the risk of both infection and neutropenia in patients with lymphoma or other hematological malignancies. On the other hand, data available to date do not indicate an increased risk of infections when using rituximab compared with concurrent control treatments in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. However, there is a lack of sufficient long-term data to allow such a statement to be definitively made, and caution regarding infections should continue to be exercised, especially in patients who have received repeated courses of rituximab, are receiving other immunosuppressants concurrently, and in those whose immunoglobulin levels have fallen below the normal range. Few data are available concerning the risk of organ transplant recipients developing infections following rituximab therapy. Data from case reports, case series, and retrospective studies correlate rituximab use with the development of a variety of infections in transplant patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies are needed to clarify the association of rituximab with infection. Physicians and patients should be educated about the association of rituximab with infectious complications. Monitoring of absolute neutrophil count and immunoglobulin levels and the identification of high-risk groups for the development of infectious complications, with timely vaccination of these groups, are clearly needed.

Late-onset neutropenia after rituximab treatment: case series and comprehensive review of the literature

Rituximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody against CD20 that is used mainly for the treatment of CD20-positive lymphoma. Recently, its use has been expanded to include treatment of other nonmalignant diseases such as rheumatologic diseases and autoimmune cytopenia. Correlating with the increased use of rituximab has been an increased number of reports of its late adverse effects. One of these is late-onset neutropenia (LON). Most investigators define LON as grade III-IV neutropenia occurring 3-4 weeks after the last treatment with rituximab, in the absence of an alternative explanation for the neutropenia.We report 6 cases of LON identified in our institution. Four patients were treated for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, and 2 patients for follicular lymphoma. Median patient age was 68 years (range, 33-83 yr); LON appeared after a median interval of 77 days (range, 42-153 d) and lasted for a median of 5 days (range, 1-45 d). Five of the 6 patients presented with infectious complications, and 4 patients experienced recurrent episodes of neutropenia. One patient presented with LON and concomitant subacute pulmonary disease that was attributed to rituximab therapy.In addition to our own case series we present a systematic review of the literature, which we performed to compile data to describe better the syndrome of LON. Systematic studies, case series, and case reports were extracted. Most studies dealing with LON are retrospective by design and are limited by the heterogeneous populations included in the analysis. The incidence of LON is generally reported to be in the range of 3%-27%. Data regarding populations at risk are not consistent, and in some instances are conflicting.Patients considered at increased risk of LON include patients after autologous stem cell transplantation, patients treated for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS)-related lymphoma, and patients treated with purine analogues. Patients who received previous cytotoxic treatment as well as those treated with more intensive chemotherapy or with chemotherapy in combination with radiotherapy are also considered to be at risk of LON. In addition, advanced stages of disease and having received multiple doses of rituximab are risk factors for LON.The mechanism of LON is poorly understood. Direct toxicity is very unlikely. Some speculate that there may be an infectious etiology involved, as well as an antibody-mediated process, but these ideas have not been substantiated. The concept of a lymphocyte subpopulation imbalance leading to LON has been presented based on the demonstration of T-LGL in peripheral blood and bone marrow of patients with LON. Perturbations in stromal-derived factor-1 and in the BAFF cytokine have also been discussed as potential players in the pathogenesis of LON. A recent study correlated specific polymorphism in the immunoglobulin G Fc receptor FCγRIIIa 158 V/F with increased rates of LON.The clinical significance of LON is important because it may affect treatment strategies. Of note, infectious complications are not very frequent and not very severe. Pooling data from the major retrospective studies reveals an infection rate of 16.9%. Most infections were mild and resolved promptly. One death occurred from infection during neutropenia. Repeated episodes of LON are not uncommon, but it is so far impossible to identify those patients at risk of these relapsing episodes of LON. Re-treatment with rituximab after LON may result in recurrent episodes, but the implications and risks are uncertain at the present time. The role of growth factors once LON appears is ill defined, and the decision to use them should be made on a case-by-case basis.

Risk factors for infection in haematology patients treated with rituximab

OBJECTIVES

Although rituximab therapy is not considered to be closely associated with infection, there have been reports of serious infections in patients treated with rituximab. We performed a statistical retrospective analysis to clarify the risk factors for infection in patients receiving rituximab therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective study of data from clinical records was performed that targeted haematology patients treated at our university hospital between April 2003 and October 2006. We selected 63 patients with CD20-positive lymphoma whose peripheral blood immunoglobulin levels had been measured within 6 months before and after rituximab therapy. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the risk factors for serious infection in these patients.

