Comparison of the cryopreservation of human embryos obtained after intracytoplasmic sperm injection with a slow cooling or an ultrarapid cooling procedure

Vitrification yields higher cryo-survival rate than slow freezing in biopsied bovine in vitro produced blastocysts

Vitrification and slow freezing are the two commonly used embryo cryopreservation methods. In most studies, vitrification of intact embryos has proven superior in several respects, including cell and embryo survival and pregnancy rate. However, there is a lack of data for comparing these two methods in in vitro produced (IVP) bovine blastocysts, which have been subjected to the retrieval of trophectoderm (TE) biopsy. Day 7 IVP blastocysts were pooled and randomized into four groups: 1) non-biopsy (NB), 2) biopsy (B), 3) biopsy-vitrification (BV), 4) biopsy-slow freeze (BSF). The blastocysts in the B, BV, and BSF groups were subjected to TE biopsy. For the B group, this was followed by 5 hours (h) incubation and subsequent scoring of the biopsy-survival (re-expansion) rate before processing for further analyses. For the BV and BSF groups, the biopsy procedure was followed by 2 h incubation, allowing for a quick re-expansion, after which the blastocysts were subjected to vitrification and slow freezing, respectively. After warming and thawing, respectively, they were then incubated for 5 h followed by scoring the cryo-survival (re-expansion) rates before processing for further analyses. These included quantification of ICM and TE cells, cleaved caspase-3- and TUNEL-positive cells, quantitative PCR on cellular stress markers (SOD1 and PRDX1), and ultrastructural analysis. The biopsy-survival rate in the B group was 94% (307/326). The cryo-survival rate in BV (86%, 138/161) was higher than that in BSF (57%, 81/142; P < 0.001). No differences were noted between the average ICM, TE, and total cell numbers of the groups. The percentages of cleaved caspase-3-positive cells were higher in BV vs. NB (P < 0.05), in BSF vs. NB (P < 0.001), and in BSF vs. B (P < 0.001). The percentages of TUNEL-positive cells were higher in BV vs. NB (P < 0.05) and in BSF vs. NB (P < 0.001). The levels of mRNA abundance for SOD1 and PRDX1 in B, BV, and BSF were not different from that in NB. The ultrastructural analysis of blastocysts in the BV and BSF groups showed distension of extracellular spaces and appearance of intracellular vacuoles in the ICM, distension of mitochondria, and disorganization of mitochondrial cristae in both ICM and TE, and weakened tight junctions between adjacent TE cells. In summary, our findings demonstrate that vitrification yields a higher cryo-survival rate than slow freezing in biopsied bovine IVP blastocysts. However, biopsy-vitrification and biopsy-slow-freeze values are comparable in terms of ICM, TE, and total blastocyst cell numbers, as well as cleaved caspase-3- and TUNEL-positive cell rates. Moreover, biopsy and cryopreservation performed alone had no effect on ICM, TE, total blastocyst cell numbers, or TUNEL-positive cell rates. Biopsy and vitrification performed alone had no effect on the cleaved caspase-3 positive cell rates, whereas slow freezing resulted in an increased rate. Furthermore, double traumatization with a combination of biopsy and cryopreservation, either vitrification or slow freezing, resulted in increased rates of cleaved caspase-3- and TUNEL-positive cells.

Female fertility: is it safe to "freeze?"

Objective:

To evaluate the safety and risk of cryopreservation in female fertility preservation.

Data sources:

The data analyzed in this review were the English articles from 1980 to 2013 from journal databases, primarily PubMed and Google scholar. The criteria used in the literature search show as following: (1) human; embryo; cryopreservation/freezing/vitrification, (2) human; oocyte/immature oocyte; cryopreservation/ freezing/vitrification, (3) human; ovarian tissue transplantation; cryopreservation/freezing/vitrification, (4) human; aneuploidy/DNA damage/epigenetic; cryopreservation/freezing/vitrification, and (5) human; fertility preservation; maternal age.

Study selection:

The risk ratios based on survival rate, maturation rate, fertilization rate, cleavage rate, implantation rate, pregnancy rate, and clinical risk rate were acquired from relevant meta-analysis studies. These studies included randomized controlled trials or studies with one of the primary outcome measures covering cryopreservation of human mature oocytes, embryos, and ovarian tissues within the last 7 years (from 2006 to 2013, since the pregnancy rates of oocyte vitrification were significantly increased due to the improved techniques). The data involving immature oocyte cryopreservation obtained from individual studies was also reviewed by the authors.

Results:

Vitrifications of mature oocytes and embryos obtained better clinical outcomes and did not increase the risks of DNA damage, spindle configuration, embryonic aneuploidy, and genomic imprinting as compared with fresh and slow-freezing procedures, respectively.

Conclusions:

Both embryo and oocyte vitrifications are safe applications in female fertility preservation.

[Vitrification: Principles and results]

Sperm and embryos cryopreservation is a commonly applied technique for several years. Recently authorized in France, vitrification tends to replace gradually the conventional technique of slow freezing, so upsetting the practices in the management of patients. It allows from now on the cryopreservation of oocytes and opens new perspectives in egg donation either still in fertility preservation. This review thus attempted to examine the contribution of vitrification in the freezing of oocytes and human embryos at various stages of development. If obviously vitrification appears as the current method of choice for the cryopreservation of oocytes as well as blastocysts, the results are less cut as regards embryos to early stages. No increase in adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes in children conceived from vitrified oocytes or embryos is noted in the literature.

Cryopreservation of day 2-3 embryos by vitrification yields better outcome than slow freezing

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcome of vitrification versus slow freezing cryopreservation for cleavage stage day 2-3 embryos.

DESIGN

A retrospective observational study.

SETTING

All thawed embryos assisted reproduction cycles between January 2010 and December 2012 at a single IVF laboratory of a Tertiary Medical Center.

PATIENTS

Five hundred and thirty-nine cycles of day 2-3 thawed embryos.

INTERVENTIONS

In 327 of the thawed cycles, the embryos were vitrified and in 212 of the cycles the embryos were derived from slow freezing embryos.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE

Embryo survival rate, blastomere surviving rate and pregnancy rate.

RESULTS

Embryo survival rate was significantly higher after vitrification compared with slow freezing (81.6%, 647/793 versus 70.0%, 393/562 embryos, p < 0.0001). The clinical pregnancy rate per ET was significantly higher following vitrification compared to slow freezing, 20.0%, 63/314 versus 11.9%, 23/193, respectively (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Vitrification of day 2-3 cleavage stage embryos yields better cycle outcome in all the parameters compared to slow freezing.

A critical appraisal of cryopreservation (slow cooling versus vitrification) of human oocytes and embryos

BACKGROUND

Vitrification is now a commonly applied technique for cryopreservation in assisted reproductive technology (ART) replacing, in many cases, conventional slow cooling methodology. This review examines evidence relevant to comparison of the two approaches applied to human oocytes and embryos at different developmental stages.

METHODS

Critical review of the published literature using PubMed with particular emphasis on studies which include data on survival and implantation rates, data from fresh control groups and evaluation of the two approaches in a single setting.

RESULTS

Slow cooling is associated with lower survival rates and compromised development relative to vitrification when applied to metaphase II (MII) oocytes, although the vitrification results have predominantly been obtained using direct contact with liquid nitrogen and there is some evidence that optimal protocols for slow cooling of MII oocytes are yet to be established. There are no prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which support the use of either technique with pronuclear oocytes although vitrification has become the method of choice. Optimal slow cooling, using modifications of traditional methodology, and vitrification can result in high survival rates of early embryos, which implant at the same rate as equivalent fresh counterparts. Many studies report high survival and implantation rates following vitrification of blastocysts. Although slow cooling of blastocysts has been reported to be inferior in some studies, others comparing the two approaches in the same clinical setting have demonstrated comparable results. The variation in the extent of embryo selection applied in studies can lead to apparent differences in clinical efficiency, which may not be significant if expressed on a 'per oocyte used' basis.

CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence suggests that vitrification is the current method of choice when cryopreserving MII oocytes. Early cleavage stage embryos can be cryopreserved with equal success using slow cooling and vitrification. Successful blastocyst cryopreservation may be more consistently achieved with vitrification but optimal slow cooling can produce similar results. There are key limitations associated with the available evidence base, including a paucity of RCTs, limited reporting of live birth outcomes and limited reporting of detail which would allow assessment of the impact of differences in female age. While vitrification has a clear role in ART, we support continued research to establish optimal slow cooling methods which may assist in alleviating concerns over safety issues, such as storage, transport and the use of very high cryoprotectant concentrations.