RESULTS

The three risk factors identified were: 1) reduction in IgM after administration of rituximab [odds ratio (OR) = 1.032, confidence interval (CI) = 1.007-1.057; P = 0.009], 2) duration of rituximab therapy [OR = 0.962, CI = 0.932-0.994; P = 0.021] and 3) G-CSF administration [OR = 4.825, CI = 1.411-16.495; P = 0.012].

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab therapy may be associated with infection, indicating the need for sequential monitoring of IgM levels and identification of the optimal interval between rituximab cycles.

Delayed-onset grade 4 neutropenia associated with rituximab therapy in a patient with lymphoma: case report and literature review

A 53-year-old man developed delayed-onset neutropenia 6 weeks after completing first-line therapy with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, vincristine, and prednisone for high-grade B-cell lymphoma. Bone marrow biopsy demonstrated hypercellular marrow with normal maturation. He also developed interstitial pneumonitis, an adverse event associated with rituximab use. Infiltrates of T cells were found in the patient's lungs. For the next 6 months, the patient required subcutaneous granulocyte colony-stimulating factor 300 mug twice/week to maintain a granulocyte count above 1000 cells/mm3. He also received oral antibiotics for mouth sores and thrush. Based on the existing evidence, monitoring blood counts for as long as 8 weeks after rituximab therapy may be advisable, although the literature reports that neutropenia can develop up to 1 year after treatment. The development of a registry and uniform testing may help uncover the cause of this delayed-onset neutropenia.

Tolerability and safety of rituximab (MabThera)

Rituximab, a human/mouse chimeric anti-CD20 antibody, has become part of standard therapy for patients with CD20-expressing B-cell lymphoma, and is currently under investigation for other indications including autoimmune diseases, in particular rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Its characteristic tolerability profile was established soon after clinical testing began and compares favourably with chemotherapy. The majority of patients experience mild to moderate infusion-related reactions (IRRs) during the first administration of rituximab, but the incidence decreases markedly with subsequent infusions. Current data suggest that the type of adverse events in patients with RA are similar to those in lymphoma, but that adverse events related to the rituximab infusions are less severe and less frequent. Rituximab induces a rapid depletion of normal CD20-expressing B-cells in the peripheral blood, and levels remain low or undetectable for 2-6 months before returning to pretreatment levels, generally within 12 months. Serum immunoglobulin levels remain largely stable, although a reduction in IgM has been described. T-cells are unaffected by rituximab and consequently opportunistic infections rarely occur in association with rituximab therapy. When used in combination with a variety of chemotherapeutic regimens, rituximab does not add to the toxicity of chemotherapy, with the exception of a higher rate of neutropenia. However, this does not translate into a higher infection rate. Over 540,000 patients worldwide have now received rituximab and serious adverse reactions have occurred in a small minority of patients, but for the great majority of patients, rituximab is safe and well tolerated.

Rituximab reduces relapse risk after allogeneic and autologous stem cell transplantation in patients with high-risk aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma

High-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT) have limited success in patients with refractory aggressive lymphoma. Allogeneic SCT may offer some advantage in this setting by providing graft-versus-lymphoma effect, but the relapse risk remains substantial. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of rituximab administration after SCT in patients at high-risk for post-transplant relapse, in order to reduce relapse risk. Twenty-eight patients were included with the intent to treat them with rituximab after autologous (n = 16) or allogeneic (n = 12) SCT. Twenty-four were given rituximab starting a median of 47 d post SCT. Three died of SCT complications prior to therapy. Nine patients not achieving a complete remission (CR) post SCT converted to CR with rituximab and with the onset of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in three. With a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 3-33 months) the estimated 2-year overall survival and disease-free survival was 85 +/- 7% and 55 +/- 13% respectively. When only those patients who were actually treated are analysed, these rates were 95 +/- 7% and 64 +/- 13% respectively. The relapse risk was 35 +/- 14%. Seven patients had recurrent neutropenia episodes associated with severe hypogammaglobulinaemia, which were further prevented with intravenous immunoglobulin. None of the 10 allogeneic SCT recipients treated with rituximab had severe GVHD. Rituximab may be an effective adjuvant therapy after SCT to reduce the relapse rate and improve the outcome in high-risk aggressive lymphoma. Larger scale comparative trials are necessary to better define its role in SCT.