Assessment of freezing procedures for rat immature testicular tissue

Fertility preservation has been included in the management of childhood cancer treatment. Cryopreservation of immature testicular tissue is the only available solution for pre-pubertal boys. Different freezing protocols have been developed in several species but without a clearly identified procedure. We tried to evaluate several protocols for cryopreservation of rat immature testicular tissue. Twelve different freezing protocols using different (i) cryoprotectant (dimethylsulphoxide [DMSO] or 1,2-propanediol [PROH]), (ii) cryoprotectant concentration (1.5M or 3M), (iii) equilibration time (30 or 60 min), (iv) equilibration temperature (4 °C or room temperature), (v) size of testicular fragment (7.5mg or 15 mg), (vi) package (straws or cryovials), were compared using cord morphological damage evaluation. A testicular tissue piece of 7.5mg cryopreserved in cryovial using 1.5M DMSO, an equilibration time of 30 min at 4 °C showed fewer morphological alterations than the other protocols tested. The selected freezing protocol was able to maintain rat immature testicular tissue architecture, functionality after testicular pieces organotypic culture, and could be proposed in a human application.

Slow freezing, vitrification and ultra-rapid freezing of human embryos: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Embryo cryopreservation is an important aspect of assisted reproduction. Many methods have been described, but they have been poorly investigated in randomized trials, highlighting the need for a systematic review of the literature. Meticulous electronic/hand searches were performed to locate randomized trials (RCT) comparing embryo cryopreservation methods. Primary outcomes were clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and incidence of congenital abnormalities. Secondary outcomes included live-birth (LBR), ongoing pregnancy (OPR), implantation (IR), and miscarriage (MR) rates. Data were extracted to allow for an intention-to-treat analysis and analysed using a random-effects model. Literature search revealed 11 RCT, of which five were excluded. The quality of the included studies was variable, but generally poor. There was a significantly higher CPR, OPR and IR with vitrification compared with slow freezing (odds ratio (OR)=1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI)=1.03-2.32, OR=1.82, 95% CI=1.04-3.20 and OR=1.49, 95% CI=1.03-2.15, respectively). In addition, there was a significantly lower CPR and OPR with embryo ultra-rapid freezing compared with slow freezing (OR=0.35, 95% CI=0.16-0.76 and OR=0.37, 95% CI=0.17-0.81, respectively). Vitrification is superior to slow freezing, which in turn is superior to ultra-rapid freezing. However, more well-designed and powered studies are needed to further corroborate these findings.

Laser-assisted hatching of cryopreserved-thawed embryos by thinning one quarter of the zona

Laser-assisted hatching is little documented in the literature regarding its efficacy in cryopreserved-thawed (CT) embryo transfer cycles. The aim of the present study was to evaluate in a randomized manner the efficacy of thinning one quarter of the zona pellucida of CT embryos to a depth of 50-80% of the original thickness, via laser treatment (the qLZT-AH procedure), in improving implantation and pregnancy rates. Two populations were studied: population I, patients who had all their supernumerary embryos cryopreserved, regardless of their morphology, and population II, patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome who had all their embryos cryopreserved. Artificial and natural protocols were used for the embryo transfers. A total of 350 laser-thinned CT embryos were compared with 352 intact zona embryos. No difference in implantation or pregnancy rate was found after using qLZT-AH in either population. These findings suggest that qLZT-AH should not be routinely performed in cryopreserved embryo programmes.

Cryopreservation of IVF embryos: which stage?

Embryo freezing is a mandatory tool in IVF technology as controlled ovarian hyperstimulation usually leads to extra embryos which are not transferred. One dilemma is the embryonic stage at which the embryos are to be frozen. Early stage freezing (PNs or cleavage stage) leads to a two step selection: at the time of thawing and a few hours or a day after. Then the recovering embryos are submitted to the classical in vitro developmental arrests in relation with maternal, paternal and cytogenetic factors. The "take home baby rate" per frozen embryo is low, rarely over 5%. Blastocyst have overcome the blocks in vitro: a first selection has already been made. The quality of freezing at this stage depends greatly on the culture conditions. It allows freezing of fewer embryos, but with higher yields: a >10% take home baby rate can be expected. It is clear to us that vitrification, beside the technical problems, has to be handled with care, especially if ethylene glycol (EG) is used. Metabolic products of EG might have negative effects on organogenesis.